Ender
Member

I keep thinking, when people stop voting, and the government fears the People. But it ain't gonna happen because CaptUSA and Anti Federalist don't have the stomach for it. Pepto Bismol, until the next election, anybody?

I haven't forgotten who financed the creation of The Jab. No confidence.

And yet the republican nominee wasn't literally "Stoned Off the Stage", but instead is seen as the one who needs to get elected because "other". Go figure. I guess if/when it comes down to it, I'll be defending myself against the left and "your side". Because I can't stand either of you nationalist-communists. :up::mouthopen::tears:

White people don't season their food... https://x.com/i/status/1833207746445074557 1833207746445074557

That is exactly what I mean. Most people do not know 1 out of 10

Weak in what sense? If you are referring to standing firm on principles and defending our Natural Rights, yes, I agree. But voting to have them taken away while taking to the streets with arms because "other" doesn't seem like a tough-guy solution to me. I think the first thing people should do before taking arms is to actually read the Bill of Rights and decide whether they like them or not.

We got here because we're weak. Because we, as American men, refused to face the problems and enemies of the republic head on and identify those problems as enemies, without hesitation. I'm not bashing you, that is a self indictment more than anything else.

They're just trying to convince people the GOP is now suddenly friendly to humans. The DNC is committing suicide. The GOP will soon be the only face of the Uniparty. Opposition? Criminal. Soon everyone will pay lip service to the GOP. We won't have a choice. Yeah, Harris is worse. By design. The only person who could possibly be worse than Trump would have to be paid, because that takes a lot of work and self-humiliation.

https://x.com/i/status/1833527176794411065 1833527176794411065

Yes he is. A cast for him and not for Kamala means he is your guy. No need to be in the closet about it, whatever you want to do is fine by me. Yet, you never seem to ever promote or advocate them. Or even suggest other ways.

:rolleyes: Once again... "My guy" isn't running. Also, once again... There are WAY more effective avenues than voting. Also, also, once again... There IS going to be an administration running the agencies the next four years. There is a chance that the heads of these departments are gone and that the new heads could be chosen in part by RFK, Tulsi, and others. Placing a single lot on that side of the scale makes an infinitely small more of an impact than keeping my lot in my pocket. Neither option is doing much, but in the aggregate, both will have a greater impact than rewarding the incumbents.

//

https://x.com/i/status/1833527690626011596 1833527690626011596

I listened to that interview. IMO, Tom is trying to slowly acclimate Nicole and the voting viewers. He understands that they are not going to suddenly stop voting, and it wouldn't matter if they did/didn't. IMO, he is trying to educate her and the masses about the fundamental problems that we face, and he doesn't want to alienate them. Tom has said numerous times: "Noncompliance is more effective than voting." You being more awake should know that by now. You are not in kindergarten, or need to be lead by baby-steps. Or, maybe you do lol Your guy should have been "Stoned Off The Stage".

Gentlemen, please take a listen to this: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?567950-Love-Loss-Liberty-and-Legacy-with-Rep-Thomas-Massie I'm not trying to convince you that you should vote. I am only trying to convince you that other good people can see some value that you may be missing.

Yep. Except, everybody in that room, and most Amerikans who vote, only heard this:

We're already seeing reports pouring in about how the cheat is getting set up. Wisconsin has a loophole that is still auto-sending 144,000 ballots to people who are "confined" due to covid, which sidesteps the requirement to show ID. That's just the last example I read. The two biggest cities in Wisconsin are democrat strongholds and they're actively encouraging their "electorate" to use this loophole. If you and I and PAF and everyone we could identify who is sick of this got everyone they know who is sick of this and got them to get everyone they know who is sick of this and got everyone they know who is sick of this all to move to Wisconsin in time to register to vote, we wouldn't even put a dent in that number just in that ONE cheat vector in that ONE state. TBH at this point I blame Brandon Herrera, and I am going to try to find a way to tell him at some point. Because every 20 years or so someone happens to slip into an election in a district that doesn't have its cheat code 100% enabled and is able to get within spitting distance of not losing (and still lose) and the rest of the country turns into Charlie Brown kicking at that football again. There is no strategy for winning 3-card monte. You're either the dealer, the plant, or the rube who is given small intentional victories prior to really getting fleeced. During the next four years under president Harris, we'll have a short time to get people to try to realize that before we're black-bagged for talking about it, and frankly, it's a bit frustrating to see people who should know better still not getting it.

