Tab Content
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:53 AM
    Thank you for your donation. A receipt has been sent to xxxxxxxx@gmail.com So you say this is winnable? Cool! I see your fundraising goal is a modest $50,000. There was a time we could do that here in an hour. Sadly those days are behind us but if everybody that comes here today to run their yapper gives you $25 you'll be much further along towards it. Just promise me win, lose or draw you won't give up! Hopefully next cycle you'll be the incumbent! And hopefully next cycle I'll be able to drop $2,500 as easily as I can drop $25 today! Edit: Direct link to the gofundme https://gf.me/u/yp2pd8
    3 replies | 272 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:40 AM
    Interesting. And on the left, Lenora Fulani was the first black woman presidential nominee, having done this prior to Foster being nominated for VP. Fulani even got ballot access in all 50 states. But shhhhh.....don't tell anyone there are more than two parties. That's a secret!
    3 replies | 75 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:21 AM
    I'm getting tired of that ridiculous excuse for Trump's ineptitude. Jeffery Epstein's lawyer gets hired by Trump? It's because it's a secret plot by Trump to get Epstein arrested....even though that had nothing to do with Epstein getting arrested. It's ridiculous.
    15 replies | 190 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:20 AM
    You are right. Trump is a punk and an empty suit. If he was a real leader, or even a real man, when Dr. Fauci wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine that COVID wasn't any worse than the regular flu, but then told Jake Tapper the reason the administration didn't act sooner was because there was "pushback", Trump should have held a press conference, read Fauci's own words, and then fired Fauci on the spot. He didn't because he is a punk. He will go on Twitter tirades against people who aren't even in his administration but he won't deal with the open festering sore of Fauci.
    15 replies | 190 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    0 replies | 48 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:04 PM
    :rolleyes: I knew about it and posted here about it before Trump ever made an announcement. That said I will agree that people are reflexively against Trump. If Trump had said "Keep the churches closed" people would have said "He's just doing that because black churches might oppose him."
    15 replies | 190 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    1 replies | 73 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:29 PM
    Yeah. Totally understandable that a Mexican drug cartel would kill all Mormons. Totally understandable. /sarcasm.
    18 replies | 697 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:26 PM
    Your saying that you understand why people would want to kill all lawyers would be like me saying I can understand why Mexican drug cartels randomly killed Mormons.
    19 replies | 274 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:25 PM
    I didn't say you said that liar. I said "If I say kill all of the Mormons." But just to be clear, if I were to say "No wonder the Mexican drug cartels killed those Mormons. Mormons are vile people." I don't think you would be too happy with me. Maybe I'm wrong though. To be clear I don't hold your asinine behavior against all Mormons.
    19 replies | 274 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:23 PM
    :rolleyes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Acosta In 2007–2008, as U.S. attorney, Acosta approved a plea deal that allowed human-trafficking ring-leader Jeffrey Epstein to plead guilty to a single state charge of solicitation, in exchange for a federal non-prosecution agreement. After Epstein's arrest in July 2019 on sex trafficking charges, Acosta faced renewed and harsher criticism for his role in the 2008 non-prosecution agreement, as well as calls for his resignation; he resigned on July 19 and was replaced by Eugene Scalia. Acosta had to resign because Epstein was arrested and not the other way around. Epstein was arrested because of the letter writing campaign of Senator Ben Sass. But keep lying to yourself.
    19 replies | 274 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:19 PM
    Okay. So if I say "Kill all the Mormons" then you won't consider that a threat. Got it. By the way I already brought your threat to the attention of the moderators liar.
    19 replies | 274 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:17 PM
    I ignore your bvllshyt in general. But guess what a$$hole who threatens to kill lawyers? Donald Trump hired the lawyer that kept Epstein from having to go to prison. Because that's how you punish pedophiles. For the record, you vile violent person, I never said Trump was involved in the pedophilia himself. I simply refute the lie put out by you and your ilk that he has gone after them.
    18 replies | 697 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:12 PM
    Trump hated Epstein so much that he hired Epstein's lawyer to be his secretary of labor. Maybe he should have followed your advice and killed the lawyers? By the, your threat of violence has been noted and reported. If you come for me you won't find me an easy target. That said, you apparently don't understand the "kill the lawyers" quote. Shakespear was not voicing his own view but the charecters in the play were tyrants and didn't want any lawyers around to break up their tyranny. That seems fitting as you are so busy defending a man who hired the lawyer that got the Jeffrey Epstein his sweetheart deal because...that's how you go after pedophiles.
    19 replies | 274 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:01 PM
    LOL. Keep telling yourself that chump. You've just convinced me to vote for Jo Jorgenson by the way. I was leaning Trump because Biden/Harris supporters are so insufferable but you're even worse. Now are you ready to admit you were wrong when you said I didn't give a source? I gave you a link the first time, but this time I went straight to the court documents.
    19 replies | 274 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:55 PM
    I'm tired of having to repeatedly give sources to the truth to people who persist in being dishonest. So, here is the suit by former Trump employee and Jeffery Epstein victim Virginia Guiffe. The document is the Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf For those who don't know, a motion for summary judgement, different from a motion to dismiss, is after there has been discovery (each side exchanges documents and takes depositions), one side or the other tells the court "Even if we accept all of the other sides alleged facts as true, you should rule in my favor because..." I am copying and pasting the text from pages 2 and 3. Defendant’s primary argument in support of her contention that she did not abuse and traffic Ms. Giuffre as a minor child is that employment records show that Ms. Giuffre was either sixteen or seventeen when Defendant recruited her from her job at Mar-a-Lago for sex with Epstein, not fifteen-years-old as Plaintiff originally thought. Call this the “yes-I’m-a-sextrafficker-but-only-of-sixteen-year-old-girls” defense. Defendant does not explain why sexual abuse of a fifteen year old differs in any material way from sexual abuse of a sixteen or seventeen year old. All instances involve a minor child, who cannot consent, and who is protected by federal and state laws. The fact remains that Defendant recruited Ms. Giuffre while she was a minor child for sexual purposes and then proceeded to take her all over the world on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet, the “Lolita Express,” as well as to his various residences, and even to her own London house. Flight logs even reveal twenty-three flights that Defendant shared with Ms. Giuffre – although Defendant claims she is unable to remember even a single one of those flights. Inconsequential details that Ms. Giuffre may have originally remembered incorrectly do not render her substantive claims of abuse by Defendant false, much less deliberate “lies.” At most, these minor inaccuracies, in the context of a child suffering from a troubled childhood and sexual abuse, create nothing more than a fact question on whether
    19 replies | 274 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:38 PM
    I gave the source. You just never never read it. https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-epstein-friendship-timeline-history-2019-7#message-pads-investigators-seized-from-epsteins-palm-beach-home-indicate-that-trump-called-epstein-twice-in-november-2004-15 At the time Trump made the "terrific guy" quote it was not well known that Epstein was a pedo. But after making that quote in 2002, phone records showed Trump called Epstein TWICE in 2004. Do you make a habit of calling people you know are pedophiles? Because I don't. Oh, and that source is in the same link that you didn't read.
    84 replies | 1177 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:59 PM
    Please explain this to me. Why was the destruction of the King George statue not considered destroying history but removal, without destruction, of confederate statues somehow is?
    17 replies | 931 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:52 PM
    Best line in video. "Saying Russian have to pay Afghan militants to kill U.S. troops is like saying you have to pay Chris Christie to eat at a buffet."
    2 replies | 124 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:03 AM
    Another tech invited me onto a job where he was going to split the $100 fee for installing two cameras in a Verizon store. I thought "Great! Easy $50 for an hours work." We got kicked off the job because the first tech wouldn't wear a facemask. He was like "It's okay. They'll still pay me for the first visit." But I didn't get paid. :mad:
    15 replies | 1030 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:00 AM
    Do you feel that people who are walking around with simple cloth masks are potentially guilty of murder? https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577 Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between medical masks and cloth masks. Setting 14 secondary-level/tertiary-level hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam. Participants 1607 hospital HCWs aged ≥18 years working full-time in selected high-risk wards.
    15 replies | 1030 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:37 AM
    Government continues to enter and distort the satire market. Who goes to The Onion anymore with stories like this?
    3 replies | 110 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:30 AM
    Thank you for the smoking gun! I was going from a hunch looking at the data.
    84 replies | 1177 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:19 AM
    Mass street movements don't last long. Look at the Tea Party....followed by Occupy Wallstreet. Hell, New Years 2008 we had at least a thousand people marching in downtown Nashville for Ron Paul. But organizing that many people for ongoing action? Not so much. Outside of Portland there aren't any mass protests going. And, as you are aware, even the NAACP is disowning the Portland protests. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?548154-Portland-NAACP-calls-out-protests-as-white-spectacle&highlight=NAACP+Portland http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?548251-From-Black-lives-to-white-spectacle-Portland-protests-have-lost-focus-civil-rights-leaders&highlight=NAACP+Portland It's a media war now. Actually it's always been a media war.
    27 replies | 457 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:58 AM
    And ^that is what the MSM says.
    93 replies | 1859 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:50 AM
    Fact 1: Nobody here is "going after Trump for Epstein." Fact 2: Trump did not "go after Epstein." Fact 3: Just because I rebut the argument that Trump is some anti-pedo crusader going after someone that he let back into his club after hitting on one of Trump's teenage workers (15 years old!) doesn't mean I am "going after Trump." Sheesh!
    84 replies | 1177 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:31 AM
    Last time. Danke said Trump had banned Epstein from his clubs. I said there was no evidence of that but Trump did kick Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago. I NEVER SAID TRUMP NEVER BANNED EPSTEIN FROM A SINGLE CLUB! NEVER! QUIT MAKING STUFF UP! But, let's go with your straw man argument. Revoking someone's membership to a private club is not the same thing as banning him from the club. At most private clubs members can bring a guest. The facts put in court is that Epstein was on the membership list but, after he tried to hit on the daughter of another member, he was kicked out and taken off the guest list. If you want to keep someone from being able to come it at all you need to put him on a ban list. You haven't provided evidence that shows Epstein was put on a ban list. Maybe that evidence exists. I don't know. I don't care. I never argued Epstein wasn't banned from one club just that he wasn't banned from ALL clubs. What I do know is this. After Epstein had attempted to recruit one of Trump's teenage workers in 1999 to his sex slave island, Epstein was STILL a member at Mar-A-Lago! How do we know Epstein was still a member? Because if his membership had been revoked then he couldn't have later had it revoked for hitting on the daughter of a club member! Let that sink in for a minute. Let it percolate. Let it seep into the recesses of your mind. Danke and everyone else who wants to hold Trump up as an anti-pedo crusader, think about that again. Anti Federalist who thinks I'm making a big deal out of nothing, think about that again. I haven't said Trump was a pedophile. I don't think he's guilty of pedophilia by association. But my God people! Would any of you keep hanging out with someone you knew was a pedophile? Would you still call him? Would you still take his calls? Because I sure as hell would not! As the employer of a teenage worker Trump had an affirmative DUTY to keep known pedophiles away and yet he STILL let Epstein come to Mar-A-Lago! WTF? Here is the timeline of Trump's association with Jeffrey Epstein. https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-epstein-friendship-timeline-history-2019-7#message-pads-investigators-seized-from-epsteins-palm-beach-home-indicate-that-trump-called-epstein-twice-in-november-2004-15
    84 replies | 1177 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:25 AM
    No doubt. Normal people aren't cut out for this stuff and it takes a huge toll on us (I know from my "real world" political experience). All mental tolls are also physical. Take care of yourself. Sleep, nutrition, exercise, stress management. Get outside, keep listening to the music, have a cold when it suits. I'll leave it at that for now. Cheers again, brother.
    6 replies | 153 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:02 AM
    Little Sina (from her web site)...
    6 replies | 153 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
43,417
Posts Per Day
9.01
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 05:54 AM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

35 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  3. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  4. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  5. Christian Liberty
  6. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  7. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
  8. DGambler DGambler is offline

    Member

    DGambler
  9. Dr.3D Dr.3D is offline

    Member

    Dr.3D
  10. GigiBowman GigiBowman is offline

    Member

    GigiBowman
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 35
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

08-13-2020


08-12-2020


07-21-2020


06-19-2020


04-03-2020


04-01-2020


03-31-2020


03-30-2020


03-18-2020

  • 02:58 PM - Deleted Posts

02-11-2020


12-22-2019


12-06-2019


08-10-2019


08-06-2019


07-28-2019


05-11-2019


03-21-2019



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 238 1231151101 ... LastLast

08-14-2020


08-13-2020



Page 1 of 238 1231151101 ... LastLast