Tab Content
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 07:33 PM
    For each document probably. --- If this isnt proof that they are committing psychological warfare, I dont know what is!
    3 replies | 79 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 06:56 PM
    I think there may be some sexism. At the same time, if women really are equal and can do anything mentally a man can do, then is it sexism that keeps women off the boards, or is there news bias and women are already on the board, but its a full woman take over?
    19 replies | 251 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 06:16 PM
    I think it is an extension of Affirmative Action, extended to women. If women do a good job, they will be on the board with or without the law. The law can only hurt the companies. What this really also says if you read between the lines is that Men deserve NO Rights and are disposable. The war on Men, the ones who die in wars, will continue until the men are weakened to the point they can no longer be what they were meant to be, free and independent.
    19 replies | 251 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:57 PM
    Easy enough to beat. The guys at the top just claim being "transgender" in court!
    19 replies | 251 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:52 PM
    Just one helmet? The modest mandatory Two Helmet Law while sleeping would not only protect people from death by bed, but increase profit margins!
    24 replies | 154 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:47 PM
    They want ALL your Data, period. EVERYTHING. Why? In today's age, he who controls access to the Data controls the Market. Companies now make more money on selling data about people than selling products to people. Again, why? Because that data can be used to permanently increase prices for individuals using that data as an excuse. For employers, we are gonna get rid of you or not give you a raise or simply not hire you because "bad genetics". Insurers, same thing, charge more, give you less. Manufacturers, exact same thing, charge more, give less. The information they sell about you is valuable because it allows them to subjectively find something wrong, a rationalized excuse. On a small scale, it is used to micromanage the individual to death. Human Livestock. On a large scale, it exists only to protect the Status Quo from Public Dissent. Make no mistake, this is NOT about Public Health. This IS about Human Farming and TOTAL Control.
    1 replies | 39 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 06:42 AM
    Im sure if wages (not just minimum wage) kept up with inflation, the minimum wage would be about $30 an hour. What would that mean for everyone else that doesnt make minimum wage? Or are we ALL getting fucked by the Fed and Fractional Reserve Banking? Ron Paul defined Inflation as a Hidden Tax on the value of money.
    5 replies | 193 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:17 AM
    19 replies | 251 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:54 PM And the morons will say "so what, can i still use Fedbook"?
    0 replies | 69 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:18 PM
    Typical California lunacy. Trying to make people safer by making sure the law abiding citizen is unable to defend themselves against the criminal who could give two shits less about making sure their guns they intend on using to hurt people with are "safe". The whole point of a gun is to be the opposite of safe. The law can not stop or prevent a determined criminal. The idea of a visual indicator for when a bullet is in the chamber might be a half decent idea, but the burden should be on the manufacturers to innovate without the interference of the law. If they innovate and incorporate those visual indicators into guns, fine, if they dont, also fine. The clip idea does nothing for me, either as a feature, and especially not as a govt mandate.
    3 replies | 98 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:58 PM Full article at link. --- Innocent Until Proven Guilty Guilty Until Proven Innocent
    0 replies | 44 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:34 PM
    In other news... a "Dyslexia for Cure" may have also been found! Uh, wait...
    3 replies | 61 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:32 PM
    Im not. To me, it is as much of a form of Free Speech as Flag Burning. Although I dont like it, I have to respect it as much as I want my own Free Speech to remain protected. I understand why they do it however. They are disgusted with the Politics of the US, as much as any of us are. However, there is a difference between the Politics of the US, and the US as a People. The other side of the story is that any National Anthem is as much of a form of Tribalism and Pavlovian Behaviors as anything else, in any country. Off topic for a sec, then coming back, our Educational Model is intended to create "Fixed Habits of reaction to authority", and standing for a National Anthem is a form of expression of those Fixed Habits. A big problem is that one is taught to love only their own country and offer ZERO respect for other countries. It is one of the reasons Americans are considered very stupid when it comes to the cultures of other countries. National Narcissism. I think what is more important than standing for the National Anthem of ANY country is what the founders of this country endured, so we may show respect for what they have given us. Although the Founding Fathers did not grant us Rights, they gave us the Bill of Rights which enumerated some of our many Rights. I believe it may be more important to respect Free Speech than either the country or our politics, so if I am to take the moral high road, I would need to be supportive of BOTH those who stand and those who kneel. Historically, by turning the US Flag upside down, it is a Call Sign of Distress. "We need help". Inverting the flag is not intended as a form of disrespect, it is intended as a form of saying "emergency". That has long been forgotten by far too many however. Inverting the Stars and Stripes is as much of a form of Free Speech as either flag burning or kneeling. I may not like what they are saying, but they still have a right to say it, so go ahead and say it. What worries me however is how many of those people who are kneeling seem to want to replace what we had and what it has turned into with something that is far worse.
    30 replies | 345 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:07 PM Great! Now we can go back in time and stop the Bankers from taking over!
    3 replies | 61 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-12-2018, 07:49 PM
    True, but companies have figured out to how create the social problems that profit from them. For people to be able to vote with their wallets, but when there is no alternative to heavily controlled socialist social media platforms, they win, we lose.
    71 replies | 1049 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-12-2018, 06:26 PM
    A Cookie! (its totally synthetic and GMO by the way...)
    2 replies | 119 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-12-2018, 05:57 PM
    Yup. Just like the total invasion of privacy has led to no more convictions of criminals. The only people they are going after are those who pose a threat to the Status Quo.
    9 replies | 195 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-12-2018, 05:28 PM Note the source: SF Gate
    2 replies | 119 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-12-2018, 05:25 PM
    In the end, if the Constitution is eliminated, guess who thinks they will be left standing? *cough* NYT, NBC, ABC, CBS, Fedbook, Youtube, etc.
    9 replies | 247 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-12-2018, 05:20 PM
    So what Zippy says is it just fine for 1% to own 80% of the wealth. Its okay because its not 80% but only 9%, even though the bottom 50% own nothing.
    16 replies | 360 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-12-2018, 05:18 PM
    The Hegalian Dialectic is most easily described as Problem Reaction Solution. It merely describes a way of thinking for those with power as Reverse Social Engineering, so you have to start with a Solution and work backwards from there. The real goal when ever the Hegalian Dialectic is applied is to have a resulting solution that causes a benefit. For example, if someone wanted to charge more for their product, cause an artificial shortage of your product. Thus, Solution is people pay more. Working backwards, they have to really want your product, so next look at the reaction. The reaction of Panic Buying could work, and what else could cause that but to cause an Artificial Shortage of your product. Free Speech, both on Individuals and Journalists is under attack. Think Backwards. The goal is to flat out BAN Free Speech. That is their solution. They want the people so upset about having Free Speech that they clamor to have it banned. Thus, they need to instigate a strong Reaction to Free Speech. That is their current stage. They want people pissed at both the Left and the Right. The only way to do this is to create a Problem with Free Speech by only recognizing REAL Hate Speech. When people see that the only thing being said by either side is Hate Speech, both sides will be so angry they will call for Govt to prohibit Free Speech, meaning that most people are effectively SILENCED, except for a handful of those with License, and guess who will hold those licenses? Yup. MSM like Fox News, NBC, ABC, and on the Internet side, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc. They will be the only one whose voices are recognized, and will eventually be granted authority to engage in Censorship of ALL who do not support their views. Do you think that the Elimination of Free Speech is not the true goal here? Debate.
    0 replies | 67 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-12-2018, 04:56 PM
    Twitter monitoring “off platform” behavior to BAN people who haven’t violated anything on Twitter The difference between Free Speech and Hate Speech is subjective. With the ridiculous things that are said every day, this is racist, that is hate speech, how long will it be before normal behavior is completely demonized? Paying your bills on time will probably soon be considered Racist. Paying for something will also be Racist. It gets much worse when you factor in things that you dont do as being racist. If you dont hate Trump enough, is that also Racist? If you dont march and decry violence against the right, is that also Racist? I usually say "eating bacon" can be subjectively interpreted as "bad" and used as an excuse to jack up your insurance premiums. What happens if "not eating bacon" is equally dangerous? Damned if you do, damned if you dont.
    9 replies | 195 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-12-2018, 02:32 AM
    Just watched this like two days ago. Basically, their economy shifted from cooperative to competitive shortly after Nixon took us off the gold standard and their own banks were deregulated, allowing investors to come in and make money off their stock market instead of by creating jobs, which drove housing prices thru the roof.
    16 replies | 360 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-12-2018, 02:29 AM
    2 replies | 166 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-11-2018, 04:00 PM
    So now disobeying corporate policy and making a reasonable objection is Hate Speech? Just the way the title is phrased, but we know how corporations are... Hopefully they figure out the only people they are hurting is themselves.
    71 replies | 1049 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-10-2018, 06:27 PM
    0 replies | 117 view(s)
More Activity


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
05-17-2017 08:42 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 07:44 PM
Join Date
View DamianTV's Blog

Recent Entries

Is a Future Revolution Possible Without Privacy?

by DamianTV on 03-11-2013 at 02:16 PM
(This was a post that I slightly edited to make sense by itself. The original post is here.)

Very few people are looking toward the Future when Privacy is Impossible. But if Privacy is completely gone, will a Revolution even be possible?

Google GlASS might be able to record what you do right now as a video, but this will only be the first in a long series of progressively privacy invading advancements. One of them inevitably will be Google Contact Lenses. However,

Read More



  • 01:24 AM - Hidden











  • 01:14 PM - Hidden


  • 08:13 PM - Hidden



Page 1 of 56 1231151 ... LastLast









Page 1 of 56 1231151 ... LastLast