I'm still trying to figure out how any presidential candidate who brags about Nationalized "Stop and Frisk" and LEO Immunity, paid for by U.S. tax payers, isn't STONED OFF THE STAGE.

Glorious :up: I lost count of the truth bombs

When the GOP -- and especially the RNC -- hands you a "monkey wrench" on a silver salver and says, "Here, chuck this in The Machine™ with our compliments!" you know what will be on that platter. Not worth getting upset over either way. There are about a million better ways to introduce wrenches into the system than voting in this farcical psyop masquerading as an election.

Spending another $8+ Trillion is a monkey wrench? Into the cogs of the machine? I can't wait!!! Let's all give consent!!! :tears::rolleyes:

Well, it was a riot, it's not gonna be peaceful. If it was all scones and crackers and tea then it wouldn't be called a riot. I don't like this need for people on the right (not necessarily you) to try to differentiate between the "peaceful" and the "violent" protestors. Let's be real here it was a god-damn riot. There's gonna be violent protestors and peaceful protestors but they're all participating in a goddamn riot which is not gonna be peaceful or otherwise they'd call it afternoon tea with scones and biscuits. I also don't like the need for people on the right to try to disassociate or disavow themselves of the "violent" portion of the riot. January 6 was a goddamn marvel of modern anger against the establishment and it should be celebrated as such. Regardless of however hundreds of feds were in the crowd instigating or not, every rioter there is a goddamn hero. People back in the day probably called the original Tea Party rioters stupid & gullible, but at least they were men of action. Rather than sitting on our ass and commentating about how stupid someone is, as if that somehow makes us better than them.

Man, you really put a lot of importance on voting. I harbor no illusions that voting (or not voting) will save anything. That's not how our system works. But there is an opportunity, if enough people want to, to throw a monkey wrench into the cogs of the machine. It won't bring the whole machine down, but it'll upset the machine operators. That's worth 15 minutes of my day. ETA: I think what's really behind this is that you think not voting gives you some moral high ground and I'm threatening that concept of yourself. But really, you can do whatever makes you feel good. I'm just saying that just because everyone doesn't come to your same conclusion doesn't mean that they've been duped.

No, actually, you are taking the same track that has gotten us to where we are today. Nothing new there. But, whatever enables you to sleep at night. I know many a folk who get sever jitters at just the thought of not voting. It's been ingrained into them since the beginning of skool. Keep on keepin' on Capt, your "track" is going to save us! I can't wait! :tears:

Two things can be simultaneously true. First, this two party system is corrupt to its core and elections are not going to fix it. Secondly, that one of these two parties IS GOING to be making decisions and hiring people and setting administrative policies that WILL affect our lives. So, while we're working on the first part, it does us no additional harm to try to leverage the second part as a way to break down the barriers of the first part. Remember, one of these administrations is going to have executive power for the next 4 years - that harm is already baked in. It's going to happen no matter who you vote for or if you don't vote at all. So, I'm taking that as a given and looking down at the second layer and asking myself, which administration gives us a possibility of throwing a monkey wrench into the cogs of the machine. Will it destroy the entire machine?! You'd have to be an idiot to expect that! But can it cause damage and fault lines that people will notice? There's a chance. Thinking that voting is some magic tool, rather than simply casting your lot, is just silly. If you don't want to cast a lot, or you want to write-in Ron Paul (like I usually do), or whatever else, that's great! But I'm taking a different tack.

That is talk of a slave. But, ok. IOW, you are a "lesser of two evils" type of person.