Dori_G
Member

This should be the default of any/all true conservatives. I'll take it. But I'm certainly not going to vote for him and his little bones in exchange for his other idiotic "bait and switch" agendas. This is how they Pied-Piper people into giving consent to all of the other harmful policies that they want to implement.

Thanks for the clarification, I didn't quite understand the reply and took it wrong ;-)

That still requires taxing people who fund the entitlements, which is wrong. I know it's not todays "reality" but the only solution is to end the entitlements. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?568258-To-Beat-the-State-We-Must-Replace-It-Radio-Rothbard

Mises Wire Ryan McMaken 10/10/2024 This article is adapted from a lecture delivered at the Albuquerque Mises Circle in New Mexico, September 14, 2024. Listen to an audio version, here. Throughout its history, liberalism—the ideology today called “classical liberalism” or “libertarianism”—has suffered from the impression that it is primarily against things. This is not entirely wrong. Historically, liberalism coalesced as a recognizable ideology in opposition largely to mercantilism and absolutism throughout western Europe. Over time, this opposition extended to socialism, protectionism, imperialism, aggressive warfare, and slavery as well. In this regard, liberals have for centuries fought against a wide array of moral and economic evils that spread poverty, injustice, and misery. Being “against” things, however, has never been sufficient in itself, and liberals have never contented themselves with being so. Liberalism, of course, has long been closely associated with so-called “bourgeois” values, private property, local self-determination, and—in spite of claims to the contrary—religious institutions. Today, however, these institutions that have long under-girded liberalism and the free society are in an advanced state of decay. These are the institutions that have made society and civic life possible without state control.

How did either one gas light? :confused:

Reich is of course an idiot and a complete moron. But, I wonder after this election is over , Musk might sell X and not care about it anymore. Elon: "Do you really think the Biden Administration is going to subsidize me?"

It's the Billionaire Club. Once Elon and others get the subsidies that they want that they "can't get" under the Biden Harris Administration, the Lame Duck president will leave office and leave us stuck with the bill.

It doesn't matter what it is; Gold, Bitcoin, Coffee Beans, any commodity for that matter... once government/central planners get their grubby fingers on it and control it, it all goes south. That much is known, but when the people continue to allow it to happen, they are just as complicit as well.

Maybe along with Elon Musk , Trump will give that blabber-mouth Ben Shapiro a cushy job too. Swordsmyth would be thrilled with that.

That's why Mises.org calls Trump the "Bait and Switch" President. Except, people don't learn from history/mistakes too well.

AI has no use for trees or vegetation. Sand is the way to go. I'm gonna buy up some land in the Mojave Desert to make nickels on the penny. Which in just a couple of years those nickels will be worth a penny. It's not so much an investment as it is a hedge. Wait... what's another term for hedge that won't be confused with vegetation?

That was posted 3 days ago in this thread: Old Lies Behind Israel’s War Live On in Senate Resolution

See how easy it is to ignore? I'll bet those students are more worried about Klaus' GLOBAL WEF and Elon Musk and being chip-implanted than a fat guy with tits.

Then, just a cigar? :tears:

I wonder what his thoughts are about the "Whiskey Rebellion" --------> LAW BREAKER, I'M FILING CHARGES AND TAKING YOU ALL TO COURT!!! :tears::tears:

You're what they call on Divergent a "stiff" and you're no fun. Some help to the revolution you would be. :rolleyes: Keep paying yer taxes, the "very good republican" forums are thataway ----> Tom Massie: "Noncompliance is more effective than voting." -also- "Disobedience Is The True Foundation of Liberty"

Just to say that I "participated". I don't want there to be any confusion about how much I abhor Klaus Schwab, the GLOBAL WEF and anybody profiting off of me chip implants and the 4th Industrial Revolution. Other people's fake tits I can simply ignore. I go about my own business every day and it's not an issue with me. It's a matter of economics.

:up: It would have even been funnier if Larken had mentioned "He was sent by God" :tears:

I just might consider voting Kamala if only for this very reason, cause there ain't no way on this planet that I will ever vote for Trumptard: Elon: "Do you really think the Biden Administration is going to subsidize me?"

I don't want to be the only one getting shot in the head. But if there were say, 2% of the people who would actually do that, sign me up!!! Except, the ones voting for Trump would never even consider that, due to they are still voting him even knowing how much he spent the last time. So why would they not want to pay taxes? Maybe Anti Federalist can take the OP Video challenge?

:up: Can you imagine though, if even just 1/10 of the Trump-Humpers actually did that? That would be a test in itself to see how much the Trump-Humpers really do want less government = 0.

Check this out, it's a really great question :tears: : http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?568251-A-Really-Great-Question

Sure, but don't call me a liar, because I despise liars, and I'm not one. :tears: In all fairness, I have what some would consider a photographic memory which is why I can pull things out of a hat so fast ;):tears:

:D