Tab Content
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Today, 12:07 AM
    Ok,, Seems to confirm my suspicions, So how many did the Police Kill?
    10 replies | 399 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:56 PM
    wiki :rolleyes: did you write that yourself?
    13 replies | 208 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:30 PM
    Nope.. It goes back to 1948,, and the creation of the State of Israel. (even further if you count Zionist aggression and terrorism).
    13 replies | 208 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:26 AM
    36 years? I think it is closer to 70 years. Long before Mr Carter.
    13 replies | 208 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:11 AM
    I believe in the decentralization of power, which is a Biblical principle, first derived in Genesis with the formation of the tribes of Israel (I don't have time to delve deeply into that, but it can be proven). So, to answer your question, I would advocate a system that is similar to what we had in our early republic, where local, state, and county governments are formed by Christians from various denominations to assess how crimes should be punished within their respective jurisdictions. So, for example, if a Presbyterian is living in a county full of Roman Catholics, and those Catholics have laws which he believes do not square with Biblical justice, then he can find another county where there are mostly Presbyterians and from there, they can work together to apply God's Law based on their Biblical convictions. That's what we had in the earlier days of America, with entire states being composed of one Christian denomination from another state of a different Christian denomination. It's one of the reasons why the First Amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," because their definition of "religion" was related to Christian denominations, understanding that each state was by and large composed of a particular Christian denomination.
    60 replies | 819 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:01 AM
    I expect no such thing in this world. and history shows that all societies in all the world know the same laws because we are born knowing it. And humans have filled the earth.. and with lawful society,,, and corruption. No One Gets Any Power in this World except Satan gives it. He rules all the kingdoms of this world.. Called "the Prince of this World" by Jesus.. The End of that is coming. But for now. the theocracy on this world is evil only.
    80 replies | 1037 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:51 AM
    Because if you want to have a just society, then there needs to be an absolute standard for determining what is just and unjust behavior. Once you have established that, then you can deal with how unjust behavior ought to be punished. Why is that? Because God desires holiness from His creatures, not just internally but also externally, which is why God expects us to put away evil from society as it emerges. And, of course, evil is defined by God's Word, not majority opinion nor by current trends of acceptable behavior.
    80 replies | 1037 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:45 AM
    If you're a Christian, then you should already know how one determines what governments God has ordained. That's why we have disciplines such as Biblical and systematic theology to delve into the subject on what the Bible teaches about the nature of government. But it is a topic that can be ascertained, and it is one that no other worldview (secular humanism, Islam, etc.) can account for.
    60 replies | 819 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:42 AM
    Why answer it? Why would you seek to criminalize? Why would you become the accuser? This is not what we are called to do.
    80 replies | 1037 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:24 AM
    No, it doesn't make me an anarchist; it just means that I hold to the view that God rules society, and therefore, He is the One Who delegates authority (those who minister to others) and sets their jurisdictions within a civilized society. That's why an elite subset of society should never manipulate the rest by force. All people should be self-governed by God's Law before they take any position of authority within God-ordained governments (family, church, and state) to ensure that an elite group do not take over society by their own whims. When that happens (as it is currently in American civics), then it is a good indication that people in positions of authority are not self-governing themselves in God's Law.
    60 replies | 819 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:22 AM
    The only way we can answer the question, "Should X be criminalized," is by, first, answering, "What does God say about X?" The two questions go together, when we are discussing what sexual sins should receive civil sanctions. But, of course, it takes wisdom to understand how to apply those sanctions in our modern world, and that can be challenging at times, I admit. But, nonetheless, it still needs to be considered when we're assessing public policy and its relation to sexual taboos. Another thing to keep in mind is that the page marked "New Testament" in our Bibles is not inspired by God. That fact is very important because when we are talking about continuities and discontinuities between the Old and New Covenants, we need to realize that the Old Testament laws still applied when the New Testament was being written. Thus, the authors' approach to how Old Testament laws would apply to them in their own day would not have been riddled with many of the assumptions that we face today in modern Christianity (with ideas such as the "Two-Kingdoms Approach," "Law vs. Gospel" dichotomies, Dispensationalism, and other concepts which inherently but inadvertently pit the Old Testament against the New Testament). Unfortunately, you, yourself, are guilty of those very approaches to the New Testament, which is why you fail at understanding how the Old Testament applies to us today. Remember, "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness..." (2 Timothy 3:16). If sexual acts were condemned with civil penalties in the Old Covenant, then those penalties apply civilly, in some way, in the New Covenant. Otherwise, you would have to say that God made a mistake when He decreed those sexual acts as punishable by civil law under the Old Covenant. But, once again, it takes wisdom to understand how they apply today because the world has changed since the times of the Old Covenant. But the moral indictment against certain sexual behaviors does not change because moral laws are eternal, by nature.
