Tab Content
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 03:09 AM
    He would probably just keep them in litigation till they went bankrupt.
    6 replies | 102 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:25 PM
    Would it fool the software if the image were reversed?
    27 replies | 219 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:17 PM
    Thanks for the comments and the +rep. For the record I'm not saying slavery would have ended anyway. You have far more faith, apparently, than I do in the ability of people who think they are getting a free lunch to realize they are actually cutting their own throats. Let me put it to you another way. Do you think welfare is going to just end on its own? It's just as counter productive to the people that are on it as slavery was to the south.
    191 replies | 2214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:08 PM
    Okay. Here's what we probably agree on. This is just a damn distraction. Tearing down statues is symbolic crap that changes nothing for anybody. Unless they're going to melt down the metal and use it to pay down the deficit who cares? The BLM movement is stupid. It masks the issue of police brutality against everybody and makes it solely about race. That Aussie woman that was gunned down by a black copy is just as much a victim of police brutality as the black concealed carry holder that was gunned down by a Hispanic cop or Tamir Rice, the black kid with the BB gun, who was gunned down by two white cops. I want real freedom. Not black freedom. Not white freedom. Real freedom. Don't think I'll get it until Jesus comes though.
    191 replies | 2214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:02 PM
    What's the justification for the southern "means" or "ends"? :rolleyes: right back at you. The Southern states were hypocrites that didn't believe in the right of secession of actual libertarian groups that didn't want to be part of the confederacy. The Southern states first instituted the draft, enslaving poor whites to fight in a rich mans war, then turned around and exempted slave owners from fighting. Note they didn't just exempt rich people! They only exempted slave owners! So if you were rich but had a conscience and didn't own slaves you were still subject to the draft! Where is the morality in that? Again, explain to me why I should be against neo-Nazis but complacent with southern apologists? What did the Nazis ever to do me or anyone like me? Sieg Heil!
    191 replies | 2214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:59 PM
    No. I am informed. You are not. I'm going to try to make it a point not to argue with ignorant people. The documentation is out there for anyone who wants to know the truth. The South seceded because they wanted to protect slavery. They said that's why they were seceding. And before any blood was shed on "Southern soil", Southern pro slavery terrorists shed blood in "bloody Kansas." And if the South gave a crap about liberty, when people in the South wanted to secede from the South, the southern states tried to put down their secession with violence. I pointed that out to you in my last post and instead of addressing it like an adult, you decided to become a child and resort to name calling. That proves that you have lost the argument.
    191 replies | 2214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:55 PM
    I think it's a distinction that makes no freaking difference at all. The south could have legitimately seceded when southern slave owner Andrew Jackson was president and the only thing on the table was tariffs. But they ran like cowardly dogs when Jackson threatened to hang the secessionists. Then, when tariffs were at record lows, but slavery was threatened by an anti slavery party taking over the presidency, then they seceded. And when parts of the south decided they wanted no part of the confederacy their right to secede was not respected. Again, watch the "Free State of Jones." That was a libertarian state that was created by poor whites who joined up with escaped slaves to form what is probably the only libertarian county to ever exist in the United States of America. No slavery was allowed and no taxes either. Each person kept what he grew himself. People voluntarily banded together for the common defense. And they kicked the confederates asses. That is the kind of insurrection that libertarians should support. But I bet you never even heard of it. I know I didn't until I saw the movie. I'll be honest. I have more respect for neo-Nazis. What did a Nazi ever do to me? Black soldiers and airmen that were captured by the Nazis were treated better than they were by the U.S. Army. Back in high school I had to just suck it up and ignore all of the confederate hats and belt buckles and whatnot. I ignored stupid comments like "I know it would have been bad for you Drake but we could have won the civil war if..." No idiot. It would have been bad for all of us. The south would have remained the ignorant, non-industrialized, agrarian backwater that it was before the civil war. That's why the South lost the Civil War. The North ultimately out produced the South. The outcome was inevitable. It's just like U.S. industrialization out performed German and Japanese industrialization in World War II. In high school as a computer geek I hung out in the computer lab all the time. One day I saw this kid drawing a swastika using computer graphics. I was like "Why the hell are you doing that?" He was like "I'm German. This is my German heritage." I started to respond, then I thought about it. I had excused the confederate flag as "southern hertitage" and I was going to bust a gut over the swastika? What the hell for? Nazis never did anything to me or mine. I watched a