Tab Content
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 03:21 AM
    Couldnt have happened to a nicer corrupt system! I hope like hell this pans out as the Fed is killing what is left of America. However, the last president that went against the Fed was JFK...
    6 replies | 194 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 03:18 AM
    Maybe they shouldnt have been printing up currency that was not backed by gold? Either way, you derailed the thread, so -REP. --- Currency is about to change, and as usual, the people at the bottom will get fucked.
    8 replies | 149 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:40 PM
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-21/big-brother-surveillance-begins-cuomo-unveils-facial-scanning-new-york-toll-plazas So how do you just bypass the Constitution and Bill of Rights? Turn every person that is protected by them into Non Citizens. Well, thats one way... I suppose another way is to just ignore them also...
    15 replies | 106 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:58 PM
    Related: Putin Says “Powerful Forces” In U.S. Aggravating Russian-American Tensions https://www.infowars.com/putin-says-powerful-forces-in-u-s-aggravating-russian-american-tensions/ Full article at link. ---
    1 replies | 94 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:50 PM
    If Voting made any real change, it would be Illegal.
    22 replies | 118 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:45 PM
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-21/are-you-prepared-end-fake-money Full article at link. --- Zippy ought to be along shortly to tell us Fiat Currency is Money because Bernanke once said to Ron Paul that Gold is NOT Money.
    8 replies | 149 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:40 PM
    Doesnt Assange have his systems set up so if he is killed or is for some reason unable to input a password to his network every three days or something that EVERY shred of information will be made available to everyone? Did they forget about Assanges Dead Man Trigger?
    15 replies | 87 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:37 PM
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-21/big-brother-surveillance-begins-cuomo-unveils-facial-scanning-new-york-toll-plazas So how do you just bypass the Constitution and Bill of Rights? Turn every person that is protected by them into Non Citizens. Well, thats one way... I suppose another way is to just ignore them also...
    15 replies | 135 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:28 PM
    https://yro.slashdot.org/story/18/07/20/2356226/social-media-manipulation-rising-globally-new-oxford-report-warns Zippy?
    1 replies | 69 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    35 replies | 443 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 07:48 PM
    Hey! Thats my new Gamer Handle! FreedomHeretic! :D
    37 replies | 312 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 06:28 PM
    Yup. Govt prevents Free Market from correcting the issues caused by Govt interference, which limits competition, and causes a Downward Spiral. In a Free Market, the employees would have enough competition they could quit and work elsewhere. As it stands, Govt has actually caused interference with people quitting by having fewer and fewer choices until the only choice the employees have is to either work for the Big Business, or be jobless, both of which are subsidized by Govt. Basically, lets say 1000 people, and 10 of those people own businesses. If one doesnt pay, there are still 9 others to choose from. With Govt interference by requiring a License to compete, 2 people own business and employ the other 998 businesses. If the other business doesnt hire the person, the person that wants to quit is screwed by lack of choice. Much like Disney swallows up everything.
    9 replies | 171 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 05:17 PM
    Exactly. I think Legal Immunity comes from Group Affiliation. "Its a business" to stalk people and sell data to people who use that data as an Excuse (as you said) to charge them more without providing anything more in exchange. "We're a business" is the excuse for charging more and not paying their employees more. "We're a business" is the same excuse why they exploit govt to prohibit competition by requiring licenses for more and more areas of work. The idea of a Corporation is a Legalized Fiction that allows for Individual Profits without Individual Responsibility. USA, Inc.
    9 replies | 171 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 05:04 PM
    Again, its not just about InfoWars, it IS about Free Speech and Free Press for ALL people in general. That is what their Narrative is really designed to shut down. InfoWars is a Scapegoat.
    31 replies | 565 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 05:01 PM
    Again, fully agree. Playfully flipping the argument... What some people want. Sure, you can go to war, and we will even give you a gun and tanks and bombs, but youre not allowed to kill anyone! I dont think that would pan out as well as some people would hope.
    20 replies | 180 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 04:57 PM
    On occasion, there are legit reasons in specific situations. If you work at a job that requires use of a Face Mask (like Painting), it may be a functional necessity to be relatively clean shaven in order for the mask to work properly. Flipping the coin, it can also be considered Conformity of Appearance, which removes Individuality. They dont want Individuals in the military, they want cookie cutter assigned identities, and removing facial hair uniqueness is a physical manifestation of psychological individuality. Same exact reason in the Prussian Education Model that students are expected to wear School Uniforms.
    18 replies | 195 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 04:50 PM
    I actually agree with you on all points. Murder being legal, we need look no further than US Military or Cops. Also, Self Defense. Just to validate both sides of the point.
    20 replies | 180 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 04:36 PM
