Tab Content
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 07:14 PM
    Only a racist would vote for somebody because of the color of their skin.
    9 replies | 331 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:50 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Anti Federalist again.
    62 replies | 683 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:49 PM
    What? You don't want to be around a man who will smell your hair and actually grab you by your privates instead of just joking about it?
    62 replies | 683 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:26 PM
    The benefit of a Jimmy Dore is to have someone out there that is not on "our side" (which is nothing but Trump at this point), to call out the BS on the Democratic side. Edit: Let me give a practical example. When I recently posted a Tucker Carlson video the response I got was "He may be right but he's a racist." I don't get that when I post Jimmy Dore even if Jimmy is saying the exact same thing. Jimmy also was one of the people who roundly attacked the whole Russiagate narrative. Wrong on some things but right enough of the time to be helpful when judiciously applied.
    7 replies | 99 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:23 PM
    Yeah...^that is pretty awful. I wonder who the constitutionalist candidate is? I hope he has ballot access in Tennessee this time. They did in 2008 and 2012 but did not in 2016.
    62 replies | 683 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:21 PM
    Because we can't support Rand Paul 2024 on the Ron Paul/Rand Paul forums. :rolleyes:
    62 replies | 683 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:20 PM
    I found out about Kamala Harris being named the nominee from a friend sending me a DM. She said "You're going to vote for her right?" I said "I will vote AGAINST Kamala Harris. This mighte even make me vote for Trump." Note that this friend caught on to Harris' anti-black track record during the primaries and decided not to support her. But the thought of the historic opportunity of supporting the first black VP nominee of a major party still got her excited. I don't get it. If blacks wanted Kamala Harris why not support her during the primaries? This is insulting. Joe Biden already told us he's not going to do anything for black people. He is unapologetic about his vote for the 1993 Clinton crime bill. His VP pick is unapologetic for the harm she did black people, black men in particular, while she was a prosecutor. But I'm supposed to support her because she's "black" (she never claimed that until recently) and Trump is "racist?" I am extremely disappointed in my community now. Extremely.
    62 replies | 683 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:14 PM
    Right. But note that those laws only apply if you know you have HIV. I'm talking about someone who, for all he knows, is HIV negative being charged with murder simply for having unprotected sex.
    10 replies | 432 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 02:53 PM
    Maybe they thought Rice would be tied up in some kind of legal battle.
    62 replies | 683 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Today, 12:19 PM
    America is not next. The most draconian mandates and enforcement are in the areas where people worship government. In areas where people hold a lower view of government, the enforcement is a lot lower, so no reason to march. Gyms and restaurants are open where I live, and people go there without masks. Not everyone, but many go maskless. The few times I've been asked, I've just used the medical exemption and that's the end of it. The one disturbing thing though, is that I've seen people who have gone from no-mask to "just put it on for the 12 seconds you're walking through..." They are undoubtedly getting tired of the drama and want to avoid confrontation. I get that, but it means that in a pinch, they wouldn't march. So no, America is not next.
    6 replies | 149 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:55 AM
    Of course it will be mandatory. That's why the mask mandate is being pushed so hard and the lockdown was pushed before that. It's all about getting everybody aclimitized and getting one half of America hating the other half for "not doing their part to end the pandemic." I don't know how many times I have hard the lie repeated "This would have been over in two weeks if everyone had just stayed in their homes." BS! Even Dr. Fauci disagreed with that. It was supposedly about "flattening the curve." A "flattened curve" IS A LONGER CURVE meaning that the pandemic goes LONGER than it would have had it been allowed to burn itself out.
    9 replies | 706 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:45 AM
    Imagine the uproar if someone suggested a law saying gay or bisexual men who had sex without a condom, regardless of whether or not they knew they had HIV were guilty of attempted murder.
    10 replies | 432 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:32 AM
    Because everybody knows that if you say I can't breath that means you can and regardless the proper first aid for someone who can't breath is to put your knee on his neck. /sarcasm
    3 replies | 96 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:17 AM
    Colin Noir on his split with the NRA. I can't believe the screwed this up. Then again...I do. One of the biggest NRA-TV stars "I learned about NRA-TV going down through an article." SMH! Colin Noir while he was still with the NRA.
    34 replies | 658 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:34 AM
    It's the principle and the precedent. This was done by executive order and over the objection of the ATF. Yeah you can "bump fire" with a belt loop. So what's to stop the next democratic president from saying "Any gun that you can bump fire with a belt loop is in effect a machine gun?" Don't say that can't happen. We have a SCOTUS that just declare "sexual orientation" to equal gender for the purposes of the 1964 civil rights law.
    34 replies | 658 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:40 PM
    If you have to pay the same amount of tax it's not "lowered."
    87 replies | 1904 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:38 PM
    You still end up with millions of "delinquent" tax payers every year. https://abc13.com/archive/6645858/
    87 replies | 1904 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:33 PM
    That's when bait piles will show up.
    17 replies | 553 view(s)
  • Miss Annie's Avatar
    08-09-2020, 02:46 PM
    I am watching Erdogan of Turkey. Pretty good candidate.
    14 replies | 503 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    08-09-2020, 11:08 AM
    So....having to pay the same taxes off into the future = lowering taxes?
    87 replies | 1904 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    87 replies | 1904 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    08-09-2020, 10:12 AM
    And here is where my Christian morality trumps my libertarian ideals. The NAP is a moral argument. As long as you have not initiated force you are within libertarian morality. You see a child drowning in pool? Even if you could save his life by simply extending a pole to him, under strictly a NAP principle as long as you didn't push him in the pool you have no moral duty to intervene. But from the Christian principle "Whatsoever you would that men would do to you, do you also unto him", you have a moral duty to save a life if you can do so without risk to yourself or others. The Christian Bible doesn't call me to use force against those who don't want to follow its precepts. But it calls me to shun them. "Have no fellowship with unbelievers. For what fellowship has light with darkness?" As a Christian I fully expect God to take care of those who refuse in this life to "Do unto the least of these My brothers" because that's what He said he would do. My job is to "shake the dust off my feet" and go to another town, not just to find people more friendly to "me" but to find people who are truly Christian and friendly to everyone. That's how I see Jo Jorgenson's call to "anti-racism." There shouldn't be thought crime laws against racists. But people who aspire to an ideal greater than NAP, a Christian ideal (that's how I define it) don't need to associate themselves with people who use NAP as an excuse to be a$$holes. There are things in this life more important than NAP. Being anti-racist doesn't mean you have to kick in people's doors and burn their copies of mein kampf. I'm not a fan of the confedaracy or confederate statutes though I support other people's right to be fans but that support wouldn't have extended to my going to Charlottesville to protest alongside neonazis and klansman. Yes there is a culture war. And our culture is, and has been for a long time, f'cked up. I am no more a fan of the rightest "Let's keep up statues of civil-war criminals and post-war racial terrorists like Nathan Bedford Forrest because...history" than I am of leftest "Let's let dudes with beards go into the ladies room as long as they throw on a wig and say they are women" culture. Both are morally bankrupt IMO.
    50 replies | 1010 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    08-08-2020, 05:41 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Anti Globalist again.
    3 replies | 94 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    08-08-2020, 05:40 PM
    She must secretly be a Trump supporter.
    11 replies | 153 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    08-08-2020, 05:39 PM
    If it is later proven that Hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment for covid 19 9/11 is an inside job....Jeffery Epbstein didn't kill himself....fill-in-the-blank, should all the social media "fact" checkers be held legally responsible for the massive numbers of unnecessary deaths that they caused? They are not just expressing a different opinion, they are shutting down any opinion that is not favorable to Big Pharma/Bill Gates/Dr. Fauxi military industrial complex. You underestimate the power of the MSM (whom the social media "fact" checkers ultimately work for) to suppress dissenting opinions no matter how documented. They will not get caught until at least 20 to 50 years later after which time there will be some lame "apology" that gets swept under the rug. I was listening to a right wing radio host who said this: "Did you hear that the CIA admitted that they put drugs in black communties? But it's not the 'conspiracy theory' that black people talk about. They didn't put the drugs in the black community to kill black people. They put it in the black community to fund fighting communism. And of course we NEEDED to fight communism!" So, a horrible evil conspiracy by the government that caused the needless deaths of tens of thousands of black people and led to mass incarceration got admitted to years later and "excused" as being done for the "greater good" all by a jackass on the radio that doesn't understand why "blacks don't just pull themselves up by their bootstraps." But this doesn't just happen along racial lines. Look at the white soildiers that the government later admitted doing radiation experiments on. Does that cause mass protests? Demands for defunding of the agencies that did this? Nope. It's all swept under the rug. As Hillary Clinton said "At this point what difference does it make?"
    11 replies | 153 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    08-08-2020, 05:26 PM
    True. The issue IMO isn't "Can a racist ever make money in a truly free market." Rather, "can a person affected by racism nonetheless find somebody willing to take him on as a customer with full customer service and benefits in a free market?" Again the Uber/Lyft model. As a black person I have never had to wait what I considered a long time for a rideshare. I've never had one cancel on me. As a driver I've had riders cancel on me but I never chalked that up to racism. Even if race was a factor I was not concerned because most of the time I got a new rider in minutes. I have not had the "I'm black and I can't get a taxi" experience, but then I've only ridden in a taxi twice in my life that I can recall, but I've heard those stories enough and seen enough stats to accept that is a thing. But taxis operate off of government licenses and an artificially created monopoly.
    50 replies | 1010 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    08-08-2020, 02:04 PM
    Very powerful.
    2 replies | 168 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
43,345
Posts Per Day
9.00
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 06:50 PM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

35 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  3. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  4. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  5. Christian Liberty
  6. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  7. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
  8. DGambler DGambler is offline

    Member

    DGambler
  9. Dr.3D Dr.3D is offline

    Member

    Dr.3D
  10. GigiBowman GigiBowman is offline

    Member

    GigiBowman
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 35
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

07-21-2020


06-19-2020


04-03-2020


04-01-2020


03-31-2020


03-30-2020


03-18-2020

  • 02:58 PM - Deleted Posts

02-11-2020


12-22-2019


12-06-2019


08-10-2019


08-06-2019


07-28-2019


05-11-2019


03-21-2019


03-18-2019


02-16-2019

  • 12:47 PM - Hidden

10-25-2018

  • 03:48 PM - Hidden


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 235 1231151101 ... LastLast

08-11-2020


08-10-2020


08-09-2020


08-08-2020


08-07-2020


08-06-2020



Page 1 of 235 1231151101 ... LastLast