Tab Content
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:38 AM
    It was determined at trial that the ringleader and the trigger man were two different people. If I plan a murder I'm just as culpable. As for group membership, it is fair to say that the actions of radical animal rights activists who don't mind killing in the name of their cause reflect on all radical animal rights activists who don't mind killing in the name of their cause. It is fair to say that the actions of radical Muslims who don't mind killing in the name of their cause reflect on all radical Muslims who don't mind killing in the name of their cause. It is fair to say that the actions of radical Catholics who don't mind killing in the name of their cause reflect on all radical Catholics who don't mind killing in the name of their cause. It is fair to say that the actions of radical Protestants who don't mind killing in the name of their cause reflect on all radical Protestants who don't mind killing in the name of their cause.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:32 AM
    So when president Trump stumps for bumpfire bans by executive order and assault weapons bans by legislation.....how is he buying us time? Thankfully on issues like that the feckless GOP leadership has shown a willingness not to follow Trump. I wish they would follow him when he is right like on criminal justice reform.
    9 replies | 125 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:25 AM
    The French were able trade with the indigenous Americans without savagery. Same with Roger Williams' purchase of Rhode Island. The savage Roman Empire was conquered through the opposite of savagery, namely Christian idealism. When the barbarian Germanic hordes overran the christianized Roman Empire, they soon became converted to it.
    102 replies | 1086 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:14 AM
    There wasn't one "killer." It was a group of killers and illegal immigration was their rallying point. If these were a group of vegetarian PETA radicals who killed some cattle ranchers I don't think you would even be debating what the motivation was. Not all who are against illegal immigration are for extrajudicial killing. So are for it as long as you killing happens when people are actively crossing the border. Some are against extra judicial killing altogether.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:09 AM
    LOL @ Van Jones running from Peter Schiff.
    21 replies | 102 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:07 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to jkr again.
    21 replies | 102 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:01 AM
    That's the way you do things. It's not the way I do them. Again, no hunters were shot on our property. And considering the race ratio where we live that was most likely smart of us. And also considering that we later needed these same trespassing hunters when we had a house fire, as they made up the volunteer fire department, not shooting them was also smart of us. Had they had a 9 year old with them, gun or no gun, if he wasn't actively shooting I me I wouldn't have shot him. That doesn't mean I don't support property rights. If you can understand that great. If you can't...well that's fine too.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:44 AM
    I think reasonable people can disagree about the wall. Ron and I are against it. You two and others are for it. I think there is a line where nativist sentiment turns violent and dangerous and that line should be called out. I don't think the people who cross that line are evil, just misguided by their own logic. Back to the wall. Do you understand why Ron is against it? It's not going to be "impersonal and inert" like the Great Wall Of China. It will be manned by human and electronic surveillance. It will split in half land owned by American citizens. (That's already happened). It won't stop the flow of illicit drugs coming through without inspection on NAFTA trucks. (Unless Trump changed that in his new NAFTA deal which everyone on both sides of the argument says is the same as the old NAFTA deal). And in a SHTF scenario, it can be used to box us in. Trump already added face scanning cameras at airports in the name of fighting illegal immigration. The very policies that you believe will protect your liberty can be used to take it away.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:32 AM
    Not to condemn it. To clarify it. For some extrajudicial killing of illegal border crossers isn't murder because "they broke a law." Since angelatc wants the context, here it is. So. Again, I don't believe in shooting unarmed children. Period. In their own house. Crossing my property. Crossing the border. I didn't kill adult hunters who were trespassing, I sure as hell ain't gonna shoot some kid. If that means I don't support personal property, okay. How extremely liberal of me. /sarcasm.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:21 AM
    Hmmm....I just looked that up. Sadly it looks like they are holding up the legislation because they want to include reparations for black people for the disproportionate effect of the drug war. https://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2018/09/black_leader_legalizing_weed_should_come_with_repa.html So...rather than stop the harm as soon as possible....use this as an opportunity to demand money. Yeah...makes sense. /sarc
    21 replies | 102 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:18 AM
    Is this in flight groper named Bill Clinton?
    2 replies | 45 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:15 AM
    Portugal decriminalized drugs but you can still get arrested in Portugal for drug trafficking. See: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/dec/05/portugals-radical-drugs-policy-is-working-why-hasnt-the-world-copied-it
    21 replies | 102 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:14 AM
    *sigh* You're fighting the wrong battle and beating the wrong dead horse and trying to flag down a ship that's already long sailed. The government already regulates marijuana. It's "regulation" is that it is illegal. The federal government "regulation" of drugs is based on a bad twisting of interstate commerce clause. The constitution had to be amended to prohibit alcohol and the same should have happened with drugs but didn't because of FDR, Wickard v Filburn and the new deal. Wickard v Filburn was quoted in the 2005 upholding federal prosecution of medical marijuana even in a state where it was legal. (See: https://www.cannalawblog.com/gonzales-v-raich-545-u-s-1-2005/) Legalization / decriminalization / whatever may be done represents a reduction in regulation, not the creation of it. Your argument would be akin to saying Trump shouldn't roll back EPA regulations on CO2 because...that means accepting more government regulation on CO2.
    21 replies | 102 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:05 AM
    If the shoe doesn't fit don't wear it. It's that simple.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:02 AM
    Except: A) A RPF member approved the killing in the name of border security because "they broke a law." B) Other members approved the idea of the killing as long as it happened on the border itself. C) The killers who did it, did it in the name of border security. D) If we were really talking about "invaders" (Red Dawn scenario), then it would be appropriate to break into the invaders homes and kill them. Now. You apparently don't approve of A or B. Fine. You don't. The shoe doesn't fit. Quit trying to wear it.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:57 AM
