Tab Content
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:15 AM
    :rolleyes: South Africa is doing the same thing that was done to Native Hawaiians in the 1984 case Midkiff v Hawaii Housing Authority. Basically some Native Hawaiian families owned most of the land and it was taken from them using eminent domain to "redistribute" to other people only for the land to ulitmately be bought up by land speculators. Oh sure they got "compensanted" but not nearly what the land was actually worth. And what does Donald Trump think about eminent domain?
    9 replies | 374 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 07:10 PM
    Okay. Those of you who claim those of us who don't like what Israel is doing to Gaza as somehow supporting Hamas or otherwise being anti semetic can shut the hell up now. https://www.timesofisrael.com/musk-vows-to-rehire-deputy-who-apparently-joked-about-annihilation-of-israel-and-gaza/ Billionaire’s X followers decide in poll to reinstate Marko Elez, 25, who resigned from Musk’s government agency after racist posts resurfaced such as ‘Normalize Indian hate’ By AFP 8 February 2025, 8:36 am 35 Elon Musk arrives before the 60th presidential inauguration in the Rotunda of the US Capitol in Washington, January 20, 2025. (Chip Somodevilla/ Pool Photo via AP) Elon Musk arrives before the 60th presidential inauguration in the Rotunda of the US Capitol in Washington, January 20, 2025. (Chip Somodevilla/ Pool Photo via AP)
    3 replies | 52 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 06:51 PM
    So I thought your argument was that if Rand were able to pull it off it would just make things worse or at the very least not any better. But it seems now that your argument is that it's unlikely he'll ever get this passed. If the former than I disagree. If the latter than I can't say you're wrong but I don't think it's bad to at least try.
    13 replies | 362 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 05:29 PM
    72478 replies | 2914458 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 05:23 PM
    72478 replies | 2914458 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 05:18 PM
    72478 replies | 2914458 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 04:34 PM
    LOL. You said "noone in the Arab world seriously denounces Hamas." Your statement is provably false. You are the only fool here. Abbas didn't support provoking a wider war with Israel or he would have done it already. I don't give a rats ass if he "feels the slightest sorrow for a dead Jew." That's irrelevant. This isn't about how somebody "feels." It's about who had the ability to prevent October 7th. Abbas didn't have that ability but Bibi Netanyahu did. Israel had the plans for the attack 1 year in advance. And Ron Paul clearly REJECTED your argument that if people other than the Afghanis had operational control of Al Qaeda on 9/11 that meant war with the Afghanis was warranted. He rejected that in November 2001 just months after voting for tha authorization for military force. Ron Paul supported SURGICAL strikes to get Osama Bin Laden, who had already escaped before we invaded, and NOT a general war! If Israel had just attacked Hamas the way it attacked Hezbollah in Lebonon with minimal civilian casualties, the civilized world would not care. Candace Owens brought that point up multiple times when she debated Zionist shills last year. Once more in case you missed it. Ron Paul: The Afghan people did nothing to deserve another war. The Taliban, of course, is closely tied to bin Laden and the al Qaeda, but so are the Pakistanis and the Saudis. Even the United States was a supporter of the Taliban's rise to power. And as recently as August of this year, we talked pipeline politics with them. The recent French publication of bin Laden, ``The Forbidden Truth,'' revealed our most recent effort to
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 03:23 PM
    DamianTV replied to a thread USAID Exposed in U.S. Political News
    And what happens if we really win and overthrow the real overlords? Musk Backs Ron Paul as Federal Reserve Chairman https://www.infowars.com/posts/musk-backs-ron-paul-as-chairman-of-federal-reserve
    108 replies | 2521 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 03:20 PM
    https://www.infowars.com/posts/musk-backs-ron-paul-as-chairman-of-federal-reserve WINNING!
    3 replies | 38 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 02:47 PM
    Feelin froggy.
    7 replies | 101 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 10:19 AM
    DamianTV replied to a thread USAID Exposed in U.S. Political News
