Tab Content
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 05:41 AM
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180612185204.htm
    0 replies | 29 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 04:57 AM
    Esther 4:14 (KJV) 14 For if thou altogether holdest thy peace at this time, then shall there enlargement and deliverance arise to the Jews from another place; but thou and thy father's house shall be destroyed: and who knoweth whether thou art come to the kingdom for such a time as this?
    654 replies | 32582 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:42 AM
    Because you understand the Constitution better than they guy who actually wrote it. Got it. :D
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:34 AM
    called. it. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523327-Trump-to-start-US-Space-Force&p=6642262&viewfull=1#post6642262
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:22 AM
    And before you make a snide remark about flintlocks and quill pens, the Framer's original intent was that the right to bear arms extended to the equal armament common to military use, and the original intent of freedom of speech extended to all manner of expression. Whereas the original intent of the Army was a land based combat force, and the Navy a sea based combat force. Original intent is a thing. maybe you should look it up.
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:18 AM
    Voyager sent linguistic messages in all human languages.
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:17 AM
    The Constituion clearly authorizes two Departments. Army, and Navy. This covers land and sea. If they want a force for the Air, they need to amend the Constitution. If they want a force for Space, they need to amend the Constitution. Original Intent. The Framers did not originally intend aircraft and spaceships.
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:08 AM
    .... until there is a 'public' on Mars, which seems to be in the works as we speak, so his point remains.
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:06 AM
    lol! out of ammo...
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:05 AM
    You don't get to wish whatever you want into the Constitution. The Constitution authorized two branches. An Army branch and a Navy branch. Any military force must either reside under one of the two Constitutionally authorized branches, or a Constitutional Amendment must be made to amend the Constitution to authorize a third branch. This isn't rocket science, and I know you are smarter than this. Is this deliberate, or is this just an example of Trumgasming?
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:58 PM
    So yeah, you are claiming to understand the Constitution better than the guy who wrote it. James Madison wrote in The Virginia Report, 1800, by the Virginia House of Delegates, that the Sedition Act was unconstitutional.
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:54 PM
    All of this was during James Madison's Presidency. Again, the guy who actually....wrote....the Constitution: From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Marine_Corps#Establishment_of_the_modern_Marine_Corps
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:51 PM
    You should demand a refund from your history professor. That base in Georgia that James Madison established in 1811 for Marines to operate out of? Yeah, you didn't know anything about that at all, did you?
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:50 PM
    LMAO! James Madison wrote the Constitution, but Swordsmyth here understands it better than the guy who...you know...actually wrote it... John Adams signed the Act into law to form the Marines in 1798. James Madison served 1809-1817 and continued to utilize the Marines in 1811. Clearly the guy who wrote the Constitution thought they were Constitutional.... Because they were organized under the Constitutional Department of the Navy. smdh.
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:43 PM
    No, the Army and Navy provisions are organizational. The Army Air Corps was organized under the Department of the Army. The same people who wrote the Constitution also created the Marine Corps and put them under the Department of the Navy. Are you claiming that the same people who wrote the Constitution did not know how to understand the words that they, themselves wrote?
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:41 PM
    The Marine Corps was raised up by an Act of the Continental Congress on 10 November 1775, and then again in the Constitutional era on 27 March 1794. The Marines were used extensively as an “Army Afloat” for amphibious raids and land marches like the assault on Derna right from the start. Their role did not actually depend on the Navy from the origins of the organization. If what you were claiming was correct, then Congress would have formed the Marines as a “Water Army” branch instead of putting them under the Department of the Navy in order to retain full Constitutionality. The proper method of Constitutional interpretation is Original Intent. The same people who wrote the Constitution had already dealt with the formation of another kind of military branch, and we can see that original intent in that act. Only two military departments are authorized in the Constitution. If you want more than two, amend it. I happen to agree that that we need an Air Force. Until we amend the Constitution, it needs to remain under the Department of the Army.
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:23 PM
    Why not have 80 Departments of the Army? You are doing the the exact same bizarre interpretation dance that gave us the FDA, Department of Education, the Drug War, Wickard v Filburn and more. That’s not the way the Constitution is supposed to work. You can’t just retcon whatever you want into the Constitution. That’s how the Swamp operates.
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:18 PM
    That sounds like justification for anything you can dream of. After all, the drug war is just a function of interstate commerce, right? Sorry, words have meaning. You don’t get to run around changing the meaning of words in order to shoe-horn whatever the hell you want I to the Constitution. That’s how the left is trying to neuter the Second Amendment. “Regulated” and all that. Article 1 Section 8 authorizes ONE Army and ONE Navy, so even if we took your absurdity as an “Air Army” it still doesn’t work. The provision is organizational, not connotative. When it was the Army Air Corps it was under the Department of the Army and therefore Constitutional. In order to become it’s own organizational branch it requires a Constitutional Amendment. This should be blatant on it’s face. Don’t get carried away by wishful thinking.
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:05 PM
    Just because the government does it, doesn’t automagically make it Constitutional. In order to have a US Air Force that is not the Army Air Corps, requires a Constitutional Amendment. If you seriously got an Air Force out of Article 1 Section 8, then I don’t think I’ve got anything to help you.
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:03 PM
    And Iím the a-hole for recognizing it in 2015....
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:56 PM
    Pretty sure this requires a Constitutional Amendment...
    81 replies | 571 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:40 PM
    That's interesting. Nevada's one of the few places RP ever placed well in when he ran for POTUS...
    9 replies | 133 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:48 PM
    http://realfarmacy.com/bad-antibiotic/?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com
    1 replies | 73 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:38 PM
    Can we establish that if a guy who when he just starts dating a girl threatens to break up with her if she doesn't have a lot of sex with him that it is her choice to continue in the relationship, and that having sex with him thereafter without the threat of force is not "sexual assault"?? Dunno how much is true, she claims she has evidence of controlling behavior, he claims she cheated on him.. she also claims he blacklisted her, no idea if that is true or not.. but I certainly don't see any criminal acts that took place.
    2 replies | 80 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:35 PM
    LIFESKILL: TAKING FILLED OUT FORMS AND DOCUMENTS TO THE COURT TO GET A PASSPORT. GOTTA HAVE IT FOR WORK. IT GETS HERE IN 4-6 WEEKS.
    2203 replies | 90259 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:33 PM
    I KEEP MY PHOTOS AND DIGITAL ART ON AN EXTERNAL HARD DRIVE AND BACKED UP USING THE WEBBERNETS(IDRIVE). IF YOU USE IDRIVE, YOU CAN GET AN IDRIVE PHONE APP THAT LETS YOU BACKUP YOUR STUFF TO YOUR IDRIVE ACCOUNT. :cool:
    2203 replies | 90259 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:34 AM
    Matthew 16:21-23 (KJV) 21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day. 22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee. 23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
    654 replies | 32582 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    06-17-2018, 01:40 PM
    Treaties that are written by the deep state and handed down to leaders controlled by the deep state are a lot easier to negotiate.
    25 replies | 292 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    06-17-2018, 09:22 AM
    Matthew 5:3 (KJV) 3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
    654 replies | 32582 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    06-17-2018, 12:46 AM
    Currently undecided. Didn't pull the trigger last time, we'll see.
    66 replies | 709 view(s)
More Activity

