Tab Content
  • Superfluous Man's Avatar
    Today, 08:06 AM
    Obviously SS is no libertarian. His theme in practically every post is to promote statism. So I don't see a need to argue over something he is so overt about. But there's nothing the slightest bit anti-libertarian about this doctrine, as you indicated when you brought it up in post 73. Almost everything else he says here is statist, but here you picked the one exceptional thing that isn't.
    79 replies | 964 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 08:02 AM
    https://www.dailywire.com/news/48458/melinda-gates-women-people-color-should-be-paul-bois?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com
    7 replies | 117 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 08:01 AM
    Hopefully angry enough that they start tearing each other apart, like the lesbians and trans fagggots are.
    11 replies | 142 view(s)
  • Superfluous Man's Avatar
    Today, 07:59 AM
    Even if you were right about government courts, it's still a fact that the Constitution, understood according to its original intent, does not guarantee taxpayer funded defense attorneys. To support that, you either have to support violating the Constitution, amending it, or legislating from the bench.
    9 replies | 148 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:47 AM
    Boy attacked by shark off NC beach https://abcnews.go.com/US/year-boy-bitten-shark-off-north-carolina-coast/story?id=63753357
    8 replies | 163 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 06:33 AM
    John 1:3 | KJV All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
    1025 replies | 60955 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Today, 06:00 AM
    Seven Reasons To Be Highly Skeptical Of The Gulf Of Oman Incident In a move that surprised exactly zero people, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has wasted no time scrambling to blame Iran … Pompeo concluded before hastily shambling off, taking exactly zero questions. Here are seven reasons to be extremely skeptical of everything Pompeo said: 1. Pompeo is a known liar, especially when it comes to Iran. Pompeo has a well-established history of circulating blatant lies about Iran … he recently told an audience at Texas A&M University that when he was leading the CIA, “We lied, we cheated, we stole. We had entire training courses.” 2. The US empire is known to use lies and false flags to start wars.
    72 replies | 648 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Today, 05:43 AM
    Trump’s Pompeo’s claim is devoid of any thought. Quick initial impressions from Trump/Pompeo’s “smoking gun” video: Nothing in the video confirm the boat is even Iranian. One could just as easily claim is Saudi, or U.S. or Israeli, or UAE or Omani, or anyone else The video does not establish a “limpet” mine or anything at all attached to the ship. It is hard to tell if there is even anything being removed at all. From the movement of ther people if anything is being removed from the ship, it would appear a magnetic anchor tethering the boat to the ship. Interestingly the edited video is only 1 minute 40 seconds long. Where is the video showing the boat approaching the ship? Where is the rest of the video? Might it show on approach the crew attaching a magnetic tether to the ship? Why are they hiding all the rest of the video of what the boat did and its approach? The US government states the video was taken at 4:10 p.m. local time – approximately 10 hours after the explosion. So the US government and US Navy just left the smoking gun evidence sit there for ten hours to purportedly allow the alleged culprits to come back 10 hours later in broad daylight, after already rescuing crews, and remove the “smoking gun” evidence. The alleged Iranians supposedly came back to the “scene of the crime” 10 hours later, in broad daylight, wearing reflective vests, with a crew that appears to be up to 18 people on the boat to remove the “smoking gun” evidence that the US government just let sit there for 10 hours. The video itself is of such horrible quality as to call into question its use, alleged conclusions and legitimacy. The US government has bases all around the gulf including in Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman as well as ships throughout the Persian gulf. Washington has made it a hotbed. US has surveillance drones, and surveillance planes and surveillance satellites watching everything throughout the gulf. And this alleged retrieving of the “smoking gun” evidence occurred ten hours after the blast. The US government would have had a litany of surveillance focused on the event by that time. Why is the only video horrendously grainy, out of focus, zooming in and out and shaky? Why is the video converted to black and white? This is not FLIR video, this is regular video. Why is this surveillance video converted to black and white?
    72 replies | 648 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Today, 05:26 AM
    "Master and and commander" ? "sole source of power"? what retarded comic book are these lines coming from? So SS would say that Obama could have committed any act whatsoever to obstruct investigation into the Obama administration wrongdoing regardless of law? Where was SS arguing Obama can do anything he wants to to obstruct any investigation by Congress or obstruct any special prosector Congress appoints. That for any investigation into Hillary crimes or Obama FISA spying or investigation into Eric Holder corruption. It is to say that it would be perfectly appropriate and acceptable for Obama to have his attorney general meet with Hillary's husband bill on a jet on a tarmac to discuss strategy to close an investigation against Hillary. Or it would be perfectly appropriate for Obama to authorize his Sec of State to destroy emails crucial to an investigation, or allow his attorney general to funnel weapons to various Mexican cartels to be used against US law enforcement officers, or on and on .... Nixon was impeached not for the Watergate break-in which it was acknowledged he had nothing to do with, but for obstruction of justice after the fact. To say it is impossible for a president to obstruct justice is to say it would be perfectly legal for Obama to threaten investigators, bribe jurors, blackmail judges, destroy evidence. Obama would have been fully within his legal rights to threaten judges. No, being a political office holder of any level is not license to break the law. SS is reaching now reaching the heights of absurdity in the never–ending quest to kneejerk defend all lunacy that is Trump.
    33 replies | 376 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 05:08 AM
    Nothing to do with 'evil'.......Everything to do with knowledge and ability.. Learning how to reach level XYZ in the latest video game isn't really a useful skill and men and women alike must have skills, the more the merrier...
    137 replies | 1287 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Today, 03:41 AM
    Well, I'm reporting YOU! Reporting that you are one hell of a great American!
    4 replies | 103 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Today, 12:23 AM
    The government had a meeting with Amazon before signing a $10 billion deal with them????!!!? I am shocked!! Just shocked!!
    6 replies | 86 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:34 PM
    Yerp. Let me know when Trump saves Assange- then I might take his bratty tweets about the press a bit more seriously.
    10 replies | 114 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:29 PM
    Read the fucking article.
    50 replies | 609 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:23 PM
    Yes- it is stealing- we have no business sanctioning anyone- if we don't like them then ignore them. Iran hasn't started a war in 100+ years & yet the US Almighty calls them the biggest terrorists in the ME. Read some real truth. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/08/jacob-hornberger/the-deep-states-long-enmity-toward-iranians/
    50 replies | 609 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:07 PM
    +rep
    79 replies | 964 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:07 PM
    Oh, I totally agree with you. Just remarking on how every generation seems to get upset because the rising generation ain't just like they were.
    137 replies | 1287 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:05 PM
    This is why when I come across threads on RPF that suggest violence (e.g. any of osan 's threads), I immediately report it to the FBI, and let them know my RPF username. It only takes a couple minutes to report a thread to the FBI, whereas on the other hand it could be many many thousands of dollars in lawyer fees if you don't.
    4 replies | 103 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:04 PM
    Good grief- learn some real history & read the OP- we have staged coups in their country & been stealing their resources for 75+ years. We have called them the bad guy so the average joe will agree to all the crap we have done to them. The solution is GTF outta their space & leave them alone. NO sanctions. NO coups. NO stealing their resources. NOTHING.
    50 replies | 609 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    45 replies | 953 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:00 PM
    None of these comments provide anything whatsoever to to support the false claim that Amash "supports the Deepstate use of FISA fraud". SS' list of points by Amash confirms the claim as false. As to the collateral issues - "fruit of the poisonous tree" refers to evidence obtained from an unlawful search. None of the alleged obstruction events came from any unlawful search. These are events that happened months and years after the FISA warrant. None of the evidence of the alleged obstruction was obtained from the FISA warrant. Is a defendant's believes the investigation frivolous or unlawful they can contest on those issues. That belief however is not a permit permit a defendant free rein to commit to put political pressure investigators, or judges, or tamper with witnesses. One corruption does not justify another. SS would be better off arguing no evidence of any obstruction rather than arguing that it is appropriate for a politician to use the power of his his office to pressure and influence investigators and witnesses.
    33 replies | 376 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:32 PM
    19 replies | 1102 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:27 PM
    502 replies | 15921 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:25 PM
    First, this statement confirms nothing to support that Amash "supports the Deepstate use of FISA fraud". Secondly, no, a politician corruptly breaking laws to obstruct justice does not become ok simply because the politicians believes the investigation is corrupt. That like saying its ok to break the law because you are only breaking the law to refute others who broke the law. That's nonsensical and has no foundation in any American law. And no opposing subsequent crimes is not endorsement of prior abuse of process. For instance a police officer may hide evidence or destroy evidence of in a case where the defendant actually committed terrible murders. Opposing the corrupt obstruction of justice by the officer after the fact, does not mean you endorse the underlying murders committed by the murderer. You may disagree with Amash's position on obstruction based on lack of evidence of obstruction, and that is a proper argument. Much better than making up falsehoods about Amash's position. I have yet to see any sufficient evidence of any obstruction. However that is based on lack of evidence, not because of a belief that politicians should abuse their power in corrupt ways to rig investigations simply because they believe the investigation is corrupt.
    33 replies | 376 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:11 PM
    Sure...this is always in play. But many things are NOT better today...just being able to walk down the street in any mid sized town and not be under total surveillance is a way in which things were better.
    137 replies | 1287 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:09 PM
    I bought the entire series for Mrs. AF as a gift a few years ago...cost a pretty penny. I don't think she's read one chapter... :(
    137 replies | 1287 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:02 PM
    Course he has...think the New Bolsheviks give a shit about that...hell, that's a badge of honor.
    9 replies | 94 view(s)
More Activity

