tebowlives
Member

The Vikings should have done that to Cousins. I think the schedule maker loves Dallas. He scheduled them to play the Vikings again. Thanks for the W. I see Dallas at 10-7 and another division title.

That's what bothers me. Why aren't there a plethora of videos showing multiple mules going to multiple boxes? edit - because there were hardly any cameras. D'Souza said Wisconsin had no video surveillance, some in Arizona were turned off, Georgia looked into it and couldn't find a reasonable answer as to why they were not used. The few times they had surveillance, it matched the geo tracking.

Name the Team and the nickname for part of the squad. The QB and 3 running backs on this team made the Hall of Fame. One of their receivers is relatively unknown but during this time he made the pro bowl 6 years in a row. Their coach is also relatively unknown even though his winning percentage is above .600 to go with one championship.

Watching They are just talking now https://2000mulespremier.com

Agreed. But like I that said, the more people involved the higher the chance someone talks. It's simple math, a numbers game. Nothing to do with one mule having knowledge of the entire operation. That is obvious and has nothing to do with more people involved, so I don't know why it was even brought up. Nothing else matters to the point I made, which is it's a numbers game. That is the only point I made and I'm spot on.

Which is what I said. 1. Why aren't those that took part in this coming forward if what they did is legal? Probably because it isn't And yes ballot harvesting is legal in some states. That's pretty much common knowledge.

I was thinking about after the fact. The more people involved, the greater the chance of someone talking.

Along with the video, another dumb move is to load up on one box while another, just as accessible, has significantly less ballots 1. Why aren't those that took part in this coming forward if what they did is legal? Probably because it isn't 2. Besides the one mule in AZ, why hasn't anyone been identified. Footage looks a bit grainy but seeing a car along with what a person is wearing, I would think some would be identified by now. Other cameras in the area probably have been over written/erased after all this time because this wasn't outed sooner. That's a shame.

lol That's been my point. That I think it's a good possibility this was a "nationalized" effort. Working together with out of state people. My comment above answers this point

Curious what was unorganized? Guessing you've watched 2000 Mules. Is this something I can see in the video or just your educated guess? Anything in the video that would led us one way or the other as to if a "national organization" got together and "seeded" the mules?

Agreed. It's so simple too. Why would many efforts mean it wasn't run by an out of state entity? So that leadership group isn't going to coordinate different ways to eg the job done? Your point doesn't make sense. But you haven't done this. Agreed. And? So? There was nothing to prevent multiple different groups from getting their marching orders from a single out of state entity either.

You don't understand the point about one single solitary person acting independently to "get" one person just for themselves vs a group coordinating together to "get" one person? 1000 catfishers going after 1000 victims. All uncoordinated. Could they have a central authority or leader coordinating all this? Not a chance 1000 mules going after 1 victim. All coordinated in that 1 area. Could they have a central authority or leader coordinating all this for other areas? Could very well be. Because the example you presented doesn't apply. It is obvious. None of what you just posted has anything to do with whether groups in different states were coordinated by a central authority vs each area acted independently on a national election. THAT is what would tie them together. The same national election. Of course Oregon isn't going to get in cahoots with Michigan in order to change their winner in a local election

Catfishing isn't about a lot of people trying to "get" the same person. Except you haven't given one legitimate example yet.

I get that people do dumb stuff all the time, but knowing cameras are going to be on them? A clip from the movie, dunno who said it but along the lines of, if someone thinks the candidate is Hitler, they wont care about breaking the law. I'm going to watch online Saturday.

Based on what? In this day and age with the technology to communicate, what would be a real world example of different groups, with a common cause, who did not communicate, but have the same idea and implement it?

Disagree with the premise that it wasn't a single organization. I doubt different groups came up with the same idea and acted on it. Rule 39 Hopefully we will find out.

I heard over 1000 were involved. Or am I confusing that with over 1000 times a mule did a drop? A hack into the finances of the mules would tell us. The average Joe isn't good at hiding their illegal profits. Educated guess the mules were paid well. I hope they vetted the Arizona mule. It wouldn't look good if she was a plant to purposely misled.

Which is the smart move. No one knows for sure who got the mules votes. I believe almost all of it was organized. In states that allow ballot harvesting, wouldn't we see this type of behavior before this election?

Haven't watched it yet. Why get so many people involved? It increases the odds of getting caught. They have video proof of one person going to multiple boxes in a state where ballot harvesting is illegal?

1. Choctaw words okla and humma, meaning red people 2. God put it there for 'Muricans. The indigenous were just temporary care takers. 3. NFL - Commodores replaced Redskins 4. Which states are the ones to join in secession? Because I don't see any.

They could dig up a few Biden supporters and they'd start for Minnesota Smith will start for Dallas at O Tackle. Williams should get playing time at DE if he stays out of jail. Tolbert will compete for a starting WRer spot.