• The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    Today, 11:44 AM
    This specifically says land force.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 10:43 AM
    Fixed. Buck Rogers is in for an unpleasant suprise when he wakes up ...
    20 replies | 308 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 10:16 AM
    I don't think that would work. If you had been born in that universe, then I bet you'd be saying exactly the same thing about other stuff that we don't have in this one ... (I suspect there's some kind of conservation principle at work here.)
    12 replies | 237 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 10:00 AM
    Are you sure you want to give an Injun access to your firewater?
    116 replies | 1466 view(s)
  • Todd's Avatar
    Today, 09:48 AM
    I used to be an avid reader of books. 6 to 10 a year. I don't think I've finished one in the last 4 years. Now there are other factors such as I am much more busy and my life is not the same as it was then, but I'm certain my smart phone has made my ability to concentrate much worse.
    5 replies | 113 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    Today, 09:27 AM
    I'll be signing up, and if you give me a referral code, they'll give you a bonus. Also any advice from experienced lyfters is appreciated.
    0 replies | 43 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    Today, 09:08 AM
    I thought about that, but the only way to divide it would be to separate "would consider" and "committed to voting Trump no matter what happens." Since an election over a year away is hypothetical anyway, I figured no one would even quibble. Turns out someone else on the forum is as obsessed with completeness and symmetry as I am.
    67 replies | 754 view(s)
  • Suzanimal's Avatar
    Today, 05:11 AM
    I used to set my bag in the urinal until Mr A explained what it was. I thought it was a little sink to wash your hands if you had a water bottle.
    20 replies | 308 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:42 AM
    Because you understand the Constitution better than they guy who actually wrote it. Got it. :D
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:34 AM
    called. it. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523327-Trump-to-start-US-Space-Force&p=6642262&viewfull=1#post6642262
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:22 AM
    And before you make a snide remark about flintlocks and quill pens, the Framer's original intent was that the right to bear arms extended to the equal armament common to military use, and the original intent of freedom of speech extended to all manner of expression. Whereas the original intent of the Army was a land based combat force, and the Navy a sea based combat force. Original intent is a thing. maybe you should look it up.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:18 AM
    Voyager sent linguistic messages in all human languages.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:17 AM
    The Constituion clearly authorizes two Departments. Army, and Navy. This covers land and sea. If they want a force for the Air, they need to amend the Constitution. If they want a force for Space, they need to amend the Constitution. Original Intent. The Framers did not originally intend aircraft and spaceships.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:08 AM
    .... until there is a 'public' on Mars, which seems to be in the works as we speak, so his point remains.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:06 AM
    lol! out of ammo...
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:05 AM
    You don't get to wish whatever you want into the Constitution. The Constitution authorized two branches. An Army branch and a Navy branch. Any military force must either reside under one of the two Constitutionally authorized branches, or a Constitutional Amendment must be made to amend the Constitution to authorize a third branch. This isn't rocket science, and I know you are smarter than this. Is this deliberate, or is this just an example of Trumgasming?
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:58 PM
    So yeah, you are claiming to understand the Constitution better than the guy who wrote it. James Madison wrote in The Virginia Report, 1800, by the Virginia House of Delegates, that the Sedition Act was unconstitutional.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:54 PM
    All of this was during James Madison's Presidency. Again, the guy who actually....wrote....the Constitution: From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Marine_Corps#Establishment_of_the_modern_Marine_Corps
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:51 PM
    You should demand a refund from your history professor. That base in Georgia that James Madison established in 1811 for Marines to operate out of? Yeah, you didn't know anything about that at all, did you?
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:50 PM
    LMAO! James Madison wrote the Constitution, but Swordsmyth here understands it better than the guy who...you know...actually wrote it... John Adams signed the Act into law to form the Marines in 1798. James Madison served 1809-1817 and continued to utilize the Marines in 1811. Clearly the guy who wrote the Constitution thought they were Constitutional.... Because they were organized under the Constitutional Department of the Navy. smdh.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:43 PM
    No, the Army and Navy provisions are organizational. The Army Air Corps was organized under the Department of the Army. The same people who wrote the Constitution also created the Marine Corps and put them under the Department of the Navy. Are you claiming that the same people who wrote the Constitution did not know how to understand the words that they, themselves wrote?
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:41 PM
    The Marine Corps was raised up by an Act of the Continental Congress on 10 November 1775, and then again in the Constitutional era on 27 March 1794. The Marines were used extensively as an “Army Afloat” for amphibious raids and land marches like the assault on Derna right from the start. Their role did not actually depend on the Navy from the origins of the organization. If what you were claiming was correct, then Congress would have formed the Marines as a “Water Army” branch instead of putting them under the Department of the Navy in order to retain full Constitutionality. The proper method of Constitutional interpretation is Original Intent. The same people who wrote the Constitution had already dealt with the formation of another kind of military branch, and we can see that original intent in that act. Only two military departments are authorized in the Constitution. If you want more than two, amend it. I happen to agree that that we need an Air Force. Until we amend the Constitution, it needs to remain under the Department of the Army.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:23 PM
    Why not have 80 Departments of the Army? You are doing the the exact same bizarre interpretation dance that gave us the FDA, Department of Education, the Drug War, Wickard v Filburn and more. That’s not the way the Constitution is supposed to work. You can’t just retcon whatever you want into the Constitution. That’s how the Swamp operates.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:18 PM
    That sounds like justification for anything you can dream of. After all, the drug war is just a function of interstate commerce, right? Sorry, words have meaning. You don’t get to run around changing the meaning of words in order to shoe-horn whatever the hell you want I to the Constitution. That’s how the left is trying to neuter the Second Amendment. “Regulated” and all that. Article 1 Section 8 authorizes ONE Army and ONE Navy, so even if we took your absurdity as an “Air Army” it still doesn’t work. The provision is organizational, not connotative. When it was the Army Air Corps it was under the Department of the Army and therefore Constitutional. In order to become it’s own organizational branch it requires a Constitutional Amendment. This should be blatant on it’s face. Don’t get carried away by wishful thinking.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:05 PM
    Just because the government does it, doesn’t automagically make it Constitutional. In order to have a US Air Force that is not the Army Air Corps, requires a Constitutional Amendment. If you seriously got an Air Force out of Article 1 Section 8, then I don’t think I’ve got anything to help you.
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:03 PM
    And I’m the a-hole for recognizing it in 2015....
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:56 PM
    Pretty sure this requires a Constitutional Amendment...
    86 replies | 705 view(s)
  • Suzanimal's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:01 PM
    Voted for the spotty dress.
    9 replies | 403 view(s)
More Activity