    80 replies | 1037 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:48 AM
    Ronin, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about in relation to Paul's theology. It's funny how you consider yourself more educated about the relationship between Jesus and Paul when world-renown Biblical scholars, such as N.T. Wright, have been applauded for their research and writings about Paul's life and theology. If you have any serious, objective interest in how Paul's theology was consistent with Christ's doctrines, then I recommend that you watch this lecture from one of the best Pauline scholars in the world, and learn something:
    41 replies | 429 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 11:18 PM
    No. it is not
    10 replies | 399 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 09:20 PM
    What "uncontrolled systems" are you referring to, fisharmor?
    60 replies | 819 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 09:16 PM
    Exactly, erowe1. That's all Ronin Truth does. He can't give a definitive, comprehensive rebuttal to anything in which he disagrees with. All he knows how to do is copy and paste links. That's why his credibility, especially in these kinds of discussions, is always suspect because of his laziness and ignorant flippancy of facts that he has no intention of researching. He seriously needs to leave these forums and stick to playing Solitaire online or something.
    41 replies | 429 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 08:48 PM
    "Attractive Hazard" has always had a different meaning to me. Mel is one.and probably Cajun and definitely Suzanimal . perhaps the definition needs defining.
    266 replies | 3713 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 08:22 PM
    My ancestors built the roads. Government usurped them.
    36 replies | 490 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 08:21 PM
    It is a big country. There are lots of small counties. ;)
    36 replies | 490 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 05:37 PM
    Lookie here,, another Fed Bombmaker http://www.sltrib.com/home/4040455-155/charges-utah-head-of-citizen-militia . Do I need to remind anyone that any named and Known Militia is Fed infested? If so,, You are reminded again.
    277 replies | 7383 view(s)
  • Root's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 01:51 PM
    Root replied to a thread FYI, (cannabis) in Open Discussion
    Nice!! I'll post more later...
    10 replies | 227 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 01:13 PM
    pcosmar replied to a thread FYI, (cannabis) in Open Discussion
    Is FYI, https://www.leafly.com/news/headlines/what-would-actually-happen-if-the-dea-rescheduled-cannabis http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/06/25/arguably-the-most-important-marijuana-decision-eve.aspx
    10 replies | 227 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 11:58 AM
    I would think many Christians are misled and confused,, if they wish to stand on the side of the accuser. or they are not Christians, and know nothing of forgiveness.
    80 replies | 1037 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 11:56 AM
    Christians have provided evidence that Paul affirmed the doctrines of Christ. It's just that people like yourself refuse to accept the evidence.
    41 replies | 429 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 11:53 AM
    The claims that Jesus was an anarchist and that Paul was a statist are simply anachronisms. As such, they make both of your assertions moot points, so there's no need to argue with you about the merits of your claims.
    60 replies | 819 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 08:47 AM
    pcosmar replied to a thread FYI, (cannabis) in Open Discussion
    Was so for years..If anything it was just the country of origin. Mexican, Jamaican, or Colombian. I suppose names were made up by the growers who developed strains,, But in legal markets,, choices and comparisons ,,and reviews exist. Just a bit of information shared.
    10 replies | 227 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 08:41 AM
    pcosmar replied to a thread FYI, (cannabis) in Open Discussion
    That would be the Sativa or Sativa Dominant hybrids. I prefer them for working,, and that has been working well. Indica tends more to the Couch Lock,, Relaxing.
    10 replies | 227 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 04:37 AM
    When you read much of the literature in favor of anarchism, it seems that anarchism starts off with 5 basic assumptions, philosophically speaking: Truth is relative. Life is random. People are basically good. A person can change his own life if he chooses to. The goal of life is self-satisfaction. Building a civic/economic philosophy on those basic assumptions opens the door wide open for an elite group to manipulate society very easily, in my opinion. Thus, anarchism (no matter if it's anarcho-capitalism, anatcho-communism, anarcho-primitivism, or any other school of thought) cannot solve the problem of having an elite manipulating and ruling over society.
    60 replies | 819 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 03:47 AM
    3823 replies | 163330 view(s)
More Activity

18 Visitor Messages

  1. Dammit Pete, I'd do you in a heartbeat.
  2. Your mailbox is full.
  3. View Conversation
    Yeah he was upset he didn't get a chance to see you. You're a good guy, Pete, don't let this keep you down.
  4. I have a really good book on the subject if you should ever want any additional info, I really should scan the whole thing but sending e-copies, well--you know.
  5. View Conversation
    Your inbox is full, so I'm leaving my message here:
    Hi Pete!

    A lot of us over at revolutionbox.org are hoping you'll join and play with us there. You're definitely one of the most requested enlistees. We've already got such luminaries as AF, amypi, JFK3, eduardo, flightlesskiwi, and myself. I hope you'll consider it.

    In Liberty,
    HB34. (I'm matveimediaarts over there, btw)
  6. View Conversation
    i don't troll politcal forums, i'm not andrew breitbart
  7. View Conversation
    Hey, Pete, here's the link where I picked up the Holder story:

    http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Atto...Bombers?page=2

    lots of info there

    susan
  8. View Conversation
    nvm. found it. was "Cuddy"!! last name of the author. duh.
  9. View Conversation
    howdy... i'm trying to find one of the links you posted awhile back... has "cuddlynwo" or some such in the addy. can't find it. can you send it to me, pretty please??? enlightening a new Ron Paul supporter who asked to be enlightened.
  10. View Conversation
    Hint: horny guys and mother natures monthly visit to their partners.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 18
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
About pcosmar

Basic Information

Age
58
About pcosmar
Biography:
Recent events have gotten me interested in politics. A search for my lost rights brought me to Ron P
Interests:
Pusuit of Happiness
Occupation:
Body/Paint,, Fabricator
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Displayed state:
Oregon
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Political Campaign Skills
Transportation:
Driver

Signature


Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
Ron Paul 2004

Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
It's all about Freedom

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
42,163
Posts Per Day
12.75
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
18
Most Recent Message
09-10-2015 03:29 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 12:17 AM
Join Date
06-09-2007
Referrals
4
Home Page
http://pcosmar.blogspot.com

25 Friends

  1. A. Havnes A. Havnes is offline

    Member

    A. Havnes
  2. acptulsa acptulsa is offline

    Member

    acptulsa
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. Bsouljah Bsouljah is offline

    New Member

    Bsouljah
  5. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  6. chudrockz chudrockz is offline

    Member

    chudrockz
  7. coyote_sprit coyote_sprit is offline

    Banned

    coyote_sprit
  8. DGambler DGambler is offline

    Member

    DGambler
  9. DonVolaric DonVolaric is offline

    Member

    DonVolaric
  10. Dripping Rain Dripping Rain is offline

    Member

    Dripping Rain
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 25
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

06-24-2016


06-14-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 17 12311 ... LastLast

06-26-2016


06-25-2016


06-24-2016


06-23-2016


06-22-2016



Page 1 of 17 12311 ... LastLast