Tab Content
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-15-2017, 11:36 AM
    I have thought about it, and agree whole-heartedly.
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-15-2017, 08:06 AM
    There are a lot of folks over here on RPF that (indirectly) back him too. SMH
    5 replies | 179 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-10-2017, 09:53 PM
    https://gizmodo.com/new-brain-technologies-could-lead-to-terrifying-invasio-1820295087 New Brain Technologies Could Lead to Terrifying Invasions of Privacy, Warn Scientists Imagine for a minute that you survive a terrible accident, and lose function of your right arm. You receive a brain implant able to interpret your brain’s neural activity and reroute commands to a robotic arm. Then one day, someone hacks that chip, sending malicious commands to the robotic arm. It’s a biological invasion of privacy in which you are suddenly no longer in control. A future in which we can simply download karate skills a la The Matrix or use computers to restore functionality to damaged limbs seems like the stuff of a far-off future, but that future is inching closer to the present with each passing day. Early research has had success using brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to move prosthetic limbs and treat mental illness. DARPA is exploring how to use the technology to make soldiers learn faster. Companies like Elon Musk’s Neuralink want to use it to read your mind. Already, researchers can interpret basic information about what a person is thinking simply by reading scans of their brain activity from an fMRI. As incredible as the potential of these technologies are, they also present serious ethical conundrums that could one day compromise our privacy, identity, agency, and equality. In an essay published Thursday in Nature, a group of 27 neuroscientists, neurotechnologists, clinicians, ethicists and machine-intelligence engineers spell out their concerns.
    51 replies | 995 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-09-2017, 09:13 PM
    So then the vehicle in which we allow freedoms (rights for everyone, no matter), is the same vehicle that destroys freedom. C'est la vie... It is as it should be. Stop fighting against the state, it is inevitable.
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-07-2017, 08:48 PM
    Well speak up then... I only asked about 4 or 5 times if anyone watched them.. Did you not read those queries? So the killing of Farkhunda was cool with you? The muslim patrols in London on non muslims? The Swedish shit holes, I mean "no go zones"? "Oh, that is a minority. You can't group an individual into a minority" Bull shit...
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-07-2017, 06:50 PM
    I like preserving liberty, and anyone who doesn't is not a defender of liberty, but is aiding in the demise of liberty. Get back to me when you watch the videos. All you have to do is click play... So simple even a someone willing to sacrifice liberty in the "name of liberty" can do it.
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-07-2017, 10:31 AM
    Not false. Still fails to watch and address the videos.
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-07-2017, 10:12 AM
    Sorry you are disappointed. Not really. LOL. Look, I understand the other side of the argument. Everyone deserves liberty no matter their religion, as to restrict that is infringing upon liberty. But I think the risk in supporting that as a blanket statement is far greater than the reward, when that equally applies to those who follow a belief system that is diametrically opposed to liberty. We have witnessed Europe and what has happened there. We know how muslim countries behave. Why replicated that in as much as it relates to islam and muslims here in the US? I want to preserve freedom and liberty FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO PRESERVE IT AS WELL. Not for those who wish to destroy it, and islam clearly wants to destroy it. Otherwise, if we allow it in the name of Liberty, it is long term, slow, "suicide by stupidity." Our children's children, and probably even our children themselves, will bear the brunt of our failures if we do nothing to protect Liberty (from the goals of islam.) Islam is not just a religion, it is a political party/agenda as well. And all these people on here who are OK with giving rights and liberty to members of that political party are basically saying they are OK with supporting everything else opposed to freedom and liberty, like the socialist party and their goals as well. Arming your enemies. I too am disappointed with so called liberty lovers on here that don't recognize a threat to liberty when it is slapping them in the face. We can bash the neocons and their agenda, bash the democrats and socialist... Hillary hating is OK... but god forbid we bash a so called "religion" (with political motives) that also wants to destroy Liberty. SMFH over and over....
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-06-2017, 06:51 PM
    The Islamic government belief system is the antithesis of the libertarian belief system. Don't bring them here to destroy liberty and then try to MAYBE convert them and rebuild it. Bingo! We have a winner!
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-06-2017, 06:47 PM
    Very little individually if they are devout. Many muslims, when in the minority, go along to get along (don't rock the boat); but when they become the majority, then everything changes (time to promote themselves to Capt.) I am sure your doctor is great, but ask him what he thinks of Sharia Law, apostates, woman's rights, while enjoying a BLT at the table with him. Again, did you watch any of the videos? Care to comment on those "boogeymen" the videos reference? The statistics that many "peaceful" muslims actually beleive what Islam teaches even though they may not have the balls (now) to practice it.... It is not a fictional scenario. Look at Europe. Turning the other cheek to give someone who follow an anti liberty and anti freedom agenda is just plain stupid, even if it violates their "rights." Rights are reserved for those who wish to preserve and respect everyone else's rights. It is not for those whose ultimate goal, by declaration of their faith which decries conquering and making everyone convert or perish, hence trampling and revoking said rights (even if they are currently acting like get along Charlie's.) Again, you haven't watched any of the videos... Like what happened in London when they took took over neighborhoods...
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-06-2017, 01:32 PM
    FIFY a :the power to do as one pleases unless yer goal is to stop others from doing as they please b :freedom from physical restraint unless yer a mooslim trying to remove freedom and liberty from others c :freedom from arbitrary or despotic control no matter the source, especially when your religion tells you gain that control d :the positive enjoyment of various social, political, or economic rights and privileges yeah, but only for certain people, amirite? Yes you are, it is for anyone and everyone who wishes that enjoyment be maintained for all to cherish. Keyword is POSITIVE enjoyment. Islam is NOT positive. e :the power of choice but only approved choices - not to choose a different God to pray to! Not if that god you want to pray to tells you to go out and conquer non-believers, stone apostates, implement a law world wide that demands obedience, subjugation, and compliance. Again, islam is counter to the original definition of Liberty. Islam is not congruent with the thinking of Liberty. Perhaps you misunderstand Liberty?
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-06-2017, 11:59 AM
    a :the power to do as one pleases b :freedom from physical restraint c :freedom from arbitrary or despotic control d :the positive enjoyment of various social, political, or economic rights and privileges e :the power of choice And Islam is counter to those points.
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-06-2017, 10:43 AM
    And as for the ban not being "Libertarian" .... For reference: https://www.lp.org/platform/ "This requirement must not take priority over maintaining the civil liberties of our citizens." Civil liberties do not extend to those that wish to exterminate Liberty and Freedom. Civil liberties are reserved for those who want to follow the NAP. Otherwise extending civil liberties to those who wish to destroy the very premise that granted them those civil liberties is just suicide by stupidity. Islam is NOT compatible with Liberty, by any stretch of the imagination. Islam is about compliance, control, and obedience. Example:
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
  • Thor's Avatar
    11-06-2017, 10:42 AM
    "African carps" - good summation.
    300 replies | 5281 view(s)
No More Results
About Identity

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Political / Activist Bio:
Monarchist. Evolan Traditionalist. Identitarian. Socialist (Syndicalist with sympathies to Corporatism)
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
49
Posts Per Day
0.87
General Information
Last Activity
11-14-2017 12:47 PM
Join Date
09-28-2017
Referrals
0

1 Friend

  1. Thor Thor is offline

    Member

    Thor
Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1
No results to display...
No results to display...
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

11-14-2017


11-12-2017


11-07-2017


11-06-2017


10-08-2017


10-06-2017


10-05-2017



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast