• jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:00 AM
    The man knew his facts. Lots of intelligence in the hood Anti Federalist. Love how he pointed out that it takes years to develop a vaccine and this one came out in 9 months. (And to be fair to white people, I have a black friend who has a master's in public health who used the same ridiculous "but the technology was being researched for 20 years" BS line that Fauci is using here. We kind of stopped talking over vaccines. I still love her as a person though.) It's funny how at 2:25 the black woman with Fauci admits to the brother that there is "something going on" with people being paid to take vaccines. And yes, the entire COVID-19 mind control experiment was about fear. Even their "600,000" number can't be trusted as they counted people who fell off ladders and dying from COVID. But after the population was widely vaccinated and the vaccinated were still dying, Fauci came on TV and said "We have to distinguish between people dying with COVID from people dying from COVID." (I wish I could find that clip.)
    672 replies | 99729 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 07:01 AM
    Matthew 11:29-30 Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.
    2833 replies | 362883 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    2 replies | 105 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:38 PM
    This looks pretty bearable to me.
    20 replies | 1761 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:13 PM
    How a real HIMARS works. The Ukrainian DIY version. I'm betting the Ukrainian version lacks accuracy. But a system like this could fix it.
    0 replies | 91 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:34 PM
    Yeah...yeah....I heard it before. So when do we get to prosecute Fauci? It's not like Fauci didn't say back in 2012 that he didn't care if there was a pandemic from his research. https://www.yahoo.com/news/fauci-argued-benefits-gain-function-185934217.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAE3cuZWuq-fYc6EkxV2KyTn4sZvOX00zt9_uSAwRf4iUIqDNeufx45Ondgm-kRxjxAEOboqBS4IS_CaFMEr-PQiezRafKEHw_CXHY3cHJpgPb0Pxlt2O7Tn8fM_qDFviaSWTma 6qJENrd_7WS_17oLTdf81kVyEGkKzfeD-qD6V8 Despite the risks involved, Fauci called gain-of-function experiments “important work” in his 2012 writing: In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision? Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.
    5 replies | 277 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:33 PM
    I've yet to see any solid evidence that Soros is a Zionist. Globalist? Yes. And maybe that's the real riddle? As I pointed out in another thread, during WW 2 there was a split between international Jewry of those who wanted to strangle the German economy through an international boycott and the Zionists who worked with Germany to undermine the boycott in order to facilitate Jewish immigration to Palestine. It seems that Soros came from the former group as opposed to the latter because his family was still trapped in Hungary rather than having already left for Palestine. That doesn't make the things Soros is doing now "good."
    19 replies | 710 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:11 PM
    That assumes that: 1) all of the PTB are in lock step and always agree on everything. We know that is false because Hillary really wanted to be president in 2008 but had to give way to Barack Obama and that was decided at Bilderberg. 2) things haven't at all "gotten away" from the PTB. Or as Anti Federalist pointed out, someone created a golem that has gone wild. There was absolutely a different response from Biden and the MSM to the Gaza protests as compared to the Black Lives Matter protests. BLM burned down a police station, looted and burned stores and shot people and Biden and all of his allies called them "mostly peaceful." The Gaza protests occupied some college buildings and sprayed some graffiti. Biden's double-speak response to the Gaza protests was described as his "Charlottesville Moment." Only a blind man would not be able to see that many people on the left are very unhappy with these protestors in a way nobody on the left was willing to call out BLM.
    19 replies | 710 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:42 AM
    I wonder how many times this same judge convicted people based on shell casings....yet apparently he didn't know to recover his own shell casings. Anti Federalist, yeah road rage people can get crazy. Best to let them be if you can.
    3 replies | 233 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:32 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to unknown again.
    5 replies | 516 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:22 AM
    Psalm 51:1-2 Have mercy upon me, O God, according to thy lovingkindness: according unto the multitude of thy tender mercies blot out my transgressions. Wash me throughly from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin.
    2833 replies | 362883 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    05-19-2024, 03:06 AM
    1 Corinthians 10:13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.
    2833 replies | 362883 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    05-17-2024, 05:36 AM
    Mark 8:36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
    2833 replies | 362883 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 05:53 PM
    0 replies | 95 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 05:41 PM
    Yep. The bill expands on the definition of what "discriminating against Jews" is and outsources that to a private entity.
    159 replies | 7987 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 12:33 PM
    True story. So when I first met my now ex-wife and her family back in 1998, I thought they were really homophobic. Like they would talk about the "gay agenda" and how Disney secretly pushing gay and sexual messages in their movies and all of that. I was pretty liberal then. I supported ending the ban on sodomy laws because I don't want to know what other people are doing in their bedroom. (Seems like these days certain people want everybody to know what they are doing in their bedroom.) I was okay with ending the ban on gays in the military because I had no intention of joining the military. When it came to gay marriage, I was okay with that until I went to law school and had to read the IRS vs Bob Jones University case. That's the case where BJU lost it's tax except status for having a ban on interracial dating. The holding was since SCOTUS had struck down separate but equal, congress had passed the CRA and President Truman had desegregated the military, all 3 branches of government had decided segregation was against public policy. (After they lost they just banned all dating on campus period). That case greatly concerned me because the SDA church operates a lot of colleges and universities and they all follow the traditional view on sexuality and marriage. About that time Obama had repealed don't ask don't tell. (Branch 1) Sometime later SCOTUS struck down DOMA. (Branch 2). And there was language barring discrimination against transgenders in medicine in Obamacare. (Branch 3). Back to my former in-laws. Four years ago when we were all together for my sons graduating college I overheard them talking to each other about how "terrible" it is that Trump was trying to take away transgender rights to healthcare. This was the first I heard of that and I wasn't sure what that meant. But I bet they thought it was about whether or not a transgender having a heart attack would be turned away form the hospital. I didn't argue with them, but I was thinking "I bet there's more to it than that." Sure enough, within a year I heard of a case of a "transman" suing a Catholic hospital for not doing a hysterectomy because the hospital said it didn't want to be involved in any gender affirming surgeries. I've never asked my ex or her family what they thought about that. At that same graduation event a pastor who is married to one of my exes sisters wanted to talk to me about politics because I guess he wanted to "set me straight" about being a "republican" and a "Trump supporter." I am neither but I get accused of that all of the time because in some circles if you aren't lining up to kiss the donkey's ass and/or if you don't totally despise Trump (and despite what some here think, I don't hate the man), then you must be a Trump supporter. Finally I asked the pastor "You have a daycare with your church right? How would you feel if the feds told you that you have to hire an openly gay teacher?" Boom! i had him! He hadn't thought about that. (Actually religious schools are allowed to discriminate in hiring of teachers because they are the same as hiring clergy and that falls under the same "ecclesiastical exception" that excempts churches form the CRA when dealing with clergy.) Anyhow, I have transgender relatives. If any of the were having a heart attack I'd want them to be able to go to any hospital and have treatment. But that is not what Obama was pushing or is being pushed now. /long rant
    7 replies | 275 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 12:09 PM
    What...the actual....hell? Like what? That man has to be possessed.
    7 replies | 275 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    7 replies | 275 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 09:38 AM
    56 replies | 10187 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 09:13 AM
    :rolleyes: If I was not correct then they wouldn't be offering this amendment! Yes there have been CRA cases based on antisemitism such as calling someone "Jew boy" but this is an escalation. Part of proving discrimination is showing animus against the protected class. The definition that this bill brings in by proxy includes saying you don't support the state of Israel as evidence of such animus. That is the problem. Read the case I linked to above before responding so we can have an intelligent conversation.
    159 replies | 7987 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 08:36 AM
    Yes. Exactly. Full stop. This is a hypothetical question. But it's based on advances that are actually being developed. Okay. And yet there are exceptions that you mentioned where you would allow it. And that's why "the government is part of the question." There's nothing "casual" about evictionism. We know that abortion will continue to happen. Ban it in one state, it will happen in another state. Women might even travel to Canada at some point.. Harm reduction is not casual. That's a disingenuous argument.
    99 replies | 6380 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 08:26 AM
    It's never been enforced based on an expansive definition of antisemitism that includes what most sane people would NOT call antisemitism. That's the point that I and Anti Federalist and Matt Gaetz are saying. Congress would never be able to pass a law that included a definition of antisemitism that said "If you say Jews killed Jesus that's antisemitism." Based on the text from the law that I already gave you this expansive definition of antisemitism can be used to trigger a federal instigation and can be used as evidence in a discrimination lawsuit. You're just being obtuse now.
    159 replies | 7987 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    05-16-2024, 06:16 AM
    Ephesians 5:15-16 See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise, Redeeming the time, because the days are evil.
    2833 replies | 362883 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 09:35 PM
    My realist side says that since government is already in the business of doing that, it should at least be done right. It also says that the worst case scenario is when government starts making public policy based on some un-elected groups definition of something like the recent antisemitism bill where a private group is being allowed to rewrite the Civil Rights Act by proxy.
    6 replies | 165 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 07:56 PM
    My favorite Trump / Giuliani moment.
    6 replies | 722 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 07:13 PM
    I don't know if this had been posted before. It's a year old but I'm just now seeing it. If there is an old thread please merge.
    0 replies | 107 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 06:48 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Anti Federalist again. And that's the sneaky part. Candace Owens was right to reject that rabbi's claim that definitions for bigotry must be allowed to morph and change over time.
    159 replies | 7987 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 06:33 PM
    The power of the evictionism argument is that it makes things like arguing whether or not the abortion is really for the "life or health of the mother" or whether the mother was raped or whether the baby is viable is irrelevant. The baby isn't being killed. So who cares about the reason it's being evicted? The only counter arguments I've heard so far is "I don't like anything but natural birth" (tough titty as there is no libertarian argument against c-sections) and "Maybe there will be fewer adoptive parents than women who want to evict." To that I say "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good." The technology could be used under any current abortion legality framework as a harm reduction method. In scenarios where abortion is legal, some women might be convinced to "evict" and give up for adoption rather than going 9 months, giving birth and giving the baby up for adoption. In scenarios where abortion is illegal, it could offer women a way out of a pregnancy they don't want to continue without having to fit into some arbitrary exception. Anyway, while the technology is ready for human trials to help save premature babies, it's not expected to be available as a general womb replacement anytime soon. See: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/09/29/1080538/everything-you-need-to-know-about-artificial-wombs/ But 50 years from now, who knows?
    99 replies | 6380 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-15-2024, 06:09 PM
    A) It's already legal to doom them to death so that "point" is irrelevant. ​ B )In a 100% anarchist it would even be legal to doom your toddler to death, because there would litterally be no state to punish you for killing your toddler, so again your point is irrelevant. That's why your question, as framed, makes no sense. The reason for your "doomed to death" scenario is 100% because of the social structure you've chosen to look at the technology through and not the technology itself. Back to reality. If we looked at it through the lens of a state, a mother who was in a state of pregnancy where abortion is illegal could have the option of evicting the pregnancy. Who pays? Pick one. In Alabama they are currently pushing a bill to make child support retroactive to conception. Or the mom could pay. Or the potential adoptive child could pay. The state already pays WIC which covers prenatal care so that amount could be applied to artificial womb care. It's estimated that pregnancy costs $19,000.so it's not like natural birth is somehow "free." Could birth by machine be cheaper? Possibly. You don't have to worry about liability for the machine "dying" but only for the baby. Right now there are programs where prospective adoptive parents pay for the healthcare of poor expected mothers in exchange for the right to adopt their babies once they are born. An artificial womb regimen would allow that to happen without the mother having to go through the 9 months of being pregnant. There are no downsides. At least not based on any argument you've put forward so far.
    99 replies | 6380 view(s)
More Activity

23 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    I believe he used to write for Forbes.

    Also, this is rather strange to claim and still be left walking around: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDXvKkSwEY8&t=55m

    Very WTF video/internet history.
  2. View Conversation
    A Liberty candidate needs your help!

    Donate today to Thomas Massie with $20.12 or something bigger! http://www.thomasmassie.com/

    For Liberty!
  3. your stupidity made me -rep you.
  4. View Conversation
    Welcome back matey! <3
  5. View Conversation
    welcome back
  6. View Conversation
    bwahaha!!! Welcome back!
  7. View Conversation
    Cleared. I had no idea it filled up so easy.
  8. View Conversation
    Per your rep message-how do you opt out completely? I can see how you can get out of income taxes-there are lots of ways to do that-but there are still indirect costs to bear, such as inflation and sales taxes. Then there's the matter of social security, which you're branded with from birth and is required for many common "on the grid" activities.
  9. View Conversation
    Thanks for your friendship too, Rev9. Indeed we will meet. I'll be at the inauguration along with millions of others. I'll see you there.
  10. View Conversation
    If you're ever in the Phoenix area, drop me a line. I'd appreciate someone to jam with. I've got my recording studio and all (as you know), but it's not as fun as playing with a group. There aren't any other good musicians in my immediate area, either. :P
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 23
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
About Revolution9

Basic Information

About Revolution9
Interests:
Music, 3D, Historical Research
Occupation:
Synthgineer

Signature


Drain the swamp - BIG DOG
http://mindreleaselabs.com/
Seeking work on Apps, Games, Art based projects

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
9,323
Posts Per Day
1.50
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
23
Most Recent Message
05-09-2012 05:36 PM
General Information
Last Activity
05-29-2015 12:53 PM
Join Date
06-01-2007
Referrals
2
Home Page
http://www.libertyeditions.com

23 Friends

  1. Article V Article V is offline

    Member

    Article V
  2. Brian Coulter Brian Coulter is offline

    Member

    Brian Coulter
  3. camp_steveo camp_steveo is offline

    Member

    camp_steveo
  4. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  5. ClydeCoulter ClydeCoulter is offline

    Member

    ClydeCoulter
  6. Deborah K Deborah K is offline

    Member

    Deborah K
  7. donnay donnay is offline

    Member

    donnay
  8. Hospitaller Hospitaller is offline

    Member

    Hospitaller
  9. jmdrake jmdrake is online now

    Member

    jmdrake
  10. John F Kennedy III
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 23
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...

09-11-2021

  • 07:45 AM - Hidden

09-07-2017


05-12-2016