Tab Content
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    12-10-2019, 07:33 PM
    Yeah, they know laws are meant for other people, just ask Hillery.
    41 replies | 485 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    12-10-2019, 06:46 PM
    Well, they are in the right country for that. Who knows how many laws there are? Just search the internet for 'Three felonies a day.' And we have people they call, lawmakers making more every year.
    41 replies | 485 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    12-10-2019, 06:39 PM
    Criminals don't care about laws.
    41 replies | 485 view(s)
  • TER's Avatar
    12-10-2019, 12:56 PM
    My belief that Q is legit is based on rational deduction, primarily based on Q's posting history, Trump's tweet history and actions during certain rallies. It is mathemetically improbable for Q not to be in cahoots with the Trump administration given the multiple proofs which have been revealed. I am not basing my belief about Q on some blind religious belief. Its strictly rational and based upon empirical facts. My original post above was replying to your constant mocking every time you believe some perceived 'bump' in the plan takes place. Especially when those 'bumps' are not bumps at all, but were expected by those who actually have put the time and effort to study the posting history of Q. For someone who thinks Q is a LARP, you sure like to post about it and mock those who believe it to be legit. Why would you do that? Either because you are a paid troll or because you are a sadist who enjoys mocking others. Maybe both? My mention of faith is because some are so easy to fall away because of some perceived 'bump'. They let emotions take over their rational mind and are so quick to forget everything in the past because of such perceived 'disappointment'. People who fall in to that later camp tend to not believe in God because in their pride and short-sightedness, they automically doubt when things dont go the way they wanted or expected. That is why your continual mocking has no effect upon me or those who actually know how to be patient and trust a plan and know how to trust those who have more knowledge and insight into the plan. You see bumps and failure, and I do not see any of that at all. In fact, I only grow more convinced. Especially when the likes of you and the corrupt MSM continue to bash Q. It only strengthes my resolve and confirms my suspicions.
    37 replies | 575 view(s)
  • TER's Avatar
    12-10-2019, 09:21 AM
    Excellent post and my sentiments exactly. Thank you. I am enjoying the show with you. God's will be done.
    37 replies | 575 view(s)
  • TER's Avatar
    12-10-2019, 09:19 AM
    I also reject the notion that in order to have faith in anything, you must have faith in everything. And I would counter that it is those like yourself who are indeed the guillible ones, and not the 'religious people' who have faith in God. For example, I don't believe there are more than two sexes, or that a man who removes his testicles is now a female, or that sodomy is a natural act, or that the earth will be destroyed in the near future because of man made climate change, or a myriad other things the atheist liberals like you have fantasies about and believe to be gospel. I have seen enough to acknowledge that Q is legit. That doesn't mean I believe Q is divine or that I worship Q. To make such pathetic straw man arguements just shows how weak minded you are.
    37 replies | 575 view(s)
  • TER's Avatar
    12-09-2019, 05:38 PM
    No, Q is not. Your question demonstrates your weak mind. The truth is that you don’t believe in God. Nor do you fear Him.
    37 replies | 575 view(s)
  • TER's Avatar
    12-09-2019, 02:04 PM
    I bet you don’t believe in God. Am I right? Those who believe in God are not so quick to lose faith like you. People who believe in God knows what it means to ‘trust the plan’. Nothing which is being revealed has dissuaded me from the plan. I always suspected that things wouldnt heat up until before the next Presidential election. Makes most sense to wait until then. I also was prepared for the media spin and the trolls to say this was a big nothingburger when in fact it wasn’t. It lays the groundwork for the attorney general now to come in and subpoena/indict. The problem with people like you are that you are weak- in faith and in character. I promise you those who have done evil will be judged, and if not in this fallen world, then before the judgment seat of God. So are my dreams shattered? LOL, not even close! I am still very much enjoying the movie and trusting the plan. Hard for someone with such lack of faith like you to understand. Sad actually.
    37 replies | 575 view(s)
  • TER's Avatar
    12-09-2019, 09:46 AM
    JohnGalt1225 Very much enjoying the video series! Thank you again!
    562 replies | 41158 view(s)
  • TER's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 10:04 PM
    .... Unwin found that when strict prenuptial chastity was abandoned, absolute monogamy, deism, and rational thinking disappeared within three generations of the change in sexual freedom. So how are we doing as we enter the second generation since our own sexual revolution at the end of the 20th century? As predicted, absolute monogamy has already been replaced with modified monogamy. Common-law relationships are becoming the norm. Although divorce occurred prior to the 1970’s, the mainstream of our culture still maintained the view that marriage should be for life, and common-law relationships were regarded with some distaste. That has clearly changed. Those who actually practice life-long commitments in marriage have become the minority, with couples born prior to the sexual revolution much more likely to maintain a life-long commitment in marriage. Deism is already rapidly declining, exactly as predicted. Prior to the 1960’s, a combination of rationalism and a belief in God was the norm for mainstream culture. Not only has belief in God greatly decreased since the 1960’s, but there has been a trend to remove the concept of God from government, the educational system, and the public forum. Those who still believe in God sense a strong societal pressure to keep deistic beliefs private. In its place, is a surprising rise in superstition, classified by Unwin as a “monistic” culture, two levels down from the rationalist culture we had prior to the sexual revolution. There has also been a huge increase in the percentage of the population that classifies itself as non-religious, a symptom of the lowest, “zoistic” level of Unwin’s categories. The swiftness with which rational thinking declined after the 1970’s is astounding. In its place arose post-modernism, characterized by “scepticism, subjectivism, or relativism” and “a general suspicion of reason”. But it gets worse … post-modernism is giving way to “post truth”. In direct contrast to rational thinking, a post-truth culture abandons “shared objective standards for truth” and instead, stands on appeals to feelings and emotions, and what one wants to believe. People can now “identify” themselves as something which flat-out contradicts science and rational thinking and, in many cases, receive the full support and backing of governments and educational systems. Not only do people feel they have a right to believe what they want, but any challenge to that belief, even if supported by truth and logic, is unacceptable and offensive. Here is a quote from Unwin that has become particularly a propos in the last couple decades since our own sexual revolution …
    6 replies | 737 view(s)
  • TER's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 10:00 PM
    https://frjohnpeck.com/why-sexual-morality-may-be-far-more-important-than-you-ever-thought/ Unwin examines the data from 86 societies and civilizations to see if there is a relationship between sexual freedom and the flourishing of cultures. What makes the book especially interesting is that we in the West underwent a sexual revolution in the late 1960’s, 70’s, and 80’s and are now in a position to test the conclusions he arrived at more than 40 years earlier. So what did he find? I have prepared a 26-page collection of quotes from his book that summarize his findings; but even that would leave you with a significant under-appreciation of the rigour and fascinating details revealed in data from 86 cultures. Here are a few of his most significant findings: Effect of sexual constraints: Increased sexual constraints, either pre or post-nuptial, always led to increased flourishing of a culture. Conversely, increased sexual freedom always led to the collapse of a culture three generations later.
    6 replies | 737 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 07:32 PM
    To me it is. It's the difference between helping your neighbor ward fight off thugs and being a thug yourself and kicking in the door. The only way to do what you are proposing from a policy perspective is to intervene in the hopes that it might work out and analyze it on the back end. Recipe for endless regime change wars right then. I take the position that it's better to either never intervene or in the worst case have some standard like going in when invited to defend an ally government rather than going in uninvited to overthrow an "enemy" government.
    179 replies | 3530 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 07:23 PM
    Clearly you are the one not reading the information provided. It's not that Trump didn't "fix" what Obama did. It's that Trump is moving forward continuing what Obama did. From Heritage.org. All the Trump administration has done is to move ahead with the process the Obama administration started. This process is about exports, so it has — it should go without saying — absolutely nothing to do with the availability of firearms in the United States. Nor does it change the fact that if you want to export firearms from the United States, you have to have both an export license from the U.S. and an import license from the country you are exporting to. If that other country doesn’t want to import from the U.S., no change in the U.S. export control system will allow a U.S. exporter to sell there. So Heritage is praising Trump for continuing what Obama was doing and stating that it had nothing to do with the availability of firearms for law abiding Americans. In other words...you got caught cherry picking again.
    252 replies | 3419 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 07:18 PM
    And Trump gave lip service to an assault weapons ban and red flag laws but thankfully backed off of them. However his "thought crime" proposal is as bad as a red flag law or perhaps even worse. As for convincing more voters to be pro-gun....I haven't seen evidence of Trump actually accomplishing that. But if he has then that's good news. Source? :confused: Where did you get that idea? Trump did a bumpfire stock ban. He didn't just talk about it.
    252 replies | 3419 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 07:14 PM
    Brains has nothing to do with it. It takes more brains to be a brain surgeon than it does to sell on eBay or buy rental property. Guess who pays the higher percentage of taxes? Business income is based on profit. It wouldn't be fair to tax someone on $1 million if it took that person $900K to generate that profit. That should be quite obvious to everyone. But once you acknowledge that fact, getting income down to zero becomes an academic exercise. That said, taxes shouldn't be based on income. Has Trump proposed abolishing the income tax? I have not seen that proposal. Please link if such a Trump proposal exists.
    60 replies | 911 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 06:55 PM
    Everybody can play by the same rules. Read Rich Dad Poor Dad Cash Flow Quadrant. Whether or not you pay taxes has nothing to do with how rich you are and everything to do with how you earn your money.
    60 replies | 911 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 06:53 PM
    Wrong. More cherry picking. Trump is continuing the program as of 2019. https://www.heritage.org/firearms/commentary/no-firearm-exports-arent-being-decontrolled Next?
    252 replies | 3419 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 06:27 PM
    You have REALLY bought the Trump kool-aid. Trump already passed tax reform. The smart rich still don't pay. And frankly it has nothing to do with how rich you are and everything to do with how you make your money. You should read Rich Dad / Poor Dad Case Flow Quadrant sometime. You sound just like a Bernie Sanders supporter.
    60 replies | 911 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 06:23 PM
    Biden won't survive the senate impeachment trial of Trump. And Elizabeth Warren is a deer in the headlights. She supports the same things as Bernie but without any of the charisma. Bootyjudge has a better chance than her.
    60 replies | 911 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 06:20 PM
    So Trump wants a system where he pays more taxes? Source? I know Warren Buffet is in the "Let's tax the rich" category. And Buffet is a leftist. Bezos didn't create the system either.
    60 replies | 911 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 06:18 PM
    Nope. I addressed the fake ammo conspiracy theory, the FFLs, the using of mental health records to take guns from vets, Fast and Furious, and the ban on import of Russian guns. I think that covered everything you brought up. :rolleyes: That isn't what I said. What I said was the the FFLs had no impact on Americans' ability to buy guns. Trump's bumpfire stock ban has had an affect on Americans ability to buy a previously legal gun accessory. Using your logic if Trump went forward with an assault weapons ban he would be a good on guns also long as people bought enough double barreled shotguns.
    252 replies | 3419 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 06:12 PM
    I didn't say it did. Every single person on planet earth is different. I pointed out that Trump gave the same "I'm jealous of rich people not paying their fair share" argument that the socialists you claim to hate so much also make. Then tell Trump to release his tax returns. I'm not mad at Trump or Bezos for not paying taxes. I admire both men for finding the loopholes. I want to be like them.
    60 replies | 911 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 06:08 PM
    Because just about everything you wrote is cherry picked bullshyt! I freaking busted your lies wide open on the issue of Obama banning Russian made weapons by pointing out not only that Trump expanded this, but that it had nothing to do with gun rights and everything to do with sanctions! I pointed out that even pro gun republicans have debunked the "Obama bought up the ammo to stop gun rights" conspiracy theory! FFLs? The second amendment says nothing about the right to sell guns, only the right to keep and bear them. Yes someone has to sell them for someone else to buy them but the fact that legal purchases of firearms under Obama increased by 158% proves that whatever happened with FFLs had no actual bearing on gun ownership! In fact the 158% increase in gun sales is the most likely cause for the so called "ammo shortage." You just full of crap...as usual. You've proven your own bias on the issue. You couldn't even give a "My bad...I was wrong" on the "Obama is worse because he banned import of Russian guns" issue. One more time. THE BANNING OF A GUN ACCESSORY BY EXECUTIVE ORDER IS THE WORSE VIOLATION OF THE 2ND AMENDMENT BY ANY PRESIDENT SINCE RONALD REAGAN EXPANDED THE MACHINE GUN BAN! Yes it's worse than Clinton's assault weapons ban because that had a sunset in it. Anti Federalist knows this. Just because you are in perpetual denial means nothing.
    252 replies | 3419 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 05:59 PM
    Trump complained because he doesn't pay taxes.
    60 replies | 911 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 05:58 PM
    The point that I was making is that Bernie Sanders is leading right now because Trump took down Joe Biden. Anyone with half a a brain knows that fact is not "garbage."
    60 replies | 911 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 04:29 PM
    SMH. I addressed the false particular statement that you made regarding burden of proof. That's all. So now you know that sometimes the burden of proof shifts. You're welcome.
    27 replies | 490 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 04:25 PM
    When did we bomb Cuba? I asked you that, you never answered the question, then you raise the claim again...and you claim you are acting in reality? :rolleyes: And why hasn't Iran attacked us? I mean if those evil mooselums are just sooooooo...violent. Except in th case of Syria and Libya WE FVCKING PARTNERED WITH SAUDI ARABIA TO DESTABILIZE THOSE COUNTRIES! So yes. There is blowback from the Saudis as a part of our joint terrorist actions with Saudi Arabia. We got the Saudis to partner with us to export jihad to Afghanistan for crying out loud. You don't think that has anything to do with our terrorist chickens coming home to roost? Nothing? Zilch? Nada?
    41 replies | 572 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 04:12 PM
    What part of "The burden of persuasion always rests with the prosecution" do you not understand? If I shoot you and claim self defense I typically have the burden of proving that affirmative defense. The burden of persuasion still rests with the prosecution. Edit: Here ya go. The U.S. Supreme Court from 1977. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11324761366859005935&q=%22affirmative+defense%22+%2B%22burden+of+proof%22&hl=en&as_sdt=3,43 We thus decline to adopt as a constitutional imperative, operative countrywide, that a State must disprove beyond a reasonable doubt every fact constituting any and all affirmative defenses related to the culpability of an accused.
    27 replies | 490 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    12-08-2019, 04:05 PM
    Wrong. A defendant may have the burden of proof of proving an affirmative defense. The burden of persuasion always rests with the prosecution. See: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/burdens-proof-criminal-cases.html
    27 replies | 490 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
42,229
Posts Per Day
9.24
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
12-08-2019 07:32 PM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

35 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  3. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  4. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  5. Christian Liberty
  6. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  7. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
  8. DGambler DGambler is offline

    Member

    DGambler
  9. Dr.3D Dr.3D is offline

    Member

    Dr.3D
  10. GigiBowman GigiBowman is offline

    Member

    GigiBowman
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 35
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

12-06-2019


08-10-2019


08-06-2019


07-28-2019


05-11-2019


03-21-2019


03-18-2019


02-16-2019

  • 12:47 PM - Hidden

10-25-2018

  • 03:48 PM - Hidden

10-24-2018

  • 02:19 PM - Hidden
  • 09:12 AM - Hidden

09-14-2018


09-13-2018


04-26-2018


04-25-2018


10-02-2017


09-07-2017


08-29-2017


05-04-2017

  • 04:05 PM - Hidden


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 199 1231151101 ... LastLast

12-08-2019



Page 1 of 199 1231151101 ... LastLast