Tab Content
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:54 PM
    They are Normalizing the idea of Citizen Score Obedience! They dont give a fuck about people, only if companies make more money by fucking people over. --- Total Technocracy is the goal which makes Democracy obsolete!
    9 replies | 61 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:13 PM Chinese style control. What happens when you cant get a job or a loan if your FB Rating is too low?
    9 replies | 61 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:52 PM Full article at link. --- When 65% of jobs pay less than $20 per hour, who the fuck in their right mind would want to move to flip burgers, or to get a temporary position in a warehouse?
    0 replies | 49 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:48 PM Full article at link.
    9 replies | 178 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:46 PM Full article at link. --- Banks can always print more money, but can not ever guarantee the value of that money they print.
    1 replies | 61 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:44 PM
    Brazil Deploys Troops To Venezuela Border After Migrant Chaos - "This Is Going To Turn Into War!"
    1 replies | 57 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:42 PM
    How Amazon, One of the Richest Companies in the World, Secretly Offloads Its Electricity Costs To Local Taxpayers Who Live Near Its Data Centers (title was truncated)
    0 replies | 58 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:22 PM
    I dont buy #1 either. But that is the excuse that many companies use. Although I *can* sorta see where they are coming from on #1, especially on small sites, such as a free site or a person that doesnt really have much tech experience trying to administer the site themselves. I dont buy the excuse for a split second when its the larger companies. Yahoo used to have a "Discuss" feature on every news article. That was shut down long ago. Same thing as many other news websites. Now, they have gotten very lazy. "Discuss this article on Fedbook". Or they use other tech giants to enable "discussion". What has happened is the big companies started to recognize that we were competing with them. It wasnt because we were reporting the news itself, but we posted different interpretations of the information as it was presented. Now, in the age of Total Tech Censorship, they want ONE point of view. They are trying to maintain relevance during a time when we have the power to spread information, not them. The goal, as usual, is a Monopoly. Only the news they report is important, and your point of view is irrelevant. This is DOUBLY dangerous. One form of Lying that typically comes from the MSM is to "Lie by Exclusion". For example, "the Russian runner came in 2nd place, while the American runner came in second to last place." The lie in that example statement is made by excluding the fact that there were only two runners in the race. Wording is also used to alter perception. Second to Last sounds bad, like that runner got his ass handed to him. But, Second to Last Place in a two man race is FIRST place. Lying by Exclusion and manipulation of wording causes a reader to believe that the person that actually won the race had lost badly. Without comments or the ability to express alternative points of view, or interpretations of the data as presented, most will believe what they are manipulated to believe.
    44 replies | 784 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:36 AM
    Try forcibly implanting a Tracking Chip into me and I will forcibly implant a fucking 9mm Bullet into your brain. We adults may never accept this, but the fairy generation will not only accept but demand it.
    21 replies | 339 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:35 AM
    One of two possibilities: 1: - Comments are disruptive, not related to the article, and fighting. Also includes Spam and BOT posts. 2: - People are posting the TRUTH, and they do NOT like the TRUTH "Truth is TREASON in the Empire of Lies" - Ron Paul
    44 replies | 784 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-19-2018, 05:31 PM
    Although everything you said was true, lets dig a bit deeper. Those who did support him, heard his message. Those who did not most likely had not heard his message. What they got was a distorted manipulated negative view of him. Everything they did, media blackout, calling him a nutjob, making his supporters look bad, it all added up, and those who didnt like him only followed the phony crowd of people that could only repeat the bad crap about him. He really did have a TON of support from us, and when they did things like shut down the Nevada GOP Convention because they found out he had won in the Caucuses, it was pure Voter Fraud coming from the top. Either way, it was our responsibility to carry his message, just as it would be for people that would and could vote for Brett85.
    120 replies | 4293 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-19-2018, 05:05 PM
    Agreed. I dont respond to junk mail and do a lot of ad blocking online, and most tv spots I just fast forward. As far as just pure advertising goes, we've gone well beyond Ad Saturation and are deep into Ad Pollution territory. Its just not effective anymore. I think better solutions are being able to get interviews on local TV and Radio Stations, as well as a lot of online media where the message being carried is more important than approaching it like advertising. When Ron Paul wasnt elected, it wasnt because of a lack of advertising, but most definitely Campaign Interference. What Ron Paul did right was that people knew who he was and the message he carried.
    120 replies | 4293 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-19-2018, 04:32 PM
    It was also a sign they probably did honest work to earn that money they had. Rich people today get rich by exploitation and shady backroom deals, getting bought out by Google, or getting Govt to fund some public thing. Kind of like the ISPs are now complaining they cant increase speeds without "more money from govt". Why is it always necessary that to get rich, you have to get the money from Govt and not by doing Honest WORK?
    25 replies | 407 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-19-2018, 04:18 PM
    What would happen if Free Speech were prohibited? Would they "let" you run for office, but not advertise it at all because it hurts your opponents feelings? Its not much different than having laws passed that "prohibit competition" for businesses by requiring Licenses to do whatever. Want to cut hair? You need a License. Want to sell Lemonade? You need a License. Interior Design? License. And the reason they say we need all these things regulated is because of problems caused by existing businesses. And who were these businesses that did all the bad things? The big existing businesses already in place. So who benefits? Companies that use those License to prohibit competition, which allows for Monopolies. So what happens if that same concept is applied to Speech, not just for the people we elect, but for the people themselves that come out in support of your campaign? If your supporters have their Speech License revoked for speaking positively about you, how could you possibly win an election? What about Media Blackouts like they repeatedly did to Ron Paul? Point being, there are a LOT of ways to "steal" an election. For those who cant see the Big Picture, they cant see when there is real election interference. --- Brett85 - Just out of curiosity, did you see other forms of Election Interference?
