Tab Content
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:55 AM
    You've got DECADES of significant decreases in deaths with regards to VMT combined with a small blip of an increase and you're ignoring all other factors other than immigration such as distracted driving. https://martinhelms.com/blog/why-are-americas-roads-so-dangerous/#:~:text=From%202020%20to%202021%2C%20the,approximately%2016%2C500%20wrecks%20per%20day. Again, most of the people immigrating to America are coming from countries who drivers are as safe or safer than white American drivers. And you still haven't explained why you ignored black countries who have driving safety records as good as the best white countries.
    33 replies | 507 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 08:41 AM
    FTFY. I'll give you through 2019, but 2020 was an unmitigated disaster. Race riots, lockdowns, spending fiascos, suspension of civil liberties, election rigging, censorship... On all his watch. If we can't expect better than that, it's time for the bunker.
    34 replies | 326 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:21 AM
    "A reverence for the truth might be a distraction that's getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done." Did I hear that right?
    41 replies | 1452 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:07 AM
    Dude, did you miss the fact that fatalities per VMT dropped even FASTER than fatalities per capita? Give it up. You shot your wad too quick on this one.
    33 replies | 507 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:04 AM
    Fixed it up for you a little bit.
    34 replies | 326 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:02 AM
    William Barr, who was connected PEDOPHILE Jeffery Epstein, was in a position of extreme power.
    34 replies | 326 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:00 AM
    1) No they didn't. 2) Even if that was true (and it's not) then FORCE McConnell to go against a nominee that the grassroots GOP would accept and expose his true colors. 3) You can always go back if the first nominee gets shot down.
    34 replies | 326 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 07:12 AM
    First off, Ron doesn't want tariffs. He'll accept low, uniform tariffs as a less obtrusive alternative to other forms of taxation. To state that he wants them is wholly disingenuous. Secondly, the purpose of low, uniform tariffs is NOT to give an advantage to domestic producers. That's what protectionist tariffs desire. And they attempt to accomplish that at the expense of the American consumer. The purpose of low, uniform tariffs on all imports, regardless of product or nation of origin, is to provide the federal government with some minimal operating revenue so they don't have to resort to other forms of wealth extraction from the American public (income taxes, debt, currency devaluation). You can't just say all tariffs are the same and Ron wants them. That's a demonstrable lie.
    193 replies | 6458 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 06:24 AM
    Incorrect. A low, uniform import tariff on all goods entering our ports is completely different than high selective tariffs on certain products, from certain countries, based on the political clout of their domestic competition. The former is a less-obtrusive way for government funding. The latter is a socialist scheme intent on giving political favors at the expense of the American consumer and the economy. You know NOTHING about the philosophy of Ron Paul. You LOVE you some socialism as long as it's your dictator in control of it.
    193 replies | 6458 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 06:17 AM
    Funny watching SS deflect from the 100% factual content of the tweet to instead attack the tweeter. :D
    34 replies | 326 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 06:14 AM
    You should NEVER quote Ron Paul. You are deliberately misstating his position. Low, uniform tariffs as an alternative to taxing income are completely different than your socialist protectionist tariffs.
    193 replies | 6458 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:47 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Anti Federalist again.
    113 replies | 10681 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:39 AM
    He picked his own cabinet.
    34 replies | 326 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:34 AM
    Interesting. I found this: https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/91423 In their letter to UCLA, Perez and Cesena strongly objected to the idea that such brain imaging -- capturing the neurological response of gender dysphoria -- could provide any scientific data that could "help" trans people in the future. "It is suggestive of a search for medical 'cure,' which can open the door for more gatekeeping and restrictive policies and practices in relation to access to gender-affirming care," the letter stated. Feusner and Savic-Berglund, however, explained that "by demonstrating that body-self incongruence was linked to brain structure and function, we aimed to help provide a biological basis and increase empathy for the life stories of transgender individuals. From the beginning, the aim was to help increase acceptance of transgender individuals."
    371 replies | 34075 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:22 AM
    LOL. Everyone knows all of those allegations are factual. Hell, William Barr is one of the worse swamp critters ever. The deficit did go through the roof. Trump attacked Thomas Massie for trying to hold things in check. Trump tweeted AGAINST Florida and Georgia opening as soon as they did. And on top of that there's the bumpfire stock ban by executive order, the pushing for an assault weapons ban in 2002 and 2018, and the push for "take the guns first and then have due process" red flag laws.
    34 replies | 326 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:02 AM
    Interesting. 1780368520502804747
