Tab Content
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 07:08 PM
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-orders-halt-to-almost-all-u-s-foreign-aid/ar-AA1xOYbk?ocid=msedgntp&pc=LCTS&cvid=aa435886297f45cabe422519b0a38e5e&ei=13
    1 replies | 35 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 06:47 PM
    Yeah, I remember when I was born, the doctor said, "The baby has his mother's features and his father's fixtures."
    15 replies | 203 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 06:32 PM
    Can't even get a blow job.
    15 replies | 203 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 03:39 PM
    He want's to end FEMA and is letting Pro Life Protestors out of jail!
    7 replies | 116 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 03:05 PM
    I don't know. What would happen if somebody was visiting USA and gave birth?
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 01:47 PM
    James, do Matt Vaeth next!! https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-vaeth-497862179/
    2 replies | 48 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 12:50 PM
    I read somewhere that he's also pulled in the Air Force. Instead of just running daily training missions for nothing, there'll be several flights per day to the offending countries. Let's say he wants to deport 2 million in the first year... (seems like an achievable goal given the bluster) That's like 5,500 people per day. Lots of flights to make this happen!
    3 replies | 54 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:29 PM
    I have watched EVERY episode of Stargate SG1 (and the spin offs as well....and all of the movies). One of the plot lines is that an alien race decides to conquer earth by offering them vaccines that cause cancer but at the same time sterilize the humans so that over time we just all die off. What did Bill Gates say about vaccines and overpopulation? Bill Gates donated 1 million to Trump's inauguration.
    7 replies | 144 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    7 replies | 144 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:05 PM
    Deport Elon Musk for hating Steve Bannon.
    2 replies | 58 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:17 PM
    Whatever. With the issues of this site I am not going to reply again on the topic. Here is what I am saying and this isn't about what you or I think. It is about what a court rules. There is some legislation somewhere in existence that is already written on how to deal with asylum seekers. I don't know what it is or where to find it. I would imagine that to satisfy a court people that were already permitted into this country by the last administration need to go thru due process. If you think they don't, I would disagree with you. I am going to say if it goes to the SCOTUS, there will be rules that must be followed regarding those people that were approved by the last administration and allowed entry. In my opinion there is no way the SCOTUS is going to let them just be rounded up and deported. No everyone that just crossed illegally, they could probably just be deported. That is all I have to say.
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:11 PM
    Man, he's really on a roll. I hate to get too optimistic - these bureaucrats aren't too keen to pay any attention to these orders. Legislation is better. Congress needs to get busy!
    3 replies | 65 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:54 PM
    Empire... Deep state... Bureaucrats... whatever you want to call them. They are already trying to undermine Trump's Executive Orders. Just like last time. In his last administration, Trump met with my old CEO, got an agreement on some energy policy, then as soon as Trump left the room, his "staffers" immediately walked back the agreement, tried to tell my CEO that he misunderstood, and slow-rolled the policy which never materialized. Already, the Executive Order to halt the IIJA and IRA spending is being "reworked" by staffers. They're trying to keep the spigot of your tax dollars flowing. The temporary OMB Director is giving industry guidance basically telling the special interests that they can count on this money still rolling out and that the EO was a "symbolic gesture". Then, there's this:
    2 replies | 48 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:20 PM
    I am really liking Trump. Lots of progress today!
    16 replies | 4743 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:08 PM
    I would think that there is standing protocol for the process of people seeking asylum. Whatever that is will need to be followed or new protocol that follows the intent of the laws the original protocol was based on.
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:51 PM
    Please share your thoughts on the issue.
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:50 PM
    I would think that there is standing protocol for the process of people seeking asylum. Whatever that is will need to be followed or new protocol that follows the intent of the laws the original protocol was based on. I would also think that would be the fastest method. If new legislation on the issue were to go thru congress, it could be a long time. I would think they know the rules they are supposed to follow and streamline them to make processing simple and fast. Furthermore, I would think the laws didn't favor Biden's goals or the processing would have already been done and all these people would be citizens or legal residents already instead of purportedly being overwhelmed with hearings 10 years in the future.
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:04 AM
    That is all I have been saying. I think for those that just crossed illegally they can get thrown out. Those invited in with app or those with pending hearings, they will need to be processed. The key, streamline that process. Call up people that thought they had 10 years and tell them to report next Friday. Failure to report will result in deportation. Something like that. Have army of processors ready to immediately hear and make ruling. Goodbye. End of story.
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:51 AM
    72433 replies | 2899875 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:48 AM
    72433 replies | 2899875 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:10 AM
    My Guess is they would need to be legally processed. Schedule their hearing, deny their asylum, and evict them. End of story. Simply rounding them up and throwing them out is not going to happen. Just my opinion.
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:24 AM
    My guess is a court will see it as US policy at the time and will step up to protect those that came here under the invite. The real solution is to have streamlined processing so everybody seeking asylum gets their case heard as soon as the get picked up. Disagree all you want. You cannot invite people to come here and then uninvite them. Whether Biden was lawful or not is not the fault of those that came. I don't like this one bit. But, I think you are an idiot to not consider that it is a strong possibility that those promised asylum or given an app to get here will not be processed according to the terms they entered.
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:52 AM
    My guess is it will be ruled that people that were invited in and allowed to enter under Biden administration cannot just be thrown out. People that crossed without those apps or authorization can be deported. I think a good strategy would be to hold extremely quick review of status and make rulings on those people allowed to enter. You cannot just discard those you invited here.
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    01-22-2025, 02:52 PM
    Trump put all government DEI employees on paid leave beginning tomorrow. That's a good start, but I wonder how many of them would love nothing more than paid leave for the next 2 months.
    44 replies | 1013 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    01-22-2025, 01:32 PM
    Maybe. My guess is if you got out your gun/rifle and demanded they leave and packed their schite and threw it on the sidewalk, and then they called the police, it might not turn out as you would like.
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    01-22-2025, 01:20 PM
    " The situation regarding immigration policies under the Biden administration, particularly those involving the use of applications or parole programs for entry, is complex and subject to various legal frameworks. Here's a breakdown: Legal Entry vs. Asylum Claims: Legal Entry via Apps or Parole: Programs like the use of the CBP One app for scheduling asylum appointments or humanitarian parole for specific nationalities (like for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans) aim to provide legal pathways for migrants to enter the U.S. under certain conditions. These are not just "come one, come all" policies but structured programs with eligibility criteria: CBP One App: This app allows migrants to schedule appointments for asylum processing at ports of entry, aiming to manage migration more orderly. Those who enter through this method are in the legal process of seeking asylum. Humanitarian Parole: This is temporary permission to enter the U.S. for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. Parolees are legally allowed to stay for a specified period but are subject to conditions of their parole. Legal Protections:
    3 replies | 113 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    01-22-2025, 01:15 PM
    Maybe. I don't know. "In Texas, if you invite someone to stay overnight at your home and they refuse to leave the next day, the process of removing them isn't as straightforward as "throwing them out." Here's how the situation might unfold based on Texas law: Initial Invitation: When you invite someone as a guest, you're implicitly giving them permission to be on your property for a limited time. Revoking Permission: If the guest overstays, you can verbally ask them to leave. If they agree and leave, the issue is resolved without legal intervention. If They Refuse to Leave: Short-Term Stay: For very short-term guests (like someone who was just supposed to stay overnight), you might be able to call the police for assistance. If the person has no legal right to stay (i.e., they've overstayed the invitation and you've clearly communicated your desire for them to leave), law enforcement might treat this as trespassing. However, police are often cautious in these scenarios, not wanting to misjudge a tenant for a guest. Potential Tenant Status: If the person has stayed long enough or has established residency (which could be as short as a few days if they've shown intent to live there by changing their mailing address, paying rent, or contributing to household expenses), they might be considered a tenant under Texas law.
    50 replies | 549 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
50,866
Posts Per Day
7.90
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 05:07 PM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

41 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. billjston4 billjston4 is offline

    New Member

    billjston4
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. bv3 bv3 is offline

    Member

    bv3
  5. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  6. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  7. CaptUSA CaptUSA is offline

    Member

    CaptUSA
  8. Christian Liberty
  9. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  10. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 41
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast

11-14-2024


11-06-2024


10-30-2024


10-27-2024


10-26-2024


10-25-2024


10-21-2024


10-20-2024


10-17-2024


10-14-2024


10-03-2024


09-19-2024


09-18-2024


09-16-2024


09-15-2024


09-14-2024


09-08-2024



Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 488 1231151101 ... LastLast

11-29-2024


11-28-2024


11-27-2024


11-26-2024



Page 1 of 488 1231151101 ... LastLast