documentary on "Bo Jangles" Jackson the other day. It was starring Gregory Hines. He showed the absolute brillance of that man. Bo Jangles had been regulated to crappy "step-in-fetch-it" roles his entire life just because he was black. He basically made Shirley Temple's career. And, to give southerner's some credit, he did get better treatment in Vaudville than he did in Hollywood. Oh...but World War II came, the U.S. was getting its ass kicked, "Tokyo Rose" was broadcasting to black GIs "Why are you fighting us for the U.S. when we aren't mistreating you like they are." To get blacks behind the war effort, the U.S. War Department asked Bo Jangles and other black performers to make a film blacks could be proud of and Stormy Weather was the result. So again, why am I supposed to be angry at the neo-Nazis but sympathetic to the neo-confederates? The South is still but hurt over a war that's end result brought it undreamed of economic prosperity. Slavery just doesn't work inside factories. Far too much can go wrong. You take a screw off a plow and maybe it breaks and the slaves get a day off and can go swimming. You take a screw off a foundry and the whole thing could fall over, men could die and the entire factory could be destroyed. The South needed slavery to end but they were just too stupid to realize it. And once slavery ended and the South industrialized, all of a sudden tarriffs became a non issue too. Many a confederate had wearing southerner who today works in a factor wants Donald Trump to do something about our...
    191 replies | 2214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:19 PM
    The bastards in the south instituted the draft first. And they started the damn war. The south was much worse than the north. That's why sections of the south seceded from the confederacy. Again, watch the "Free State of Jones" and educate yourself. I've lived in the south my whole damn life so I'm talking from experience and not "yankee ignorance." Southern planters didn't give a damn about the white dirt farmers they either suckered or forced at gun point to fight for their immoral and illegitimate cause. Hell, go back to before the civil war and read about the case of negro Will. He was a black slave who had invented a new hoe. (Farming implement, not street walker). The white overseer demanded Will let another slave use his hoe. Will was like "Screw you! This is my hoe!" The overseer fought Will and Will kicked his ass so bad that he died. Guess who paid for Will's defense? The plantation owner. Why? Because as property, Will was worth more than the overseer. Will got off. Later Will killed another slave. Guess what happened then? Then owner hung Will. Why? Because Will destroyed his property. Southerners who didn't own slaves were nothing but the hoes (as in street walkers) for the southerners who did own slaves. Once the south lost the civil war economic prosperity in the form of manufacturing and agricultural diversity came to the south and everyone was better off. Losing the civil war was the best thing that could have happened to the south. The south was brought into the industrial age kicking and screaming but the it found out "Hey...this ain't so bad after all." It's kind of like Japan's economy taking off after losing World War II.
    191 replies | 2214 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:14 PM
    Well, if his plan was to get the Civil War monuments removed, he succeeded and then some.
    322 replies | 358 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:10 PM
    ^This. Guns and Roses had the right idea. What we've got here is..failure to communicate... So men you just can't reach. So you get what he last week. Which is the way he wants it. So he gets it. I don't like it anymore than you.
    191 replies | 2214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:05 PM
    You do understand that the confederates enslaved poor white farmers by instituting a draft and then exempting slave owners from the draft right? The confederacy was about as anti liberty as you can get. Watch "The Free State of Jones" if you want to really be informed.
    191 replies | 2214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:55 PM
    Steve Bannon is not an Israel firster. Therefore he must be anti-semetic even though they can't prove it. Remember when Ben Stein accused Ron Paul of being anti-semetic for having the audacity to have an open mind about the Israeli/Palestinian problem?
    5 replies | 151 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:10 PM
    Mark Levin called Trump a populist which is basically the same thing. Of course this is back when Levin's golden boy Ted Cruz was still in the race. Levin was silent on Trump's faults until Rand Paul dropped out. https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/populism-nationalism-and-americanism THE NIXON PERIOD Moving into the Nixon period: We had wage and price controls that were set in place in 1971 to try to attack inflation. But what did wage and price controls do? Terrible dislocation of markets. And when the controls were lifted, of course, they spun out of control. Massive spending and massive redistribution of wealth. Now Donald Trump is proposing $1 trillion in infrastructure spending — twice as much as Hillary Clinton did. They insist this is going to create jobs for the middle class and union workers and so forth. How many more times are we going to do this? How many more times are we going to take money out of the private sector to fund some mastermind's idea about how to create jobs?The great power of the American economy was not created by government or tariffs or protectionism or progressivism or populism or nationalism. It was created by Americanism, by Americans.
    322 replies | 358 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:03 PM
    This idea that Bannon is a racist is the biggest load of crap ever put out. From the ADL's on hit piece trying to paint Bannon as a racist. hxxps://www.adl.org/education/resources/backgrounders/stephen-bannon-five-things-to-know 5. WE ARE NOT AWARE OF ANY ANTI-SEMITIC STATEMENTS FROM BANNON. While there is a pattern of evidence that Breitbart served as a platform for a wide range of bigotry and there is some controversy related to statements from Mr. Bannon’s divorce proceedings in 2007, we are not aware of any anti-Semitic statements made by Bannon himself. In fact, Jewish employees of Breitbart have challenged the characterization of him and defended him from charges of anti-Semitism. Some have pointed out that Breitbart Jerusalem was launched during his tenure. Nevertheless, Bannon essentially has established himself as the chief curator for the alt right. Under his stewardship, Breitbart has emerged as the leading source for the extreme views of a vocal minority who peddle bigotry and promote hate. RELATED TO THIS RESOURCE PRESS RELEASE
    5 replies | 151 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:56 PM
    Well....technically I would rather a drone fire a sniper rifle than a hellfire missile. Less risk of collateral damage. That said, that looks buildable as a weekend DIY project.
    6 replies | 122 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:52 PM
    I see you totally ignored my point about Jeff Sessions and asset forfeiture. That's probably because you know that I'm right and that my point about Jeff Sessions destroys your whole argument. Attacks on liberty come from both parties. But since you seem to be solely concerned about welfare and socialism I assume that means you support H1B visas? Those immigrants are, by definition, coming for high end jobs as opposed to welfare.
    83 replies | 1706 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:51 PM
    Well, you have to have a bad paint job if you are having to reproduce the car a couple of times for every episode.
    17 replies | 199 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:50 PM
    Very clever. You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to helmuth_hubener again. Most immigrant groups diversify in their voting patters over time. Take the Irish for instance. No guarantee on them voting Democrat these days.
    83 replies | 1706 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:48 PM
    You know how it is. With those convoluted areas like that, it takes around 10 minutes to find anything in there. Gotta search every corner.
    10 replies | 176 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:36 PM
    Maybe they see two doors, think about General Lee and automatically want it to be a Charger.
    17 replies | 199 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:25 PM
    These guys say it's a Charger. :confused: http://mentalfloss.com/article/30999/what-happened-all-those-chargers-destroyed-dukes-hazzard
    17 replies | 199 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:08 PM
    Then what's this?
    17 replies | 199 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:58 PM
    Unless it's all acting and the performance is for the media to use.
    24 replies | 410 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:25 PM
    If somebody doesn't want civil war monuments in parks, one way to accomplish the task would be to hire two groups of people to have a violent conflict over them.
    24 replies | 410 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:06 PM
    Of course not. But obviously not all rich people are part of that very small group of globalist tyrants. That's all I meant. :)
    24 replies | 410 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:41 PM
    Exactly what I've been trying to say. +rep! ETA: Except instead of "the rich" I'd say the globalist PTSB.
    24 replies | 410 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:00 PM
    They have been doing that too. Impatient protesters begin digging up Confederate general’s grave — themselves!
    2 replies | 130 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:59 PM
    Now I'm beginning to wonder if both groups that day were funded by the same people.
    136 replies | 1893 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:53 PM
    Yeah, might want to be on the lookout for AntiFa and the BLM too.... they catch you taking a picture and you might be assaulted.
    24 replies | 334 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:33 PM
    Seems to happen around here a bit too.
    136 replies | 1893 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
39,710
Posts Per Day
10.66
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 11:17 PM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

35 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  3. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  4. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  5. Christian Liberty
  6. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  7. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
  8. DGambler DGambler is offline

    Member

    DGambler
  9. Dr.3D Dr.3D is online now

    Member

    Dr.3D
  10. GigiBowman GigiBowman is offline

    Member

    GigiBowman
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 35
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

05-04-2017

  • 04:05 PM - Hidden

04-19-2017


04-16-2017


04-03-2017


03-26-2017


01-31-2017


12-20-2016


11-23-2016


11-21-2016


11-02-2016


10-15-2016


09-27-2016


06-21-2016


03-25-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 99 1231151 ... LastLast

08-17-2017


08-16-2017


08-14-2017



Page 1 of 99 1231151 ... LastLast