spudea
Member

Not true. 100% of democrats, 210 Dems voted yes, which means less than 7 republicans were needed to pass the bill. Ultimately 101 republicans voted yes, 112 voted no, so a majority voted no. I think Trumps influence clearly helped the republican majority to vote no and more voted no than we've seen previously.

A veto proof majority of Congress passed the bill. Show me a single representative that changed their vote from no to yes based on the alleged "support" from Trump. You can't, they all wanted it already. Trump has been consistent in calling for peace and the end of the war as soon as possible which would entail concessions with Russia. Any suggestions, like in the OP, that Trump could have stopped the bill if he had just come out harder against it, is just ridiculous fiction.

Not in the least. He was self described leftist, anarcho-communist and trump hater. Sorry you lost a fellow comrade. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/shocking-video-shows-man-engulfed-flames-outside-trump-trial-nyc

Bring back empty chair!

Schumer had the audacity to talk about having a trial on these charges would be a bad precedent.... Bitch this is the first impeachment not to go to trial in our history, i.e. unprecedented! How is it even allowed in our constitution that the Senate can just dismiss the impeachment, even with just a simple majority... should be 2/3rds to dismiss or higher.

Thread is supposed to be about MTG not Trump. 1780587843225571584 I'm in love ♥️

Ben Shapiro has been talking about this for many years. Just like there are RINOs, there are JINOs, Jews in name only. "Jewish identity is about more than ethnicity."

How's a boycott supposed to work after our domestic industry is already destroyed, and we are totally reliant on slave made foreign goods. Combined with inflation and the upside down concentration of wealth, most people have no choice.

So you're just fine with slave labor as long as the products are cheap. Nice thought experiment. Next you'll tell us we should just compete better than China and and be more like them and bring back slave labor in the US.

Oh no! Mean tweets?? Boo fucking hoo. Keep the political snakes in line.

as predicted, more philosophy tropes. The essence of competition requires a level playing field with all parties following the same rules. This is you: "we don't need a textile industry, the child slaves in asia will make all our clothes. we don't need an auto industry, the child slaves in asia will make all our cars. oh yeah freedom baby!"

My god you are incapable of connecting the dots. Don't buy them? The destruction of our domestic industry combined with the destruction of our wealth by the federal reserve leaves most of us no choice but to buy the slave made products in order to survive at a basic level.

That is incredibly short sighted and your just going by what a simpleton philosophical book says rather than use your brain and look at the complex real world implications. How can you have free trade with a communist country? They tariff our products or outright ban them, use slave labor, and we don't tariff their products results in the destruction of our vital industries and jobs. You're idealistic book based response will probably be something stupid like, "well they just do it better and we are better off not having those industries..." The result being the mass consumerism society that we have today that also enables mass manipulation to keep people from being capable of challenging the fraudster owners of this country. You're fine with communist slave made products as long as it's cheaper? I'm not.

Video evidence has been known to magically disappear, a la Jeffrey Epstein.

Looks deliberate, turns right into the bridge support. Any mechanical/electrical failure excuses could easily cover up a deliberate act.