jmdrake
Member

True - but the real story here is the money-making scheme created by our government to bring in a bunch of culturally unassimilated people to use as indentured servants. BTW, that's YOUR money!

That sounds good but in reality people should be judged for who they are and what they do as individuals. I have known dirt poor people in third world countries that are awesome. Sometimes the only difference between abundance and poverty is circumstance beyond the individuals control.

Do they sell cat and or dog meat?

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Occam's Banana again. I 100% agree!

Interesting. TBH I rarely click on the "Invasion USA" thread because it's one of those threats that has been around a long time and I kind of feel like everything that can be said on the subject has been. But this story was new. And as I mentioned to AF, I don't think this thread blowing up here is significant as the fact that the cat story became the immigration narrative for the past week. J.D. Vance said he "created" the cat eating story to bring attention to the immigration issue. (His words, not mine. And I get he meant that he pushed this particular story as opposed to creating it out of thin air.) It reminds me of some of the more outlandish 9/11 conspiracy theories. Just "following the money" and/or looking at who the CiA was letting in to the country isn't as sexy as "Space lasers and/or drones painted as airplanes took down the twin towers." Immigration was already a big story this election cycle with Kamala Harris pretending that it was Republicans who started calling her the "border czar" as opposed to the MSM.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to acptulsa again.

This thread was 15 posts in before anyone (you actually) posted anything that countered the narrative and then it was only to say "Look! Bill Kristol says it's an urban legent so it must be true!" And TBH, this forum isn't really the issue as the election will not be won or lost here. But Trump / Vance took the advice of Nick Fuentes (and you) and "played to his base" and it's temporarily cost him momentum. I watched most of the J.D. Vance "Meet The Press" interview. Part of it he did well by distancing himself from some nutjob who had recently endorsed Trump and he had to do it repeatedly because the dishonest woman interviewing him kept asking the same question. (Pete Bootyjudge came on after him and brought up the same phony argument all over again). But Vance stepped in it talking about the cat video. Even worse on CNN he said that he "created the story" in order to focus attention on immigration. I know that's not what he meant, but it's what he said. He could have talked about the Venezuelan gang in Colorado. It's at least confirmed that they were forcing their way into an apparment while armed. (Not true that they had "taken over" the appartment however). But nope. We got distracted by "cats." How about J.D. Vance claiming Trump would "veto" a national abortion ban and Trump having to walk back that position in the debate? Trump and J.D. Vance have not yet talked about the possibility of federal abortion legislation? Why the hell not? Here's a better answer. "Certainly for the most part abortion should be left to the states. The U.S. did pass a federal abortion ban in 2003 for late term abortions but it didn't cover all procedures. It should be strengthened. Some states and the District of Columbia allow abortion at any time during pregnancy for any reason. Kamala Harris claimed she didn't support late term abortion. Will she stand with President Trump and I to support a federal ban on late term abortion? Also Trump supports access to IVF. Some states in their eagerness to ban abortion post conception have inadvertantly put IVF clinics at risk for wrongful death lawsuits. We need to come together as a nation and address that too." But nope. ^That would make too much sense.

Fair enough. "Prefered lesser of two evils candidate." Regardless he's part of the specific problem you complained about from outsourcing his own manufacturing to China to being under the influence of people like Larry Fink.

Gee. I wonder why they're so poor. Meanwhile also in Haiti. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna47398045 Gold! Haiti eyes potential $20 billion bonanza Its capital is blighted with earthquake rubble. Its countryside is shorn of trees, chopped down for fuel. And yet, Haiti's land may hold the key to relieving centuries of poverty, disaster and disease: There is gold hidden in its hills — and silver and copper, too.

Is there any difference between bringing in immigrants to work the stamp presses as i tis to outsource manufacturing to China like Trump did with his own products? But at least you're talking about real issues as opposed to whether the woman eating the cat in the video was Hatian (she wasn't but at least she was black) or if the man in the video eating a cat was Hatian (he turned out to be white). We've got nearly 300 posts now on a fake story. How many posts on Kamala Harris lying about not supporting late term abortion? This thread is like a cat chasing its tail. (I know that's dogs but that isn't in the thread title). Here's the proper way to address the mass immigration issue. Trump would be better off with Jimmy Dore as his VP.

Larry Fink wrote your savior Donald Trump's COVID economic rescue package before COVID was declared a world health emergency and Trump did everything Dr. Fauci asked him to do including downplaying the pandemic in February 2020 when Fauci was publicly calling the risk of COVID "miniscule" and then going along with Fauci htting the "panic" button and locking down the entire country in March. And now Trump took what was becoming a unifying issue against mass immigration and following Black Rock protege' J.D. Vance turned it into an unproven story about "eating cats" with J.D. Vance pushing a specific video that had already been debunked. You're being had dude. Love you but you're being had. Even black people were turning against the mass migration issue and they we get the fake cat story and you can't put 2 and 2 together to get 4. Go to this video at 2:30 in to see what I'm talking about.

Learn to quit being dishonest. And yet you can't bring yourself to call for the mass deporatation of over 217,000 Ukranians.

I find that Aldi in low income neighborhoods have many carts in the parking lots. The other day I went to Aldi. Upon approach of the door I noted a cart halfway pushed into the rack with it's quarter in it. I wasn't going to use a cart but decided to take it. This store has carts stored on both sides of the entrance. After turning the corner with my free cart, I noted 4 more carts just waiting to be stowed. I temporarily parked my free cart, and stowed the other 4 carts and pocketed the change. I imagined that had a person that left a cart by the door with money in it witnessed me stowing the cart and pocketing the money, they would confront me and tell me that the cart was for a needy person not for me to take the quarter. Anyway, I always make money off of Aldi carts.

On the same list, Italy is shown as more corrupt than Botswana, Bahamas and Barbados .

There's an entire list of countries and Russia and Ukraine aren't the only eastern European countries at the wrong end of that list. And I see you ignored the Thomas Sowell video as well as the race of the main criminals destroying civilization as we know it. (Bill Gates. Claus Schwab. Larry Fink. Dr. Fauci.) Hell, for good measure throw in George Soros too even though people will say "He's not white. He's Jewish." as if being Jewish was actually a race. (Yes. Whoopi Goldberg actually got that one right).

:rolleyes: Now you sound like black racist Idi Amin. Looking at the country corruption index you'll find Singapore listed as one of the least corrupt countries and Russia and Ukraine as some of the most corrupt countries. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023 It's no accident that Hunter Biden was on the board of a Ukrainian country.

I've yet to see a single documented fact that proves a Hatian in Springfield Ohio ate a cat. But if you find one please send it to J.D. Vance. I'm not the one tasked with carrying this story for the Trump administration. J.D. Vance is. He's your problem.

:rolleyes: ^This.

"We had to destroy the villiage in order to save it." Robert McNamara. "We had to ban the bump stock in order to unban it." SwordSmyth. I guess we need more police immunity to get rid of police immunity and more stop and frisk in order to get rid of stop and frisk and more red flag laws in order to get rid of ref flag laws.

:rolleyes: No it doesn't. Anti Federalist is honest. You are not. The fastest growing demographic group in America is Asian. They also have a stronger work ethic, better grades, higher median income and lower crime rates than white people. You don't want to see them coming in mass either.

What you call "attacking the entire issue" is what an honest person calls investigating the facts. So far you have none. Sorry, not sorry, to piss in your Cheerios. And I specifically refered to J.D. Vance on Meet The Press this week talking about a video 30 miles from Springfield Ohio that "proved" is point when it didn't prove his point. You calling that a "blunt instrument" is just you being ignorant. J.D. Vance actually had some halfway decent points in that exchange, but nobody is even talked about them because he stepped in it with a fake cat story that he doubled down on.

And I appreciate your honesty. This clearly has nothing to do with cats.

Bvllshyt. I"m not conflating anything. You are doing that. I specifically called out J.D. Vance for relying on debunked evidence. If he has better evidence he should come forward with it. Just because I'm not a cultist like you doesn't mean I support the MSM. That's a cultist thing for you to say. Tom Cruise is correct about psychiatric drugs but that doesn't mean that everything about Scientology is correct. It's still a cult. Same thing with people who can't simply say "J.D. Vance really stepped in it this time." They are cultists.

I agree with 99% of what you just said. But the Tim Pool story is important because it's part of a bigger picture of control of the media. We had Julian Assange prosecuted and persecuted for over a decade. We've recently had the head of Telegram arrested in France. We've had black leftists tried and convicted by a supposedly leftist grovenment for going to the U.N. and speaking out against African geonocide and speaking against the war in Ukraine based on the same "They were backed by Russia" allegation that's being hurled against Tim Pool. It's possible to walk and chew gum at the same time. I don't know where Tim Pool stands on the cat eating story, but if he is spreading it he shouldn't be prosecuted for it under some "Russian disinformation" fig leaf.

:rolleyes: Do you realize how stupid you sound? I specifically said J.D. Vance referenced the case that was debunked, then YOU said it wasn't debunked but admitted that it WAS debunked! It is impossible to prove a negative. The only thing people can do is demand evidence and then either affirm or debunk that specific evidence. J.D. Vance looks like a complete moron going on news shows talking about a specific piece of evidence that has already been debunked.

You totally have not called for the mass deportation of the Eastern Ukrainians. Let me know why you put up the petition for mass deporatation of Ukrainian refugees. I already told you I'd sign it you hypocrite.

Good opinion piece on "The Hill" about the biased fact checking. But the video clip accompianing is only one of Trump talking about somebody said a Haitian ate his dog. :rolleyes: https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4879842-false-claims-harris-trump-debate/ “You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.” That famous line from Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-N.Y.) remains a virtual mantra for politicians and pundits. Yet, judging from the presidential debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, we have officially entered the post-truth political era. ABC News has been widely criticized for the bias of the two moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir. Even liberal outlets acknowledged that the two journalists seemed inclined to “fact check” only Trump. In the meantime, they allowed clearly false statements from Harris go unchallenged.