Judge Nap thinks this could be entirely legitimate. I could see Trump being sloppy and playing fast and loose with the rules on classified docs. I could also see the DOJ/FBI planting evidence and having an axe to grind:
This is interesting because usually you can say anything you want against public figures and candidates so long as it isn't designed to hurt their personal business. I wonder if this case breaks new ground?
He introduced me to liberty in 2006, before I knew about Ron Paul. His video series course was a game changer for my understanding of politics, government, and the Constitution. I wish more people had taken his course. When Ron came on the scene in 2007 I was instantly aware of his ideals because Michael had already explained them in his course.
I still have Mike's signed book sitting next to me here at my desk on my bookshelf.
That's not what they are talking about. They are saying that anyone who sells crypto in the US may have to follow FEC regulations which are exceptionally burdensome and possibly even prohibitive in some cases.
So in effect most Americans will not have an active way to trade most crypto.
Sabatini calls on FL to break ties with federal gov DOJ:
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/anthony-sabatini-calls-for-the-florida-state-government-to-break-all-ties-with-the-department-of-justice/
Remember in 2016 when the left flipped out after Trump said in a debate that he would put Hillary in prison if he got elected?
The left accused him of threatening to weaponize the justice system against a political enemy...
A crop of lawsuits could finally settle the question of whether most digital assets are illegal securities offerings.
https://www.wired.com/story/crypto-web3-securities-ripple-sec-lawsuits/
__________________________________________________ ________________
"A politician will do almost anything to keep their job, even become a patriot" - Hearst
Connect With Us