    34 replies | 326 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 04:58 AM
    Great video! Ron Paul's friendship with DK seems to have rubbed off.
    3 replies | 136 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 04:53 AM
    Road deaths per capita have been steadily going down as the U.S. population is steadily rising. There are more deaths total because there are more people total which means more people on the road.
    33 replies | 507 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 04:50 AM
    Okay. Let's go with your first premise, that there are more accidents these days. I looked it up. per capita there are FEWER fatal car accidents these days! If you start with a faulty premise you will never reach a correct conclusion. So here's MY why question. Why are we even talking about a problem that you made up in your head?
    33 replies | 507 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:00 PM
    Also from your own chart Haitians are much safer drivers that than Dominicans, but people from Cuba, Barbados, Trinidad, the Bahamas, are right in there with the white European countries for being safe drivers. Yet...for some odd reason they don't make your list. Why is that? (And based on the chart I provided they're probably safer drivers than white Americans.)
    33 replies | 507 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:44 PM
    :rolleyes: Your chart is silly because it has nothing to do with your point. Let's walk through your "thesis" if it can even be called that. 1) You "noticed" driving accidents going up recently. (You didn't include ANY data on that so we're just going off your gut on that). 2) You assume "it must be because of them immigrants." 3) You find a chart NOT OF ACCIDENTS BY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN IN THE U.S., but rather accidents by COUNTRY AS A WHOLE and ASSUME that somehow translates to your gut feelings in points 1 and 2. Why are accidents higher in certain other countries? Could it be bad roads? Could it be conflict? (If your car hits a landmine is that considered a driving accident or a post war casualty?) Could it be a lack of stoplights? Poor maintenance on cars in certain countries because of a lack of parts? Who knows! You just found a stat that goes with you hunch #1 and hunch #2 and by golly you're going to make some hay out of it garsh darnit! 4) You don't even LOOK at the ethnicity or country of origin of accidents by driver in the U.S. to see what's going on IN THE U.S.!
    33 replies | 507 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:01 AM
    I was a fan. Just a little less frequent on RPF these days. Dude. I'm feeling like Don Rickles being left out of Mad Mad Mad Mad World right about now. TOS FTW.
    73 replies | 949 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:02 AM
    33 replies | 507 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:33 AM
    You whole argument implodes based on facts that you can't disputed. In the FREAKING UNITED STATES Hispanics have lower fatality rates than whites period, end of story. Even from your own silly chart, Mexico is the same color as the U.S., yet you for some unknown reason only mentioned white countries and Japan. And Africans aren't driving the immigration rates right now. In fact Africans never have. Most immigrants are coming from Hispanic countries and Asian countries. It's not even close. Stupid argument is stupid.
    33 replies | 507 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:07 AM
    A) I'm surprised the cackling hens didn't all lay eggs when Dr. Phil dropped those truth bombs on them. B) It was fun to see Dr. Phil smack down Whoopi Goldberg's false assertion that the lockdowns were saving kids from COVID when VERY FEW school aged children died from COVID ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD! C) I wonder if he brought up the fact that other countries like Japan and Taiwan had better COVID outcomes WITHOUT closing down schools. D) The Washington Post reported back in 2016 that the Obama administration had turned children over to child traffickers. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/obama-administration-placed-children-with-human-traffickers-report-says/2016/01/28/39465050-c542-11e5-9693-933a4d31bcc8_story.html
    11 replies | 548 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:55 AM
    :rolleyes: According to this chart, Hispanics are safer drivers than whites.
    33 replies | 507 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:40 AM
    71237 replies | 1616761 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:37 AM
    Bumped for modern relevance.
    18 replies | 4032 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:36 AM
    71237 replies | 1616761 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:35 AM
    71237 replies | 1616761 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
48,742
Posts Per Day
7.91
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 08:55 AM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

41 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. billjston4 billjston4 is offline

    New Member

    billjston4
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. bv3 bv3 is offline

    Member

    bv3
  5. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  6. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  7. CaptUSA CaptUSA is online now

    Member

    CaptUSA
  8. Christian Liberty
  9. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  10. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 41
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast

04-16-2024


12-12-2023


08-29-2023


08-06-2023


08-03-2023


08-01-2023


07-21-2023


07-17-2023


07-16-2023


07-14-2023


07-12-2023


07-11-2023


07-10-2023


07-08-2023


07-03-2023


06-29-2023


06-26-2023



Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 415 1231151101 ... LastLast

04-18-2024


04-17-2024


04-16-2024


04-15-2024



Page 1 of 415 1231151101 ... LastLast