• jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:00 AM
    The man knew his facts. Lots of intelligence in the hood Anti Federalist. Love how he pointed out that it takes years to develop a vaccine and this one came out in 9 months. (And to be fair to white people, I have a black friend who has a master's in public health who used the same ridiculous "but the technology was being researched for 20 years" BS line that Fauci is using here. We kind of stopped talking over vaccines. I still love her as a person though.) It's funny how at 2:25 the black woman with Fauci admits to the brother that there is "something going on" with people being paid to take vaccines. And yes, the entire COVID-19 mind control experiment was about fear. Even their "600,000" number can't be trusted as they counted people who fell off ladders and dying from COVID. But after the population was widely vaccinated and the vaccinated were still dying, Fauci came on TV and said "We have to distinguish between people dying with COVID from people dying from COVID." (I wish I could find that clip.)
    672 replies | 99729 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    2 replies | 101 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:38 PM
    This looks pretty bearable to me.
    20 replies | 1761 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:13 PM
    How a real HIMARS works. The Ukrainian DIY version. I'm betting the Ukrainian version lacks accuracy. But a system like this could fix it.
    0 replies | 90 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:34 PM
    Yeah...yeah....I heard it before. So when do we get to prosecute Fauci? It's not like Fauci didn't say back in 2012 that he didn't care if there was a pandemic from his research. https://www.yahoo.com/news/fauci-argued-benefits-gain-function-185934217.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAE3cuZWuq-fYc6EkxV2KyTn4sZvOX00zt9_uSAwRf4iUIqDNeufx45Ondgm-kRxjxAEOboqBS4IS_CaFMEr-PQiezRafKEHw_CXHY3cHJpgPb0Pxlt2O7Tn8fM_qDFviaSWTma 6qJENrd_7WS_17oLTdf81kVyEGkKzfeD-qD6V8 Despite the risks involved, Fauci called gain-of-function experiments “important work” in his 2012 writing: In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision? Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.
    5 replies | 277 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:33 PM
    I've yet to see any solid evidence that Soros is a Zionist. Globalist? Yes. And maybe that's the real riddle? As I pointed out in another thread, during WW 2 there was a split between international Jewry of those who wanted to strangle the German economy through an international boycott and the Zionists who worked with Germany to undermine the boycott in order to facilitate Jewish immigration to Palestine. It seems that Soros came from the former group as opposed to the latter because his family was still trapped in Hungary rather than having already left for Palestine. That doesn't make the things Soros is doing now "good."
    19 replies | 708 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:11 PM
    That assumes that: 1) all of the PTB are in lock step and always agree on everything. We know that is false because Hillary really wanted to be president in 2008 but had to give way to Barack Obama and that was decided at Bilderberg. 2) things haven't at all "gotten away" from the PTB. Or as Anti Federalist pointed out, someone created a golem that has gone wild. There was absolutely a different response from Biden and the MSM to the Gaza protests as compared to the Black Lives Matter protests. BLM burned down a police station, looted and burned stores and shot people and Biden and all of his allies called them "mostly peaceful." The Gaza protests occupied some college buildings and sprayed some graffiti. Biden's double-speak response to the Gaza protests was described as his "Charlottesville Moment." Only a blind man would not be able to see that many people on the left are very unhappy with these protestors in a way nobody on the left was willing to call out BLM.
    19 replies | 708 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:42 AM
    I wonder how many times this same judge convicted people based on shell casings....yet apparently he didn't know to recover his own shell casings. Anti Federalist, yeah road rage people can get crazy. Best to let them be if you can.
    3 replies | 229 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:32 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to unknown again.
    5 replies | 516 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    05-19-2024, 05:06 PM
