Yep, you are right. I didn't see that aspect of it. Proceed Sir! Sorry for interjecting.
WTH? What the heck is with the message below this one? I came to your profile to send you a PM and saw this? What an arrogant message..... the "don't mind you participating in threads"..... ON A PUBLIC forum!?! OMG...... the arrogance is astounding!!
WRT your rep message-I don't mind you participating in threads. Just keep in mind that I will call you on it when you make false or dubious claims. Nothing personal (I happen to like you ~hugs~).
Regarding your VM comment: It seems worse to me. And, while I don't think I'm qualified to judge whether Terry IS a slut, Nang correctly identified the content of the posts. In this case, Terry is completely missing PaulConvention's points.
THen again, she's never been intelligent, its nothing new.
And, BTW: I am aware that anyone can read this.
Thanks! I hope you can try to talk to them. I can see that I'm not getting anywhere with them on that thread, lol.
lol! @your VM rep.
But, I didn't so much mean the personal property of cops we know personally. I think everyone knows at least one whether they'll admit to it or not And many of them are nice people. The one I know certainly is. And he has a couple dogs as well.
But, I do have a problem with the career. A K9 dog is assisting in the immoralities of the career, and its a dog. Its not like its a person, its a dog. So, I'm kind of indifferent toward them.
Nang doesn't get unbanned, if the mods are to be believed. Life isn't fair.
Thank you! And yeah, it seems that way... haha!