Weston White
Member

Rand Paul just needs to F'ing run! Win or no win.

I decided to find out what Alex Jones said about "Operation Warp Speed" and I found this liberal attacking AJ for attacking Trump on that. And....somebody left this comment. Actually, I had QUIT listening to Alex Jones for his UNQUALIFED SUPPORTING of Trump. I can't stand Biden either, But AJ acted like Trump could do no wrong. But this makes me like AJ again. And yes the Operation Warp Speed vaccines ARE dangerous. Anybody that doesn't know that has his head up his butt. In May 2020, your precious Dr. Anthony "lab leak cover up" Fauci said the vaccines wouldn't be ready for another 18 months because they needed to be fully tested. Then 9 months later Dr. Fauci was endorsing vaccine mandates! During the 2020 presidential debates Biden and Harris said they wouldn't trust the Trump vaccines. And right after they won the election they were pushing mandates. The Democrats and their allies have been on both sides of this issue. The Democratic (at the time) controlled House of Representative released a report in 2021 on the COVID response where they compared Trump "rushing" the vaccine to his endorsements of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin! Dr. Robert Malone, the man who INVENTED the mRNA technology, said these vaccines are dangerous. Bill Gates after dumping his vaccine stock for a huge profit, said the vaccines didn't work as expected. The data is in now on excess deaths and countries with high vaccination rates have higher CONTINUING excess deaths than countries with low vaccination rates. Military women had a huge spike in miscarriages post vaccination that the military attempted to cover up by falsely claiming miscarriage was "under reported" before. And what about Damar Hamlin? Now way a football player in his prime in full pads AND NO PRE-EXISTING HEART CONDITION has a heart attack simply from making a tackle! When Michael Strayhan asked him what his doctors said about that, he said "I can't comment." It's funny that liberals love being lied to and hate Alex Jones more than they hate Trump. And no dannno. Trump didn't do "Operation Warp Speed" to get the democratic governors to agree to "open up the country." That doesn't even make sense. Fauci would have NOT agreed the vaccines were safe enough for mass distribution until Trump was out of office.

v2o2kza

v2o2n88

Happy Memorial Day! Psalm 144 King James Version 144 Blessed be the Lord my strength which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight: 2 My goodness, and my fortress; my high tower, and my deliverer; my shield, and he in whom I trust; who subdueth my people under me. 3 Lord, what is man, that thou takest knowledge of him! or the son of man, that thou makest account of him!

Solid point. Lot of self hatred among SJWs, especially the white ones. 1662934001307488256 1662918581330509826

Or they'll say their psychosis is caused by conservatives bullying them.

LOL. If its any consolation, RFK Jr. moved up in my personal rankings after Desantis said he'd repeal the First Step Act. I like Tim Scott but he's full neocon on Ukraine. I don't know enough about the Vivek character.

We're talking about two different scenarios. 1) What's legal to do right now. 2) What's practical to do in a state of full scale rebellion where everything you do against the state is technically illegal but possibly moral. Right now it's legal for someone to build a full scale working model of the "suicide drone" I linked to. The only thing that's not legal is actually arming it with a warhead. But you can legally own all of the chemical components needed to make the warhead even without a special "license" from the gubmint. This video explains what I'm talking about.

I know. And then we started talking about bans. I support a ban on products produced by victimization. (Slavery, child porn, body parts from murder victims). You don't. I get it. What I don't get is the cavalier "Don't worry about the gun rights cause they can't really take them away" bit. But....okay. Cool. But I'm not even talking about "voting" here. I'm talking about this particular comment from you. Guns ain't going anywhere in this country. It's another distraction point away from the real and underlying issues. My specific point is banning child porn, murder body parts and items produced by slavery do not limit my liberty the way banning guns (even if they can't really do it) does. That's it. It's pretty simple what I'm saying. Banning body parts from murder victims limits your liberty how exactly?

I've been thinking about this. How many fighter jets did the Taliban have? (I'm talking about before Biden screwed up the withdrawal). How about those Iraqi insurgents? The Mogadishu militias? And considering how the Russia/Ukraine war has almost entirely a drone war from the Ukraine side with the Russians also making good effect of Iranian "suicide drones" made with moped motors, is typical "air superiority" really the same advantage that it used to be? I bet bubba in Bama could whip up one of these with a welding torch.

It's not simply about whether or not they are "going anywhere." The issue is future importation and manufacture. Let's just say a new assault weapon ban went through. Yeah, I could risk becoming a a felon and buying one anyway. But why would I? I seriously don't understand why you're more concerned about your right to buy slavery produced goods than your right to buy a newly manufactured semiautomatic rifle? Seriously...I don't get it.

One of those "laws already on the books" is that you can't traffic in child porn. In other words it's a ban. Does the fact that it's "underground" make it any worse than if it was not underground? We're not talking about adult prostitution (victimless crime) or drugs (victimless crime). Snuff films are banned. Does banning snuff films make the situation worse? Please explain with specifics. And no. This is not about banning an entire country. Let's say some made up country (Epsteinistan) decides to make child prostitution and porn legal. Epsteinistan also exports coconut oil. How is the entire country of Epsteinistan banned if their one product derived from harming children is banned?

I know you didn't ask me but...... If RFK Jr. successfully stopped importation of slave labor produced goods that would in no way limit my freedom. I could still buy those goods, they just might cost a bit more. If RFJ Jr. successfully stopped the domestic production and importation of semiautomatic rifles with magazines, that would limit my freedom. I would have a hard time buying those goods at all. Yeah I could illegally buy them but I don't want to take that risk. I could make them I suppose but I'm not that mechanically inclined. Now I hear what you're saying. RFK Jr. has said he defends the Bill of Rights. The ACLU says that too but somehow they never stand up for the 2nd amendment. And some people say they stand up for the 2nd amendment but believe there are "reasonable" exceptions.

So....are you for or against the current ban on child porn? That's a yes or no question. Child porn was legal to consume in the U.S., though not produce, until 1977. (Yeah, I looked it up to be sure). As for laws against murder, would it be okay to allow the import of body parts from murder victims? Another "yes or no" question. I'm not asking the gubmint to go into China and stop the CCP from murdering Faulun Gong practitioners. But I don't think people should say "Hey! They're getting killed anyway. I guess I can get a new heart out of the deal." Do you remember this? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5602971/Real-Bodies-Exhibition-cadavers-come-Chinese-political-prisoners.html Yeah. I'm not at all bothered by restricting someone's "freedom" to fund the CCP murder of political prisoners because he thinks it's cool to look at corpses.

Hmmm....seems to be an even bigger story than I thought.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/27/politics/whats-in-the-debt-ceiling-deal/index.html Caps non-defense spending: Under the deal, non-defense spending would remain relatively flat in fiscal 2024 and increase by 1% in fiscal 2025, after certain unspecified adjustments to appropriations were made, according to the source. After fiscal 2025, there would be appropriations targets, but they would not be enforceable, according to the source. The House GOP fact sheet says that non-defense discretionary spending would be rolled back to fiscal 2022 levels and topline federal spending would be limited to 1% annual growth for the next six years. The debt ceiling bill that House Republicans passed last month would return discretionary spending to fiscal 2022 levels and then limit the growth in spending to 1% for a decade. Defense spending would be protected. Protects veterans’ medical care: The deal would maintain full funding for veterans’ health care and would increase support for the PACT Act’s toxic exposure fund by nearly $15 billion for fiscal year 2024, according to the source.

Isaiah 53:5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

You talk about the government won't stop air pollution. Put your hand over your mouth when you cough, that will help the solution.

LOL. Well when you put it that way. :) But imagine the cognitive dissonance that will ensue! The woke crowd blames everything bad in the world on "western imperialism" and worship "indigenous wisdom." So...are they going to say this Navajo tribal elder is *gasp* wrong?