    My youngest son got a job before graduating college. He has been there 4 years and got a good promotion. His bonus last year was $30,000. He has over $375,000 net assets and isn't even 27 yet. He owns 2 cars paid for and a 2 family home. The first floor rent covers the mortgage and he has roommates where he occupies the 2nd and 3rd floor. He has 1700 sq ft on those 2 floors. So his transportation is paid for and his housing is free. I think his base salary is around $150k plus stock and bonus. Youngest daughter working as chemical engineer making close to $100k but she spends way more than my son. Son plans on being financially independent after working 10 years. Maximizes his savings, retirement, and wealth, and minimizing his taxes. All his accomplishments are his to take credit for. No handouts from the parents. But he is a rare case and exceptional person. In the 70's any person that wanted to work hard could prosper without college.
    13 replies | 342 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    05-19-2024, 04:57 PM
    I guess there was more to it than finding a job and buying things for cash. We had jobs since we were small. Everyone of us had paper route that got passed from kid to kid. In those days you had to purchase the paper route. You were a business man. You bought the papers and it was your responsibility to collect from your customers. I had a morning and afternoon route. We cut grass and shoveled snow and raked leaves. Once 16 people worked. My mother made sure that money was saved. In 1970 a brand new C10 was less than $2,000 so all those years of work and savings made purchasing a vehicle possible. Houses cost less than $30,000 so with a small downpayment you were a homeowner. Two of my brothers purchased 2 family homes and lived on one floor and rented the other. As mentioned one brother still lives in the home he purchased when he was 18.
    13 replies | 342 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    05-19-2024, 04:48 AM
    Back in the early 70's all my older brothers purchased homes prior to age 24. 2 of them purchased brand new half ton trucks one Chevy one Ford and paid cash. Everybody worked menial jobs. One brother purchased his home when he was 18 and still lives there today. So when you are talking about purchasing a home, a car, or even being able to just live on a wage, that has changed.
    13 replies | 342 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 05:53 PM
    0 replies | 95 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 05:41 PM
    Yep. The bill expands on the definition of what "discriminating against Jews" is and outsources that to a private entity.
    159 replies | 7985 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 12:33 PM
    True story. So when I first met my now ex-wife and her family back in 1998, I thought they were really homophobic. Like they would talk about the "gay agenda" and how Disney secretly pushing gay and sexual messages in their movies and all of that. I was pretty liberal then. I supported ending the ban on sodomy laws because I don't want to know what other people are doing in their bedroom. (Seems like these days certain people want everybody to know what they are doing in their bedroom.) I was okay with ending the ban on gays in the military because I had no intention of joining the military. When it came to gay marriage, I was okay with that until I went to law school and had to read the IRS vs Bob Jones University case. That's the case where BJU lost it's tax except status for having a ban on interracial dating. The holding was since SCOTUS had struck down separate but equal, congress had passed the CRA and President Truman had desegregated the military, all 3 branches of government had decided segregation was against public policy. (After they lost they just banned all dating on campus period). That case greatly concerned me because the SDA church operates a lot of colleges and universities and they all follow the traditional view on sexuality and marriage. About that time Obama had repealed don't ask don't tell. (Branch 1) Sometime later SCOTUS struck down DOMA. (Branch 2). And there was language barring discrimination against transgenders in medicine in Obamacare. (Branch 3). Back to my former in-laws. Four years ago when we were all together for my sons graduating college I overheard them talking to each other about how "terrible" it is that Trump was trying to take away transgender rights to healthcare. This was the first I heard of that and I wasn't sure what that meant. But I bet they thought it was about whether or not a transgender having a heart attack would be turned away form the hospital. I didn't argue with them, but I was thinking "I bet there's more to it than that." Sure enough, within a year I heard of a case of a "transman" suing a Catholic hospital for not doing a hysterectomy because the hospital said it didn't want to be involved in any gender affirming surgeries. I've never asked my ex or her family what they thought about that. At that same graduation event a pastor who is married to one of my exes sisters wanted to talk to me about politics because I guess he wanted to "set me straight" about being a "republican" and a "Trump supporter." I am neither but I get accused of that all of the time because in some circles if you aren't lining up to kiss the donkey's ass and/or if you don't totally despise Trump (and despite what some here think, I don't hate the man), then you must be a Trump supporter. Finally I asked the pastor "You have a daycare with your church right? How would you feel if the feds told you that you have to hire an openly gay teacher?" Boom! i had him! He hadn't thought about that. (Actually religious schools are allowed to discriminate in hiring of teachers because they are the same as hiring clergy and that falls under the same "ecclesiastical exception" that excempts churches form the CRA when dealing with clergy.) Anyhow, I have transgender relatives. If any of the were having a heart attack I'd want them to be able to go to any hospital and have treatment. But that is not what Obama was pushing or is being pushed now. /long rant
    7 replies | 274 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 12:09 PM
    What...the actual....hell? Like what? That man has to be possessed.
    7 replies | 274 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    7 replies | 274 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 09:38 AM
    56 replies | 10187 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 09:13 AM
    :rolleyes: If I was not correct then they wouldn't be offering this amendment! Yes there have been CRA cases based on antisemitism such as calling someone "Jew boy" but this is an escalation. Part of proving discrimination is showing animus against the protected class. The definition that this bill brings in by proxy includes saying you don't support the state of Israel as evidence of such animus. That is the problem. Read the case I linked to above before responding so we can have an intelligent conversation.
    159 replies | 7985 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 08:36 AM
    Yes. Exactly. Full stop. This is a hypothetical question. But it's based on advances that are actually being developed. Okay. And yet there are exceptions that you mentioned where you would allow it. And that's why "the government is part of the question." There's nothing "casual" about evictionism. We know that abortion will continue to happen. Ban it in one state, it will happen in another state. Women might even travel to Canada at some point.. Harm reduction is not casual. That's a disingenuous argument.
    99 replies | 6380 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 08:26 AM
    It's never been enforced based on an expansive definition of antisemitism that includes what most sane people would NOT call antisemitism. That's the point that I and Anti Federalist and Matt Gaetz are saying. Congress would never be able to pass a law that included a definition of antisemitism that said "If you say Jews killed Jesus that's antisemitism." Based on the text from the law that I already gave you this expansive definition of antisemitism can be used to trigger a federal instigation and can be used as evidence in a discrimination lawsuit. You're just being obtuse now.
    159 replies | 7985 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 09:35 PM
    My realist side says that since government is already in the business of doing that, it should at least be done right. It also says that the worst case scenario is when government starts making public policy based on some un-elected groups definition of something like the recent antisemitism bill where a private group is being allowed to rewrite the Civil Rights Act by proxy.
    6 replies | 165 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 07:56 PM
    My favorite Trump / Giuliani moment.
    6 replies | 720 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 07:13 PM
    I don't know if this had been posted before. It's a year old but I'm just now seeing it. If there is an old thread please merge.
    0 replies | 107 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 06:48 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Anti Federalist again. And that's the sneaky part. Candace Owens was right to reject that rabbi's claim that definitions for bigotry must be allowed to morph and change over time.
    159 replies | 7985 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 06:33 PM
    The power of the evictionism argument is that it makes things like arguing whether or not the abortion is really for the "life or health of the mother" or whether the mother was raped or whether the baby is viable is irrelevant. The baby isn't being killed. So who cares about the reason it's being evicted? The only counter arguments I've heard so far is "I don't like anything but natural birth" (tough titty as there is no libertarian argument against c-sections) and "Maybe there will be fewer adoptive parents than women who want to evict." To that I say "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good." The technology could be used under any current abortion legality framework as a harm reduction method. In scenarios where abortion is legal, some women might be convinced to "evict" and give up for adoption rather than going 9 months, giving birth and giving the baby up for adoption. In scenarios where abortion is illegal, it could offer women a way out of a pregnancy they don't want to continue without having to fit into some arbitrary exception. Anyway, while the technology is ready for human trials to help save premature babies, it's not expected to be available as a general womb replacement anytime soon. See: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/09/29/1080538/everything-you-need-to-know-about-artificial-wombs/ But 50 years from now, who knows?
    99 replies | 6380 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 06:09 PM
    A) It's already legal to doom them to death so that "point" is irrelevant. ​ B )In a 100% anarchist it would even be legal to doom your toddler to death, because there would litterally be no state to punish you for killing your toddler, so again your point is irrelevant. That's why your question, as framed, makes no sense. The reason for your "doomed to death" scenario is 100% because of the social structure you've chosen to look at the technology through and not the technology itself. Back to reality. If we looked at it through the lens of a state, a mother who was in a state of pregnancy where abortion is illegal could have the option of evicting the pregnancy. Who pays? Pick one. In Alabama they are currently pushing a bill to make child support retroactive to conception. Or the mom could pay. Or the potential adoptive child could pay. The state already pays WIC which covers prenatal care so that amount could be applied to artificial womb care. It's estimated that pregnancy costs $19,000.so it's not like natural birth is somehow "free." Could birth by machine be cheaper? Possibly. You don't have to worry about liability for the machine "dying" but only for the baby. Right now there are programs where prospective adoptive parents pay for the healthcare of poor expected mothers in exchange for the right to adopt their babies once they are born. An artificial womb regimen would allow that to happen without the mother having to go through the 9 months of being pregnant. There are no downsides. At least not based on any argument you've put forward so far.
    99 replies | 6380 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 03:48 PM
    I saw this on a progressive YouTuber I follow. See: https://www.foxnews.com/media/tara-read-timeline-joe-biden-staffer-political-firestorm Even on the left, Tucker is making an impression. Summary : There is credible evidence that Joe Biden sexually assaulted Tara Reade. Her mother made a call to Larry King Live back in 1993 when the alleged assault happened. Yet Tara Reade is facing a sealed indictment against her! That's why she's in Russia. There's are criminal charges against her that she can't even know what they are. A year ago Tucker reported that Tara Reade was forced to pay the lawyer fees for the New York Times after she sued them over putting her Social Security Number on the Internet.
    0 replies | 98 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 01:47 PM
    Yes it does. Again my summary: I quoted it to you. There are none so blind as those that cannot see. A private group's definition of antisemitism, which includes criticism of Israel, was written into the bill as prima facia evidence of discrimination. And this group's definition of antisemitism is used under this bill to show intent to discriminate whether that's creating a hostile work environment, firing someone, retaliation or whatever.
    159 replies | 7985 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 01:42 PM
    Right! But under this bill just having a "Free Palestine" poster on your wall counts the same as having Adolf Hitler or KKK posters on your wall! Edit: And doesn't it bother you that rather than having the balls to just say what their own definition of antisemitism is, they delegate that to some third party by reference? As Matt Gatez pointed out, even the Christian Bible saying "the Jews killed Jesus" is antisemitism by this definition. So this is legalized discrimination against Christianity.
    159 replies | 7985 view(s)
More Activity
About GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
3,404
Posts Per Day
2.62
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 04:09 AM
Join Date
10-30-2020
Referrals
0

5 Friends

  1. Danke Danke is offline

    Top Rated Influencer

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Danke
    Danke
  2. fatjohn fatjohn is offline

    Member

    fatjohn
  3. harrysng10 harrysng10 is offline

    New Member

    harrysng10
  4. jmdrake jmdrake is offline

    Member

    jmdrake
  5. Sammy Sammy is offline

    Member

    Sammy
Showing Friends 1 to 5 of 5

12-13-2023


09-04-2023


08-19-2023


09-05-2022


02-11-2022


12-05-2021


10-21-2021


Page 1 of 80 1231151 ... LastLast

05-19-2024


05-15-2024


05-13-2024


05-12-2024


05-10-2024


05-09-2024



Page 1 of 80 1231151 ... LastLast