02-26-2021, 12:43 PM
Yes, that is the phrase that made me sit up and take notice.
I still maintain that, with very little legal parsing or tortured logic, as the law is written, it could be taken to mean what I have said all along: a sexual advance from a hommosexual or trans-queeer that was declined, again, this is the key point, based simply on the fact that the advancee was, in fact, a weirdosexual and the subject of the advance was not, could be on the face of it, proof of criminal discrimination.
I'm still trying to unpack that idea, and see if it has merit or is even possible.
I have been, and that's what's got me wound up.
Connect With Us