• Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 02:38 AM
    I was going to say more about this in that post, but it seems to have slipped through the cracks, so I'll just tack it on here: Just because they like to invoke the phrase "free trade" in their rhetoric, or stick it into their euphemistically-titled edicts (such as the "North American Free Trade Act"), don't let them gaslight you into thinking that they in any way support or endorse (or have any interest at all in) actual, genuine free trade, or that their policies really have anything to do with it. Their cynical and manipulative use of the term "free trade" is every bit as empty and bogus as their use of terms such as "affordable care" and "inflation reduction" (vis-à-vis the "Affordable Care Act" and the "Inflation Reduction Act", for example) - and for exactly the same reasons. Whenever they say "free trade", what they actually mean is "managed trade". Actual, genuine free trade absolutely does not require the implementation of multi-thousand-page documents (unless those thousands of pages are nothing more than a list of myriad rules and regulations that are to be abolished and replaced with nothing at all). IOW: Buchanan was right to oppose NAFTA - but he did so for the wrong reason:
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 12:33 AM
    LOL - they did the meme: American democracy was "literally shaking". :tears: And when their supporters donate more in order to offset the offset - what then? Fine them again? And then again? And ... ? (Leave it to the government to indulge in self-masturbatory circle-jerks and call it "justice".)
    6 replies | 137 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:56 PM
    Have the red flag laws been overturned? I guess the folks down there either don't mind, or haven't made it clear enough to whoever holds office. I'm not making light of this. But for too long, people have been sacrificing their rights; Red flag, Patriot Act, NSA, TSA, Massive Spending. Perhaps instead of waiting for politicians to do something, this will be a wake-up call for the People to do something. IMO, politicians are representative of the people, either people who support such "laws", or because they are too complacent.
    42 replies | 1833 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:07 PM
    Truth: Nowadays, you yourself, A/F, can identify as anything that you want. Cash in. lol
    7 replies | 164 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:45 PM
    John Kerry says US farmers must radically transform food production to meet 'net zero' emissions goals by 2030 "We can't get to net zero, we don't get this job done, unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution." https://thepostmillennial.com/john-kerry-says-us-farmers-must-radically-transform-food-production-to-meet-net-zero-emissions-goals-by-2030 Libby Emmons (28 May 2023) Biden's Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, former Senator John Kerry, made a stunning revelation earlier this month when he spoke about the need to transform the way food is produced in order to lower emissions. The new crusade for climate activists is to reduce emissions that are a result of food production. "A lot of people have no clue that agriculture contributes about 33 percent of all the emissions of the world," Kerry said, "depending a little bit on how you count it, but it's anywhere from 26 to 33. And we can't get to net zero, we don't get this job done, unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution. So all of us understand here. The depths of this mission." First they came for fossil fuels and the energy sector, now they are coming for our sustenance. "The largest source of anthropogenic methane emissions is agriculture, responsible for around one quarter of emissions, closely followed by the energy sector, which includes emissions from coal, oil, natural gas and biofuels," the IEA states.
    25 replies | 2548 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:24 PM
    20 replies | 471 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:40 AM
    Obama sold more than anybody. Guns ain't going anywhere. But, ok. Next!
    42 replies | 1833 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:34 AM
    I never expected an answer, I form those myself. I believe I asked you to cite a source that I can reference in case I missed one. You are one of the most aware and liberty grounded on this forum and I always enjoy reading your posts. I am not sure where you even got that impression? For the "record", you are among my favorite posters :-)
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:25 AM
    You proclaimed him to a defender of the Bill of Rights. I merely pointed out that if he's actually serious about defending those rights, then he should at least have an answer to the question you asked. (You seemed to expect me to have an answer for it, and I'm just some random schmuck on the Internet, not a major POTUS candidate.) If that makes me an agent of "division" ... well, okay, whatever. I don't even know what that's supposed to mean - but it doesn't negate or nullify anything I've said.
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:07 AM
    I know that "let it not be said that I did nothing", but, I give up :mouthopen:
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:59 AM
    But would it be legal? And would you risk buying one :D
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:49 AM
    Say wha??? jmdrake, this thread was about "tariffs", which I am 100% against, even if RFK supports them. I am not a single issue decider; Anti-abortion, he gets my vote! Pro-gun, he gets my vote! He hates democrats, he gets my vote! I look at the entire records, and if records are not available due to not having held office, what issues are being addressed that have an impact on liberty, freedom and fiscal responsibility. RFK is addressing corporate/lobby and legislative capture. He is addressing the corrupt pharm and military complexes. He is trying to explain that corporate polluters can actually care about the environment and without poisoning people, while advocating a true Free Market system. Whether we actually get there is for the People to decide. He is trying to get it through to everybody that if we can re-unite as Americans and actually talk about issues, we can stop digging ourselves deeper.
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:14 AM
    Sometimes, the less said the better. As a pretty decent left-"libertarian", he is trying to garner support from the democrats. Here we go with "division" again, Occam's, right on this very forum lol
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:05 AM
    Go ask RFK, Jr. If his "defense" of the Bill or Rights is really serious, then he should be able to tell you (or at the very least, he should be proclaiming that we ought to be allowed to have the teeth necessary "to defend against such tyranny"). And if he can't (or he isn't), then he's not really serious, is he?
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:05 AM
    I love ya too, jmdrake, but think about the bold for a moment . Guns ain't going anywhere in this country. It's another distraction point away from the real and underlying issues.
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:56 AM
    As much fun it is to play with stuff and eat like like that, I'm more into "changing the hearts and minds" as Ron Paul advocates. I'm still hoping RFK will be a uniter, and get folks to understand that corporate capture/lobbyists are the ones driving everything that is happening in government, ie: Fascism/Global Control.
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:44 AM
