Ender
Member

Probably true. But then only the GOP could stick the son of a CIA CEO and an accomplice in the 9/11 operation in front of a camera and have him say...

Ukrainian PoW talks Bout his surrender, Azov, and unwillingness to return to Ukraine https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses/8491

Sexy DPR chick talks about something probably important https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses/8448

I disagree. Public disembowelment is far more fitting.

So, Trump is finally pissed. It's finally the war he promised us six years ago. All holds are now barred. But his lawyer apparently has enough evidence to say on national television that Paul Pelosi had an "undisclosed passenger" in his car when he was busted, implying the passenger is a child (because why else is identity ever withheld?), and merely drops a hint and drops the subject. If you had a grenade like that in your pocket, wouldn't you pull the pin and throw it? Someone explain the chess strategy to me, please. Because one doesn't simply show the enemy a glimpse of their ammo unless they're negotiating with them. 2:52

Objection. Witness didn't say anything about the affidavit. Witness merely translated a phrase of legal jargon. Question is immaterial, assumes a fact not in evidence, and is leading and suggestive. It borders on misconduct.

LOL I'll bet they found a counterfeit Pet Rock, too...

Understood, but the journal he published it in, while having a global network, was founded by an American and its primary offices are in the United States. https://group.sagepub.com/our-story That's what I noticed at first glance.

The other side of that established American joke is that it's not illegal for the buyers to remove the tags, only the sellers. Yet. Unless that was changed on page 3,752 of the Inflate Inflation Act, and nobody found it yet.

To be clear, I wasn't comparing this to "the Hillary case". I was saying that if EVERYTHING was identical except for the party affiliation, the same people would flip roles on how they're reacting to the latest version of the intrigue of the rich and powerful. The outrage or support is completely contingent upon which team you like better. ETA: Also, remember that if the right are being called hypocrites here, then the same goes for left. It's this fun little game that they play where both sides can call the other side hypocrites for the way they acted when the roles were flipped. Mark this thread, because in a few years, there will be a time when the R's use a Federal agency to go after their political opponents and we can watch the roles flip again. And the excuses that, "well, that was different".

This thing was manufactured that way. They differ this way, they differ that way, none of the details mesh. But 99 44/100% of people are like, state secrets, bathroom, same mental file drawer. All the better to stir up partisans with. "Who're you callin' a hypocrite?!" It's carefully designed to make everybody pissed at anyone who brings rational analysis to the Two Minutes Hate.

I bet that if they actually found that they would use it...

But everyone seems to love those who pretend to be unreasonable on TV and Twitter, but hate on me.

Sounds like whoever it was, fucked him up pretty badly. It also seems that the attacker was stopped by people there on the scene, re-enforcing yet again the fact that, when seconds count, cops are only minutes away. Perhaps they could have saved him from severe injury had they been allowed to exercise their right to self defense. I don't wish Rushdie any particular harm, even though he is a run of the mill lefty academic that has supported policies that make it impossible for people in the PRofNY to arm themselves.

What's the matter with destruction? No, seriously. Every word in the sentence capitalized, even A, Is and It, except destruction? Hell, Chloe, it's the longest and most polysyllabic card in your whole deck! Give it some Love!

The least commonly self-reported side effect is SADS.