Tab Content
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 10:19 AM
    Based on actual results and accounting for states currently not called, still counting, recounting, under investigation or audit, or states with election issues now in the courts, President Trump is winning the 2020 Presidential Election.Here is what we currently know in reference to the 2020 Presidential election. A number of states have been called but a number are still in question. Here is a list of those in question. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/current-actual-election-result-update-president-trump-13-paths-win-2020-election-biden-10-paths-win/
    1 replies | 21 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 07:21 AM
    Of course there is individual agency on both sides. What TPTB do is get inflame the passions of those who are peaceful on the right and the left by getting us to paint everybody on the other side with the same "they are violent and want to kill me" brush while downplaying violence coming from people who associate with our side.
    53 replies | 1804 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 07:13 AM
    Seems he also didn't buy the official story on the Zika virus. I wonder what he thinks about COVID-19? Yeah he ultimately backed Biden, but he did come to the defense of Chris Pratt for not attending a Biden fundraiser with the rest of the Avengers cast. https://www.acsh.org/news/2019/11/20/what-hulk-911-truther-mark-ruffalo-testifies-congress-science-14416
    2 replies | 40 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 07:11 AM
    There is something that you are missing. National Socialists (Nazis) are still socialists. That was true all the way back to the 1930s and Adolf Hitler. Hitler took power in part as a result of his faction of socialists (the Nazis) fighting the other faction of socialists (the communists or the international socialists). The Nazis and the Communists did actually hate each other. After forming a non-aggression pact, Hitler and Stalin eventually went to war with each other. First Hitler came to the aid of Finland in the "Winter War" then he invaded Russia directly. And all of these groups are ultimately manipulated by the not at all "liberal" banksters who have no intention of redistribution of wealth to anyone but themselves. So no. Neo Nazis don't have to be "planted" to make conservatives look bad. They're just doing what they naturally do. But I agree with you that they aren't conservatives.
    53 replies | 1804 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 07:04 AM
    There are FAR MORE CASES OF ALT-RIGHT ARSON than just those two! I mention the Michigan Police department because that's the first and most widely cited case of arson associated with the BLM protests and I mention Nashville because I live there. But an alt-right dweeb started the California wildfires (how many people died in THAT?) and there are a lot of other cases if you have the honesty to look for them. https://googlethatforyou.com?q=alt-right%20arson Ignore the facts if you want to. You've been blinded by the corporate media. Antifa is controlled opposition. The alt-right is controlled opposition. There were even reports of BLM protesters early on calling out Fed infiltrators and pointing out the truckloads of brick pallets being dropped off.
    53 replies | 1804 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 04:46 AM
    IMO any objective person that looks at what happened gets that impression. If a person cannot see it, they are in denial. Election laws were also disregarded.
    5 replies | 338 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:10 PM
    Interesting, thanks for posting.
    1 replies | 157 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:06 PM
    I came across this video showing a shopkeeper using common law to defy the mask mandate in his area. The police show up five times but leave empty handed each time (13.5 minutes). I found it interesting enough that I looked at other videos from the channel and this one gives a good background on who the Common Law Court organization is (1 hour 10 minutes).
    0 replies | 40 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:08 PM
    Think I would take a loan on the credit card for the rest.
    8 replies | 128 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:50 PM
    I doubt it's on any kind of sale.... https://safelifedefense.com/product/tactical-flexible-rifle-armor-fras/
    8 replies | 128 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:26 PM
    Dr.3D replied to a thread RPF Flag in Open Discussion
    Looks Masonic....
    8 replies | 141 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:21 PM
    Trump was boasting and going off about himself with his new Attorney General Flynn when Flynn was trying to interject an important detail. Finally Flynn had enough and he politely said, "Pardon me Mr. President, but....." Trump looked at him and said, "I already did."
    43 replies | 1222 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:04 PM
    Trump should deal with all these issues in his second term. AG Flynn should prosecute Obama, HRC, Clapper, Brennen, Bidens, Hire Snowden and put him and Assange in charge of election fraud and IT Specialties. Weed out the corrupt judges. Get rid of ANTIFA, Redefine Black lives matter. End the Pandemic.
    43 replies | 1222 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:38 PM
    That comes with a Trump win. A huge segment of the population will only acknowledge an awakening when their tribe is victorious.
    43 replies | 1222 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:55 PM
    IMO Team Trump doesn't need to convince the left. They only need to show a judge the laws and the irregularities that took place and show that had those irregularities not taken place the election could have turned out differently.
    43 replies | 1222 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:48 PM
    Exactly. The Georgia Supreme Court has madeclear that Plaintiffs need not show how the voters would have voted if their ballots had been regular. only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.” All Trump has to do is show that there there were irregularities that could have changed the winner.
    43 replies | 1222 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:08 PM
    I think Trump will get re-elected. Most all the arguments can be utilized in other states. PA is in shambles. All it takes is PA, GA, and one more. I think they will all fall in line. If they don't there is not justice at all in this country. The arguments IMHO are irrefutable.
    43 replies | 1222 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:39 AM
    In the alternative, Plaintiffs seek an emergency order prohibitingDefendants from including in any certified results from the General Electionthe tabulation of absentee and mailing ballots which do not comply with theElection Code, including, without limitation, the tabulation of absentee andmail-in ballots Trump Campaign’s watchers were prevented from observingor based on the tabulation of invalidly cast absentee and mail-in ballotswhich (i) lack a secrecy envelope, or contain on that envelope any text, mark,or symbol which reveals the elector’s identity, political affiliation, orcandidate preference, (ii) do not include on the outside envelope a completeddeclaration that is dated and signed by the elector, or (iii) are delivered inperson by third parties for non-disabled voters.210.When we consider the harm of these uncounted votes, and ballots notordered by the voters themselves, and the potential that many of theseunordered ballots may in fact have been improperly voted and also prevented 100proper voting at the polls, the mail ballot system has clearly failed in thestate of Georgia and did so on a large scale and widespread basis. The size ofthe voting failures, whether accidental or intentional, are multiples largerthan the margin in the state. For these reasons, Georgia cannot reasonablyrely on the results of the mail vote. Relief sought is the elimination of themail ballots from counting in the 2020 election. Alternatively, the electors forthe state of Georgia should be disqualified from counting toward the 2020election. Alternatively, the electors of the State of Georgia should be directedto vote for President Donald Trump.211.For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment intheir favor and provide the following emergency relief: 1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and theGeorgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results; 2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currentlycertified election results to the Electoral College; 3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified electionresults that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of theelection;101 4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines andsoftware in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs. 5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that werenot certified as required by federal and state law be counted. 6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of StateRule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause,U.S. CONST. art. I, 4; 7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system ofsignature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause byworking a de facto abolition of the signature verificationrequirement; 8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified electionresults violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV; 9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballotfraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statisticallyvalid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absenteeballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if therecount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligibleabsentee ballots were counted;102
    43 replies | 1222 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:28 AM
    The Georgia Supreme Court has madeclear that Plaintiffs need not show how the voters would have voted if their ballots had been regular. only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.” See OCGA 21-2-520 etseq., Mead v. Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (1994) theSupreme Court invalidated an election, and ordered a new election because itfound that,Thus, t was not incumbent upon to show how the voters would have voted if their ballots hadbeen regular. He only had to show that there were enough irregularballots to place in doubt the result. He succeeded in that task.
    43 replies | 1222 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:07 AM
    I read the Complaint. If people want to say no evidence they are not reading what I am reading. There is established law outlined and then there is proof that the law was broken. Trump lost by less than 13,000 votes and they have hundreds of thousands of issues. All that is necessary according to law is to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election. I think Sidney Powell did more than that. Furthermore, much of what she said is applicable in other states. If a judge rules against this they rule against established law. No way to dismiss this as conspiracy theory.
    43 replies | 1222 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:25 AM
    Source? Neither are as dangerous as dimwits like you pretend them to be. Typical antifa dweeb.
    53 replies | 1804 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:24 AM
    I saw that. What FB, Google and Twitter are doing is a violation of the Sherman anti-trust act. They can be civilly and criminally sued for that regardless of CDA 230 immunity.
    4 replies | 225 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:21 AM
    It's got nothing to do with my "personal philosophy" and everything to do with my personal knowledge. I know good people and a$$holes on both sides. Antifa made their big debut after the "tiki torch" neo Nazi rally. One side burns people in ditches (the far right) which is worse than burning buildings.
    53 replies | 1804 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:55 AM
    good thread, great links.
    20 replies | 917 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:31 AM
    Sounds interesting. Adding to my wish list.
    6 replies | 223 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
44,249
Posts Per Day
8.99
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 07:48 AM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

38 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  3. bv3 bv3 is offline

    Member

    bv3
  4. Cap Cap is online now

    Member

    Cap
  5. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  6. Christian Liberty
  7. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  8. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
  9. DGambler DGambler is offline

    Member

    DGambler
  10. DiverseSegregation
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 38
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

11-13-2020


11-05-2020


10-13-2020


08-28-2020


08-27-2020


08-15-2020


08-13-2020


08-12-2020


07-21-2020


06-19-2020


04-03-2020


04-01-2020


03-31-2020


03-30-2020


03-18-2020

  • 02:58 PM - Deleted Posts

02-11-2020



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 267 1231151101 ... LastLast

11-27-2020


11-26-2020


11-25-2020


11-24-2020


11-23-2020


11-22-2020



Page 1 of 267 1231151101 ... LastLast