    Well, I did say that I'm not too worried - not that I'm not worried at all. ;) Far be it from me to gainsay the people of Connecticut if they see fit to consign themselves fully to the mercy of politicians and bureaucrats (and their enforcers). There would still be that problem of logistics, though. No doubt there would be a good deal of "law abiding" compliance - but that doesn't necessarily mean there would be "enough" compliance. And even if there were, prophylactic reaction outside CT is sure to be galvanized by any draconian enforcement inside CT - in which case: so much the worse for CT, and so much the better elsewhere. If anything, it would just be that much more impetus for self-segregation and separation.
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:40 AM
    Yep. Come to the farm, we can show you the same, except we have 50 feet of home-cooked food for before, during and after. But I am sure that you know as well as I do, what "hoops" and "payment" to fed.gov is involved. I was referring to the commonfolk People. Like, where can one buy that stuff over the counter as easily as they can buy a dozen hot-wings tonight? SWAT Team: they have 6 pea-shooting guns in the house! We need to use the Battering Ram! And trust me, if/when they approach a compound with the equipment shown in that video, Fed.Gov will have no problem sending out the troops with no restrictions on size and number at all.
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:22 AM
    That's nice, and likewise I am happy for you. Now, because I like big teeth, aside from the 9mm pea-shooters that you are allowed to have out of appeasement, where are all of those machine guns, tanks and grenade launchers that the commonfolk People can use to defend against such government tyranny?
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:15 AM
    Wow, jmdrake, that's a lot. So allow me to sum it: You can not legislate morality. But if a child is harmed in any way, sexually, slave labor, or otherwise, there are laws already on the books. The accused gets a court date, a jury, and a verdict. You as an attorney should know that. Government(s) "banning" will do nothing but drive things underground, and as a byproduct in the case of banning entire countries, affect innocent by-standers who have no involvement. This may sound contradictory to you and perhaps some others, and if it is; I am staying grounded that outside of family and local community, the federal government's role is not to decide/enforce moral behavior. If you personally want to ban, then ban.
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:39 AM
    That's nice. I'm happy for you. And for the record, I'm not too worried that RFK Jr. or anyone else is going to be coming for all our guns (if only as a matter of practical logistics). But if it's all the same to you, I'm not going to give a whole lot of credit to any defense (or defender) of the Bill of Rights in which (or for whom) a full-throated advocacy of the principle behind the 2nd Amendment does not figure prominently front-and-center. The right to keep and bear arms as the ultimate recourse against tyranny is the wellspring of the effective defense of all other rights, and any defense of those other rights that cannot be bothered to make clear and emphatic reference to the critical importance of the right to keep and bear arms is simply not to be taken seriously. Such "defenses" are merely pleasant-sounding but empty words coming from a mouth with no teeth.
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:15 AM
    It's a comparative thing. That's why I qualified my characterization of Kennedy as "the most anti-establishment of all the notable candidates". Granted, that's a pretty low bar, relative to the other notables - but your points 1 & 2 are pretty big things that you, I, Rockwell & DiLorenzo can all agree upon, and I think that goes a long way towards explaining Rockwell's regard for Kennedy as a "legitimate and promising 'alternative' candidate", despite any disagreements over the issue of high protective tariffs (And if you were to frame the first part of point 3 in terms of "Globalized Free Managed Trade", then there would certainly be a basis for broad agreement on that point, as well.) I know exactly what you mean. While I like Kennedy much more than the other notables (with the exception of Ramaswamy, whom I also like), I neither endorse nor "support" him for pretty much the same reason. But I am glad he's running and giving voice to things no one else is saying, despite my disagreements with him on other things.
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:44 AM
    Occam's Banana Anti Federalist , ponder this: RFK Jr. routinely refers to and defends the Bill of Rights, citing specific examples of how they were violated, which more people need to hear. Considering that his father and uncle were assassinated, and he doesn't speak about the 2nd A (if he has, please cite the source), I consider RFK Jr. to be "gun shy" - not gun control, simply because he has not "controlled" anything. Also consider that because he believes that the CIA had involvement in the assassinations, he understands that nobody is going to take government agencies guns away. As I have stated previously, Obama sold more guns than any other president ; it is up to the People to defend/protect their rights, not politicians. The 2nd A is not a concern for me. There are other more pressing issues that need to be dealt with, such as corporate capture/lobbyists, which drive things such as Anti-gun, LGBTQ, War, etc. etc. etc. and other campaigns.
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    68472 replies | 1187350 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    68472 replies | 1187350 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:47 AM
    Is this is a consequence of Danke having done something, or a consequence of Danke having failed to do something?
    918 replies | 89968 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:32 AM
    Because Kennedy is by far the most (and most visibly and vocally) anti-establishment of all the notable candidates, and he is quite good on a number of important things. Rockwell's position on the issue of tariffs is pretty much straight Austrian/Misesian - which means: pretty much identical to DiLorenzo's. I'm sure there are a number of issues other than just high protective tariffs over which Rockwell disagrees with Kennedy, such as gun control. His positive regard for Kennedy is not evidence that what DiLorenzo & Rockwell think about such tariffs is untrue (or hypocritical, in Rockwell's case), any more than it's evidence that DiLorenzo's & Rockwell's opposition to gun control is misguided or incorrect. Speaking for myself, I like Kennedy better by far than any of the other noteworthy candidates, Republican or Democrat (with perhaps the exception of Ramaswamy, whom I also like), and almost certainly for exactly the same reasons Rockwell does - despite the fact that I vehemently disagree with Kennedy about tariffs (and gun control).
    81 replies | 1566 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:03 AM
    And just in case anyone thinks that's a morbid joke:
    26 replies | 1097 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:40 AM
    EU official says Twitter abandons bloc’s voluntary pact against disinformation https://apnews.com/article/twitter-musk-disinformation-social-media-eu-34072bfe3c348aed86c390fdc97d4667 Kelvin Chan (26 May 2023) LONDON (AP) — Twitter has dropped out of a voluntary European Union agreement to combat online disinformation, a top EU official said Friday. European Commissioner Thierry Breton tweeted that Twitter had pulled out of the EU’s disinformation “code of practice” that other major social media platforms have pledged to support. But he added that Twitter’s “obligation” remained, referring to the EU’s tough new digital rules taking effect in August.
    11 replies | 1274 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    845 replies | 73799 view(s)
More Activity