    120 replies | 4293 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-19-2018, 04:09 PM
    Exactly. Today, if any country tries to ditch a Central Bank and Fiat Money System, the US will come in, declare them the enemy for some humanitarian crisis or false flag, and bomb them back into the stone age until they are again under the control of the International Banking Cartels. Anyone remember the Dinar? Gold backed money that Hussein (I think) was trying to introduce? What countries were not under the control of the Banks? Afghanistan, Syria, Lybia, Iran, and North Korea? There were a number of them, and now, the only ones left seem to be North Korea and Iran. And who are we beating the War Drums against? Modern Banking is a War Against Humanity.
    19 replies | 287 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-19-2018, 04:00 PM
    1 replies | 123 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-19-2018, 07:32 AM
    Dont tell me what I can and can not buy just because you think Im supposed to trust you with my money! Fuckers! This is WHY there is a WAR ON CASH!
    5 replies | 185 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 07:36 PM
    "Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake." Only trouble with the video is that people dont recognize Socialism as a mistake, and Fox News watchers dont question the validity of the lopsided statements they hear. They are trained to be Parrots, and only repeat what they hear, and dont challenge ideas as they are presented to them. I believe our job, like Danke did, is to call out the mistakes. So kudos to Danke on that! Thats when we mop the floor!
    8 replies | 255 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    2 replies | 78 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 05:18 PM
    Agreed. I didnt post it to be pro socialism. Free education has big problems. The reason I posted was because Fox News is full of shit. Back on "Free Education" for a second. Lets say education is "free" but not paid for by taxes, instead, by big corporations. Would those corporations not have an undue level of influence on what is taught in schools? Now, if education isnt free, then the people can "vote" with how much money they have. Same problem, colleges will listen to those with the most money, and they will listen to big corporations over anyone taking out student loans to pay for that education. On the "isnt free" side, big corporations can still buy any politician with campaign contributions and control how education works indirectly. Im not agreeing or disagreeing with your statement, but trying to identify all possible avenues of problems. And, as usual, I think the best solution is a Free Market Economy with truly privatized schools, or flat out Home Schooling and Education, where children may even learn the Trade Skills of their parents, which are completely unrecognized by anyone who buys into "you need a college degree" media hype.
    8 replies | 255 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 05:08 PM Perhaps the REAL solution is to get Govt OUT of telling people what to eat? If Govt continues to have "authority to regulate what you eat recognized" while simultaneously only recognizing big corporations, everyone will end up on a diet of pure Brawndo.
    1 replies | 210 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 04:57 PM Meanwhile in the US, people are only granted the Right (Permission) to throw shit away well before its time in order to make them buy a new product and keep the giants afloat. If US companies had their druthers, there would be little if any repair at all. Dont get me wrong, there is true obsolescence and planned obsolescence. Planned obsolescence is quite destructive to the people and only benefits big companies. Real obsolescence is making way to better technology and ideas, and inspires genuine innovation.
    2 replies | 78 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 04:53 PM
    First two videos appear to be gone or censored.
    29 replies | 1338 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 04:52 PM
    2 replies | 93 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    8 replies | 255 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-17-2018, 04:09 PM Full article at link. --- Meanwhile, Google wants to break into the Chinese market so they are tweaking their search algorithms to comply with Chinese Laws (which is fine), but try to apply the Chinese Censorship in the US and use Chinese Tracking in the EU?
    2 replies | 272 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-16-2018, 05:56 PM
    It might be nice if Trump funded a Ron Paul campaign! Or even put Ron Paul in a high position in power. I think most of us still genuinely believe in liberty, and Trump is more of a distraction from Ron Paul. We all should be able to recognize that it isnt just about Ron Paul, but the fundamental ideas he carries. Trump does not carry those ideas well enough for me. We are still alive, but quite disorganized without a strong figurehead to carry that proverbial torch. With the outright attacks on Free Speech now being authorized, we have a very big problem if we have no place we can organize and discuss problems and solutions.
    124 replies | 1654 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-16-2018, 04:05 PM
    War on White Men while claiming White Privilege.
    32 replies | 577 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-16-2018, 03:22 AM
    Self Censorship is what this country is about to come to. Except for those with no filter, and need a Mouth Diaper, like most of the MSM...
    1 replies | 96 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-15-2018, 04:34 PM
    Great! Can we start with the political leaders?
    8 replies | 177 view(s)
More Activity


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
05-17-2017 08:42 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 07:13 PM
Join Date
View DamianTV's Blog

Recent Entries

Is a Future Revolution Possible Without Privacy?

by DamianTV on 03-11-2013 at 02:16 PM
(This was a post that I slightly edited to make sense by itself. The original post is here.)

Very few people are looking toward the Future when Privacy is Impossible. But if Privacy is completely gone, will a Revolution even be possible?

Google GlASS might be able to record what you do right now as a video, but this will only be the first in a long series of progressively privacy invading advancements. One of them inevitably will be Google Contact Lenses. However,

Read More



  • 01:24 AM - Hidden











  • 01:14 PM - Hidden


  • 08:13 PM - Hidden



Page 1 of 57 1231151 ... LastLast








Page 1 of 57 1231151 ... LastLast