GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged
Member

Let's see. Rural areas where teens kill squirrels with pellet guns vs city slickers that shoot everyone except their intended target with their Glocks cocked to the side. Hmmmmm.... Note this dude doesn't even use a scope.

Fantastic! Move to a state with like minded people.

I would imagine she would be a joy to be in a relationship with.

The best thing that could happen is they make it illegal under any circumstances for a pregnant woman to abort her fetus if she resides in that state. That would be the natural way for crazy Liberals to gravitate to the Liberal hell holes they deserve and Conservatives to enjoy their own way of life. Why should every state be subject to wokeness?

Both decisions were based on principle and textualism. There is not right to an abortion written into the constitution. There is an individual right to bear arms written into the constitution. Really, the gun issue was decided back in 2008. I'm surprised it took this long to strike down New York's gun law.

For any woman that doesn't want children:Reversing Your Tubal LigationJust because you were anti-pregnancy when you had your operation doesn’t mean you’ll always feel that way. More than 14% of women who had their tubes tied have later asked for information about how to reverse it.If you want to get pregnant, you may able to reverse your tubal ligation. In a best-case scenario, the pregnancy rate after this procedure is 75%-80%. Success depends on several things, such as:Length and health of fallopian tubesAgeThe type of surgery usedPresence of scar tissue: In general, you can’t reverse Essure, the method that causes scar tissue to form via tiny implants.If you’re not a candidate for reversal surgery, you may still be able to get pregnant through in-vitro fertilization. This is when a fertilized egg is placed directly into your womb. This may be the best option for women over 40 who want to get pregnant. Women this age are less likely to have good results from the reversal. https://www.webmd.com/sex/birth-control/pregnancy-after-tubal-ligation

I live in Connecticut and often times I want to purchase something online only to find out that the suppliers of the item are prohibited from selling to people in Connecticut. If Connecticut has laws that make it illegal for "Do my Own" insecticides to ship me an effective insecticide to eradicate an ant, termite, or roach problem, why shouldn't South Carolina be able to make it illegal for Planned Parenthood to ship abortion pills to their state? If a person is pregnant and abortion is illegal in their state, any person aborting a fetus should be charged with murder by the state in which they live that has deemed abortion illegal! People that want to live Liberal lifestyles should stop infecting Conservative communities and move to their own Liberal Hell Holes.

This woman has the qualifications to become an elementary public school teacher.

Forget about that Conspiracy schite and concern yourself with those abysmal rulings regarding guns and Roe from the SCOTUS.

She should get her tubes tied or use effective contraception. When guys don't want to have kids they get snipped. Over and done. Planned Parenthood should be pushing tube tying. What better way to go? Even if you've previously taken active steps to prevent conception, like getting a tubal ligation, you still have reproductive options. In-vitro fertilization. https://www.nyfertility.org/blog/can-i-still-attempt-ivf-if-ive-had-my-tubes-tied

I lived in Colorado for years and my ex-wife and her family lived in Wyoming. I spent lots of time there. My guess is that the majority of people living in Wyoming do not want Lizzy Biotch representing them.

What is better than roses on a piano? Two lips on an organ.

This is where insurance companies come into play. Health insurance is generally state specific unless in the case of an emergency. People can travel out of state for abortions but will have to pay out of pocket. Good luck getting Medicaid, state run insurance for the indigent to pay for an out of state abortion. Maybe that digital currency thing will make little brother (states) spy on your illegal action of going to get an illegal abortion across state lines. Maybe they won't charge you for getting an illegal abortion but charge you with Murder when you return. Maybe all the leftists and politicians will once again think cash is good and should not be messed with.

Would be nice to get a mandate this mandate that executive order this executive order that, pronoun this pronoun that, BS ruling to eliminate face masks, injected poisons, and other liberty effecting issues.

Perfect example of why gun control laws do not work.

//

What? You mean San Fran Nan's "Asian hate crimes bill" wasn't enough to assuage Asian American's concerns about rising crime? Seriously? /sarcasm I suspect there will be a significant shift in the Asian American vote this fall.

This belongs here.

Well I'm glad the SCOTUS finally reversed course a little bit.

Why should so many Democrats have to change their party? Lizzy baby should change hers.

The Roe v. Wade "opinion" was written by 9 men, 8 of them white men. Men (especially white men) should have no opinion on abortion. Therefore Roe v. Wade is a invalid "opinion." Make that into a t-shirt and sell it.

Interesting read. But it has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. The founders were careful to put the word "congress" in the first amendment and leave it out of the 2nd.

Okay. So what do you think is the relevance of the fact that Nunn v Georgia was a state supreme court decision that recognized that the 2nd amendment applied to the states?

The constitution was ratified as a result of the problems that led to Shays' rebellion. You mentioned "mutual protection" among the states. (I may have your wording off, but I've got the thought.) Shays' was an unpaid Revolutionary War veteran. His local state was still oppressing him and his fellow vets with taxes, he was getting no debt relief from the merchants, and he and other vets were basically watermelon seeds that were being squeezed to hard. In short, the articles of confederation were a provable failure. Yep. There's a lot I don't like about the current system as well. But the "mutual protection" goal that you (and I) agree is necessary for a country, be it federal or confederate, cannot happen either without an individual right to bear arms or a large central military. Over the years the right to keep and bear arms has diminished at the same time the size and scope of the federal military has increased. I don't think that's an accident.

It's the same video....that's still up. :confused: So....who do you think doesn't want who to see it?

Okay. Well part of that existence is the second amendment and I'm happy for that even though you are not. And states cannot effectively execute the "purposes of mutual defense" (as YOU put it), without either A) a large standing army or B) an individual right to bear arms. It simply cannot happen. So...which would you rather have? The 80000000 ton gorilla that is the military industrial complex that we all see going around the world brutalizing everyone, or the "800 pound gorilla", as you described it, pissing on poor New York's ability to brutalize it's own citizens? Take your pick.

Yeah....that won't last long. It will last long enough for the left to realize the right is better armed and better trained.

In bankruptcy, unsecured debts are discharged...as in "forgiven." A student loan is, by definition, an unsecured loan. https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/chapter-7-bankruptcy-faq.html Chapter 7 bankruptcy wipes out most types of unsecured debt. Unsecured debts are debts that aren't guaranteed by collateral property. (A mortgage is a secured debt guaranteed by the home; an auto loan is a secured debt guaranteed by a vehicle.) Unsecured debts wiped out by Chapter 7 bankruptcy include credit card debt, medical bills, and gasoline card debt. However, you can't wipe out all unsecured debt. For instance, child and spousal support and student loans (except in limited circumstances) are nondischargeable—you'll remain responsible for repaying them after bankruptcy. Some other debts might not be dischargeable if the creditor objects, such as recent debts for luxury goods, debts incurred based on fraud (such as lying on a credit application or writing a bad check), and tax debts first due within the previous three years. Learn more about which obligations remain after Chapter 7 bankruptcy in What Bankruptcy Can and Cannot Do and When Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Isn't the Right Choice. Here is the secret the politicians forgot to tell you. There were already ways prior to this to get student loan debts discharged even though you couldn't do it through bankruptcy. So this is just doing for everyone what those in the know were already doing for themselves. If your concern is the moral hazard, I agree. But there is a moral hazard built into the system the other way too. It's too easy to get a student loan in the first place precisely because they lenders know they are federally guaranteed. The lenders aren't worried about whether or not there is a potential for payout later. The entire SYSTEM is broken. There are some IT schools that have figured this out. They let students go to school for free, help them find jobs, then contract with their new employers to deduct from their salaries later. The schools only get paid if the students get paid. If the student flunks out of school? No money for the school. If the student can't find a job? No money for the school. Job placement becomes the profit center for the school as opposed to an afterthought that typically does a half-ass job of placing students. See: