Tab Content
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    72049 replies | 1974478 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 06:52 AM
    There ya go, Trumpworld! Blame it on Jewish space lasers! That'll ensure America that you're not insane. Look, I don't know what happened, and a laser may be one of a hundred possibilities, but going down that path - even if it turns out to be true - is stuupid.
    1084 replies | 47972 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 06:11 AM
    You never heard of redundancies??
    28 replies | 712 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 04:26 AM
    That is a pretty bold statement. If an "invader" has no rights, why are asylum laws on the books?
    532 replies | 11393 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 03:03 AM
    :rolleyes: Any intelligent person knows that you don't get on national TV and push a video that's already been debunked as your "proof" whether you are right or not. As I talked about in PAF's recent thread, had Trump and Vance talked about the money, as you are doing now, they would have been on solid ground. Go with the things you can absolutely prove. But I get it. You're unwilling to admit that anyone on team Trump ever makes a mistake.
    532 replies | 11393 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 01:54 AM
    Every black Republican member of Congress is from a majority white district. She won her GOP primary. I'm sure if she was running as a democrat she would be a shoe in.
    6 replies | 198 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:11 PM
    Looking at the Liberty Candidates form, http://www.ronpaulforums.com/forumdisplay.php?42-Liberty-Campaigns, Joe Kent and Lilly Tang Williams seem to be the only ones to have made it past their primaries, besides liberty incumbents like Thomas Massie.
    6 replies | 198 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    9 replies | 231 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:38 PM
    You as well. But I don't think we ever "started." I was answering someone's point about the OP movie getting into theaters and explained that winning the election isn't the priority of the people who have the money to get such a movie into theaters. Folks are trying to a culture war as opposed to an election. And...that's fine. Everybody has their own priorities.
    8 replies | 191 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:34 PM
    Okay. Well I was talking about J.D. Vance's unverified (read debunked) cat story and you started talking about the Bible. I have no idea what you meant by any of that but whatever. Have a great day!
    532 replies | 11393 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:59 PM
    I'm not sure what's confusing. I'm trying to agree with you. I guess I'm the one confused by your argument that peddling debunked videos about cat eating Haitians and going on meet the press and claiming that you "created" the story (when we all know J.D. Vance didn't), is somehow productive or not divisive or whatever it is that you're trying to say. So please...unconfuse me. Edit: This is the word salad I'm trying to parse: Whether stories are "verified" or "unverified" has little if anything to do with whether they also "bring people together" or "pull people apart". "Verified" stories can "pull people apart" - and "unverified" ones can "bring people together". (And that's not even getting into the questions of what "verified" really even means in the first place, which standards of "verification" ought to be applied to which stories under which circumstances, and so forth.)
    532 replies | 11393 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:56 PM
    Okay. Let you know if I ever find such a a movie? Such a what movie? A movie that attacks Kamala Harris? That's in the OP! And I'm not trying to "criticize" it. Quite the contrary I'm making the point that even though the right (supposedly) wants to beat Kamala Harris, they aren't going to support putting the only movie that I'm currently aware of that specifically attacks Kamala Harris into theatres. Nope. Their resources are going to win the "culture war" in between harping for Israel. But okay. However people want to spend their limited resources is on them. Clearly culture war issues and Israel are clearly more important to Ben Shapiro and company. Got it. And I'm betting the only "real racism" is against white people right?
    8 replies | 191 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:43 PM
    Jimmy Dore knocking it out of the park again.
    0 replies | 77 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:24 PM
    Sure buddy. Whatever you say. Having J.D. Vance peddle an already debunked cat lady video is the way to win hearts and minds. Don't actually focus on the real issues because Nick Fuentes said not to. Just have funny playing in the kitty litter box playing to a base of MAGA hat wearing welfare recipients.
    532 replies | 11393 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:22 PM
    And some things are just counter productive but whatever. The main point I was addressing is why you won't see an actual video attacking Kamala Harris in a way that could win an election while we're in an election year. On a certain level I don't care except that I would love to see more and more black people wake up to the fact that the Democrats don't really care. But "Racism doesn't exist" movies don't really help that. It makes the base feel good though. I'm looking forward to Rand Paul/Thomas Massie 2028.
    8 replies | 191 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:28 PM
    Right? And that's just one program. There are dozens of those buried in other spending bills throughout federal and state governments. They spend billions of our dollars making these problems worse! I guess it helps the GOP with fundraising and helps the Dems with power structures. Like always, the answer is less government. If we could shut that stuff down, immigration wouldn't be the issue it is. But to just open the borders while these things are in place will make it even worse!
    39 replies | 467 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:02 PM
    Yeah. Like the Democrats can pass $780 million dollar spending packages without Republican acquiessance. But thanks for the additional data! Now if only there was a presidential candidate or VP candidate that would talk about immigration in terms of dollars and cents as opposed to cats and dogs. Rand Paul/Thomas Massie 2028?
    39 replies | 467 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:56 PM
    There was no "magical invisible wall" keeping people out in the 1970s when I was a kid and we were able to walk across the border to Mexico to get a birthday pinata and walk back without knowing when we crossed. During that same trip it was harder to get from Arizona to California because there was a fruit quarantine going on. I think tht's PAF's point. The more the government has gotten involved the worse the immigration problem has become.
    39 replies | 467 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:43 PM
    You must actually care about winning the election rather than winning the culture war. You know what's in theaters right now? Matt Walsh's "Am I Racist?" Nothing at all to do with the election itself, but hey, gotta fight the culture war.
    8 replies | 191 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:20 PM
    :rolleyes: Because verfifed stories that can bring people together aren't as fun as unverified stories that pull people apart.
    532 replies | 11393 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:19 PM
    //
    532 replies | 11393 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:13 PM
    And that's just the welfare... There are also huge government payouts to support this grift. Here's just one recent announcement: If anyone is under the assumption that we're seeing a natural migration of people just yearning to breathe free, a little research should dispel them of this notion. And what's worse is that the beneficiaries of this spending isn't just the migrants, but a whole industry stood up to profit off them and a democratic party that is encouraging it in order to secure power.
    39 replies | 467 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:07 PM
    Did gangs take over apartment complexes in Colorado? Is it still a problem? Why is that not the discussion?
    532 replies | 11393 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:45 AM
    To be clear, I'm a big supporter of natural migration. If people want to move where there is more opportunity to engage in free commerce, then all the best to them! They'll be a net benefit and will enrich us all. It's artificial migration that causes us all the issues. And to open the flood gates without addressing the artificiality of it first, is just dumb. It's two completely different topics and we end up talking past each other. You get 2 completely different types of migrants - those that add to your wealth and those that suck it dry. Jacob thinks that only 1% are of the latter, but provides zero evidence to support his conclusion. I think it's WAY higher and is the reason that a whole industry has been established to feed off the government largesse, while putting real people in servitude.
    39 replies | 467 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    8 replies | 191 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:40 AM
    Going down the EBT high balance rabbit hole I found this story that doesn't seem to be related to immigraiton: https://web.archive.org/web/20210125011903/https://www.bostonherald.com/2013/05/30/next-scandal-platinum-ebt-cards/ Next scandal: Platinum EBT cards RECORDS REQUEST: A receipt showing a hefty EBT card balance, right, has sparked a records request from the state. Above is the keeper of public records in the state, Secretary of State William Galvin.
    39 replies | 467 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:38 AM
    ^This is what the conversation should be about.
    532 replies | 11393 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:35 AM
    As Anti Federalist pointed out, during the Trump years the number of immigrants from Ukraine were less than 10,000. Now it's over 217,000. The difference is not the amount of welfare. The difference is (drumroll please) U.S. foreign policy which destabilized their country! If the welfare state was reduced to nothing, people would still be streaming into the U.S. because of how the U.S. has for over 100 years destablizied Haiti, for the past few decades destablized Venezuela, and for the past few years destablized Ukraine. So until we stop screwing over other people countries it's not going to slow the mass migration numbers. That said, there SHOULD be limits on welfare especially for migrants and people SHOULD investigate if the stories are true. From what I can find so far refugees are granted cash assistance both that the federal and the state level, but I can't find how anyone would end up with $30,000 on an EBT card. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/orr/orr_asylee_fact_sheet.pdf https://www.dshs.wa.gov/esa/community-services-offices/refugee-cash-assistance#:~:text=To%20be%20eligible%20for%20the,would%20no%20longer%20receive%20RCA. So...why aren't Trump and J.D. Vance talking about ^that? Why isn't anybody talking about that?
    39 replies | 467 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:20 AM
    So....I read the whole thing. It's got headers so its easy to find the part talking about the welfare state. Here it is: The welfare state and liberty What about the old right-wing canard that you can’t have open borders with a welfare state? It’s wrongheaded. Of course, you can have both. Sure, it might mean the payment of higher taxes, but is that any reason to abandon one’s principles and, in the process, inflict harm on all the people who are not coming to get on welfare? Moreover, keep in mind that both right-wingers and left-wingers favor a welfare state. So they’re saying that advocates of liberty should join them in their support of immigration socialism until the right-wing, left-wing welfare state is dismantled, which might be never. Instead of destroying the freedom that comes with open borders, how about devoting our efforts to dismantling the right-wing, left-wing welfare state? In the meantime, if right-wingers and left-wingers choose to give welfare to foreigners, let’s not be duped into joining them in their wrongdoing. Let’s just continue trying to end their wrongdoing. And make no mistake about it: open borders is not just about bringing an end to death, suffering, rapes, kidnappings, deportations, a Berlin Wall, and a massive police state. Most important, open borders is about liberty. As Thomas Jefferson pointed out in the Declaration of Independence, everyone — not just Americans — has been endowed by nature and God with such fundamental rights as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That’s precisely what most people are doing when they cross political borders — they are trying to sustain their life with labor, entering into mutually agreeable arrangements with others, and pursuing happiness in their own way.
    39 replies | 467 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:56 AM
    Oh FFS, I read his justification, but it doesn't work. In fact, it's kinda retarded. He starts with the assumption that 99 percent are coming here naturally. Come on, dude - do you really believe that?!! He's talking about the welfare state, but that's not the only artificial lure. Our government is setting these people up in nice hotels, giving them phones, stipends, vouchers, and dropping them off in favored political districts. There are agencies set up to profit off of these people and turn them into indentured servants. Those agencies have the incentive to lure more people away from their homelands with promises of luxuries. Without those things, these people could be a net-benefit to our society - but with them, they are taking taxpayer wealth and funneling some of it back in. Ending the border enforcement without FIRST ending the subsidies is insanity!
    39 replies | 467 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
50,110
Posts Per Day
7.93
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 03:03 AM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

41 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. billjston4 billjston4 is offline

    New Member

    billjston4
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. bv3 bv3 is offline

    Member

    bv3
  5. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  6. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  7. CaptUSA CaptUSA is online now

    Member

    CaptUSA
  8. Christian Liberty
  9. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  10. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 41
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast

09-19-2024


09-18-2024


09-16-2024


09-15-2024


09-14-2024


09-08-2024


09-05-2024


08-30-2024


08-26-2024


08-25-2024


08-23-2024


08-13-2024


07-26-2024



Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 463 1231151101 ... LastLast

09-20-2024


09-19-2024



Page 1 of 463 1231151101 ... LastLast