• Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 05:40 PM
    How it started: How it's going:
    8 replies | 578 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 07:23 AM
    More credible: 1. Trump and Swordsmyth or 2. Tom Massie
    51 replies | 4589 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 07:16 AM
    The only thing preventing him from trashing Massie is the fact that everybody here would kick him off the board if he did. No doubt Swordsmyth is looking in every cupboard and every crack in the board, trying to come up with something tangible - to no avail.
    292 replies | 12630 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 07:10 AM
    Trump has not uttered a single word about the money being given to NGOs even though some of us in the know know all about it. Instead, he wants to do what he does best - spend more, more, more money without addressing the underlying problem. Seems all of the people that Trump endorsed was even responsible for passing that pathetic bill.
    292 replies | 12630 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 06:41 AM
    Not only did Trump want to suspend the Constitution when Tom Massie wanted a roll count on that Covid Cares Act, he wanted to suspend the Constitution yet again over the election.
    51 replies | 4589 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 06:32 AM
    And what's with the Federally Funded Nationwide "Stop and Frisk" with Local LEO Immunity that Trump is now touting? He goes from violating the 2nd Amendment right to the 4th. I'm sure Swordsmyth will have a reason for that too.
    562 replies | 45996 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 06:23 AM
    He didn't. And now Trump even wants to build the GREATEST DOME EVER. Trump: “We’re giving billions of dollars to other countries so they can build a dome. But we don’t have a dome ourselves. We’re going to have the greatest dome ever.” I'm sure Swordsmyth will tell us why we must fund the Military Industrial Complex further.
    36 replies | 699 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:47 PM
    What, 24/7/365? Will he have that amount of time to listen to him? And/or will he take Rand's advice 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 30% of the time?
    51 replies | 4589 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:42 PM
    Yes, according to me. I don't subscribe to "Fair Share" commie philosophy. Even if you do :rolleyes: Did you know that one can balance a budget of $10,000 the same way that one can balance a budget of $500 Trillion?
    17 replies | 317 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:28 PM
    THREAD: Trump Bans Bump Stocks
    51 replies | 4589 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:24 PM
    You see, if the law is clear, then people might know what it is. And if people know what the law is, then they might try to get around it. So to prevent that, the law needs to be vague and inscrutable to anyone who isn't a government bureaucrat. That way, government bureaucrats will be free to decide if and when to apply it "on a case-by-case basis".
    562 replies | 45996 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:16 PM
    Even aside from the "Fair Share" garbage, it's garbage.
    17 replies | 317 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:13 PM
    https://x.com/shannonrwatts/status/1801975437381316721 They're coping and seething and seething and coping ... The Group Helping the Supreme Court Rewrite America’s Gun Laws Is Worse Than the NRA https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/06/supreme-court-nra-gun-laws-bump-stocks.html {Dahlia Lithwick & Mark Joseph Stern | 15 June 2024}
    562 replies | 45996 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:50 PM
    "The opinion was written by Justice Thomas" https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1801621025093788144 :cool: FPCGear.com https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1802375575253692640
    562 replies | 45996 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:24 PM
    Corrupt "Super Mayor" ATTACKS Children https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/corrupt-super-mayor-attacks-children:c {Actual Justice Warrior | 15 June 2024} In this video I discuss the "Super Mayor" taking revenge on the Park's District that she has had a long standing dispute with. Sources: Local Segment On Auto Show: https://youtu.be/DBk5vKtffkI New Segment: https://youtu.be/fKKscy64jvM
    56 replies | 4051 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:12 PM
    Oh, the "Fair Share" BBA again :nauseated: By Publius Huldah Why the “Balanced Budget Amendment” is a Hoax – and a Deadly Trap You can not responsibly support a proposed Amendment to Our Constitution unless you have read and understand the proposal and how it would change our Constitution. You must look behind the nice sounding name! Will the Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) really “rein in” the federal government? Will it really “show them” that they have to balance their budget the same as we do?
    17 replies | 317 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:48 PM
    Jones' willful disobedience of court orders may justify the making of a default judgement against him, but it doesn't justify the egregious degree of the damages awarded after that default judgement was rendered (especially if they end up including Jones' social media accounts - see below). And in any case, whatever the degree of damages (whether egregious or not), they are supposed to represent liability incurred for defamation, not liability incurred for disobeying the court (which liability was already accounted for in the making of the default adverse judgement). So, no - any egregiousness of the awarded damages is not warranted by Jones' disobedience, the proper remedy for which, depending on the kind and manner of disobedience, is something along the lines of "contempt of court" or, in the limit, adverse judgement by default (which is what happened in this case). If they are so concerned about recovering damages from Jones, then why are they trying to deprive Jones of his ability to "promote new business ventures"? It makes absolutely no sense to seek to recover damages by imposing conditions that are explicitly specified to be for the purpose of delimiting Jones' ability to exercise a means of earning the resources required to be able to pay those damages. Pray tell, how does deliberately impairing Jones' ability to "promote new business ventures" redound to the benefit of the plaintiffs or of their chances of recovering damages? And of what possible value are Jones' social media accounts, anyway, if they are no longer owned or controlled by Jones? I wouldn't be surprised if just the mundane and routine legal costs involved in depriving Jones of ownership and transferring it to someone else are more than the accounts are even worth without Jones behind them. Such a process appears to be aimed, not at compensating the plaintiffs for damages, but at applying a surreptitious kind of "prior restraint" by impeding or preventing the defendant's ability to publish anything at all (including things having nothing at all to do with the original defamation). It's like suing an old-fashioned newspaper for defamation, and then, after winning the suit, demanding that ownership of the newspaper be granted to the plaintiffs (or the state) in order to "deplatform" the publisher. But at least in the case of an old-fashioned newspaper, the physical plant of the newspaper would at least continue to be worth something significant even if ownership was seized and transferred. That is not the case for Jones' social media accounts, the seizure of which seems to be motivated by the desire to punitively silence him, and little or nothing more (it certainly won't serve to help make the plaintiffs whole in any significant way). And what is to happen if, after seizing Jones' social media accounts, Jones simply creates new ones (which will, of course, end up being more valuable than the seized ones, by virtue of the fact that they will be Jones')? Are such new accounts then to be seized as well, under the same justifications? If not, then what is the point of having seized his previous accounts (which would now be of little if any value)? If so (which seems must be the case, if the justifications for the previous seizures are to be accepted), then how would that not dovetail perfectly with the claim that "hey won't stop until Jones' 1st Amendment rights are taken away" (your reply to which is still a non sequitur), whether one actually believes that claim or not? Jones being held liable for defamation does not in any way obviate (and is not mutually exclusive of) a deliberate attempt to exploit that holding of liability as a means of squelching Jones (especially given the feds' self-admitted proclivity for "nudging" things in the direction they desire).
    45 replies | 1196 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:50 AM
    1802176863554392203 https://x.com/dylanmallman/status/1802176863554392203?s=46
    11 replies | 1261 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:19 AM
    by Kyle Anzalone June 14, 2024 The Russian leader said there could be an immediate pause to hostilities. Russian President Vladimir Putin laid out four conditions for Ukraine that he said would lead to an immediate ceasefire and, ultimately, an end to the conflict. According to the Kremlin, Kiev’s neutral, non-aligned, non-nuclear status and the lifting of all Western sanctions are necessary conditions for ending the conflict. In a speech to the Russian Foreign Ministry on Friday, Putin said that if Ukraine withdraws its forces from the four regions annexed by Moscow – Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson – then he would order a halt to operations and begin negotiations to end the war.
    6 replies | 258 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:37 AM
    If Biden wins, will it be because “stolen election”? If Trump wins, will it be because “stolen election”?
    2 replies | 421 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:40 AM
    PAF replied to a thread War is Gay in Grassroots Central
    As we both know, that's the whole entire point of walls and entry points; it funnels them for processing. It only benefits the government while we get to pay for it all. God forbid if anybody escapes being a government-owned subject "asset".
    95 replies | 32165 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:24 AM
    PAF replied to a thread War is Gay in Grassroots Central
    Actually that's not true: ``Sec. 3. (a)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this title, every male citizen of the United States, and every other male person residing in the United States, between the ages of eighteen and twenty-six, shall be automatically registered under this Act by the Director of the Selective Service System.
    95 replies | 32165 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:26 AM
    Anti Federalist , isn't it amazing, that now these "let's pretend we are republicans" are fully advocating citizen-to-IRS accountability and "everybody must pay their fair share". He even snuck in "uni-party" as if he isn't one of them :tears: I remember a time when immigrants would come in to work for a wage based on employee/employer contract rights, even under the table, and then go home off-season, until "Republicans" got mad that they weren't "paying their fair share" and "Funding the Fed". Regarding signing up to "vote" with Driver "Licenses" even though the workers are not engaged in "interstate commerce", consider it Blow-Back caused by government intervention and people embracing it .
    212 replies | 33428 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:24 AM
    Anti Federalist , look at that! They are not complying even though he won! Amazing how that works! Thomas Massie: "Noncompliance Is More Effective Than Voting"
    145 replies | 696 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:14 AM
    Voting is .gov's way of obtaining their subjects consent and to suppress any sense of individuality rather than: Thomas Massie: "Noncompliance Is More Effective Than Voting". Do you actually think that they are going to eliminate the IRS based on your "I Voted!" sticker? Or would there be a better chance of that happening once people do not comply. I don't remember a "vote" taking place across the country when people got fed up enough to stop wearing masks. What about town ordinances? You might even have some kind of town ordinance where burning permits exist to only allow burning between 02:00-07:00pm on Saturdays. If people in that town refused to comply, wouldn't that be more effective than voting? Yet, instead, you will cast a vote and comply no matter what the outcome is. Voting is nothing more than surrendering and offering your compliance. But here, I'm sure that you would rather dig into this lol
    2 replies | 210 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 04:39 PM
    https://www.infowars.com/posts/illegal-aliens-receiving-voter-registration-forms-across-u-s-republicans-move-to-stop-it/ Full article at link. --- The only way the Decepti-crats can win is to STEAL elections by BREAKING THE FUCKING LAW.
    2 replies | 210 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 09:58 AM
    Who said there was? :confused: Such statements do nothing to substantively rebut the claim that "they won't stop until Jones' 1st Amendment rights are taken away". On the contrary, the fact that they are seeking to seize Jones' social media accounts - despite and in addition to the fact that Jones has already been adjudicated liable for defamation (and egregiously so, at that) - indicates that they indeed "won't stop won't stop until Jones' 1st Amendment rights are taken away". That the article referenced in the OP explicitly states that "the families on Wednesday asked a U.S. bankruptcy judge in Houston, Texas, to additionally take control of Jones' X.com account and prevent Jones from using it to promote new business ventures" (bold emphasis added) only serves to reinforce that indication (especially given that Jones is unlikely ever to discharge even a significant fraction of his adjudicated liability if his ability to "promote new business ventures" is impaired).
    45 replies | 1196 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 09:40 AM
    Who Owns the Arctic?
    7 replies | 294 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 09:34 AM
    If he didn't make the difference and they were going to win anyway, then what do they owe him a favor for?
    113 replies | 4088 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 08:35 AM
    Ron Paul Institute by Dennis J. Kucinich Jun 14, 2024 Our government is planning a big draft, conscripting millions of young Americans for an even bigger war! I call to your attention a Democratic amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which was slipped into the almost trillion-dollar Pentagon war spending bill, by voice vote, in the House Armed Services committee. The Democratic Amendment to H.R. 8070, the National Defense Authorization (NDAA) reads:
    7 replies | 341 view(s)
More Activity

57 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    How are you?? Do you see these?
  2. View Conversation
    Awww...you changed your avatar. I like it. You've got great expressions. You also look very handsome. Is that a vest? I like vests. Men don't wear them enough.
  3. View Conversation
    I'm a lazy stalker. I need you on my friends list to keep up.
  4. View Conversation
    Your cats?
    Where the hell are you?

  5. View Conversation
    Better video.

  6. View Conversation
    Just out of curioisity, what exactly about "anarchism" do you disagree with? Mind you, I'm talking about philosophical anarcho-capitalism, not "anarchism" in the sense of no law and order of any kind. Were you using the term in the latter sense when you said you disagreed with it?

    What distinction do you see between voluntarism and anarcho-capitalism, if any?
  7. View Conversation
    Yes, it does. And it will for a short spell, and then they'll go right back to it. Correct; Attack; Claim Victimhood - that is the M.O. They've admitted that Christianity is a warzone, and they believe that they aren't doing God's work unless they are sowing discord and reviled.

    Get ready for phase three: victimhood, they are going to claim it.
  8. View Conversation
    You have no true foundation, Glen!!! Now prostrate yourself before Christ and beg for mercy! Oh wait, that's what I'M supposed to do. smfh! LOL.
  9. View Conversation
    No wait. I'm the one who got the spelling wrong!
  10. View Conversation
    G. Edward Griffin still has you on his unfiltered news under Campaigns for Freedom!:

    Glen Bradley, running for North Carolina Senate.

    And he spelled your name wrong too! Nevertheless, that was quite an honor! Those are all old though. He really should update it.

Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 57
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
About GunnyFreedom

Basic Information

Date of Birth
September 11, 1973 (50)
About GunnyFreedom
Technology, communications, computers, networking, automation.
Former State House Rep Opposed by Karl Rove
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Political / Activist Bio:
Constitutionalist forever, alone until 2007. Discovered Ron Paul and found others like me who believed in the Constitution. Went full speed ahead and never looked back.

Canvassed three states as a grassroots volunteer for Ron Paul in 2008, Delegate to the 2008 State Convention for Ron Paul.

Won County GOP Vice Chair in 2009.

Won State House in 2010, and served one two year term before being redistricted out.

Ran for NC State Senate in 2012.

Canvassed two states as a grassroots volunteer for Ron Paul in 2012, Ron Paul Delegate to the RNC in 2012.

Ran for Vice Chair of the NC GOP in 2013.
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Campaign Manager
Collateral Writer, Speech Writer, Editor, Language Skill, Proofreading, Typing, Researcher, Reporter
Graphic Artist, Graphic Designer, Photographer, Collateral Printer, Sign Printer
Computer and Technical:
WebMaster, Unix Guru, SQL/Database Expert, Scientists and Engineer, Telecommunication


http://glenbradley.net/share/aleksan...nitsyn_4-t.gif “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
11-21-2019 11:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
05-02-2022 08:27 PM
Join Date
Home Page

65 Friends

  1. 1stvermont 1stvermont is offline


  2. aliceleuchte aliceleuchte is offline

    New Member

  3. April1775 April1775 is offline


  4. asimplegirl asimplegirl is offline


  5. basilstaples basilstaples is offline

    New Member

  6. Bill M DC Bill M DC is offline


    • Send a message via Yahoo to Bill M DC
    Bill M DC
  7. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline


  8. BrendanWenzel BrendanWenzel is offline


    • Send a message via Skype™ to BrendanWenzel
  9. brooke499 brooke499 is offline

    New Member

  10. Bryan Bryan is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 65
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
View GunnyFreedom's Blog

Recent Entries

North Carolina Governor Beverly Perdue vetos HB2 Health Care Freedom

by GunnyFreedom on 03-05-2011 at 06:05 PM
Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
She lectures the State and then posts her veto on YouTube.

See our brazen Governor lecturing us on why government knows best. A mandate of wage slavery to Big Corporate HMO is now pursuant to the US Constitution (never actually explaining how) and illegitimately invokes Article 6 to veto the Healthcare Freedom Act. Support HB2 for healthy government!

I will be the first to stand for a veto override.

Read More


Glen Bradley Webdomain Update 12/23

by GunnyFreedom on 12-23-2010 at 07:00 PM
We are working on a community network that enhances the services, duties, and abilities of a State Legislator to affect the will of his district into law.

By developing a community caucus and integrating it with physical town halls and events, a new level of transparency will be achieved that will hopefully lead America back into the 21st century of Freedom.

Your help is vital to this project. We will need volunteers and funding. This is technically a "campaign activity"

Read More

Updated 12-23-2010 at 07:01 PM by GunnyFreedom


S.510 Food Safety LIVES!

by GunnyFreedom on 12-19-2010 at 09:19 PM
Beware! Using a procedural trick, the US Senate late Sunday night unanimously added the Food Safety Bill back into the new Continuing budget resolution. It returns to the House in the exact text they sent it for consideration and a vote.

So says Jamie Dupree.

A major food safety bill that had almost been given up for dead was suddenly revived in the Senate late on Sunday evening, and may be ready for House approval as early as Tuesday.

In a parliamentary

Read More


Glen Bradley Legislative Agenda Strategy 2.0

by GunnyFreedom on 12-19-2010 at 06:31 PM
Bouncing off the Liberty community, and given the death of S.510, I have refined the proposed agenda another step. I think it's now about one refinement prior to press release, and dissemination.

Quote Originally Posted by Glen Bradley
Food Safety Modernization just died in the Senate Omnibus bill, but I think Farmer's Freedom Protection Act is still critical. Rather than blocking a given law, let's define the relationship between State food producers and Federal regulatory power.
NC Electoral Freedom Act, An Act enabling

Read More

Updated 12-19-2010 at 07:48 PM by GunnyFreedom


North Carolina Farmer's Freedom Protection Act

by GunnyFreedom on 12-13-2010 at 04:18 AM
Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
I just submitted a bill to the Bill Drafting department. They are waiting until the finalized version of S.510 is produced in order to detail what protections exactly are needed, but we should have the NCFFPA ready to file extremely early -- during the first week if not on the first day.

The basic idea is to specify via the 10th Amendment that all foodstuffs produced in and remaining within the borders of the State of North Carolina are not subject to Federal law or Federal regulation.

Read More

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast







  • 02:58 PM - Deleted Posts


  • 09:16 AM - Hidden





  • 10:27 PM - Hidden
  • 09:19 PM - Hidden


  • 08:21 PM - Hidden





Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 124 1231151101 ... LastLast













Page 1 of 124 1231151101 ... LastLast