    Well, a Civil Liberty would say that when I am in your house and it is your property, I have a Liberty to use the bathroom, but do NOT have a Right to smoke in your house. I would have a Right to smoke in my own house, but not yours, as it would be your permission (Civil Liberty) to grant in that specific situation. What neither one of us would have a Right to do is to decree that the other may not smoke, ever. Recognizing the difference between a Right and a Civil Liberty (Permission) is a very important concept to understand. Trouble with this understanding is that for most people, the Definition between Rights and Permissions has been heavily confused. Whether that Confusion is intentional or not, the consequences are the same. Rights end where the Equal Rights of others begin. So yes, a person you once invited into your house has Rights, but by coming into your house, where you are Sovereign, King, and there is NO higher authority, they choose to temporarily give up their own Rights and abide by your rules. Outside your house, you would have zero authority over what they do. You could say that based on their behavior outside your house that you will no longer allow them to come inside your house, but, being Sovereign over your own property, you do NOT need ANY reason to say "no, you may not come in". A "Civil Liberty" would be nothing more than a Permission you chose to grant, and have valid authority to revoke that Permission at any time. Can I have one of your beers? That is your Permission to grant, but most importantly, I should not think for a second that I have any authority to take your beer without your permission. Ron explained a form of this as Entitlement. Immigration I do not believe is a Right, but a Permission to be granted by the We the People, and we can pick and choose, and even cherry pick who we will allow to come into the country for what ever reason, if any, that we want. Also, this isnt directed specifically at you, just an in general reply.
    37 replies | 312 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 04:19 PM
    Making anything illegal only creates a Black Market for it. If you want any sort of control over it, it needs to be legalized. Trouble with this concept is that it isnt Mexico that is consuming all the drugs, its the US.
    20 replies | 180 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 04:18 PM
    Since Privacy is gone, if you buy Plus Sized Jeans, expect your Health Insurance Rates to go up. The poor and unhealthy pay even more than the rich.
    9 replies | 171 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 04:16 PM
    I guess Minimum Wage is too expensive for the company to afford and still make a profit? Oh well, it seems to solve the problem of Livable Wage by rejecting all humans and also takes care of the problem of companies that exploit people with Minimum Wage being subsidized by govt thru Welfare... --- War on Cash. Debit Cards are as dangerous to Privacy as Cell Phones and Google and the NSA.
    35 replies | 443 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 04:13 PM
    Then the People have Rights, both at an individual level, and at a national level? Would that also mean (and yes, stretching here a bit) to collectively say "we dont want every immigrant that wants to come here"? Would the People have the Right to do such a thing? Again, extending, if one of the foundations of Rights is "I own myself", as a collective (and yes, being careful with that), would "The People" technically own the country? And same as Private Property Rights where if you own your Property like your house, you have a Right to say you may / may not smoke in my house, and that is MY Permission to grant. A homeowner would also a Right to say you may / may not enter my house. Abstracting to larger scale and extension, collectively you may / may not enter our Country? Abstract to small scale, I think what has happened is a homeowner allowed a person to come into their house, and the invited person is now inviting other people to come into the homeowners house, even though they do not have the Right to do so. I believe that concept is why there is a major difference between Constitutional Rights and Civil Liberties, where the Rights protect the Individual and Civil Liberties protect the community as a whole. Feel free to challenge the idea, but is that thinking rational?
    37 replies | 312 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 04:04 PM
    Lets play with an idea here... The idea is how to shut down InfoWars instead of how to keep them going, or if InfoWars is protected by First Amendment. And, lets do it legally. Easy concept that respects Freedom of Press, called Free Market. So, if we wanted InfoWars shut down, then people would not watch, and companies would not associate with InfoWars by advertising products. First, InfoWars would adjust their prices for Law of Economics, for Supply & Demand. If that did not work, then InfoWars would go out of business because no one listened and no one bought advertising or sold products or provide services. Free Market and Free Press both work as neither Right is even remotely infringed. The reason that Free Market has not worked in shutting down InfoWars is exactly because of Free Market, protected by Free Press. InfoWars has a Demand for people to get information that does not fit the MSM's Official Narrative about more war and bigger govt and terrorists and socialism / communism. InfoWars offers their own flavor with the exact opposite, that bigger govt is not the solution, socialism / communism does not work, more war hurts everyone, and individuals and small groups in high positions of power really are out to cause harm to people in various forms. Both Alex and MSM offer different flavors of Sensationalism. That Sensationalism is a drug that can get people addicted as it plays on Emotions. Trouble is, people stop watching for the Truth, but rather how much information is Sensationalized in the way it is presented.
    31 replies | 565 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 03:53 PM
    Hmm... If people are not given Rights from Govt, but rather their Creator, and Govts are created by people, would that make the People the Creator of Govts, and, in turn, again since Rights are granted by their Creator and People created Govt, can the People grant very specific Rights (really Privileges) to the Govts they create? I am sort of testing the concept of Abstraction at both Macro and Micro scale, so I need to hear both sides to the argument... The idea is that things which work at the small scale also work on large and very large scale, abstracting back and forth between very small and very large, so I am curious.
    37 replies | 312 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 03:43 PM
    Information is the new Gold. Those who have the most information will have the most power over people.
    12 replies | 124 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-20-2018, 02:18 AM
    Well, of course we just want people to die! --- Here's the thing. They claim they are making us safer. The definition of "safer" is as subjective as "good". They are offering a temporary decrease to risks from "terrorists" while increasing the risk that individuals will face from EVERY other type of faction that would use the information gathered for less than honorable means. Every single one of those group affiliations will cause harm to other individuals in many various forms, not all of which are physical, but all are done with a clear conscious that they are "doing the right thing". So make people safe by disabling peoples ability to protect themselves from government intrusions into their lives is only a temporary means due to the Turnkey Nature of Surveillance. When you get a political party into office that will have you dead because you are white or brown or the wrong religion or wrong political affiliation, that same Surveillance they used to temporarily "keep you safe" from groups of people the US itself armed and now defines as "enemy" will be used against the American People. Who watches the Watchmen?
    12 replies | 124 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-19-2018, 10:13 PM
    https://yro.slashdot.org/story/18/07/19/214211/fbi-director-without-compromise-on-encryption-legislation-may-be-the-remedy There is no greater threat to the Status Quo than those people who can communicate unsurveilled and promote self conclusions.
    12 replies | 124 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-19-2018, 06:26 PM
    https://yro.slashdot.org/story/18/07/19/214211/fbi-director-without-compromise-on-encryption-legislation-may-be-the-remedy There is no greater threat to the Status Quo than those people who can communicate unsurveilled and promote self conclusions.
    12 replies | 358 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-19-2018, 06:06 PM
    Agreed. I do continue to wonder who the real target is here. The people that threw the shit, or the people that had the shit thrown at them. Im thinking that by normalizing throwing shit, they are trying to tell people something else by reading between the lines: "If you do not support Immigration, then shut the fuck up or you will have shit thrown at you". That is rather worrisome if that is the real objective. Making people afraid to express Political Opinions due to threat of retaliation is a rather dangerous outcome.
    21 replies | 396 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    07-19-2018, 05:27 PM
    Not really about you changing the labels, but the way it was originally presented. I think it is more about trying to Normalize behaviors of irresponsible people by presenting the information in such a way as to cause a bias. We cant really know who threw the dung, but what is more important is how the information is presented. By changing the Labels, perceptions shift dramatically. Lets try some scenarios. First scenario: the Poo Throwers were Illegal Immigrants. Then the headline would have read "Illegal Immigrants Throw Poo at people for not being Pro Illegal Immigration". How does that change peoples perspective of the situation? Second scenario, the Shit Hurlers are whitey rich college students. Headline would then read "White College Students Hurl Shit at people that are not Pro Immigration". Does the bias alter the perception of the people who are Anti Immigration, or the College Students? Scenario Three: forget the topic of contention. Headline might then read "Shit Thrown at a Business over Political Disagreement". It makes the subject very vague as well as the points of view of both parties. Not interesting enough to be sensational as little is known about either side. Next, as stated, it Normalizes behaviors. A lot of people learn their own behaviors by observing others. In this case, it teaches that Throwing Shit at others when they disagree is normal. I think much like School Shootings, if we desire for less actual shit to be thrown at others over any form of disagreements, then those ideas are not mentioned or given focus. Not much different than watching any episode of Desperate Housewives of where the fuck ever. It normalizes non thinking emotional based intolerable behaviors which can only result in a need for supervision of those who mimic the behaviors they have seen. Thus, in a way it promotes Big Govt to manage everyones behavior by teaching everyone to behave irresponsibly and immaturely when ever they disagree with anyone about anything. Thoughts?
    21 replies | 396 view(s)
More Activity

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
17,439
Posts Per Day
4.50
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
17
Most Recent Message
05-17-2017 08:42 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 07:00 AM
Join Date
12-07-2007
Referrals
0
View DamianTV's Blog

Recent Entries

Is a Future Revolution Possible Without Privacy?

by DamianTV on 03-11-2013 at 02:16 PM
(This was a post that I slightly edited to make sense by itself. The original post is here.)

Very few people are looking toward the Future when Privacy is Impossible. But if Privacy is completely gone, will a Revolution even be possible?

Google GlASS might be able to record what you do right now as a video, but this will only be the first in a long series of progressively privacy invading advancements. One of them inevitably will be Google Contact Lenses. However,

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

04-09-2018

  • 01:24 AM - Hidden

03-17-2018


03-07-2018


02-02-2018


01-30-2018


01-22-2018


11-15-2017


10-01-2017


09-24-2017


09-04-2017


09-19-2016

  • 01:14 PM - Hidden

09-03-2016

  • 08:13 PM - Hidden

06-01-2016


11-17-2017


Page 1 of 54 1231151 ... LastLast

07-22-2018


07-21-2018


07-20-2018


07-19-2018



Page 1 of 54 1231151 ... LastLast