GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged
Member

Desantis per capita COVID numbers are worse than California's. And he's prioritizing seniors get a vaccine that is killing seniors. Right now proper COVID response is the #1 issue. Not only did she take the pro-freedom approach but she has the numbers on her side. The only thing the media will be able to say is "Well SD is such a small and sparsely populate state without a big tourist industry that those results can't be replicated." But that also hits home the importance of continued federalism.

"We focused on hospital capacity. Dr. Fauci said on our worst day we would have 10,000 hospitalized. Instead our worse day was 600. Dr. Fauci is wrong a lot." She can compare and contrast her record on COVID with that of (former) media darling Andrew Cuomo. She didn't mandate masks, she didn't mandate businesses shut down, she didn't mandate nursing homes take COVID positive patients, she didn't mandate her health officials cook the numbers. And the results speak for themselves. Edit: Still watching. She brought out that Stephonopolis brought her on right after Andrew Cuomo and asked Cuomo to give HER advice on handling COVID! That's a TV ad right there! And no, Cuomo won't be running in 2024. He'll be lucky if he's still governor. (Yeah I said it. He's in that much trouble now!) But what she needs to do is run against the media. That was Donald Trump's strength.

Until they are deemed terrorists.

harvesting children's organs from goyim in China is OK

Are you a jew? Yes or no.

Why are they doing live press conferences in the midst of a pandemic? These should be virtual press conferences.

Is this the same guy that is going to give us everything?

We could use less Injuns oyarde

reported

Israel tried to kill Harry Truman. Israel killed 34 Americans in 1967. (USS Liberty) Israel stole Nuclear weapons secrets from us. Israel spies on americans including on president trump.

fascinating

Any person for any reason that can get people to not trust the narrative is okay with me.

Does any person have the authority to subject minors to gender change? What about all those parents that were really wishing for a girl?

I was in an officer's bar drinking in Turkey when that was on big screen CNN, I had no idea what was going on.

.

Wasn't there already a Mrs. Potato head? And isn't the whole point that you can give it your own makeover? I'm glad I'm no longer able to have kids.

LOL. You're welcome and touche'! Here is my final response. I thought I laid out enough concerning stuff about the new law as it stands without going down the "A gay person can make you have sex with him" rabbit hole. It does concern me that religious affiliated institutions will have to deal with this. I've already seen it happen. When I first went to Vanderbilt there was a Christian Legal Society. I never joined but I had respect for them. They would offer to pray for you when exams were coming up, would have weekly worship services etc. My second year three women started the LGBT legal association. (Q hadn't yet arrived). I was cool with them too but didn't join them either for obvious reasons. ONE YEAR later I read in the paper that the Christian Legal Society lost its funding. Why? The fact that their bylaws required officers to have a personal faith in Jesus and lead worship services was considered "intolerant." (See: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/vanderbilts-religious-and-political-student-organizations-under-attack) Maybe that was just a coincidence. I dunno. But it seems the more "inclusive" our society becomes, the Christian views are being sidelined. I mean seriously there are so many flavors of Christianity, including Christian churches with gay pastors, that it's crazy that requirement that an officer be a believer is deemed "intolerant." Can I be over the chess club if I hate chess and never learned how to play it? And then there's the question of parents and children. We already have the James Younger case to deal with. How will this new law affect that? What about parents of "Q" children who take them to a conservative church where they hear fire and brimstone about the life they are considering? Yes the CRA doesn't directly affect that, but the Bob Jones University Case shows me how the law can be applied in ways it was never intended to be applied. So...just because I don't share one particular concern with you doesn't mean I don't have concerns.

My brain hurts reading this. As I was explaining to Anti Federalist, any interpretation of an amended Civil Rights Act is to look at how the current CRA is interpreted. It's not a thing of "Well I didn't discriminate against you for being black because I perceive you as being white even though you told me you were black." it's "I didn't discriminate against you for being black because I fired you for being repetitively tardy and that has nothing to do with you being black." Certainly if an employee is in the closet and there's no evidence that he informed his boss that he was gay, then that would be a pretty solid defense against a CRA claim. But the has EVERYTHING to do with the REASON the employee was fired and not some twisted interpretation of what the language you are referencing. If I have a legitimate reason for firing you and I never give any indication that I fired you for anything other than that reason and I fire other people that don't fit your protected class for the same reason then I have a rock solid CRA defense. If, on the other hand, I only fire gay people, or black people, or women, or some other protected class for that same reason, then I have a problem. Look at the other language in the definitions section of the act. 14) LGBTQ people often face discrimination when seeking to rent or purchase housing, as well as in every other aspect of obtaining and maintaining housing. LGBTQ people in same-sex relationships are often discriminated against when two names associated with one gender appear on a housing application, and transgender people often encounter discrimination when credit checks or inquiries reveal a former name. ^That is what the "perceived" language is talking about. Two people could be best friends, or it could be a man and a woman with the feminine or masculine names. Think "The Boy Named Sue" song by Johnny Cash. (In college I knew a young man named Wanda that was dating a young lady named Wanda). Someone seeing such an application might perceive this was a gay couple when it wasn't.

Sure, only if your gun is unloaded.

The Count is gay, who'd have thought ?

she is now just ashes, otherwise I'd pay to see you do necrophilia on a trans

my mother died last year

I will pay for the @TheTexan to date a trans,