• GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:56 AM
    Did this plane take off in Denver, have an engine fail and pretty quickly return and land in Denver? How did they recover a fan blade on a soccer field in Bloomfield CT? Never mind. Somebody asked about that toward the end of the video. He meant to say Broomfield Colorado.
    21 replies | 353 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:20 AM
    The President has donated seven checks, $78,333 after taxes each, to different government agencies. He has not yet announced who will receive his final check from 2018. He received a salary and donated it. Is it possible that if Trump donated his salary to the swamp, the swamp had more money to waste. I would bet that the budgets for all those organizations increases frequently and never decreases.
    36 replies | 737 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 353 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 353 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 353 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:26 AM
    I can only speculate that if toxic waste falls from the sky and lands on your property it would be the homeowners responsibility to clean up the toxic waste. If some valuable items fell from the sky, the homeowner would have no right to the items but would be responsible for fixing any and all damage on their property.
    21 replies | 353 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 353 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:21 AM
    Which one was it? Did he take a salary and donate it to charity or did he refuse his salary and take only $1?
    36 replies | 737 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 353 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:11 AM
    https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1363249686665187329?s=20 1363249686665187329
    21 replies | 353 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:54 AM
    I could be wrong but I think you are wrong. I think he took a salary and donated it to charity. There is a difference.
    36 replies | 737 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:43 AM
    It is obvious. He is saying I am eager to hear, ****** here next. I think he is calling for insurrection or an armed revolution. He needs to realize that words have meanings!
    23 replies | 1407 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:40 AM
    I think Massie is the best! However, most people do not go to MIT, develop patents, or have the capability to purchase and maintain 1,000 acre spread.
    1 replies | 69 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:22 AM
    Lots of great information in this video. Interestingly enough Max brings up the "event 201" simulation that happened October 18, 2019 simulating a coronavirus pandemic. But then he dismisses the idea that COVID-19 was created in a laboratory because he has "seen no evidence of that." What does he call the fact that the NIH funded gain of function research on bat corona viruses and that research was being done in Wuhan which is the epicenter of the virus? Why was that left out of his analysis? But the overarching point is spot on. People say "trust the science", but a college dropout is being all over the Sunday talk shows promoting "science."
    1 replies | 48 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 10:15 PM
    Looks like you're a prophet when it comes to the SCOTUS.
    37 replies | 2074 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 06:50 PM
    Irony. Or is that supposed to be satire?
    96 replies | 1829 view(s)
  • Sammy's Avatar
    replies | 129 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 06:29 PM
    “Service members, Department of Defense civilians and all those who support our mission, are entitled to an environment free of discrimination, hate and harassment.” Frick. Can I sue now for all the harassment I received in the military?
    96 replies | 1829 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 02:59 PM
    I disagree. He made some absolutely indefensible asinine moves. "I didn't want to cause a panic?" Do you seriously think that didn't cost him any votes? Talking about injecting disinfectant? Letting Fauci be all over the map? Simple Trump win. In January 2020 if he made this speech he would have been difficult to beat. "My fellow Americans. I know what I am about to say may not be well received due to the recent impeachment trial. But we are about to be in a state of emergency. I have received intelligence from Taiwan about a new SARS virus coming out of China but this one may be much worse than the other. Taiwan is locking down its borders but not its economy. We will do the same. All travel to an from the U.S. will be severely limited for the next month. Any Americans abroad please report to the nearest embassy, consulate or military base for 14 day quarantine and testing. We will keep re-evaluating this situation as we go along. I'm asking Congress for immediate emergency spending to procure protective equipment for hospital workers and first responders and to ramp up on shore manufacturing of the same. Make your on mask if you wish. The plans will be on the Whitehouse website. I want a clean bill. If congress tries to put any earmarks in this bill I will veto it. Please call your members of congress and tell them not to do that. We will put our best minds not only into discovering pharmucutical treatments and a possible vaccine for this new virus but also put forward a clearinghouse of which already available treatments and natural remedies may be effective. The type of virus, a coronavirus, has been known to the medical community for many years even though this is a new variation." Yeah. That MIGHT not of worked, but it MIGHT have. The fact that Trump managed to keep things close despite possibly being the worst presidential candidate in my lifetime tells me how weak Biden was.
    45 replies | 865 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 02:42 PM
    Why thank you! Of course I am sure AOC and the most extreme leftists supports their followers having conversations promoting the "Green New Deal" or whatever....to a point. But for them, and Stef, there is a point to go cultist. At least that's my impression after having watched again the Joe Rogan interview with Stef on the subject. Here is where Stef goes off the cult end. Joe Rogan asks him about cutting people off who agree with the state and think that it's okay to have a government and Stef says "yes" and makes the phoney argument is that if you're going to be principled "at some point personal relationships have to become part of the equation." Now here's where I call that argument phoney. It's one thing to make personal relationships part of the equation by accepting the fact that other people might cut you off for having a difference of opinion. Jesus Himself was quit clear that would happen. But to cut others off because they disagree with you based on some far fetched argument that if they believe in the state "they want you killed?" Yeah...that's kind of ridiculous. No...that's absolutely ridiculous. Consider this. The Ron Paul position on pro-life, which I have adopted as my own, is in essence a "statist" position. If states are allowed to have abortion laws, then they can use force to prevent doctors from performing abortions. There's no way around it. Of course you can promote life by trying to change the culture (and I do). But that doesn't require a repeal of Roe v Wade. So...technically Stef would want my son to "defoo" me at some point. Maybe it's years and years down the road, after you've tried every argument you can think of etc. But I follow a higher calling. "Whatsoever it is that you would that men would do to you, do ye also unto them." I wouldn't want someone to cut me off just because I have a different view than them on which party to vote for or abortion or LGBTQIA or whatever. We ought to be able to disagree indefinitely about a whole host of issues and still be friends or at least family. Until there is a clear and present danger...until someone is literally turning names into the Stazi on the left or the Pinochet police on the right to be "disappeared", there is no justification from top down, bottom up, left wing, right wing, crowd sourced or one on one cancel culture. That brings me to another problem with Stef's video. He acted like only socialists disappeared people. Pinochet was no socialist. A death squad is a death squad. LOL. Funny!
    45 replies | 896 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 02:26 PM
    As long as there is no violation of the antitrust laws that's true. What Farcebook, Twisteder and Ghougle did by sharing information on who to deplatform is a violation of the antitrust laws. Also just because something can fall under the definition of capitalism doesn't make it right. It was wrong for country stations to quit playing the Dixie Chicks. And no matter how dannno tried to differentiate it, that's still top down cancel culture. But who cares if it's bottom up? The attack on Chik-Fil-A for having donated to the family research council was absolutely bottom up cancel culture. I don't recall any conservatives saying "Well I guess that's all well and good. Free market and all." Of course Chik-Fil-A made record profits after being "cancelled" but they still caved and apologized for something that shouldn't have required an apology. Anyway, back to the Dixie Chicks. It's funny that the same country stations that cancelled them for saying they were ashamed of Bush for having started a war with Iraq still largely rallied around Trump for telling Jeb Bush "Your brother did not protect this country on 9/11." What's the difference? I'm sure people on the right will have some BS excuse like "Well they were on foreign soil" or "Well Bush was still president" or something equally as stupid. The truth is Trump had already earned his conservative bones by saying Mexico was sending rapists, along with "some good people," over the border and he was going to build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. I guess political correctness goes both ways. Michael Savage also got away with calling Iraq "the biggest foreign policy blunder in American history", after supporting the Iraq war and slamming Ron Paul in 2008 for being against it. But again he had earned his conservative bones. The Dixie Chicks first foray into politics was critical of Bush who was still loved by the useful idiots in the GOP at that time.
    45 replies | 896 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 01:47 PM
    You left out "The president was compromised." Seriously if Trump hadn't been such a douche the election wouldn't have been close enough to steal. What kind of person tells Bob Woodward, of all people "I knew back in January it was really bad but I didn't want to cause a panic?" Like...the panic wasn't going to happen anyway?
    45 replies | 865 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 01:44 PM
    Gotcha! And I agree. Agorism FTW!
    45 replies | 865 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 01:25 PM
    LOL. So now victory is the fact that the porn star will only have been paid twice (once for doing the deed and once to remain silent) rather than 3 times? Someone explain to me again why this isn't all about Trump?
    45 replies | 865 view(s)
  • Sammy's Avatar
    2 replies | 165 view(s)
  • Sammy's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 12:40 PM
    Go fuck yourself.
    45 replies | 896 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 08:43 AM
    Do you think this is limited to BOA?
    4 replies | 201 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    02-23-2021, 08:42 AM
    I don't know what do you think?
    45 replies | 865 view(s)
More Activity
About GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
579
Posts Per Day
4.91
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 07:32 PM
Join Date
10-30-2020
Referrals
0

4 Friends

  1. Danke Danke is offline

    Top Rated Influencer

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Danke
    Danke
  2. fatjohn fatjohn is offline

    Member

    fatjohn
  3. jmdrake jmdrake is offline

    Member

    jmdrake
  4. Sammy Sammy is offline

    Member

    Sammy
Showing Friends 1 to 4 of 4
No results to display...
Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast

02-24-2021


02-23-2021


02-22-2021


02-19-2021


02-18-2021


02-17-2021


02-16-2021


02-12-2021


02-11-2021



Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast