• Danke's Avatar
    58 replies | 1385 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Today, 11:21 AM
    Danke replied to a thread Danke, do something in Open Discussion
    I already got mine.
    756 replies | 45370 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 10:42 AM
    Hunter and Empire Biden should be able to make a fortune off that.
    9 replies | 73 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:43 PM
    The people most at risk for dying from vaccine complications are the same people being prioritized to get the vaccine. SMH! The reason for "herd immunity" is you immunize people in the herd who can stomach the vaccine in the hopes that herd immunity protects the weak. Instead this sounds like a culling of the weak.
    6 replies | 186 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:20 PM
    jmdrake replied to a thread Rand 2024? in Rand Paul Forum
    Not disagreeing. Just disagreeing with the idea that the subset you mention represents 75 million people.
    53 replies | 1076 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:40 AM
    A Now. Post a single video that shows Ahmaud with a hammer or anything else in his hand after leaving the house. The burden of proof is on you. He grabbed the AR-15 after other people were shot. Ahmaud grabbed the shotgun after being hit by a truck.
    48 replies | 983 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:39 AM
    Joe was on top of this. He has been doubling down on the masks for a long time.
    19 replies | 402 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:56 AM
    OK, post those videos. "guy saved the lives of people in a waffle house by grabbing an AR-15." was that before shooting started or after?
    48 replies | 983 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:38 AM
    I already got my card.
    15 replies | 412 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    7 replies | 149 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:28 AM
    ^This is just asinine. To compare apples to apples, how is Lloyd Austin worse then General Mattis? (Hint. He's not.) Should Rand have voted against Trump's nominees? Principles >>>>> partisanship.
    53 replies | 1431 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:09 AM
    :rolleyes: Once again, do you think Ted Cruz would have not been confirmed. Yes or no. And Bolton wasn't the only horrible pick. Jeff Sessions for attorney general. Nikki Haley for U.N. ambassor. Mike Pompeo for secretary of state. The swamp list goes on and on.
    53 replies | 1431 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:03 AM
    Every video that I have seen of him leaving the construction site he is empty handed. If you have a video showing him with something in his hand as he is leaving the site please post it. As for what was supposedly seen in the road, have you never seen a piece of branch or tire tread in the road? None of the defendants have EVER claimed he was carrying something or dropped something. As for grabbing the shotgun, well this guy saved the lives of people in a waffle house by grabbing an AR-15. https://www.foxnews.com/us/waffle-house-patron-29-hailed-a-hero-after-snatching-gun-from-shooter One of the men chasing Abrey actually side swiped him with the truck. It wasn't hard enough to disable him but that had to be scary. Under those circumstances it's not illogical to think your life may be forfeit if you DON'T try to disarm the assailant. So no. I don't support your theory on Arbery. But I don't think you should be banned for it nor do I think RPF should face liability over it.
    48 replies | 983 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:23 AM
    @Brian or @Bryan Someone hacked TheTexan's account. Please delete it. Pretty sure the real Texan died during gender reassignment surgery.
    42 replies | 1059 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 08:42 PM
    You are a great contributor here on RPFs. but I have not seen any video that shows Ahmaud Abrey empty handed from the time he left the construction site. There are videos that have three (at least two) objects on the road that someone put there, suspicious to say the least. Did Ahmaud Abrey drop them there as he was "jogging"? or maybe some white supremists trying to frame him? That aside, he did grab a shotgun in his hands...just the wrong end.
    48 replies | 983 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 06:07 PM
    3 replies | 134 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 06:07 PM
    So I created one for AF and TheTexan. Now I think we need one for Oyarde. Let me start.
    3 replies | 134 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 01:43 PM
    The CDC has updated the 2020 death toll to be over 3.3 million. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/COVID19/index.htm
    4 replies | 271 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 12:14 PM
    A) It's not a "few exceptions." B) Define "rich." An NBA "millionaire" who makes his money from his salary is "rich" by some definitions of the word but the reason he pays such a high tax rate is that he makes his money from salary rather than corporate investments. Educate yourself about taxes.
    48 replies | 983 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 12:08 PM
    So you HONESTLY BELIEVE that if Trump had nominated Ted Cruz to be head of the NSA (just picking one name out of many that would have been better than Bolton), he would have had REPUBLICANS fighting him on that? SMH!
    53 replies | 1431 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 12:04 PM
    Trump was the last commie usurper that had his bad nominees approved.