    Lets make this simple. The ONLY ones that are complaining are the politicians that are PUTTING MONEY DIRECTLY IN THEIR POCKETS. Everyone else will just scratch their heads as to how we blow 10 BILLION on TRANSGENDER COCKROACHES. Yes, they ACTUALLY spent money on TRANSGENDER COCKROACHES. MILLIONS. Jeez, why are you pissed again?
    108 replies | 2521 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 10:15 AM
    BREAKING: President Trump Orders Elon Musk’s DOGE To Attack The Globalist Mother Ship — Trump Has Directed DOGE Auditors To Investigate The Private Run For-Profit Federal Reserve https://www.infowars.com/posts/breaking-president-trump-orders-elon-musks-doge-to-attack-the-globalist-mother-ship-trump-has-directed-doge-auditors-to-investigate-the-private-run-for-profit-federal-reserve END THE FED!
    21 replies | 107 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-10-2025, 07:11 AM
    I'm sure if Rand had been on the Supreme Court he would have voted to strike down Chevron Deference. And if this law had been passed sooner the Court wouldn't have NEEDED to strike down Chevron Deference. So Rand is doing exactly what it seems you're saying needs to be done. And Court decisions can be reversed. The left is now kicking itself for not codifying Roe v Wade with federal legislation when Obama was president and they had the house and a 2/3rds majority in the Senate. The republicans don't have that 2/3rds majority so this may be tilting at windmills, but if the Dems are forced to vote to protect bureaucracy that is also a win.
    13 replies | 362 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-09-2025, 06:24 PM
    Well..considering that the pistol brace ban didn't not get passed after the ATF rule got struck down by the courts it seems the answer is no. The administrative state clown car drives much faster. https://www.cato.org/cato-handbook-policymakers/cato-handbook-policymakers-9th-edition-2022/reining-administrative-state#restore-popular-accountability-domestic-policymaking Agencies regulate through a combination of the legislative, executive, and judicial functions by issuing rules with the force of law, policing those rules, and adjudicating their enforcement. In 2021, for example, the Biden administration issued 3,257 regulations with the force and effect of law, whereas Congress passed 81 laws during that time. The last available year for comprehensive data about administrative adjudications is 2013, when the five busiest agencies convened 1,351,342 executive branch tribunals; that same year, there were 57,777 total cases (civil and criminal) filed in the U.S. district and appellate courts.
    13 replies | 362 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-09-2025, 05:32 PM
    Ron Paul: The Afghan people did nothing to deserve another war. The Taliban, of course, is closely tied to bin Laden and the al Qaeda, but so are the Pakistanis and the Saudis. Even the United States was a supporter of the Taliban's rise to power. How are you enjoying that copium?
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-09-2025, 05:16 PM
    You're honesty quotient is low. And I fully explained my position. You either lack the reading comprehenion to understand it or you lack the honesty to admit it. Most people here reject the idea that the war in Afghanistan was somehow justified based on the theory that all the CIA did was merely help the mujahadeen back in the 1980s and then Al Qaeda attacked America because they hate us for our freedom. Even though Ron Paul voted for authorization military action to take out Al Qaeda, as early as November 2001 he said: The Afghan people did nothing to deserve another war. The Taliban, of course, is closely tied to bin Laden and the al Qaeda, but so are the Pakistanis and the Saudis. Even the United States was a supporter of the Taliban's rise to power.
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-09-2025, 05:12 PM
    Oh, and your claim that "noone in the Arab world seriously denounces Hamas" is provably false. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/palestinian-president-blames-hamas-continuing-war-gaza-2024-07-13/ Palestinian president blames Hamas for continuing war in Gaza By Reuters July 13, 20242:47 PM CDTUpdated 7 months ago RAMALLAH, July 13 (Reuters) - Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said Israel and the United States were responsible for an attack that killed dozens in the Gaza Strip on Saturday, but the Western-backed leader also blamed Hamas for the continuing war in Gaza. His comments signal rising tension between Abbas's Fatah faction and the Islamist Hamas group, which accused the Palestinian president of taking Israel's side.
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-09-2025, 05:07 PM
    Have you been drinking with Kamala Harris? Because ^that is some serious word salad.
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-09-2025, 05:05 PM
    Ron Paul clearly says ^here that he didn't come out and say everthing he thought for political reasons. Here at 1:30 in Ron Paul says "Building 7 going down...that raises a lot of questions." So contrary to your false assertion he certainly entertained conspiracy theories about 9/11. But that's a straw man argument. I didn't say "Ron Paul believes 9/11 was not done by Al Qaeda" I said "A lot of people here do not believe 9/11 was done by Al Qaeda." So please keep your argument honest. The issue is did Snowball's "a-okay" to your post about 3,000 Americans being killed by Al Qaeda mean he was okay with 3,000 Americans being killed, or was he really saying "Whatever you say dude" to your claim that Al Qaeda killed 3,000 Americans? You and I both know it's most likely the latter and not the former. You asserted the position was the CIA only helped the mujahadeen fight the Soviets. That's different from the CIA helping Al Qaeda carry out 9/11. So now that you're arguing the honest position here is my response. If the CIA helped Al Qaeda, a group of non Afghan terrorists who simply used Afghanistan as a base, carry out 9/11, then does that justify killing a bunch of Afghanis especially considering that we KNEW Osama Bin Laden was no longer in Afghanistan BEFORE we invaded? Osama Bin Laden likely escaped Afghanistan in November 2001. (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunduz_airlift) Hamas consists of about 4,000 people. Israel killed about 40,000+ Palestinians. Do the math.
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    02-09-2025, 01:12 PM
    No, that's from the Bible. Judges 1:18
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-09-2025, 09:46 AM
    So do you think Congress would have passed the pistol brace ban?
    13 replies | 362 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-09-2025, 08:48 AM
    And to break this down for you Swordsmyth: 1) Not everybody here believes Al Qaida had anything to do with 9/11. You've been around enough to know the various conspiracy theories that exist on that. 2) If Al Qaida did do 9/11, the CIA involvement is much more than just that they "promoted the mujahadeen against the Soviets." At the very least the CIA helped the 9/11 terrorists into the U.S. 3) If the CIA had operational control of Al Qaeda throughout the attack, as Benjamen Netanyahu seems to have had operational control over Hamas throughout October 7, then it's not justified to kill Muslims, even in Afghanistan who were not part of Al Qaeda or the Taliban, when we're not actually going after the people really responsibile. (The CIA).
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-09-2025, 07:57 AM
    You're either being dishonest over very stupid. The "A-OK" wasn't "A-OK" to 3,000 Americans being killed! It was "A-OK" as in "I know you're full of shyt but I'm not going to argue with you!"
    111 replies | 1661 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    1 replies | 88 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 06:18 PM
    It's taking power back from the bureauracy and requiring a vote by congress. Bureauracts don't have to get re-elected. Congress does. The current standard is that the bureauracrats have to put up their new rules for public comment which is supposed to mean something but really doesn't.
    13 replies | 362 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 06:13 PM
    And this is why this forum is still relevent. r3volutionary memory. Good find Anti Federalist and good bump Matt.
    8 replies | 1022 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
50,934
Posts Per Day
7.88
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 06:30 PM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

42 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. billjston4 billjston4 is offline

    New Member

    billjston4
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. bv3 bv3 is offline

    Member

    bv3
  5. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  6. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  7. CaptUSA CaptUSA is offline

    Member

    CaptUSA
  8. Christian Liberty
  9. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  10. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 42
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast

11-14-2024


11-06-2024


10-30-2024


10-27-2024


10-26-2024


10-25-2024


10-21-2024


10-20-2024


10-17-2024


10-14-2024


10-03-2024


09-19-2024


09-18-2024


09-16-2024


09-15-2024


09-14-2024


09-08-2024



Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 490 1231151101 ... LastLast

02-11-2025


02-10-2025


02-09-2025


02-08-2025


02-07-2025



Page 1 of 490 1231151101 ... LastLast