Tab Content
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 12:17 PM
    tod evans replied to a thread NO in U.S. Political News
    8 replies | 64 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 11:55 AM
    PAF replied to a thread NO in U.S. Political News
    YES to the NO
    8 replies | 64 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 11:46 AM
    'It was Lincoln who said of Grant, "I cannot spare this man. He fights." It was Grant himself who said, "Let us have peace."'--Calvin Coolidge 'This is the civilization which intelligence has created and which sacrifice has redeemed. We did not make it. It is our duty to serve it. Education ought to assess it at its true worth. It ought not to despise it but reverence it. If there be in education a better estimation of true values, it must be on the side of a great optimism. Under its examination human relationship stands forth as justified and sanctified. There is no place for the cynic or the pessimist. Who is he that can take no part in business because he believes it is selfish? Who is he that can take no part in religion because he believes it is imperfect? These institutions are the instruments by which an eternal purpose is working out the salvation of the world. It is not for us to regard them with disdain; it is for us to work with them, to dedicate ourselves to them, to justify our faith in them. It is a high calling in which to be even a doorkeeper is better than to rule over many multitudes of critics and philistines. 'The great service which education must perform is to confirm our faith in the world, establish our settled convictions, and maintain an open mind. The heritage of all the past is neither mean nor insignificant. It is a high estate. The work of the world is neither undignified nor degrading. It lacks neither character nor nobility. It is the means and measure of all real manhood. It is truly the creation and the redemption. Those who are worthily engaged in it are ministers of a holy cause, priests of a divine imposition.'--Calvin Coolidge 'So long as the National Government confined itself to providing those fundamentals of liberty, order, and justice for which it was primarily established, its course was reasonably clear and plain. No large amount of revenue was required. No great swarms of public employees were necessary. There was little clash of special interests or different sections, and what there was of this nature consisted not of petty details but of broad principles. There was time for the consideration of great questions of policy. There was an opportunity for mature deliberation. What the government undertook to do it could perform with a fair degree of accuracy and precision. 'But this has all been changed by embarking on a policy of a general exercise of police powers, by the public control of much private enterprise and private conduct, and of furnishing a public supply for much private need. Here are these enormous obligations which the people found they themselves were imperfectly discharging. They therefore undertook to lay their burdens on the National Government. Under this weight the former accuracy of administration breaks down. The government has not at its disposal a supply of ability, honesty, and character necessary for the solution of all these problems, or an executive capacity great enough for their perfect administration. Nor is it in the possession of a wisdom which enables it to take great enterprises and manage them with no ground for criticism. We cannot rid ourselves of the human element in our affairs by an act of legislation which places them under the jurisdiction of a public commission.'--Calvin Coolidge
    14 replies | 587 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 11:42 AM
    Yep, no dispute there at all. You clearly can see what the libs are doing and I agree. See what the "republicans" are doing? Contracts with domestic surveillance and police-state corporations, government eminent domain, elimination of private contract rights along the border and removal of property from private individuals and businesses, holding cells, processing centers to "sign them up!". Until you hold BOTH sides accountable and demand your representatives to end all Welfare, Corporate AND Domestic, the problem will continue from now to eternity. BOTH side are playing you, Snowball, at our expense, in terms of both dollars and freedom.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 11:34 AM
    RonPaulInstitute by john w. whitehead & nisha whitehead september 22, 2021 America is in the midst of an epidemic of historic proportions.
    0 replies | 10 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 11:17 AM
    As to your Post #88, it is a disgusting f&cking mess. .GOV caused all of the problems yet again.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 11:12 AM
    Biden Admin Releasing Haitian Migrants into USA Despite Promise to Remove Them https://www.breitbart.com/border/2021/09/22/biden-admin-releasing-haitian-migrants-into-usa-despite-promise-to-remove-them/ Bob Price 22 Sep 2021 2:40 Media outlets report that despite promises from DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Haitian migrants are being released into the U.S. interior. One official told the Associated Press the number of migrants released in recent days is in the thousands. “If you come to the United States illegally, you will be returned, your journey will not succeed, and you will be endangering your life and your family’s life,” Department of Homeland Security Secretary Mayorkas said during a press conference in Del Rio on Monday. “Your journey will not succeed, and you will be endangering your life and your family’s lives.”
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 11:05 AM
    Citizen noun. a native or naturalized member of a state or other political community. Subject adjective. Placed or situated under; lying below, or in a lower situation. Citizen noun. a legally recognized subject or national of a state or commonwealth, either native or naturalized. 'a British citizen' Well, I consider myself a sovereign individual, not a "subject", forcefully coerced in some aspects that are out my immediate control. Who owns you, AF? Do you believe in slavery?
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 11:02 AM
    Hard to see how you can blame us. Your ideas have carried the day and are now policy across the board, not mine. There is no border to speak of. You've won.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 10:56 AM
    Is your argument that the Bill of Rights is not part of the Constitution? Yes, of course I am. If you are not a citizen of the United States you have one right only: the right to fuck off back to wherever you came from.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Today, 10:55 AM
    Paste? No. Prescription? Yes. Same active ingredient, though. The only question is if there is something specific in the horse paste that might not be good for humans. I highly doubt it. Maybe after extended use, but even that seems unlikely.
    6 replies | 87 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 10:52 AM
    Yes they do. And since the Almighty has long ago ceased poking directly into human affairs it is up to us to create institutions to protect those rights. You know the thing: "That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed". Full scale demographic invasion, orchestrated by Marxist revolutionaries in and out of government, is the most sure way to destroy those institutions.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 10:52 AM
    Ron Paul's words, not mine Brian4Liberty :
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • NorthCarolinaLiberty's Avatar
    Today, 10:49 AM
    Nopes.
    8 replies | 64 view(s)
  • NorthCarolinaLiberty's Avatar
    Today, 10:48 AM
    Well, somebody is earning his paycheck. lol
    111 replies | 6849 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 10:48 AM
    That's the heading for the CONstitution, not the Bill of Rights. Are you implying that the Bill of Rights only applies to "American" people?
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Today, 10:48 AM
    TheTexan replied to a thread NO in U.S. Political News
    no
    8 replies | 64 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 10:43 AM
    Ummm, it pretty much says exactly that in the very first line: "We the People of the United States" It does not say, "We the people of Haiti" or We the people of Trashcanistan" or "We the people of Belarus" or "We the people of China". Nor does it say "We the people of the world".
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 10:33 AM
    Ron Paul speaks for himself. Also: But me being called "moron", "dummy", Soros partner in crime, are acceptable? Statist is simply: The practice or doctrine of giving a centralized government control over economic planning and policy.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 10:28 AM
    Yeah, and I see the account is banned. Just didn't want it to go unanswered.
    8 replies | 832 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 10:23 AM
    And they will try to legitimize each and every one of their brutal costly tactics, instead of looking inward and perhaps see things differently - in and for the cause of liberty.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 10:18 AM
    As you can see below, Left, Right, march in lock step. But, keep throwing money at it, on the tax payer dime, and don't contact your representatives to Stop the Incentives, and the "legal" path to citizenship which does nothing but 1. Fund the Fed via taxation 2. enables access to gubermint programs. Some conservative you are.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 10:08 AM
    That's funny. Jefferson said people are endowed with inalienable rights by our Creator. You say rights come from the government, then whine when they're taken away from you by that government. But you don't even see how you legitimized your own slavery. You are part of the problem and you can't even see it. Say that citizens of a land have a right to bestow or deny citizenship. Whine about having to share space with brown people (some of whom are descended from those who tried to keep the very first whites out). Whatever. Deny that all people are endowed by our Creator with rights, however, and you enable the globalists. You become the dog working with the sheep herder. Yeah, it's convenient, when all you want is to repel brown people. That's how we got this government, courtesy of people who stand for no principle, but will fall for any line that appears to support their pet agenda. Arf arf.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 09:57 AM
    LOL Klaus Schwab love folk like you: "You will own nothing, and be happy" because "general welfare" CONstitution. Try reading the Declaration of Independence, and the link right there in my sig. Page 38 for starters.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 09:54 AM
    Computer programs have no sense of humor.
    8 replies | 832 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 09:50 AM
    This has to be a joke, right. So much of what you said is just not true. 1. Marxism is based on a labor theory of value that is just not accurate. Demonstrably, the subjective theory of value reflects a better understanding of human nature. It's why it creates wealth as opposed to destroying it. And it reflects the differences between what people value. Marxism has no concept of that. 2. Marxism DEMANDS that everyone have the same view. Ever notice how non-Marxists get treated by Marxists?! 3. The rich are getting richer, but so are the poor. Your claim that the poor are getting worse is just factually false. Empirical data mean nothing to Marxists. What is true is that the poor in Marxist countries have less ability to escape poverty. And the more that Capitalist countries turn that way, the more harm is done to the poor. 4. The "profit percentage" isn't up to you. (I guess you missed the irony of saying that we don't need to see the world through the same lens, while advocating the whole world adhere to your values.) The "profit percentage" is up to both people in the exchange. Even when you sell your labor to someone, you both profit - otherwise, you wouldn't do it. If you're unhappy about your percentage, find a different buyer or improve your product. That's what "owners" do. (But again, Marxism denies that you are the owner of your own labor.) 5. Marxism confuses gullible and lazy people into thinking they are being exploited. That's a great way to sell books and to incite unrest, but it does nothing to improve the lives of people. If you want greater rewards out of life, the answer is simple - provide more value to your fellow man. You will both benefit. You can complain about "superstructures" but capitalism doesn't require those. It just requires enforcement of private property rights - including your own body and labor. The "superstructures" are created by Cronyists and Marxists. 6. The only "force" required in Capitalism is an enforcement of negative rights. The force in Marxism is literally violence and theft.
    8 replies | 832 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Today, 09:38 AM
    When you're living in a cage, unable to separate from those you profoundly disagree with, tolerance does indeed have deleterious effects. This is how you end up with the toxic CRT / LGBTTOOTTQTS4S mess we have today. But tolerance is still the only way forward. With enough tolerance, eventually that cage will break. (Either violently broken. Or dismantled via mutual respect. One way or the other.)
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 09:37 AM
    The centralist communist rag called the CONstitution never would have been ratified without the Amended Bill of Rights, Snowflake. The Anti-Federalists warned, but nobody took heed.
    95 replies | 1000 view(s)
More Activity

2 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Wasn't Brigham Young a supporter of slavery on account of the whole curse of Ham shtick? Just saying.
  2. View Conversation
    I know you mean well, but I'd appreciate it if you would avoid engaging people like Sola in this thread who are clearly only there to be rude and derail. Perhaps take it to PMs or another thread. Thanks! ~hugs~
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 2 of 2
About Ender

Basic Information

Signature


There is no spoon.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
12,337
Posts Per Day
2.45
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
2
Most Recent Message
03-14-2018 06:47 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 09:34 PM
Join Date
12-03-2007
Referrals
0

42 Friends

  1. acptulsa acptulsa is offline

    Member

    acptulsa
  2. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is offline

    Member

    Anti Federalist
  3. AZJoe AZJoe is offline

    Member

    AZJoe
  4. cajuncocoa cajuncocoa is offline

    Banned

    cajuncocoa
  5. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  6. CaptUSA CaptUSA is online now

    Member

    CaptUSA
  7. CCTelander CCTelander is offline

    Member

    CCTelander
  8. DamianTV DamianTV is offline

    Member

    DamianTV
  9. dannno dannno is offline

    Member

    dannno
  10. devil21 devil21 is offline

    Member

    devil21
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 42
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

08-30-2021


11-28-2020


11-06-2020


09-26-2020

  • 08:44 AM - Hidden

09-15-2020


09-13-2020


08-29-2020


07-09-2020


06-21-2020


06-18-2020


01-11-2020


07-10-2019


05-20-2019


02-09-2019


12-07-2018


10-31-2018

  • 04:49 PM - Hidden

10-29-2018


09-28-2018


09-10-2018


08-25-2018



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 259 1231151101 ... LastLast

09-20-2021


09-13-2021


08-31-2021


08-30-2021


08-28-2021


08-21-2021


08-14-2021


08-11-2021


08-10-2021


08-03-2021


08-01-2021


07-28-2021



Page 1 of 259 1231151101 ... LastLast