    53 replies | 1431 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 10:02 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to belian78 again.
    9 replies | 385 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 10:00 AM
    Rand is the alpha male. Trump is the cuck. And Klobuchar didn't want to talk because she in 2019 signed onto a letter with Elizabeth Warren that Dominion voting machines may have stolen an election in Georgia in 2019 on behalf of Republicans. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?550745-DEMOCRATS-Elizabeth-Warren-And-Amy-Klobochar-Attacked-Dominion-Voting-Systems You don't change things by gassing up your followers with a phony "plan" to try to get people like Rand Paul and Mike Pence to overturn the election on January 6th after the electoral college already voted and the states had already certified the election, fraudulent or not.
    19 replies | 756 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 09:45 AM
    Sometimes using "multiple angles" is a good thing and sometimes not. If terrorists had hostages in a small enclosed space a sniper with a clear should would be a good idea. A Hellfire missile would not be. The issue is collateral damage. There is no collateral damage against websites like RonPaulForums.com from the Sherman Anti Trust angle because, RonPaulForums.com is not a trust. However you try to repeal, rewrite, or judicially re-interpret Section 230, there is risk to websites like RonPaulForums.com and risk to freedom a speech. One way a website can avoid liability for controversial points of view that might be libelous is to do MORE of what Facebook and Twitter are currently doing.
    48 replies | 983 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 09:39 AM
    SMH. You are totally missing the point. It's not YOU that the forum would have to worry about. It's someone else who may not even be on this forum who reads something you wrote that the forum would have to be worried about! Let's take the Ahmaud Abrey case. People on this forum were claiming he was carrying a hammer or something right before he was killed. All of the actual video evidence proves that's false. But some people persisted in it. We are such a small fish in a big ocean that such libel isn't an issue. But it could be. Or take the Sandy Hook or Pizzagate conspiracy theories. Alex Jones already had to settle lawsuits on both of those. Say if EVERY web-forum that that allowed such conspiracy theories to be pushed were liable to being sued? Would that lead to more free speech or less? And don't kid yourself into thinking that can't happen. And you might say "Well those conspiracy theories are true." You have the right to believe that. That doesn't mean you won't lose in court for propagating them. Now, I like what you said here: "individuals are personally responsible....not platforms." That is exactly the point of Section 230! Exactly! 100%! A state court had held Prodigy Inc. liable for the content of an individual's post being libel against someone who wasn't even on Prodigy Inc. The court's reasoning? Because Prodigy Inc. had removed some offensive content, Prodigy Inc. was acting like a "publisher" and not a "platform." So either Prodigy Inc. had not moderate NOTHING in order escape liability (porn, child porn, prostitute ads, whatever), or Prodigy Inc. was responsible for EVERYTHING (user X saying that the local burger joint had a roach infestation). This is where TheCount has a better understanding of this issue than some here. Section 230 has never been about end user's ability to sue over their post being deleted or editorialized or edited. It's always been about whether some third party, that might not even use the service, can sue the platform over what what the users post. You're right in your gut thinking that such lawsuits shouldn't be allowed.
    48 replies | 983 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-24-2021, 09:13 AM
    Yeah....but sometimes people get banned for reasons that have nothing to do with violation of the political mission statement. In fact sometimes it's hard to figure out why someone got banned. The fallback argument is always "Well it's our private property so we can do what we want." Okay. That might not hold up under the new judicial review that regime that you want. In fact I'm CERTAIN it wouldn't hold up. There are too many examples of people who fully support the political mission statement in word and deed who have nonetheless been arbitrarily de-platformed here. Also nothing in the language of Section 230 even comes close to supporting the "political mission statement" exception.
    48 replies | 983 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-23-2021, 11:15 PM
    Please explain to me how to rewrite or repeal section 230 in a way that doesn't expose RonPaulForums.com to liability.
    48 replies | 983 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    01-23-2021, 11:08 PM
    You mean like Jeff Sessions, Mike Pompeo and John Bolton? Oops...my bad. Wrong administration. :rolleyes:
    53 replies | 1431 view(s)
More Activity
About GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
452
Posts Per Day
5.13
General Information
Last Activity
Today 12:28 PM
Join Date
10-30-2020
Referrals
0

4 Friends

  1. Danke Danke is offline

    Top Rated Influencer

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Danke
    Danke
  2. fatjohn fatjohn is offline

    Member

    fatjohn
  3. jmdrake jmdrake is offline

    Member

    jmdrake
  4. Sammy Sammy is online now

    Member

    Sammy
Showing Friends 1 to 4 of 4
No results to display...
Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast

01-25-2021


01-23-2021


01-22-2021


01-21-2021


01-20-2021



Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast