nayjevin
Member

https://twitter.com/GenMhayden/status/1560027626626072577

//

//

"YOUR WELCOME" with Michael Malice #220: Robert Barnes Michael Malice (“YOUR WELCOME”) invites constitutional and civil rights lawyer, Robert Barnes, onto the show to discuss the FBI raid at Mar-a-Lago, the “strange” names associated with the raid, and Trump’s reaction to it all. Robert also gives us his legal insight into the Alex Jones trial, and the Orwellian nature of it all. https://odysee.com/@MichaelMalice:6/your-welcome-with-michael-malice-220:9 your-welcome-with-michael-malice-220/9ccd120cd80a28852f481549978c7e2ab257960b

Not sure if this has been posted, but here is the official Warrant. I haven't read it yet, but it doesn't look good that some of the boxes were labeled TOP SECRET. https://www.npr.org/2022/08/12/1117277865/read-the-full-warrant-documents-from-fbi-search-of-trumps-mar-a-lago-home

//

"They thought Trump was the river but he was the dam." -- Michael Malice

If they are such an "overwhelming swath", then 3rd party voters or abstainers cannot make any difference, and are therefore irrelevant. But if 3rd party voters or abstainers can make a difference, then the "swath" to which you are referring obviously cannot be "overwhelming". Words have meanings. You don't get to have it both ways.

The Future w/ Michael Malice - Part Of The Problem 894 On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave and Michael discuss their concerns for the future, from the dramatic raid on Donald Trump's home, to the impact it will have on the upcoming election. We also hear about the Media backlash to the trumpianisim that is surging in American politics. This Episode Was Recorded On 8.15.22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shrLq3GwljI

The Future w/ Michael Malice - Part Of The Problem 894 On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave and Michael discuss their concerns for the future, from the dramatic raid on Donald Trump's home, to the impact it will have on the upcoming election. We also hear about the Media backlash to the trumpianisim that is surging in American politics. This Episode Was Recorded On 8.15.22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shrLq3GwljI

//

https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1559631370607017985

I disagree. I'm inclined to give Trump himself much more of the "credit" for his being such a disappointment. As for Biden, I'm not entirely confident he is even always aware that he is the President.

I doubt Biden's handlers would allow him to oversee so much as the flower arrangements in the Rose Garden. let alone taking down a former President.

No! You're not the boss of me! :p ;):D (I was just very recently discussing with someone about the seemingly increasing prevalence of tediously wheel-spinning and unfalsifiable narratives of the "controlled oppostion", "everything is scripted", and/or "X is a distraction from Y" variety. So I still had some words left over that needed being said.) Pic tax:

Critical Education Theory Series, Part 20: Paulo Freire's Marxist Easter for Educators The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 90 (15 August 2022) This episode of the New Discourses Podcast continues a long miniseries exploring Paulo Freire’s landmark 1985 book The Politics of Education: Culture, Power, and Liberation, and it is embedded in the broader Critical Education Theory series here. In the previous part, James Lindsay presented the ideas in the ninth chapter of that book, where Freire outlines that the purpose of education is to humanize Man and the world, exactly as indicated by Karl Marx. post #1 of this thread. - OB] In this episode, the last in the formal educational series covering this book, James takes up the first part of the very weird tenth chapter of The Politics of Education, wherein Freire discusses Liberation Theology and the Role of the Church as a parallel educational institution. In this first part of this shocking chapter, before turning to the role he envisions for churches, Freire explains the religious conversion educators must go through in order to be “true” educators. He describes it as a process of spiritual death and rebirth, literally an Easter educators and religious leaders must go through to be resurrected on the side of the oppressed. This is the religious heart of the so-called “pedagogy of the oppressed” at the center of Freire’s entire project and legacy. Join James to understand how Freire enabled the theft of education so that it could be transformed into religious education for the Theology of Marxism. https://odysee.com/@newdiscourses:9/paulo-freire's-marxist-easter-for:f paulo-freire%27s-marxist-easter-for/f31b4834ce727e50dd4e5dfe193965e6bd418cc3

https://www.dailywire.com/news/bidens-inflation-bill-made-7500-electric-vehicle-tax-credits-ford-and-gm-just-raised-their-prices-by-the-same-amount

https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/status/1559345662784839685

Looks like Yang is hoping to recruit Cheney to the Forward Party, given how much he's kissing her ass prior to her imminent primary loss: https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/1559324756603699200 Barring some kind of miracle - or election "fortification".

Meh. As "Thing X is just a distraction from Thing Y" narratives go, this one is pretty weak. I mean, what is there new to say about the "Afghanistan disaster", other than that the Earth has made one full orbit of the Sun since it occurred? Or how many of the people who would be inclined to think that the "FBI/Whitmer entrapment case" is "bad" do not already think so? And so on. How is "I support/oppose things other than the current thing" really any less blinkered, flighty, or capriciously obsessive than the "I support/oppose the current thing " phenomenon? (Different sides, same coin.) How long will it be before the "Trump Raid" is added to the list of things from which we are being distracted by some newer thing? When is it ever not possible to compose a menu of items that deserve more attention than they are being (or have been) given?

https://www.theguardian.com/food/2021/may/08/if-we-want-to-save-the-planet-the-future-of-food-is-insects

So does "Lucy" count? :confused: I don't mean as "mentally ill" - that's obvious (see above). I mean as a "liberal white woman":

I agree. I do not think any subject area should be regarded as forbidden to academic investigation or scholarly consideration (including any of various paraphilias). But some subject areas are more worthy of consideration and investigation than others (especially when they are conducted on the public dime) - and in any case, when it comes to subject matter that is otherwise objectionable, such endeavors should strive to be as neutral in character as possible, rather than apologetic (such as in an attempt to "rehabilitate" otherwise objectionable subject matter by normalizing it or making it seem less objectionable). Seeking to understand a thing does not require condoning or endorsing it. The work by this Karl Andersson person is pretty clearly of the latter kind. Given just the material presented in this thread, it is pretty clear he is using the academy as cover for indulging in a kind of public exhibitionism of his own personal pedophilic fixations - that is, he may well get some kind of "kick", not just out of the subject matter itself, but also out of talking about his own indulgence of it under the guise of an otherwise "respectable" venue (in this case, a scholarly journal). There is also at least some reasonable basis for suspicion that he might have gone beyond mere "thought crime" and into actual crime. For just one example, this is from the Vice interview referenced in the last tweet in post #7 above:

Whether true or not, this perfectly embodies the spirit of modern governance, which can be summarized as follows: "When the policy doesn't fit reality, try to make reality fit the policy."

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/15/starbucks-asks-labor-board-to-suspend-mail-in-ballot-union-elections-alleging-misconduct-in-voting-process.html