57 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    How are you?? Do you see these?
  2. View Conversation
    Awww...you changed your avatar. I like it. You've got great expressions. You also look very handsome. Is that a vest? I like vests. Men don't wear them enough.
  3. View Conversation
    I'm a lazy stalker. I need you on my friends list to keep up.
  4. View Conversation
    Your cats?
    Where the hell are you?

  5. View Conversation
    Better video.

  6. View Conversation
    Just out of curioisity, what exactly about "anarchism" do you disagree with? Mind you, I'm talking about philosophical anarcho-capitalism, not "anarchism" in the sense of no law and order of any kind. Were you using the term in the latter sense when you said you disagreed with it?

    What distinction do you see between voluntarism and anarcho-capitalism, if any?
  7. View Conversation
    Yes, it does. And it will for a short spell, and then they'll go right back to it. Correct; Attack; Claim Victimhood - that is the M.O. They've admitted that Christianity is a warzone, and they believe that they aren't doing God's work unless they are sowing discord and reviled.

    Get ready for phase three: victimhood, they are going to claim it.
  8. View Conversation
    You have no true foundation, Glen!!! Now prostrate yourself before Christ and beg for mercy! Oh wait, that's what I'M supposed to do. smfh! LOL.
  9. View Conversation
    No wait. I'm the one who got the spelling wrong!
  10. View Conversation
    G. Edward Griffin still has you on his unfiltered news under Campaigns for Freedom!:

    Glen Bradley, running for North Carolina Senate.

    And he spelled your name wrong too! Nevertheless, that was quite an honor! Those are all old though. He really should update it.

Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 57
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
About GunnyFreedom

Basic Information

Date of Birth
September 11, 1973 (49)
About GunnyFreedom
Technology, communications, computers, networking, automation.
Former State House Rep Opposed by Karl Rove
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Political / Activist Bio:
Constitutionalist forever, alone until 2007. Discovered Ron Paul and found others like me who believed in the Constitution. Went full speed ahead and never looked back.

Canvassed three states as a grassroots volunteer for Ron Paul in 2008, Delegate to the 2008 State Convention for Ron Paul.

Won County GOP Vice Chair in 2009.

Won State House in 2010, and served one two year term before being redistricted out.

Ran for NC State Senate in 2012.

Canvassed two states as a grassroots volunteer for Ron Paul in 2012, Ron Paul Delegate to the RNC in 2012.

Ran for Vice Chair of the NC GOP in 2013.
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Campaign Manager
Collateral Writer, Speech Writer, Editor, Language Skill, Proofreading, Typing, Researcher, Reporter
Graphic Artist, Graphic Designer, Photographer, Collateral Printer, Sign Printer
Computer and Technical:
WebMaster, Unix Guru, SQL/Database Expert, Scientists and Engineer, Telecommunication


http://glenbradley.net/share/aleksan...nitsyn_4-t.gif “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
11-21-2019 11:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
05-02-2022 08:27 PM
Join Date
Home Page

66 Friends

  1. 1stvermont 1stvermont is offline


  2. aliceleuchte aliceleuchte is offline

    New Member

  3. April1775 April1775 is offline


  4. asimplegirl asimplegirl is offline


  5. basilstaples basilstaples is offline

    New Member

  6. Bill M DC Bill M DC is offline


    • Send a message via Yahoo to Bill M DC
    Bill M DC
  7. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline


  8. BrendanWenzel BrendanWenzel is offline


    • Send a message via Skype™ to BrendanWenzel
  9. brooke499 brooke499 is offline

    New Member

  10. Bryan Bryan is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 66
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
View GunnyFreedom's Blog

Recent Entries

North Carolina Governor Beverly Perdue vetos HB2 Health Care Freedom

by GunnyFreedom on 03-05-2011 at 06:05 PM
Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
She lectures the State and then posts her veto on YouTube.

See our brazen Governor lecturing us on why government knows best. A mandate of wage slavery to Big Corporate HMO is now pursuant to the US Constitution (never actually explaining how) and illegitimately invokes Article 6 to veto the Healthcare Freedom Act. Support HB2 for healthy government!

I will be the first to stand for a veto override.

Read More


Glen Bradley Webdomain Update 12/23

by GunnyFreedom on 12-23-2010 at 07:00 PM
We are working on a community network that enhances the services, duties, and abilities of a State Legislator to affect the will of his district into law.

By developing a community caucus and integrating it with physical town halls and events, a new level of transparency will be achieved that will hopefully lead America back into the 21st century of Freedom.

Your help is vital to this project. We will need volunteers and funding. This is technically a "campaign activity"

Read More

Updated 12-23-2010 at 07:01 PM by GunnyFreedom


S.510 Food Safety LIVES!

by GunnyFreedom on 12-19-2010 at 09:19 PM
Beware! Using a procedural trick, the US Senate late Sunday night unanimously added the Food Safety Bill back into the new Continuing budget resolution. It returns to the House in the exact text they sent it for consideration and a vote.

So says Jamie Dupree.

A major food safety bill that had almost been given up for dead was suddenly revived in the Senate late on Sunday evening, and may be ready for House approval as early as Tuesday.

In a parliamentary

Read More


Glen Bradley Legislative Agenda Strategy 2.0

by GunnyFreedom on 12-19-2010 at 06:31 PM
Bouncing off the Liberty community, and given the death of S.510, I have refined the proposed agenda another step. I think it's now about one refinement prior to press release, and dissemination.

Quote Originally Posted by Glen Bradley
Food Safety Modernization just died in the Senate Omnibus bill, but I think Farmer's Freedom Protection Act is still critical. Rather than blocking a given law, let's define the relationship between State food producers and Federal regulatory power.
NC Electoral Freedom Act, An Act enabling

Read More

Updated 12-19-2010 at 07:48 PM by GunnyFreedom


North Carolina Farmer's Freedom Protection Act

by GunnyFreedom on 12-13-2010 at 04:18 AM
Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
I just submitted a bill to the Bill Drafting department. They are waiting until the finalized version of S.510 is produced in order to detail what protections exactly are needed, but we should have the NCFFPA ready to file extremely early -- during the first week if not on the first day.

The basic idea is to specify via the 10th Amendment that all foodstuffs produced in and remaining within the borders of the State of North Carolina are not subject to Federal law or Federal regulation.

Read More

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast







  • 02:58 PM - Deleted Posts


  • 09:16 AM - Hidden





  • 10:27 PM - Hidden
  • 09:19 PM - Hidden


  • 08:21 PM - Hidden





Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 124 1231151101 ... LastLast













Page 1 of 124 1231151101 ... LastLast