Tab Content
  • Root's Avatar
    Today, 10:46 AM
    I voted no, but if there's a good soccer match on, I might watch the end of it. Oh and I watch a lot of skiing in the winter.
    4 replies | 55 view(s)
  • TER's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:14 PM
    Yes, I understand that. You already alluded to that earlier. I explained to you it was fake news. I also friendlily suggested that you should stop falling for fake news. Or much worse, peddle it when you already know it is fake news. https://www.npr.org/2019/08/23/753699013/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-underwent-another-round-of-cancer-treatment-this-sum
    58 replies | 1545 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:25 PM
    LOL, if there were no cops, the crime rate would go down.
    8 replies | 110 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    32 replies | 311 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:07 PM
    And black birth rates are even lower than white birth rates. If the "plan" was to replace whites with minorities that wouldn't be the case. There are two simple reasons why birth rates of newly arrived immigrants are higher and neither have anything to do with socialism. 1) Newly arrived immigrants often come from countries where they don't have access to birth control or information about birth control and 2) Birthright citizenship. Newly arrived immigrants want at least one kid with that's a citizen. Those kids, though, aren't having 5 kids. Your theory that this is based on socialism somehow causing whites not to have babies and minorities to have more babies just isn't supported by evidence.
    126 replies | 1776 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:00 PM
    *Hugs* Hope you get to feeling better!
    19 replies | 320 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:47 PM
    That's why we need a wall. :p
    5 replies | 110 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:44 PM
    So does the green pipe.
    449 replies | 9708 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:13 PM
    The only two things Rep. Gabbard has in common with Dr. Ron Paul are: She boldly calls out her own political party for its corruption and failure to uphold its principles, and She is against interventionist foreign policies. Other than those things, she is a Progressive, through and through, which means she is an enemy of a true, Constitutional republic and has no respect for the rule of law, private property, the life of the defenseless unborn, and pretty much every other individual right given to us from God, not the State.
    29 replies | 880 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:49 PM
    Had he not shot the attacker, he would have been charged with brandishing a firearm. Of course that would have been a lesser charge with less prison time.
    22 replies | 267 view(s)
  • TER's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:54 AM
    They placed a biliary stent, which in someone with pancreatic cancer, is palliative treatment. Stop falling for the fake news.
    58 replies | 1545 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:01 AM
    That's got nothing to do with what Trump actually said. Again, what he actually said. "We have very strong background checks right now. But we have missing areas. And areas that don't complete the whole circle." What "missing areas" do you think Trump thinks are in our "very strong background checks?" He hasn't proposed banning Zoloft. (And most people who take Zoloft don't have mental health issues.)
    43 replies | 214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:34 AM
    I'm not denying anything. I have always wondered why those drugs are allowed to be prescribed while marijuana is still illegal at the federal level. But I asked you a specific question and you have decided to dodge it. You are acting like the liberal media. The liberal media claimed in that video you posted that Trump has backed away from gun control and you are pushing the liberal media narrative. You will not see any liberal media outlet give the analysis that I have given which is Trump has always been a gun grabber and still is a gun grabber. So back to my specific question. Would you, or would you not, support expanding background checks to gun shows for the purpose of dealing with people on psychotropic drugs? Yes or no?
    43 replies | 214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:06 AM
    Okay. So if someone who is under doctors orders to take certain mind-altering drugs goes to a gun show and attempts to buy a gun what do you think should happen at that point and what do you think Trump thinks should happen at that point?
    43 replies | 214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:44 AM
    No. Ron Paul supported congressional action. Wrong. It was through Supreme Court case law. Specifically the case United States vs Wong Kim Ark.
    84 replies | 956 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:37 AM
    At 0:21 in your video. "We have very strong background checks right now. But we have missing areas. And areas that don't complete the whole circle." Please explain to me what I shouldn't think he's talking about closing the so called "gun show loophole?" And please explain to me why I am "liberal" to be concerned about that?
    43 replies | 214 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:34 AM
    Enhanced_deficit, are you a Trump supporter? If so, then can you explain Trump's strategy concerning the OP?
    48 replies | 1415 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:30 AM
    Has he come out and said he's against red flag laws? If so please post the video. I'm not on this forum everyday. And I don't hate Trump. I love America and the entire constitution including the Bill of Rights. Background checks themselves are unconstitutional. Red flag laws are worse. Why do you interpret legitimate criticism of Trump, even Swordsmyth is mad about this one, as "hate?"
    43 replies | 214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:24 AM
    Trump was put in the race to hedge the bets. Ask yourself this question. Why would a lifelong democrat with a history of supporting the Clintons who backed Hillary Clinton when she ran for president the first time and is on record as far back as 2002 supporting an assault weapons ban in his own freaking book decide one day "Hey, I think I'll run as a republican?" Seriously, why can't you understand what happened? Going into 2016 the liberty movement was cresting. Rand had a real shot at a win. Then Trump sucked all the air out of the room by making immigration the issue. No more talk about the federal reserve. No more talk about rolling back the NSA or the Patriot Act. No more talk about rolling back the military to an actual constitutional roll of defending America rather than foreign adventurism around the globe. Nope. Just immigration. Only Trump has never been serious about immigration. Obama deported more illegals than Trump. As soon as Trump gets his wall built (which is possibly never), his plan, in his own words, is to let "tremendous" numbers of immigrants in through a "process." Obama was doing the same thing (ramping up immigration enforcement to have the political room to "reform" immigration). Now Trump is pushing gun control and he's pulled Rand along with him.
    512 replies | 3376 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:09 AM
    Correction. In direct opposition of what your interpretation of Ron's position in 2008. You ignore Ron's current actual position. And Trump isn't really about border security or stopping immigration. He's deported fewer illegals than Obama. You've been had.
    512 replies | 3376 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:38 AM
    Practicing dentistry as an ophthalmologist?
    19 replies | 320 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:35 AM
    :rolleyes:
    103 replies | 1585 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:11 AM
    All of a sudden it's become much easier to be a Trump critic.
    43 replies | 214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:08 AM
    Are you really that deluded? Seriously? You pick a video where Trump is talking about stronger background checks, ignore the video where he talks about red flag laws, and delude yourself into believing that he's not talking about red flag laws? Then you expect other to follow along with your delusion? Here. Watch this video. Then put it on repeat and watch it again. Then watch it again until the truth of it sinks into your brain. You need to be cured of your TDS (Trump Delusion Syndrome).
    43 replies | 214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:03 AM
    It's been a rough year hasn't it?
    43 replies | 214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:56 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to EBounding again.
    43 replies | 214 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:46 AM
    Infinity-D chess at work.
    15 replies | 922 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
41,782
Posts Per Day
9.36
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 08:09 PM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

35 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  3. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  4. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  5. Christian Liberty
  6. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  7. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
  8. DGambler DGambler is offline

    Member

    DGambler
  9. Dr.3D Dr.3D is offline

    Member

    Dr.3D
  10. GigiBowman GigiBowman is offline

    Member

    GigiBowman
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 35
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

08-10-2019


08-06-2019


07-28-2019


05-11-2019


03-21-2019


03-18-2019


02-16-2019

  • 12:47 PM - Hidden

10-25-2018

  • 03:48 PM - Hidden

10-24-2018

  • 02:19 PM - Hidden
  • 09:12 AM - Hidden

09-14-2018


09-13-2018


04-26-2018


04-25-2018


10-02-2017


09-07-2017


08-29-2017


05-04-2017

  • 04:05 PM - Hidden

04-19-2017



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 183 1231151101 ... LastLast

08-24-2019


08-23-2019


08-12-2019



Page 1 of 183 1231151101 ... LastLast