Tab Content
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:39 PM
    Expect her to get another bump outta this. Such a shame.
    100 replies | 1186 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:24 PM
    Trump’s whole strategy was wrong going into this debate. He’s debating her. He should have just debated the deep state and kept calling her their latest puppet. And then every time she said anything, he could say, “yeah, this is what your handlers want you to say” and then move on to his plans and why the deep state hates him.
    100 replies | 1186 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:18 PM
    And literally opening herself up to, “yeah, Goldman Sachs and the Cheneys are backing you! Because you’re just a puppet for them!”
    100 replies | 1186 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:07 PM
    Right? Or censoring free speech? Or transgender woke crap. There’s so much, but he’s not hitting anything.
    100 replies | 1186 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:05 PM
    Maybe it’s just me, but feels like Trump is blowing this. He’s hitting all around the targets, but he’s so inarticulate trying to get the point across.
    100 replies | 1186 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:10 PM
    Thank you. You said it better than I did.
    62 replies | 1595 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:13 PM
    jmdrake replied to a thread Candace Owens in U.S. Political News
    And.......that video has now been taken down.
    114 replies | 9277 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:44 PM
    Snopes finds a way to say it's false: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-planned-parenthood/ "FALSE: You see, she left office 2 months before her team completed the work and brought the charges!!" Relevant pic tax:
    72000 replies | 1958551 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:34 PM
    Please provide evidence that this will do anything. They stopped voting in Ukraine - do you think the Ukrainian government fears its people? I work tirelessly against the leadership of the Depts of Energy and Transportation. My vote at the polls matters very little, but the people who are assigned to run those organizations matter a great deal. Granholm and Buttigieg or Secs selected with the help of RFK, Tulsi, etc.??? Heck, even Rick Perry was VASTLY better than Granholm. What about the Court? Gorsuch or Ketanji? It's very easy to sit back and say you don't care which people are running what, or that there shouldn't even be this department or that, and I'd probably agree with you on the latter. But in the real world, there will be people in these positions making decisions that affect your life. My vote won't decide which people get to decide, but I don't think that casting a lot is any worse than abstaining.
    62 replies | 1595 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:00 PM
    Rep. Massie: "I refuse to be a thespian in this failure theater." 9/9/24
    replies | 41 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:39 AM
    My introduction to James Earl Jones. You old African! I've found you! The second movie I saw him in.
    8 replies | 185 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:53 AM
    :rolleyes: Once again... "My guy" isn't running. Also, once again... There are WAY more effective avenues than voting. Also, also, once again... There IS going to be an administration running the agencies the next four years. There is a chance that the heads of these departments are gone and that the new heads could be chosen in part by RFK, Tulsi, and others. Placing a single lot on that side of the scale makes an infinitely small more of an impact than keeping my lot in my pocket. Neither option is doing much, but in the aggregate, both will have a greater impact than rewarding the incumbents.
    62 replies | 1595 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:31 AM
    That and in a way it doesn't matter who's president, democrat or republican, because they don't actually run anything. Kind of the opposite point PAF seems to think was being made. Glenn Greenwald isn't close to being a republican.
    14 replies | 415 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:22 AM
    Oh look. We have another case of someone who hates actual facts even when they aren't actually against the position he is trying to advance, that there are some cases of illegal immigrants voting, but they don't go bat guano crazy as what he would prefer. The Trump appointed AG in the Northern District of Aalbama actually got one indictment and rather than be happy about that you want to bitch about it. Typical. There are illegal votes, just not proof of millions of them. And there is reason to be careful in moving forward because white people who have been here for generations have been falsely put on the list.
    82 replies | 4486 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:08 AM
    Gentlemen, please take a listen to this: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?567950-Love-Loss-Liberty-and-Legacy-with-Rep-Thomas-Massie I'm not trying to convince you that you should vote. I am only trying to convince you that other good people can see some value that you may be missing.
    62 replies | 1595 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:40 AM
    Man, you really put a lot of importance on voting. I harbor no illusions that voting (or not voting) will save anything. That's not how our system works. But there is an opportunity, if enough people want to, to throw a monkey wrench into the cogs of the machine. It won't bring the whole machine down, but it'll upset the machine operators. That's worth 15 minutes of my day. ETA: I think what's really behind this is that you think not voting gives you some moral high ground and I'm threatening that concept of yourself. But really, you can do whatever makes you feel good. I'm just saying that just because everyone doesn't come to your same conclusion doesn't mean that they've been duped.
    62 replies | 1595 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:16 AM
    Two things can be simultaneously true. First, this two party system is corrupt to its core and elections are not going to fix it. Secondly, that one of these two parties IS GOING to be making decisions and hiring people and setting administrative policies that WILL affect our lives. So, while we're working on the first part, it does us no additional harm to try to leverage the second part as a way to break down the barriers of the first part. Remember, one of these administrations is going to have executive power for the next 4 years - that harm is already baked in. It's going to happen no matter who you vote for or if you don't vote at all. So, I'm taking that as a given and looking down at the second layer and asking myself, which administration gives us a possibility of throwing a monkey wrench into the cogs of the machine. Will it destroy the entire machine?! You'd have to be an idiot to expect that! But can it cause damage and fault lines that people will notice? There's a chance. Thinking that voting is some magic tool, rather than simply casting your lot, is just silly. If you don't want to cast a lot, or you want to write-in Ron Paul (like I usually do), or whatever else, that's great! But I'm taking a different tack.
    62 replies | 1595 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:00 AM
    Are you sure about that?
    62 replies | 1595 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:58 AM
    The last time we talked about this I landed on "He should have just Spartan kicked her." There's really no such thing as a "good shooting" in my book because something has gone wrong to get to that point. (I guess shooting a deer when you're hungry is a good shooting but that's besides the point). I think there should have been a trial of the officer who should Ashley Babbit or at the very a public adversarial hearing where he had to explain himself. I don't buy the "It's obviously murder" argument that Tucker Carlson and others gave who seem to always want due process and "wait for all of the facts" for every other officier involved shooting. (I'm not sure what Tucker has to say for the officer who has now admitted he shot Sonya Massie in the face because he took "I rebuke you in the name of Jesus" to be a threat.) As for the point of the Babylon Bee sketch, I get it. I'm just making a counter point. It's misleading. And everytime I've seen Fox News cover January 6th being "peaceful" the only show the peaceful parts. CNN only shows the violent parts. Same in reverse for the BLM protests. Dr.3D hit the nail on the head. There were two sets of protestors on January 6th. There were two sets of protestors for the BLM protests. Both sides have people who can honestly say that the protests they were involved in were peaceful. And I'm certain there were government provecetures who inflitrated both groups. And in both groups there were people who were not with the government who got carried away with the violence because they were gullible and impressionable. And that is how you divide and conquer. Go all the way back to the Tea Party protests which were followed by the Occupy Wallstreet protests. Both groups were made about the same thing yet both groups saw the other group as the problem. There is an old video that I can't find now of a Sarah Palin supporter who just couldn't believe Palin supported the banker bailouts. We're so easily manipulated it's not even funny.
    17 replies | 660 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:29 AM
    We need more Massies!!! Hopefully, his courage becomes contagious!
    3 replies | 178 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:22 AM
    Go ahead and refuse to play if that's the way you want to play it (see how you're still playing? "if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice") I won't disparage anyone for their strategy here. But we WILL have an administration setting rules and spending our money next year. I'm not a "lesser of two evils" type of person, but I know which administration will have a better chance of causing the machine heartache.
    62 replies | 1595 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:46 AM
    72000 replies | 1958551 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:45 AM
    72000 replies | 1958551 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:45 AM
    72000 replies | 1958551 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:44 AM
    72000 replies | 1958551 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:33 AM
    You laugh, but Trump should be up by 30 points in every swing state. The economy is in ruins, foreign policy is a disaster, invaders are flooding our borders, they tried to kill Trump and couped Biden, the dollar has never been more in jeopardy, and Kamala is an obvious puppet of the machine. And yet, it's still close. Because Trump SUCKS! Look, I want him to win, but damn he SUCKS!
    62 replies | 1595 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:20 AM
    That is a feature of an empire; not a bug.
    14 replies | 415 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    09-09-2024, 02:04 PM
    I was in between Nashville and Birmingham at the time and I don't disagree.
    17 replies | 660 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    09-09-2024, 12:51 PM
    January 6 was a two part project. One group of folks was bussed in to riot and cause mayhem, and the other group walked there while the riot was going on. I suspect the violent part was planned by the democrats and aided by government agencies. They knew there would be protests to the stealing of the vote. At one end of the building, they had a staged riot and damage. At the other end of the building, the doors were open and people were going in as if going on a tour. It was a trap and many got caught in it.
    17 replies | 660 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    09-09-2024, 08:56 AM
    So one false positive (that I know of) so far and one indictment so far. And this indictment is a federal indictment in the Northern District of Albama which, as I pointed out to Swordsmyth, is still occupied by a Trump appointee. See: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndal/pr/undocumented-individual-charged-connection-voting-fraud-and-passport-fraud#:~:text=Using%20the%20same%20false%20identity,and%20from%20Guatemala%20in%202022. We'll see how many of the 3,000 "alien voters" turn out to be false positives, how many turn out to be indictiments, and how many are never resolved one way or the other.
    82 replies | 4486 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
49,893
Posts Per Day
7.91
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 08:06 PM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

41 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. billjston4 billjston4 is offline

    New Member

    billjston4
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. bv3 bv3 is offline

    Member

    bv3
  5. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  6. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  7. CaptUSA CaptUSA is offline

    Member

    CaptUSA
  8. Christian Liberty
  9. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  10. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 41
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast

09-08-2024


09-05-2024


08-30-2024


08-26-2024


08-25-2024


08-23-2024


08-13-2024


07-26-2024


07-24-2024


07-11-2024


07-09-2024


07-07-2024


06-22-2024


05-29-2024


05-27-2024



Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 455 1231151101 ... LastLast

09-10-2024


09-09-2024


09-08-2024


09-07-2024



Page 1 of 455 1231151101 ... LastLast