89 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Thank you--you're a sweetheart!
  2. View Conversation
    Thanks again! I know what you mean--it's frustrating.
  3. View Conversation
    Thanks Kotin for the support!
  4. View Conversation
    Kotin, I just really want people to be able to critically think by posting non-mainstream issues--and ones that appear very controversial. I truly care about humanity and want to see less people sick, and less people beholden to the system.

    Freedom encompasses so many things, one of which is to be healthy. There is no other freer feeling than to be healthy and full of life!

    Btw, I love your avatar; Calvin and Hobbes!!
  5. View Conversation
    I passed that info along, he said Thanks!
  6. View Conversation
    i think MC is out of the tempa~ban and is being tight-lipped and i am in shock
    because usually he seems to be a loose cannon as opposed to a team player
    so if you modify the header or convert it over to an"attention getter" thread he
    may actually be very appreciative. he has behaived himself while all else went zoo.
    i'd have handed you rep right now but i am fresh out. today has been intense...
  7. View Conversation
    Thank you, sir. I am glad there are those out there who don't rule out the good fate of others.
  8. View Conversation
    Hey! Do you get a bigger audience on soundcloud.com than you would on youtube? Thanks. I'm always looking to reach new listeners.
  9. View Conversation
    Hey brother, can you do me favor?

    Misposted a thread in the wrong forum:

    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...-being-subdued

    Could you move to wherever and out of Grassroots?

    Thanks!
  10. View Conversation
    Sent debate pics to your yahoo email. Get gmail!
Showing Visitor Messages 11 to 20 of 89
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
About Kotin

Basic Information

About Kotin
Interests:
Musician/politics
Occupation:
Ron Paul Enthusiast
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)
Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Phone Bank Worker
Copywriters:
Collateral Writer, Typing, Researcher
Graphics:
Garment Printer
Entertainers and Events:
Band / Musician, Music Producer
Marketers:
Online Marketer
Transportation:
Driver

Signature


The ultimate minority is the individual. Protect the individual from Democracy and you will protect all groups of individuals
Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual. - Thomas Jefferson
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

- Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
11,755
Posts Per Day
3.05
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
89
Most Recent Message
03-09-2016 06:03 PM
General Information
Join Date
11-29-2007
Referrals
1

30 Friends

  1. Bruno Bruno is offline

    Member

    Bruno
  2. canadian4ronpaul canadian4ronpaul is offline

    Member

    canadian4ronpaul
  3. CasualApathy CasualApathy is offline

    Member

    CasualApathy
  4. ChrisKuper ChrisKuper is offline

    Member

    ChrisKuper
  5. constituent constituent is offline

    Member

    constituent
  6. Cowlesy Cowlesy is offline

    Moderatorus Emeritus

    Cowlesy
  7. dannno dannno is offline

    Member

    dannno
  8. Deborah K Deborah K is offline

    Member

    Deborah K
  9. donnay donnay is offline

    Member

    donnay
  10. efiniti efiniti is offline

    Member

    efiniti
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 30
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

06-10-2018


01-17-2018


12-28-2017


11-06-2017


09-22-2017


09-16-2017


09-04-2017


08-19-2017


03-04-2017


02-01-2017


01-01-2017


12-23-2016


12-10-2016


12-09-2016


11-22-2016


11-05-2016


08-20-2016


08-19-2016

  • 08:47 PM - Hidden
  • 04:44 PM - Hidden
  • 03:10 PM - Hidden

07-25-2016

  • 12:42 PM - Hidden

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

11-14-2016


11-08-2016


11-06-2016


09-20-2016


09-19-2016


09-18-2016


09-13-2016


09-10-2016


09-09-2016


08-20-2016


08-17-2016



Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast