Tab Content
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 10:09 AM
    Yes, I know. I donít have any clue what the finance company you work for has anything to do with the government requiring biometric data to be stored at the Fed. Nope, not Alex. Just a guy who sees where this heading. Perhaps the 4th Amendment is no longer valid, according to neocons and democrats. Or maybe it is only reserved for certain people and not other people. Who knows anymore, in this day and age, it is no longer 2007/2012.
    4 replies | 97 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 08:19 AM
    Gotcha. Then you will have no problem whatsoever providing a blood sample (fingerprint and blood are both personal) and facial recognition (in place of an outdated photo) and have it stored in a Federal database (where governments and companies can access it at will). It's the same thing that you are doing now except a lot more efficient.
    4 replies | 97 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 07:39 AM
    We will reject any Form I-539 with an edition date of 12/23/16, or earlier, that is received by USCIS after March 21. the revised Form I-539 includes the following significant changes: ē Every co-applicant included on the primary applicantís Form I-539 must submit and sign a separate Form I-539A, which will be available on the Form I-539 webpage on March 8. Parents or guardians may sign on behalf of children under 14 or any co-applicant who is not mentally competent to sign. ē Every applicant and co-applicant must pay an $85 biometric services fee, except certain A, G, and NATO nonimmigrants as noted in the new Form I-539 Instructions to be published on March 8. ē Every applicant and co-applicant will receive a biometric services appointment notice, regardless of age, containing their individual receipt number. The biometric services appointments will be scheduled at the Application Support Center (ASC) closest to the primary applicantís address. Co-applicants who wish to be scheduled at a different ASC location should file a separate Form I-539.
    4 replies | 97 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:32 PM
    Twisting my words yet again. Amazing how some of you have that down to a rock-solid science. Because you have absolutely no principles whatsoever.
    16 replies | 268 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:27 AM
    Vested interest in the MIC who create the very problems, lobby and win federal contracts to “fix” the problems. Some on this very board openly admit to not being libertarian, calling some of us names such as Lefty, Commie, for promoting liberty, freedom and fiscal responsibility, as well as calling Ron Paul out for not knowing what he’s talking about... those be your social-fascists.
    16 replies | 268 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:11 AM
    The not popular solution is to recognize the very cause of this once declining problem. Sacrificing Liberty for Security is the consensus as of late, restricting the right to travel freely, promoting government eminent domain, eliminating private contract rights, while funding more lobbyists and global contractors to build a wall at tax payer expense. Calling for an End to Welfare earns titles such as Leftist, anarchist, et al. I believe in striking at the root, stop the flow of money that funds the MIC who creates these very problems for profit. Applying bandaid on top of bandaid such as walls and restricting freedom only lines the pockets of the MIC contractors who create the problem in the first place. It is a viscous cycle that ďnationalistsĒ (as opposed to individualist) do not want people to know about. There is a lot of vested interest in social-fascism. That tax payer wall while taking rightful private property, more concentration camps giving aid and comfort, sacrificing Liberty for Security, I donít buy that ďsolutionĒ for a second when the only true solution is ending Welfare, corporatist and private. Ron Paul is having an upcoming conference to address this very problem.
    52 replies | 2772 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:22 AM
    Yes, I know you want want want that wall. You must have vested interest, just like SS and Ann Coulter: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?536916-The-Corporate-Interests-Behind-The-Homestead-Migrant-Youth-Detention-Center
    27 replies | 325 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:17 AM
    Well under progress. Yes, we should have MIC secure the border so that MIC won’t put police state inside our country. I see. Furthermore, too late: This OP Article, and also this:
    17 replies | 320 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 11:03 PM
    :seenoevil: :hearnoevil: :speaknoevil:
    17 replies | 320 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 11:00 PM
    What’s the matter with you? Don’t you know that THAT kind of talk is not permitted around here anymore? Don’t you know that we MUST sacrifice Liberty for Security because it is no longer 2007/2012? SwordShill, please put kpitcher in his place for heavens sake. And please, keep posting nonsensical threads to keep the important ones down at the bottom, we do not ever want to talk about or advertise actual evidence that the Global Military Empire under President Trump is growing exponentially! Hoorah!
    27 replies | 325 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    14 replies | 240 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    27 replies | 325 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 03:09 PM
    If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Few understand “cause and effect”, even though they will try to convince you otherwise.
    4 replies | 145 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 02:54 PM
    Read the Natural Rights, outlined in the Bill of Rights, which applies to ALL people, not just Americans and/or Canadians. Read one by one and the solution will present itself.
    45 replies | 572 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 02:30 PM
    I am not the one who is “importing” them. You can ask the D’s AND the R’s in the White House about that, between their meetings with MIC lobbyists. End Welfare is step 1. No other steps, loss of liberty or money is necessary.
    45 replies | 572 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 02:11 PM
    Should we continue to not call for the End to Welfare, while we continue to fully fund the MIC? Should we implement more MIC solutions, which sacrifices our Liberty, for the security that the Special Interest provides? Lots of information in the OP, take a look.
    17 replies | 320 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 02:00 PM
    I like Ron Paul on ALL issues. Because he speaks truth. Not when Democrats AND REPUBLICANS along with the MIC steals my money and hands it out like candy. And you think I am going to trust them to provide “solutions” as I willingly forfeit my freedom and liberty? :tears: :tears: :tears:
    45 replies | 572 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 01:48 PM
    Here, fixed it for you:
    45 replies | 572 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 01:31 PM
    Nice failed attempt, Shill No. 2. You must have vested interests in the MIC also, along with SS and Ann Coulter. You guys make me laugh, calling me a Leftist as I call for an End to Welfare across the board, while trying to convince me that sacrificing liberty for security is necessary. This is RonPaulForums, not StatistQoeForums. Even though it feels like this site has been taken over. Put your own house in order, before even trying to suggest to me what freedom, liberty and fiscal responsibility truly means.
    45 replies | 572 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 01:26 PM
    Danke replied to a thread Another one for AF in Open Discussion
    45 replies | 782 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    07-20-2019, 12:00 PM
    Every bit as much as you are a closet statist/fascist, yes. We may move along to other topics now that that has been established.
    45 replies | 572 view(s)
More Activity
About Dori_G

Basic Information

About Dori_G
Biography:
I'm an attorney and Libertarian activist originally from New Jersey, now residing in Northern California. I was formerly the vice chair of the New Jersey Libertarian Party. I'm the founder of the Libertarian children's book series Little Libertarians.
Interests:
documentary film making, law, politics, knitting, eating food
Occupation:
attorney
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Displayed state:
California
Displayed country:
USA
Political / Activist Bio:
Former Vice Chair of the New Jersey Libertarian Party. Former Libertarian candidate for US house for NJ's 6th congressional district.
Current founder and directer of Little libertarians (a Libertarian children book company).
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
5
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
1
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Political Campaign Skills
Copywriters:
Editor
Legal:
Lawyer

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
28
Posts Per Day
0.11
General Information
Last Activity
12-08-2018 04:23 PM
Join Date
11-18-2018
Referrals
0
Home Page
http://www.LittleLibertarians.com

3 Friends

  1. Danke Danke is offline

    Goldmember

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Danke
    Danke
  2. PAF PAF is offline

    Member

    PAF
  3. The Rebel Poet The Rebel Poet is offline

    Member

    The Rebel Poet
Showing Friends 1 to 3 of 3

11-19-2018


No results to display...

12-07-2018


11-23-2018


11-20-2018


11-19-2018


11-18-2018