Tab Content
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:28 PM
    ooooo, I sense an army-air force pissing match ready to break out in here any moment.... :D :cool:
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:59 PM
    Everybody who supports zippy needs to watch this video and realize what a fraud he is, and maybe what a fraud you are. Trump is talking about a protester who was throwing punches.. he was saying it is a shame you can't punch back anymore (they can't defend themselves because conservatives get treated like crap and get lied about by the media, and by horrible, horrible liars like zippy) You should really be ashamed of yourself zip, you went from being at least seemingly relatively benign and possibly naive a decade ago to becoming a truly evil person through all of this.
    15 replies | 179 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:43 PM
    I think you meant "comin' around"
    5 replies | 127 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:41 PM
    Inb4 TheCount makes some ridiculous argument about how private companies are allowed to defraud their customers..
    1 replies | 53 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:37 PM
    Are you insinuating Trump was going to pay the Antifa's legal fees? This doesn't make any sense. Trump said that if a protester gets violent, knock the crap out of them and he will pay their legal fees. In this case, a Trump supporter was beaten by Antifa. The amount of violence against Trump supporters is 100x that of the violence against people protesting Trump.
    15 replies | 179 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:41 AM
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180612185204.htm
    1 replies | 77 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:57 AM
    Esther 4:14 (KJV) 14 For if thou altogether holdest thy peace at this time, then shall there enlargement and deliverance arise to the Jews from another place; but thou and thy father's house shall be destroyed: and who knoweth whether thou art come to the kingdom for such a time as this?
    654 replies | 32616 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:42 AM
    Because you understand the Constitution better than they guy who actually wrote it. Got it. :D
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:34 AM
    called. it. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523327-Trump-to-start-US-Space-Force&p=6642262&viewfull=1#post6642262
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:22 AM
    And before you make a snide remark about flintlocks and quill pens, the Framer's original intent was that the right to bear arms extended to the equal armament common to military use, and the original intent of freedom of speech extended to all manner of expression. Whereas the original intent of the Army was a land based combat force, and the Navy a sea based combat force. Original intent is a thing. maybe you should look it up.
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:18 AM
    Voyager sent linguistic messages in all human languages.
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:17 AM
    The Constituion clearly authorizes two Departments. Army, and Navy. This covers land and sea. If they want a force for the Air, they need to amend the Constitution. If they want a force for Space, they need to amend the Constitution. Original Intent. The Framers did not originally intend aircraft and spaceships.
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:08 AM
    .... until there is a 'public' on Mars, which seems to be in the works as we speak, so his point remains.
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:06 AM
    lol! out of ammo...
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:05 AM
    You don't get to wish whatever you want into the Constitution. The Constitution authorized two branches. An Army branch and a Navy branch. Any military force must either reside under one of the two Constitutionally authorized branches, or a Constitutional Amendment must be made to amend the Constitution to authorize a third branch. This isn't rocket science, and I know you are smarter than this. Is this deliberate, or is this just an example of Trumgasming?
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:58 PM
    So yeah, you are claiming to understand the Constitution better than the guy who wrote it. James Madison wrote in The Virginia Report, 1800, by the Virginia House of Delegates, that the Sedition Act was unconstitutional.
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:54 PM
    All of this was during James Madison's Presidency. Again, the guy who actually....wrote....the Constitution: From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Marine_Corps#Establishment_of_the_modern_Marine_Corps
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:51 PM
    You should demand a refund from your history professor. That base in Georgia that James Madison established in 1811 for Marines to operate out of? Yeah, you didn't know anything about that at all, did you?
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:50 PM
    LMAO! James Madison wrote the Constitution, but Swordsmyth here understands it better than the guy who...you know...actually wrote it... John Adams signed the Act into law to form the Marines in 1798. James Madison served 1809-1817 and continued to utilize the Marines in 1811. Clearly the guy who wrote the Constitution thought they were Constitutional.... Because they were organized under the Constitutional Department of the Navy. smdh.
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:43 PM
    No, the Army and Navy provisions are organizational. The Army Air Corps was organized under the Department of the Army. The same people who wrote the Constitution also created the Marine Corps and put them under the Department of the Navy. Are you claiming that the same people who wrote the Constitution did not know how to understand the words that they, themselves wrote?
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:41 PM
    The Marine Corps was raised up by an Act of the Continental Congress on 10 November 1775, and then again in the Constitutional era on 27 March 1794. The Marines were used extensively as an “Army Afloat” for amphibious raids and land marches like the assault on Derna right from the start. Their role did not actually depend on the Navy from the origins of the organization. If what you were claiming was correct, then Congress would have formed the Marines as a “Water Army” branch instead of putting them under the Department of the Navy in order to retain full Constitutionality. The proper method of Constitutional interpretation is Original Intent. The same people who wrote the Constitution had already dealt with the formation of another kind of military branch, and we can see that original intent in that act. Only two military departments are authorized in the Constitution. If you want more than two, amend it. I happen to agree that that we need an Air Force. Until we amend the Constitution, it needs to remain under the Department of the Army.
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:23 PM
    Why not have 80 Departments of the Army? You are doing the the exact same bizarre interpretation dance that gave us the FDA, Department of Education, the Drug War, Wickard v Filburn and more. That’s not the way the Constitution is supposed to work. You can’t just retcon whatever you want into the Constitution. That’s how the Swamp operates.
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:18 PM
    That sounds like justification for anything you can dream of. After all, the drug war is just a function of interstate commerce, right? Sorry, words have meaning. You don’t get to run around changing the meaning of words in order to shoe-horn whatever the hell you want I to the Constitution. That’s how the left is trying to neuter the Second Amendment. “Regulated” and all that. Article 1 Section 8 authorizes ONE Army and ONE Navy, so even if we took your absurdity as an “Air Army” it still doesn’t work. The provision is organizational, not connotative. When it was the Army Air Corps it was under the Department of the Army and therefore Constitutional. In order to become it’s own organizational branch it requires a Constitutional Amendment. This should be blatant on it’s face. Don’t get carried away by wishful thinking.
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:05 PM
    Just because the government does it, doesn’t automagically make it Constitutional. In order to have a US Air Force that is not the Army Air Corps, requires a Constitutional Amendment. If you seriously got an Air Force out of Article 1 Section 8, then I don’t think I’ve got anything to help you.
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:03 PM
    And Iím the a-hole for recognizing it in 2015....
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 10:56 PM
    Pretty sure this requires a Constitutional Amendment...
    92 replies | 922 view(s)
More Activity

89 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Thank you!!
  2. View Conversation
    I remember you were planting strawberries! I'm so siked for you! What more do you need, really? Leafy greens? I gather you're winemaking? What else do you do with mulberries? (they don't grow here) Are you still scaling up?
  3. View Conversation
    Sure and its done dont worry. I saw Rand Paul did great.
  4. View Conversation
    Thank you. It seems like bullying. My settings have been changed so that I only receive messages from contacts (none) and staff. It's a shame. I rarely send PMs anyway, but it would be nice to have the option without going to a whole lot of work.
  5. View Conversation
    ...
  6. I'm pretty sure he's got to be a sociopath--you'd probably know better than me though since your folks are in psychology.
  7. View Conversation
    http://stephanpastis.wordpress.com/2...l-he-just-did/ - confirmed Bill Watterston sighting
  8. View Conversation
    Just to clarify:

    Is it not acceptable to theorize (based on the hundreds of years of history of Roman Catholic persecution) about who might be the victims of that persecution today? If not, then I won't do it. But just remember....Jews, Atheists, and Christians were all victims of this tyranny.
  9. View Conversation
    Can you name anyone else off the top of your head?
  10. View Conversation
    That's cool, I am also. We are pretty uncommon here.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 89
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
About Kotin

Basic Information

About Kotin
Interests:
Musician/politics
Occupation:
Ron Paul Enthusiast
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)
Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Phone Bank Worker
Copywriters:
Collateral Writer, Typing, Researcher
Graphics:
Garment Printer
Entertainers and Events:
Band / Musician, Music Producer
Marketers:
Online Marketer
Transportation:
Driver

Signature


The ultimate minority is the individual. Protect the individual from Democracy and you will protect all groups of individuals
Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual. - Thomas Jefferson
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

- Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
11,755
Posts Per Day
3.05
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
89
Most Recent Message
03-09-2016 06:03 PM
General Information
Join Date
11-29-2007
Referrals
1

30 Friends

  1. Bruno Bruno is offline

    Member

    Bruno
  2. canadian4ronpaul canadian4ronpaul is offline

    Member

    canadian4ronpaul
  3. CasualApathy CasualApathy is offline

    Member

    CasualApathy
  4. ChrisKuper ChrisKuper is offline

    Member

    ChrisKuper
  5. constituent constituent is offline

    Member

    constituent
  6. Cowlesy Cowlesy is offline

    Moderatorus Emeritus

    Cowlesy
  7. dannno dannno is online now

    Member

    dannno
  8. Deborah K Deborah K is offline

    Member

    Deborah K
  9. donnay donnay is offline

    Member

    donnay
  10. efiniti efiniti is offline

    Member

    efiniti
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 30
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

06-10-2018


01-17-2018


12-28-2017


11-06-2017


09-22-2017


09-16-2017


09-04-2017


08-19-2017


03-04-2017


02-01-2017


01-01-2017


12-23-2016


12-10-2016


12-09-2016


11-22-2016


11-05-2016


08-20-2016


08-19-2016

  • 08:47 PM - Hidden
  • 04:44 PM - Hidden
  • 03:10 PM - Hidden

07-25-2016

  • 12:42 PM - Hidden

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

08-17-2016


08-03-2016


08-02-2016


08-01-2016


07-31-2016


07-27-2016


07-22-2016


07-20-2016


07-15-2016


07-14-2016


07-10-2016


07-07-2016


07-05-2016



Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast