Tab Content
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 04:34 PM
    Start a journal. Set goals.
    5 replies | 72 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 03:51 PM
    Prancing around with a child firing shots at the stars in the country might draw a different conclusion than prancing into the streets of a city, while high or not, cavorting about with a child in your arms while discharging a weapon. Especially after your girlfriend called the cops on you worried you were a threat.
    31 replies | 365 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 03:16 PM
    Will probably go down as Tom Brady's most memorable Super Bowl victories.
    2554 replies | 89079 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 02:00 PM
    Newsmax folded like a cheap suit.
    98 replies | 562 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 12:32 PM
    Local news here has Second Strains Narrative repeating at hypnotic levels. I don't see it ending anytime soon. Face masks Save Lives! Double up is Even Better!
    8 replies | 217 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 10:42 AM
    Hunter and Empire Biden should be able to make a fortune off that.
    9 replies | 140 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Today, 07:01 AM
    we know. private poll is now public.
    43 replies | 1105 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:43 PM
    The people most at risk for dying from vaccine complications are the same people being prioritized to get the vaccine. SMH! The reason for "herd immunity" is you immunize people in the herd who can stomach the vaccine in the hopes that herd immunity protects the weak. Instead this sounds like a culling of the weak.
    7 replies | 205 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:20 PM
    jmdrake replied to a thread Rand 2024? in Rand Paul Forum
    Not disagreeing. Just disagreeing with the idea that the subset you mention represents 75 million people.
    53 replies | 1213 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:40 AM
    A Now. Post a single video that shows Ahmaud with a hammer or anything else in his hand after leaving the house. The burden of proof is on you. He grabbed the AR-15 after other people were shot. Ahmaud grabbed the shotgun after being hit by a truck.
    48 replies | 998 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:39 AM
    Joe was on top of this. He has been doubling down on the masks for a long time.
    23 replies | 498 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:27 AM
    He should use a plastic bag over his head.
    23 replies | 498 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    7 replies | 157 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:28 AM
    ^This is just asinine. To compare apples to apples, how is Lloyd Austin worse then General Mattis? (Hint. He's not.) Should Rand have voted against Trump's nominees? Principles >>>>> partisanship.
    54 replies | 1511 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:09 AM
    :rolleyes: Once again, do you think Ted Cruz would have not been confirmed. Yes or no. And Bolton wasn't the only horrible pick. Jeff Sessions for attorney general. Nikki Haley for U.N. ambassor. Mike Pompeo for secretary of state. The swamp list goes on and on.
    54 replies | 1511 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:03 AM
    Every video that I have seen of him leaving the construction site he is empty handed. If you have a video showing him with something in his hand as he is leaving the site please post it. As for what was supposedly seen in the road, have you never seen a piece of branch or tire tread in the road? None of the defendants have EVER claimed he was carrying something or dropped something. As for grabbing the shotgun, well this guy saved the lives of people in a waffle house by grabbing an AR-15. One of the men chasing Abrey actually side swiped him with the truck. It wasn't hard enough to disable him but that had to be scary. Under those circumstances it's not illogical to think your life may be forfeit if you DON'T try to disarm the assailant. So no. I don't support your theory on Arbery. But I don't think you should be banned for it nor do I think RPF should face liability over it.
    48 replies | 998 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 01:43 PM
    The CDC has updated the 2020 death toll to be over 3.3 million.
    4 replies | 276 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 12:14 PM
    A) It's not a "few exceptions." B) Define "rich." An NBA "millionaire" who makes his money from his salary is "rich" by some definitions of the word but the reason he pays such a high tax rate is that he makes his money from salary rather than corporate investments. Educate yourself about taxes.
    48 replies | 998 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 12:08 PM
    So you HONESTLY BELIEVE that if Trump had nominated Ted Cruz to be head of the NSA (just picking one name out of many that would have been better than Bolton), he would have had REPUBLICANS fighting him on that? SMH!
    54 replies | 1511 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 12:04 PM
    Trump was the last commie usurper that had his bad nominees approved.
    54 replies | 1511 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 10:02 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to belian78 again.
    9 replies | 390 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 10:00 AM
    Rand is the alpha male. Trump is the cuck. And Klobuchar didn't want to talk because she in 2019 signed onto a letter with Elizabeth Warren that Dominion voting machines may have stolen an election in Georgia in 2019 on behalf of Republicans. You don't change things by gassing up your followers with a phony "plan" to try to get people like Rand Paul and Mike Pence to overturn the election on January 6th after the electoral college already voted and the states had already certified the election, fraudulent or not.
    19 replies | 837 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 09:45 AM
    Sometimes using "multiple angles" is a good thing and sometimes not. If terrorists had hostages in a small enclosed space a sniper with a clear should would be a good idea. A Hellfire missile would not be. The issue is collateral damage. There is no collateral damage against websites like from the Sherman Anti Trust angle because, is not a trust. However you try to repeal, rewrite, or judicially re-interpret Section 230, there is risk to websites like and risk to freedom a speech. One way a website can avoid liability for controversial points of view that might be libelous is to do MORE of what Facebook and Twitter are currently doing.
    48 replies | 998 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 09:39 AM
    SMH. You are totally missing the point. It's not YOU that the forum would have to worry about. It's someone else who may not even be on this forum who reads something you wrote that the forum would have to be worried about! Let's take the Ahmaud Abrey case. People on this forum were claiming he was carrying a hammer or something right before he was killed. All of the actual video evidence proves that's false. But some people persisted in it. We are such a small fish in a big ocean that such libel isn't an issue. But it could be. Or take the Sandy Hook or Pizzagate conspiracy theories. Alex Jones already had to settle lawsuits on both of those. Say if EVERY web-forum that that allowed such conspiracy theories to be pushed were liable to being sued? Would that lead to more free speech or less? And don't kid yourself into thinking that can't happen. And you might say "Well those conspiracy theories are true." You have the right to believe that. That doesn't mean you won't lose in court for propagating them. Now, I like what you said here: "individuals are personally responsible....not platforms." That is exactly the point of Section 230! Exactly! 100%! A state court had held Prodigy Inc. liable for the content of an individual's post being libel against someone who wasn't even on Prodigy Inc. The court's reasoning? Because Prodigy Inc. had removed some offensive content, Prodigy Inc. was acting like a "publisher" and not a "platform." So either Prodigy Inc. had not moderate NOTHING in order escape liability (porn, child porn, prostitute ads, whatever), or Prodigy Inc. was responsible for EVERYTHING (user X saying that the local burger joint had a roach infestation). This is where TheCount has a better understanding of this issue than some here. Section 230 has never been about end user's ability to sue over their post being deleted or editorialized or edited. It's always been about whether some third party, that might not even use the service, can sue the platform over what what the users post. You're right in your gut thinking that such lawsuits shouldn't be allowed.
    48 replies | 998 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 09:13 AM
    Yeah....but sometimes people get banned for reasons that have nothing to do with violation of the political mission statement. In fact sometimes it's hard to figure out why someone got banned. The fallback argument is always "Well it's our private property so we can do what we want." Okay. That might not hold up under the new judicial review that regime that you want. In fact I'm CERTAIN it wouldn't hold up. There are too many examples of people who fully support the political mission statement in word and deed who have nonetheless been arbitrarily de-platformed here. Also nothing in the language of Section 230 even comes close to supporting the "political mission statement" exception.
    48 replies | 998 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-23-2021, 11:15 PM
    Please explain to me how to rewrite or repeal section 230 in a way that doesn't expose to liability.
    48 replies | 998 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-23-2021, 11:08 PM
    You mean like Jeff Sessions, Mike Pompeo and John Bolton? bad. Wrong administration. :rolleyes:
    54 replies | 1511 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-23-2021, 11:06 PM
    Hmmmm...."Good faith." Here's where things get sticky. Back in 2016 Facebook was hauled in front of congressional committees to answer for there "misdeeds" of "not reigning in Russian bots" that were "hacking the election." And of course the pressure is ramping up to "reign in" the "Q-Anon terrorists" that caused the January 6th "insurrection." Before 2016 the issue was how to stop ISIS from "radicalizing using social media." And no. It doesn't come down to section 230. That's a red herring. This very forum would not survive section 230 repeal. Not even a redefinition of "good faith." I explain that over and over again and nobody seems to get it. The problem with big corporate tech's big corporate tech. If Facebook had the size and scope of nobody would give a rat's ass how arbitrarily they ran their website. But they aren't that size and scope. They are a huge mega-corporation. Corporate person-hood is the problem. And when you have multiple corporations operating as a trust, sharing data and conspiring to control as much of the sector as possible, that's a violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust act. There is already a vehicle in place to deal with this situation that doesn't get into the impossibly vague question of WTH "good faith" means.
    48 replies | 998 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 09:43 AM
Join Date

38 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline


  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline


  3. bv3 bv3 is offline


  4. Cap Cap is offline


  5. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline


    Captain Shays
  6. Christian Liberty
  7. cjm cjm is offline


  8. Crowish Crowish is offline


  9. DGambler DGambler is offline


  10. DiverseSegregation
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 38
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More


The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More


Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More


Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts

By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


















Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


Page 1 of 281 1231151101 ... LastLast





Page 1 of 281 1231151101 ... LastLast