56 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Awww...you changed your avatar. I like it. You've got great expressions. You also look very handsome. Is that a vest? I like vests. Men don't wear them enough.
  2. View Conversation
    I'm a lazy stalker. I need you on my friends list to keep up.
  3. View Conversation
    Your cats?
    Where the hell are you?

  4. View Conversation
    Better video.

  5. View Conversation
    Just out of curioisity, what exactly about "anarchism" do you disagree with? Mind you, I'm talking about philosophical anarcho-capitalism, not "anarchism" in the sense of no law and order of any kind. Were you using the term in the latter sense when you said you disagreed with it?

    What distinction do you see between voluntarism and anarcho-capitalism, if any?
  6. View Conversation
    Yes, it does. And it will for a short spell, and then they'll go right back to it. Correct; Attack; Claim Victimhood - that is the M.O. They've admitted that Christianity is a warzone, and they believe that they aren't doing God's work unless they are sowing discord and reviled.

    Get ready for phase three: victimhood, they are going to claim it.
  7. View Conversation
    You have no true foundation, Glen!!! Now prostrate yourself before Christ and beg for mercy! Oh wait, that's what I'M supposed to do. smfh! LOL.
  8. View Conversation
    No wait. I'm the one who got the spelling wrong!
  9. View Conversation
    G. Edward Griffin still has you on his unfiltered news under Campaigns for Freedom!:

    Glen Bradley, running for North Carolina Senate.

    And he spelled your name wrong too! Nevertheless, that was quite an honor! Those are all old though. He really should update it.

    http://www.realityzone.com/currentperiod.html
  10. View Conversation
    I do have to wonder how far up your ass your shorts would be if you *didn't* agree with me on the Subway thing.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 56
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
About GunnyFreedom

Basic Information

Date of Birth
September 11, 1973 (44)
About GunnyFreedom
Biography:
Constitutional Originalist with a strong Government Reform platform
Interests:
Technology, communications, computers, networking, automation.
Occupation:
Former State House Rep Opposed by Karl Rove
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Political / Activist Bio:
Constitutionalist forever, alone until 2007. Discovered Ron Paul and found others like me who believed in the Constitution. Went full speed ahead and never looked back.

Canvassed three states as a grassroots volunteer for Ron Paul in 2008, Delegate to the 2008 State Convention for Ron Paul.

Won County GOP Vice Chair in 2009.

Won State House in 2010, and served one two year term before being redistricted out.

Ran for NC State Senate in 2012.

Canvassed two states as a grassroots volunteer for Ron Paul in 2012, Ron Paul Delegate to the RNC in 2012.

Ran for Vice Chair of the NC GOP in 2013.
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
9
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
9
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Campaign Manager
Copywriters:
Collateral Writer, Speech Writer, Editor, Language Skill, Proofreading, Typing, Researcher, Reporter
Graphics:
Graphic Artist, Graphic Designer, Photographer, Collateral Printer, Sign Printer
Computer and Technical:
WebMaster, Unix Guru, SQL/Database Expert, Scientists and Engineer, Telecommunication
Transportation:
Driver

Signature


“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
32,226
Posts Per Day
8.36
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
56
Most Recent Message
09-28-2016 05:46 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 10:13 AM
Join Date
11-28-2007
Referrals
3
Home Page
http://glenbradley.net/

64 Friends

  1. 1stvermont 1stvermont is offline

    Member

    1stvermont
  2. aliceleuchte aliceleuchte is offline

    New Member

    aliceleuchte
  3. April1775 April1775 is offline

    Member

    April1775
  4. asimplegirl asimplegirl is offline

    Member

    asimplegirl
  5. Bill M DC Bill M DC is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Yahoo to Bill M DC
    Bill M DC
  6. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  7. BrendanWenzel BrendanWenzel is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Skype™ to BrendanWenzel
    BrendanWenzel
  8. brooke499 brooke499 is offline

    New Member

    brooke499
  9. Bryan Bryan is offline

    Admin

    Bryan
  10. cajuncocoa cajuncocoa is offline

    Banned

    cajuncocoa
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 64
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
View GunnyFreedom's Blog

Recent Entries

North Carolina Governor Beverly Perdue vetos HB2 Health Care Freedom

by GunnyFreedom on 03-05-2011 at 06:05 PM
Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
She lectures the State and then posts her veto on YouTube.

See our brazen Governor lecturing us on why government knows best. A mandate of wage slavery to Big Corporate HMO is now pursuant to the US Constitution (never actually explaining how) and illegitimately invokes Article 6 to veto the Healthcare Freedom Act. Support HB2 for healthy government!



I will be the first to stand for a veto override.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Glen Bradley Webdomain Update 12/23

by GunnyFreedom on 12-23-2010 at 07:00 PM
We are working on a community network that enhances the services, duties, and abilities of a State Legislator to affect the will of his district into law.

By developing a community caucus and integrating it with physical town halls and events, a new level of transparency will be achieved that will hopefully lead America back into the 21st century of Freedom.

Your help is vital to this project. We will need volunteers and funding. This is technically a "campaign activity"

Read More

Updated 12-23-2010 at 07:01 PM by GunnyFreedom

Categories
Uncategorized

S.510 Food Safety LIVES!

by GunnyFreedom on 12-19-2010 at 09:19 PM
Beware! Using a procedural trick, the US Senate late Sunday night unanimously added the Food Safety Bill back into the new Continuing budget resolution. It returns to the House in the exact text they sent it for consideration and a vote.

So says Jamie Dupree.

A major food safety bill that had almost been given up for dead was suddenly revived in the Senate late on Sunday evening, and may be ready for House approval as early as Tuesday.

In a parliamentary

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Glen Bradley Legislative Agenda Strategy 2.0

by GunnyFreedom on 12-19-2010 at 06:31 PM
Bouncing off the Liberty community, and given the death of S.510, I have refined the proposed agenda another step. I think it's now about one refinement prior to press release, and dissemination.

Quote Originally Posted by Glen Bradley
Food Safety Modernization just died in the Senate Omnibus bill, but I think Farmer's Freedom Protection Act is still critical. Rather than blocking a given law, let's define the relationship between State food producers and Federal regulatory power.
NC Electoral Freedom Act, An Act enabling

Read More

Updated 12-19-2010 at 07:48 PM by GunnyFreedom

Categories
Uncategorized

North Carolina Farmer's Freedom Protection Act

by GunnyFreedom on 12-13-2010 at 04:18 AM
Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
I just submitted a bill to the Bill Drafting department. They are waiting until the finalized version of S.510 is produced in order to detail what protections exactly are needed, but we should have the NCFFPA ready to file extremely early -- during the first week if not on the first day.

The basic idea is to specify via the 10th Amendment that all foodstuffs produced in and remaining within the borders of the State of North Carolina are not subject to Federal law or Federal regulation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

03-28-2018


03-25-2018


03-24-2018


02-22-2018


01-27-2018


11-04-2017


10-11-2017

  • 09:32 PM - Hidden

05-02-2017


03-31-2017


12-28-2016

  • 02:44 AM - Hidden

11-08-2016


09-11-2016

  • 07:53 PM - Hidden
  • 07:52 PM - Hidden

09-08-2016

  • 03:45 PM - Hidden

09-07-2016

  • 02:59 PM - Hidden

08-22-2016


08-12-2016


07-09-2016


04-20-2016



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 97 1231151 ... LastLast

06-19-2018


06-18-2018


05-24-2018


05-23-2018



Page 1 of 97 1231151 ... LastLast