    It's not a strawman poll. Again, you apparently lack the intelligence to know what a strawman is. Golly. Maybe you shouldn't have assumed that a thread that wasn't about you somehow is. Then...you're a grown woman have have the full right to act retarded.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:56 AM
    That support what? Being against extra judicial killing? That's "squirrely leftist?" Ummm....okay. And for the record the reason Ron Paul said mass deportation is not practical is because it would require a police state. You understand that right? He's not saying "Oh it's just too expensive." Similarly he sees police state ramifications in border walls. Some of us aren't willing to sacrifice essential liberty for the illusion of security. I didn't say anything against deportations. The "strawman" is the one you are building. Border security is fine. But there has to be a limit. Mine is extrajudicial killing. Since you say you are for due process I will assume you are against extra judicial killing as well.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:52 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Influenza again.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:52 AM
    If you support due process then you are not on the same side as the RPF members I was addressing who claimed that if you don't support extrajudicial killing of people crossing the border then you don't support property rights. So...what the hell are you babbling about? The shoe doesn't fit. Quit trying to wear it.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:49 AM
    My poll came straight from conversations with people on this forum which means it is not a strawman. In fact.....I don't think you even know what a strawman is. For the record, a strawman is an argument that nobody has made. People here have made the argument that if you don't support private militias killing unarmed illegal immigrants then you don't support property rights. It is the closed border side that created the strawman. This poll exposes it. If the shoe doesn't fit, don't wear it.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:48 AM
    LOL. So quoting RP is "clutching pearls?" Really? You're just being obtuse and dishonest which is okay. I've seen you get that way on other issues. Ron Paul didn't say "We should do mass deportation but just make sure there is due process." And shooting an unarmed person crossing the border is not due process. I didn't call you out and say that you supported that because I have not seen any place that you do. So....why do you have your panties in a knot? Why defend an indefensible position that you didn't take?
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:44 AM
    The reality is you didn't answer the poll and now you are fabricating reality claiming that Influenza was trying to make you choose sides.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:43 AM
    Ron Paul 2015. On Trump's plan to round up and deport 15 million people: Ron Paul: How practical do you think this would be to round up 15 million people without any consideration for due process? McAdams: You’d essentially need a police state because you’d practically have to be going to go door to door almost, because they don’t keep track of these people. Ron Paul: I think it’s impossible.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:42 AM
    Ron Paul 2015. On Trump's plan to round up and deport 15 million people: Ron Paul: How practical do you think this would be to round up 15 million people without any consideration for due process? McAdams: You’d essentially need a police state because you’d practically have to be going to go door to door almost, because they don’t keep track of these people. Ron Paul: I think it’s impossible.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:41 AM
    In other words you are afraid to actually answer the poll. Got it.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:40 AM
    Correction. Your signature has part of Ron Paul's position in it. Leaving out the other part and pretending he didn't say it is dishonest on your part.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:39 AM
    Ummm....I support marijuana legalization but I would suggest you try being sober before posting. The people inside the house returning fire (the illegal immigrants) didn't moot the self defense point as they (not the vigilantes) had the right to self defense. The point that I was making to the nativist "if you don't support militias killing illegal immigrants you don't support property rights" position is that defending your property doesn't give you the right to kill someone just because they don't get off it fast enough. If they threaten you with physical harm then it is self defense. Understand now? Also what do you think of Ron Paul's "no border wall and no mass deportation" closed border position? I support it.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:33 AM
    It's a simple poll. You can vote your conscience or you can choose not to vote. And I will note that in your mind various border militias = organized crime. The motivation for the poll came from the dishonesty of the closed border nativists. Because I wasn't going to sign off on "Well should private citizens be able to shoot to kill to defend the border" argument I was falsely accused of not supporting property rights. But again, I have not generalized. I separated the "You can kill the 9 year old girl only when she is actively crossing the border" and "you can kill the 9 year old girl anytime" options. Edit: And for the record, I believe closed border and open border is being mis-used on the forum by you and others. Ron Paul is not for open borders. angelatc said so. And yet Ron Paul is on record being against the border wall and mass deportation.
    69 replies | 366 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:29 AM
    Who was not a saboteur? The battle cry of the revolution was "no taxation without representation" and when it was all over George Washington sent in the military to collect taxes from whiskey farmers who didn't want to pay taxes for a frontier army to fight the Indians when they didn't ask for that to happen.
    35 replies | 1176 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
40,629
Posts Per Day
9.77
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 10:39 AM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

35 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  3. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  4. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  5. Christian Liberty
  6. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  7. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
  8. DGambler DGambler is offline

    Member

    DGambler
  9. Dr.3D Dr.3D is online now

    Member

    Dr.3D
  10. GigiBowman GigiBowman is offline

    Member

    GigiBowman
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 35
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

09-14-2018


09-13-2018


04-26-2018


04-25-2018


10-02-2017


09-07-2017


08-29-2017


05-04-2017

  • 04:05 PM - Hidden

04-19-2017


04-16-2017


04-03-2017


03-26-2017


01-31-2017


12-20-2016


11-23-2016


11-21-2016


11-02-2016


10-15-2016


09-27-2016


06-21-2016



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 135 1231151101 ... LastLast

10-23-2018


10-18-2018



Page 1 of 135 1231151101 ... LastLast