2 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Wasn't Brigham Young a supporter of slavery on account of the whole curse of Ham shtick? Just saying.
  2. View Conversation
    I know you mean well, but I'd appreciate it if you would avoid engaging people like Sola in this thread who are clearly only there to be rude and derail. Perhaps take it to PMs or another thread. Thanks! ~hugs~
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 2 of 2
About Ender

Basic Information

Signature


There is no spoon.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
10,902
Posts Per Day
2.59
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
2
Most Recent Message
03-14-2018 06:47 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 11:02 PM
Join Date
12-03-2007
Referrals
0

40 Friends

  1. acptulsa acptulsa is offline

    Member

    acptulsa
  2. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is offline

    Member

    Anti Federalist
  3. AZJoe AZJoe is offline

    Member

    AZJoe
  4. cajuncocoa cajuncocoa is offline

    Banned

    cajuncocoa
  5. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  6. CaptUSA CaptUSA is offline

    Member

    CaptUSA
  7. CCTelander CCTelander is offline

    Member

    CCTelander
  8. DamianTV DamianTV is offline

    Member

    DamianTV
  9. dannno dannno is online now

    Member

    dannno
  10. donnay donnay is offline

    Member

    donnay
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 40
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

05-20-2019


02-09-2019


12-07-2018


10-31-2018

  • 04:49 PM - Hidden

10-29-2018


09-28-2018


09-10-2018


08-25-2018


05-30-2018


04-18-2018


04-06-2018


03-17-2018


02-23-2018


02-22-2018


02-14-2018


02-04-2018


02-02-2018


11-05-2017


11-01-2017


10-06-2017



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 220 1231151101 ... LastLast

06-17-2019


06-16-2019


06-13-2019



Page 1 of 220 1231151101 ... LastLast