Invisible Man
Member

"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Firestarter again."

It's not just possible. That's exactly what the quote you just gave says--"different government agencies" = the swamp.

+rep

From the link in the OP: What kind of nonsense is this? I also watched the video and the guy making it couldn't tell that what he called snow burning and not melting was just soot from a candle collecting on a snowball that was clearly melting.

I guess this means Rand has no plans to run for president in 2024. But that's no surprise.

Here you go: https://live.laborstats.alaska.gov/pop/ Click the link that says "Age and Sex 2010 to 2020" and download the Excel file. Enable editing on the file. Highlight all the cells from age 18 on down to the bottom on the column for total in July 2020. The total population of those age 18 and older in Alaska in July 2020, according to the state's own Department of Labor's estimate was 546,420. That total includes some people who are not eligible voters. So, this is an overestimate of the number of eligible voters, and is still considerably lower than their number of registered voters. I wonder if you actually tried to find that. Or, if not, then I wonder if you assumed that Alaska's own website didn't provide figures for population by age at all, in which case your demand that that website be used as a source for that figure would have had to be disingenuous.

Are you talking about the M1 money supply?

I'm a conservative. I think this seems like fiddling while Rome burned. But he still has several years before reelection. We will all forget like good Americans.

There's some irony in making this particular statement in a post in which you revive a 6 year old thread.

There are times when people are forced to realize the shortcomings of mankind, and that no one (especially gov't) can solve, control, fix, or protect you from everything. I can remember several events even in my lifetime when these realizations brought Americans to their knees before a sovereign God. Those days are sadly almost gone, as our leaders blaspheme and vow to rebuild the tower of Babel even higher.

She was saying that the Clinton tapes stood to hurt Clinton more than the Trump tapes would hurt Trump. To me that concession makes the story more believable, not less.

You have to wonder what kind of delusions someone is under if they don't at the very least see the verisimilitude of this story.

And in spite of that, the price has only doubled over the past year. Compare that to the way GME at its peak was up almost a hundredfold over a year prior. It just seems unlikely to me that a company like Bear Stearns can't hand this.

Do you have data to back this up? The fact that you're talking about those large investment houses, combined with the fact that the amount of silver out there to buy is on a scale so many times larger than the market cap of GME makes it a lot harder to expect them not to be able to cover.

He has repeatedly claimed that he won in a landslide. I haven't seen him put a number to it. Normally, I would infer at minimum winning the popular vote. However, on the other hand, Trump and his followers also repeatedly called his victory over Hillary a landslide, which they based just on the official results apart from additional assertions they made about election fraud in that election too. So I suppose that calling it a landslide doesn't necessarily mean he claimed to have won the popular vote. I'm not sure though. I have a hunch that with some digging I could find something where he either outright claims he won the popular vote in 2020 or says something that implies it.

You'll be hard pressed to find Trumpers who concede that point. They continue to repeat the claim Trump himself made that Hillary received 3 to 5 million illegal votes. How did Trump and his followers arrive at the number 3 to 5 million? By no other basis than the fact that that's the number that he would need in order to claim that he beat her in the popular vote.

There's a big difference between saying Trump won the popular vote and saying he won it by the largest margin in history.

So the evidence for them not getting their kids vaccinated is the fact that they claim they did get them vaccinated, on the grounds that they are more likely to lie than tell the truth. In that case, how do you know they really want you to eat pretend meat? You can't take their word for it. In fact, if they say they do want that, then it's evidence that they actually don't.

Are such people more likely to get their kids vaccinated? Or less likely?

If it's based on an unfounded net rumor, and his wife denies it, then that's a reason to believe it's not right.

Source?

Which one is it? Has the extent of election fraud been proven? Or have the investigations that are a prerequisite to proving the extent of election fraud not been done yet?

I don't see the connection between that fact and the question of whether or not some of those states have more registered voters than eligible voters being irrelevant. Would you agree that when a state has registered voters who are not eligible voters in that state, particularly in the cases of mail-in ballots and in states that don't have voter ID laws, this situation makes it easier for people to get away with casting fraudulent votes by falsely using the names of those registered voters who are not eligible voters who live in that state?