• jmdrake's Avatar
    33 replies | 512 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:48 AM
    Yeah.....I already know this by reading MSM reports that Israel had the Hamas plans for over a year. Egyptian intelligence warned Israel that a Hamas attack was immient right before Oct 7. U.S. intelligence warned Israel that a Hamas attack was imminent right before Oct. 7. ISRAELI intelligence warned Israel that a Hamas attack was imminent right before Oct 7th. Yet, for no explainable reason, Netanyahu movved the IDF north AWAY from Hamas to supposedly face off against Hezbollah. Oh, and the former head of the Iraeli intelligence agency Shin Bet said that Netanyahu propped up Hamas as a counterbalance to the Palestinain Authority as a was to thwart a Palestinian state.
    3 replies | 114 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:17 AM
    You're not interested in trading your bill of rights? Which rights are still left? The 3rd amendment against quartering soldiers? I'm still not voting for Trump. But, at least on the campaign trail, adopting Ron Paul proposals as Anti Federalist has pointed out is a good thing. Do I think Trump will actually follow through? Nope. But the fact that these ideas are being mainstreamed is a positive. And unlike some people on this forum I give Obama credit for the few things he got right. (The Iran nuclear deal. Letting schools opt out of No Child Left Behind. Curbing funding for gain of function research in 2014. Letting guns be carried on Amtrack trains and in National Parks). A broken clock is right twice a day, but it's still not worth buying.
    27 replies | 567 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:44 AM
    So North America, Western and Eastern Europe, Russia and Australia are a "relative small portion" of the planet? What are you smoking? :rolleyes:
    2171 replies | 166126 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:39 AM
    Getting rid of the income tax is a net positive even if it means higher tariffs. Individuals should not be required to report to the government how much they make every year. This is a much bigger problem for individual liberty now with more and more people moving into the "gig" economy where their wages are reported to the government but their taxes are not withheld. Lots of people are making barely enough to survive and simultaneously running up huge tax bills that they may never be able to pay. That's also why Biden is now going after people's CashApp and PayPal receipts.
    27 replies | 567 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:36 AM
    Explain. Why do you think the income tax is necessary?
    27 replies | 567 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:15 AM
    NATO is dead.
    0 replies | 100 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:54 AM
    Biden demands compensation when his personality or image is used to enhance anyone other person or entity. If you don't believe me, just ask Hunter.
    14 replies | 357 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:33 AM
    I guess one could say that the tax credit is worthless for any person that doesn't have the taxable income. In order to get the $7500 Federal Tax Credit you must have $7500 of tax liability in the year you take delivery. You cannot carry forward any unused credit. So from that perspective, I guess if you don't pay taxes or that much tax, you wouldn't benefit from the tax break. However if you don't pay tax or that much tax, you are not paying for the other guys EV either. The person that is getting the tax break is the person that has tax liability. No taxes due, no tax credit for EV.
    671 replies | 61887 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:15 AM
    Alex Jones will never be left alone. If I were him, I would leave the country and broadcast from someplace where nobody can touch him.
    13 replies | 351 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-13-2024, 01:59 PM
    Brandon Herrera gave a great shout out to Ron Paul at the end of this post election video! Brought a tear to my eye. Ron should have him on his show.
    34 replies | 5073 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-13-2024, 10:36 AM
    You're looking at the "half empty" part of the glass. Here's the "half full" part. George Kent, a deputy assistant secretary of state, testified Tuesday that he worried that Hunter Biden’s position at the firm Burisma Holdings would complicate efforts by U.S. diplomats to convey to Ukrainian officials the importance of avoiding conflicts of interest, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of confidentiality rules surrounding the deposition. Kent said he had concerns that Ukrainian officials would view Hunter Biden as a conduit for currying influence with his father, said the people. But when Kent raised the issue with Biden’s office, he was told the then-vice president didn’t have the “bandwidth” to deal with the issue involving his son as his other son, Beau, was battling cancer, said the people familiar with his testimony. .. The testimony by Kent offers a reminder that as Democrats probe President Trump’s alleged actions in pressuring Ukraine to dig up compromising information on Biden, the impeachment inquiry also threatens to keep alive questions about the former vice president’s handling of his son’s foreign work at a precarious moment for his 2020 presidential campaign. Kent, who also testified about how Trump’s associates raised unfounded allegations about the former ambassador to Ukraine, is the first known example of a career diplomat who raised concerns internally in the Obama administration about Hunter Biden’s board position. The Washington Post has previously reported that there had been discussions among Biden’s advisers about whether his son’s Ukraine work would be perceived as a conflict of interest, and that one former adviser had been concerned enough to mention it to Biden, though the conversation was brief.
    4 replies | 305 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2024, 08:19 PM
    I'll give you one better. A member of the Obama administration warned Joe Biden back in 2015 that this was a potential conflict of interest. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/diplomat-tells-investigators-he-raised-alarms-in-2015-about-hunter-bidens-ukraine-work-but-was-rebuffed/2019/10/18/81e35be9-4f5a-4048-8520-0baabb18ab63_story.html And to access the above link without the paywall, you can turn off Javascript for washiingtonpost.com in the Chrome settings. Or here's the full article (since I already did that). Diplomat tells investigators he raised alarms in 2015 about Hunter Biden’s Ukraine work but was rebuffed By John Hudson, Rachael Bade and Matt Viser October 18, 2019 at 7:44 a.m. EDT
    4 replies | 305 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2024, 07:36 PM
    This is of course directed at TheTexan's proposed underground liberty city.
    4 replies | 166 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2024, 05:59 PM
    And....that's why celebrities hire security to manhandle and push away idiots who think the have a right to rush up on them just because they are famous. :rolleyes: A random guy with no press pass shouldn't be going up to women he doesn't know putting a camera in their face. But hey, maybe Anti Federalist thinks Rand Paul was "taking things from white people" in this clip. Seriously, this is bvllshyt. You don't get to be an arsehole just because you see somebody famous. I mean...you do. But you shouldn't bitch about it, and arsehole Matt Walsh shouldn't bitch about it just because the famous person calls you out on Twitter. You can do that. You can do whatever you like. I just think that's stupid.
    2171 replies | 166126 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2024, 11:26 AM
    I don't know. Is there a "Matt Walsh is being phony" section? Cause this is bvllshyt. It's one thing to want "more attention." It's another thing to want to make sure everybody is safe. We "whined and complained" about Ron Paul not getting attention in 2008. Then when Rand Paul was actually making waves, and a "counter protester" got to close, a Rand Paul supporter threw the counter protester to the ground and put his foot on the counter protester's neck. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Showing up at a press conference and asking someone a tough question? That's fine. Finding out where somebody's hotel is so that you can practice ambush journalism, not on the person who did the fragrant foul, but her team mates? Seriously? :rolleyes:
    2171 replies | 166126 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2024, 11:00 AM
    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/11/florida-ban-gender-affirming-care-00162721 Federal judge strikes Florida ban on gender-affirming care for children The judge also blocked requirements that would make accessing care harder for transgender adults. A placard supporting transgender rights is shown at the Stonewall Pride Parade and Street Festival. A placard supporting transgender rights is shown at the Stonewall Pride Parade and Street Festival on June 17, 2023, in Wilton Manors, Florida. Tuesday's ruling is a major win for a coalition of human rights groups that filed the federal lawsuit arguing the ban violated equal protection rights. | Lynne Sladky/AP By AREK SARKISSIAN 06/11/2024 02:52 PM EDT
    10 replies | 324 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2024, 10:22 AM
    1 replies | 184 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2024, 10:20 AM
    Is there no clearer indication of the beast system than the current Bishop of Rome? Someone who offers a "blessing" to same sex couples, then says "But it's not for them as a couple but as individuals" then privately says "There's too much f*ggotry in the Jesuit order" then publicly apologizes for his own statement? At one point are people to heed the call "Come out of her my people lest ye partake of her plagues?"
    68 replies | 1606 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2024, 10:16 AM
    Just to be clear, and I think you keep missing this point, I didn't bring this up to attack the Orthodox church but rather to preempt an attack that I saw coming back from supporters of the Roman church since, as you recall, that's the way they've argued that point in the past. Since you agree with me that killing someone because of his religious beliefs is no more justified than clergy sexually molesting children, then I really don't have anything else to argue with you about this. From what I understand you saying, whatever Orthodox clergy might have been involved in the massacre of the Latins, that's no more official of Orthoxy than Olver Cromwell's persecution of Catholics is official of Protestantism. Fine. No argument then.
    68 replies | 1606 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2024, 08:53 AM
    Wrong movie analogy. You'll be in the Matrix if you take Elon Musk's brain chip or you get sucked into Apple's (way to expensive) augmented reality device. Apple is also talking about building OpenAI into all of their devices. Having your own drone is more like being the resistance in the Terminator 2 and beyond. In T2 a Terminator was reprogrammed to fight alongside the resistance. In a full blown tyranny situation in the U.S. the resistance having its own drone will be as important as people having their own firearms. In some ways maybe even more so. Biden loves to say that private ownership of guns is irrelevant because you can't fight against a modern military unless you have F-16s (which are now outdated anyway). But in Ukraine, drones are doing much of the job of a modern air force from reconnaissance to taking out hardened targets including tanks, machine gun nests and mortar positions and concentrations of troops. They even do some limited resupply. A drone cant bring in troops but it can drop off food, water and ammo to troops already in the field. But more important than the drones themselves is drone manufacturing capacity, meaning 3D printers. I posted this thread about multiple DIY ways to defeat drones: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?566591-The-best-defense-against-drones-is Oddly enough there are threads that go on for pages of posts with back and forth about nothing, but that thread with actual advice on what to do about a real threat that most people on this forum are really concerned about only got one response. :confused:
    12 replies | 453 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    06-12-2024, 08:46 AM
    From a 13 year member with only 38 posts. Wow! Jbunker must have felt that was important to be said.
    21 replies | 468 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    06-11-2024, 04:41 PM
    When the FBI are involved it is not a crime!
    1 replies | 125 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    06-11-2024, 04:29 PM
    Yea but if Bundy was speeding. You know traffic stops have a way of escalating into way more than what the person got pulled over for.
    62 replies | 1836 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    7 replies | 1483 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-11-2024, 04:22 PM
    Okay. Well this is an easy misunderstanding to clear up. Your response where you said you disagreed with me and Protestants disagreed with me was you responding to a post where I gave scripture to support the position that post the Cross the Church isn't supposed to killing people over their beliefs. Do you agree or disagree with me on that? And if you disagree, what New Testament scripture can you use to point out my error? A list of books on the perils of democracy (which I probably agree with you on) doesn't help me understand your disagreement.
    68 replies | 1606 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-11-2024, 04:13 PM
    Fair enough.
    68 replies | 1606 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-11-2024, 03:49 PM
    Disagree with me on what? I'm sorry but you're talking out of both sides of your mouth. On the one had you say "The church have never killed anyone based solely on his religious beliefs." Then you come back and say I'm wrong for saying that it's wrong, post the cross, for a follower of God to kill someone based solely on his religious beliefs. I don't care if a lot of Protestants in history "disagree" with my position on that. They were wrong. And YOU should agree with me on that! Oliver Cromwell was in many ways a great leader, but he was wrong to persecute Catholics. And he wasn't simply wrong to persecute Catholics because they are Christians. He was wrong to persecute Catholics because Jesus has no interest in advancing His church or "protecting" His church based on killing people who don't agree or no longer agree with its teachings. If you don't understand that, then I just feel sorry for you.
    68 replies | 1606 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-11-2024, 03:46 PM
    Well said!
    68 replies | 1606 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-11-2024, 03:40 PM
    I went from the link that you posted! And no I'm not going to go on a fishing expedition to look through all possible source to see who else, beside you, is out to spread misinformation on this subject. You posted a link. It clearly said Hus was burned at the stake for supporting Wyclyff's heresy. The Jewish leaders made up lies about Jesus too. Edit: One more thing. It's might odd that your source, which is pro Catholic, supports my position. In law when someone states a fact that goes against his own position it's deemed more credible because, after all, who's going to lie against himself? A Catholic source saying Hus was burned at the state for heresy is far more credible than 1,000 Catholic sources that say Hus was executed for fomenting uprisings.
    68 replies | 1606 view(s)
More Activity
About GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
3,478
Posts Per Day
2.63
General Information
Last Activity
Today 04:20 AM
Join Date
10-30-2020
Referrals
0

5 Friends

  1. Danke Danke is offline

    Top Rated Influencer

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Danke
    Danke
  2. fatjohn fatjohn is offline

    Member

    fatjohn
  3. harrysng10 harrysng10 is offline

    New Member

    harrysng10
  4. jmdrake jmdrake is offline

    Member

    jmdrake
  5. Sammy Sammy is offline

    Member

    Sammy
Showing Friends 1 to 5 of 5

12-13-2023


09-04-2023


08-19-2023


09-05-2022


02-11-2022


12-05-2021


10-21-2021


Page 1 of 82 1231151 ... LastLast

06-14-2024


06-12-2024


06-10-2024


06-06-2024


06-05-2024


06-04-2024



Page 1 of 82 1231151 ... LastLast