Tab Content
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:31 PM
    Although everything you said was true, lets dig a bit deeper. Those who did support him, heard his message. Those who did not most likely had not heard his message. What they got was a distorted manipulated negative view of him. Everything they did, media blackout, calling him a nutjob, making his supporters look bad, it all added up, and those who didnt like him only followed the phony crowd of people that could only repeat the bad crap about him. He really did have a TON of support from us, and when they did things like shut down the Nevada GOP Convention because they found out he had won in the Caucuses, it was pure Voter Fraud coming from the top. Either way, it was our responsibility to carry his message, just as it would be for people that would and could vote for Brett85.
    120 replies | 4272 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:05 PM
    Agreed. I dont respond to junk mail and do a lot of ad blocking online, and most tv spots I just fast forward. As far as just pure advertising goes, we've gone well beyond Ad Saturation and are deep into Ad Pollution territory. Its just not effective anymore. I think better solutions are being able to get interviews on local TV and Radio Stations, as well as a lot of online media where the message being carried is more important than approaching it like advertising. When Ron Paul wasnt elected, it wasnt because of a lack of advertising, but most definitely Campaign Interference. What Ron Paul did right was that people knew who he was and the message he carried.
    120 replies | 4272 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:32 PM
    It was also a sign they probably did honest work to earn that money they had. Rich people today get rich by exploitation and shady backroom deals, getting bought out by Google, or getting Govt to fund some public thing. Kind of like the ISPs are now complaining they cant increase speeds without "more money from govt". Why is it always necessary that to get rich, you have to get the money from Govt and not by doing Honest WORK?
    24 replies | 307 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:18 PM
    What would happen if Free Speech were prohibited? Would they "let" you run for office, but not advertise it at all because it hurts your opponents feelings? Its not much different than having laws passed that "prohibit competition" for businesses by requiring Licenses to do whatever. Want to cut hair? You need a License. Want to sell Lemonade? You need a License. Interior Design? License. And the reason they say we need all these things regulated is because of problems caused by existing businesses. And who were these businesses that did all the bad things? The big existing businesses already in place. So who benefits? Companies that use those License to prohibit competition, which allows for Monopolies. So what happens if that same concept is applied to Speech, not just for the people we elect, but for the people themselves that come out in support of your campaign? If your supporters have their Speech License revoked for speaking positively about you, how could you possibly win an election? What about Media Blackouts like they repeatedly did to Ron Paul? Point being, there are a LOT of ways to "steal" an election. For those who cant see the Big Picture, they cant see when there is real election interference. --- Brett85 - Just out of curiosity, did you see other forms of Election Interference?
    120 replies | 4272 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:09 PM
    Exactly. Today, if any country tries to ditch a Central Bank and Fiat Money System, the US will come in, declare them the enemy for some humanitarian crisis or false flag, and bomb them back into the stone age until they are again under the control of the International Banking Cartels. Anyone remember the Dinar? Gold backed money that Hussein (I think) was trying to introduce? What countries were not under the control of the Banks? Afghanistan, Syria, Lybia, Iran, and North Korea? There were a number of them, and now, the only ones left seem to be North Korea and Iran. And who are we beating the War Drums against? Modern Banking is a War Against Humanity.
    14 replies | 224 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:00 PM
    0 replies | 70 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:32 AM
    Dont tell me what I can and can not buy just because you think Im supposed to trust you with my money! Fuckers! This is WHY there is a WAR ON CASH!
    5 replies | 158 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 07:36 PM
    "Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake." Only trouble with the video is that people dont recognize Socialism as a mistake, and Fox News watchers dont question the validity of the lopsided statements they hear. They are trained to be Parrots, and only repeat what they hear, and dont challenge ideas as they are presented to them. I believe our job, like Danke did, is to call out the mistakes. So kudos to Danke on that! Thats when we mop the floor!
    8 replies | 240 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    2 replies | 75 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 05:18 PM
    Agreed. I didnt post it to be pro socialism. Free education has big problems. The reason I posted was because Fox News is full of shit. Back on "Free Education" for a second. Lets say education is "free" but not paid for by taxes, instead, by big corporations. Would those corporations not have an undue level of influence on what is taught in schools? Now, if education isnt free, then the people can "vote" with how much money they have. Same problem, colleges will listen to those with the most money, and they will listen to big corporations over anyone taking out student loans to pay for that education. On the "isnt free" side, big corporations can still buy any politician with campaign contributions and control how education works indirectly. Im not agreeing or disagreeing with your statement, but trying to identify all possible avenues of problems. And, as usual, I think the best solution is a Free Market Economy with truly privatized schools, or flat out Home Schooling and Education, where children may even learn the Trade Skills of their parents, which are completely unrecognized by anyone who buys into "you need a college degree" media hype.
    8 replies | 240 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 05:08 PM Perhaps the REAL solution is to get Govt OUT of telling people what to eat? If Govt continues to have "authority to regulate what you eat recognized" while simultaneously only recognizing big corporations, everyone will end up on a diet of pure Brawndo.
    1 replies | 153 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 04:57 PM Meanwhile in the US, people are only granted the Right (Permission) to throw shit away well before its time in order to make them buy a new product and keep the giants afloat. If US companies had their druthers, there would be little if any repair at all. Dont get me wrong, there is true obsolescence and planned obsolescence. Planned obsolescence is quite destructive to the people and only benefits big companies. Real obsolescence is making way to better technology and ideas, and inspires genuine innovation.
    2 replies | 75 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 04:53 PM
    First two videos appear to be gone or censored.
    29 replies | 1333 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-18-2018, 04:52 PM
    2 replies | 89 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    8 replies | 240 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-17-2018, 04:09 PM Full article at link. --- Meanwhile, Google wants to break into the Chinese market so they are tweaking their search algorithms to comply with Chinese Laws (which is fine), but try to apply the Chinese Censorship in the US and use Chinese Tracking in the EU?
    2 replies | 181 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-16-2018, 05:56 PM
    It might be nice if Trump funded a Ron Paul campaign! Or even put Ron Paul in a high position in power. I think most of us still genuinely believe in liberty, and Trump is more of a distraction from Ron Paul. We all should be able to recognize that it isnt just about Ron Paul, but the fundamental ideas he carries. Trump does not carry those ideas well enough for me. We are still alive, but quite disorganized without a strong figurehead to carry that proverbial torch. With the outright attacks on Free Speech now being authorized, we have a very big problem if we have no place we can organize and discuss problems and solutions.
    124 replies | 1441 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-16-2018, 04:05 PM
    War on White Men while claiming White Privilege.
    32 replies | 572 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-16-2018, 03:22 AM
    Self Censorship is what this country is about to come to. Except for those with no filter, and need a Mouth Diaper, like most of the MSM...
    1 replies | 96 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-15-2018, 04:34 PM
    Great! Can we start with the political leaders?
    8 replies | 176 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-15-2018, 03:14 PM
    But people who work for the govt can do what ever they want with "their" money! Its "fraud" if a person uses food stamps to pay rent, but not fraud if an elected govt official uses "taxpayer dollars" to fund the drug cartel!
    8 replies | 176 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-15-2018, 02:37 AM Poor have no Rights. Not that Im a fan of welfare, but Rights are the one thing that should equalize both rich and poor.
    8 replies | 176 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-15-2018, 02:27 AM
    Doesnt Google own Wordpress? Googlag?
    8 replies | 214 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-14-2018, 07:33 PM
    For each document probably. --- If this isnt proof that they are committing psychological warfare, I dont know what is!
    3 replies | 134 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-14-2018, 06:56 PM
    I think there may be some sexism. At the same time, if women really are equal and can do anything mentally a man can do, then is it sexism that keeps women off the boards, or is there news bias and women are already on the board, but its a full woman take over?
    32 replies | 572 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-14-2018, 06:16 PM
    I think it is an extension of Affirmative Action, extended to women. If women do a good job, they will be on the board with or without the law. The law can only hurt the companies. What this really also says if you read between the lines is that Men deserve NO Rights and are disposable. The war on Men, the ones who die in wars, will continue until the men are weakened to the point they can no longer be what they were meant to be, free and independent.
    32 replies | 572 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-14-2018, 04:57 PM
    Easy enough to beat. The guys at the top just claim being "transgender" in court!
    32 replies | 572 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-14-2018, 04:52 PM
    Just one helmet? The modest mandatory Two Helmet Law while sleeping would not only protect people from death by bed, but increase profit margins!
    24 replies | 213 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    08-14-2018, 04:47 PM
    They want ALL your Data, period. EVERYTHING. Why? In today's age, he who controls access to the Data controls the Market. Companies now make more money on selling data about people than selling products to people. Again, why? Because that data can be used to permanently increase prices for individuals using that data as an excuse. For employers, we are gonna get rid of you or not give you a raise or simply not hire you because "bad genetics". Insurers, same thing, charge more, give you less. Manufacturers, exact same thing, charge more, give less. The information they sell about you is valuable because it allows them to subjectively find something wrong, a rationalized excuse. On a small scale, it is used to micromanage the individual to death. Human Livestock. On a large scale, it exists only to protect the Status Quo from Public Dissent. Make no mistake, this is NOT about Public Health. This IS about Human Farming and TOTAL Control.
    1 replies | 68 view(s)
More Activity


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
05-17-2017 08:42 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 05:19 AM
Join Date
View DamianTV's Blog

Recent Entries

Is a Future Revolution Possible Without Privacy?

by DamianTV on 03-11-2013 at 02:16 PM
(This was a post that I slightly edited to make sense by itself. The original post is here.)

Very few people are looking toward the Future when Privacy is Impossible. But if Privacy is completely gone, will a Revolution even be possible?

Google GlASS might be able to record what you do right now as a video, but this will only be the first in a long series of progressively privacy invading advancements. One of them inevitably will be Google Contact Lenses. However,

Read More



  • 01:24 AM - Hidden











  • 01:14 PM - Hidden


  • 08:13 PM - Hidden



Page 1 of 56 1231151 ... LastLast









Page 1 of 56 1231151 ... LastLast