Tab Content
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-13-2019, 11:42 AM
    This is the State that started the gold rush.
    48 replies | 450 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-12-2019, 05:13 PM
    If the public sector was 100 percent and taxes were 100 percent then no one would have an incentive to produce. There would also be nothing to tax(steal). Also if every country got involved in war it would be nothing but death, destruction, chaos. So why is anyone worried about the private sector taken to the extreme? Are they afraid of peace and prosperity?
    3 replies | 85 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-11-2019, 07:27 PM
    Again it won’t happen over night but Donald Trumps win is a step in that direction. It’s like the Wright Brothers flight in Kitty Hawk. It started controller flight but it didn’t become a way of life until decades later.
    16 replies | 187 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-11-2019, 07:19 PM
    No one expected him to run and no one expected him to win and his victory changed that. Yes, it took a billionaire, celebrity, tough guy to start the ball rolling and to break down and establishment but after this you won’t have to be a billionaire, etc. He humiliated the media, the political parties, etc. After this you will need not need to be a billionaire celebrity then it will lessen to anyone who leads a movement.
    16 replies | 187 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-11-2019, 07:08 PM
    You have no idea how big our pool is. Donald Trump proved that there is no one “next in line”. He came out of nowhere and that inspired a lot of people. This is why the 2016 election is such a big deal. It goes way beyond Donald Trump.
    16 replies | 187 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-11-2019, 07:01 PM
    There’s 535 Congress people and corrupt media personnel but there are millions of Americans who are not into politics and are Trump supporters(some who are celebrities). Our pool is much bigger.
    16 replies | 187 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-11-2019, 06:57 PM
    Well there are a lot of Republicans inspired by Donald Trump. Some of them will run for President on the Republican side. It won’t happen on the Democrat side just yet because they are still going to be establishment types because they oppose Donald Trump. If Donald Trump wins re-election then the Dems will start running as nonpoliticians and winning because at that point they will come to realize that career politics doesn’t sell anymore.
    16 replies | 187 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-11-2019, 06:46 PM
    Donald Trump’s toughness was needed to get the ball rolling. There are more nonpoliticians then there are politicians. It will work itself out naturally. Career politicians will lose or someone will be discouraged from wanting to be a career politician as they are as marketable as they used to be. It won’t happen overnight but November 9 was a yuuuuuge step in that direction. That I can tell you. That I can tell you.
    16 replies | 187 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-11-2019, 06:37 PM
    Most of the examples you gave were before the Donald Trump Era. These were career politicians because they use the Stare level as a farm system for federal office. The governors were seeking the Presidency while state legislators were seeking Congress before running for President. The Donald Trump era changed all of this. Now most running for President won’t care about partisan politics or getting re-elected and are on a mission to get things done when elected. The most corrupt people in politics have been in politics most of their lives. GHWB, John McCain, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, etc. When Donald Trump won on November 9, 2016, everything changed.
    16 replies | 187 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-11-2019, 12:06 PM
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=c4dauQTci-w
    2 replies | 110 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-09-2019, 04:48 PM
    Either bureaucrats are too lazy to hand them out or they are too lazy to prevent fraud.
    2 replies | 119 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-09-2019, 04:33 PM
    Andrew Yang proposes a $1,000 basic income per month. Crooks will get multiple identities posing for an example as 5 different people. This person would get $5,000 per month and over 12 months $60,000 a year and space it over 10 years that’s $600,000. It will work for the crooks because bureaucracy is so inept.
    2 replies | 119 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-08-2019, 06:54 PM
    They are registrered and heavily regulated by the State, some of them have price controls, some of them are contractors with the government, seek monopolies, they are not owned by a single or few people, and they also get welfare.
    23 replies | 719 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-01-2019, 08:18 PM
    It’s not theoretical either. It works itself out naturally. During the Vietnam Era 206,000 were reported to evade the draft, 9000 were convicted. The 4th anemndnent severely limited the governments ability to enforce the law as they lacked resources to get warrants. If there was no 4th amendment then they would all have been arrested immediately but because they needed to go court to get a warrant it would clog up the court if they tried to get that many warrants. So the Bill of Rights limits the governments ability to carry out a draft.
    24 replies | 680 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-01-2019, 06:52 PM
    If we want to restore this country to its limited function then we need to explain to the public about the Preamble to the Bill of Rights. We need to explain to the American people that the anti-federalists enacted the bill of rights to severely limit the three branches of government. The Federalists made the government stronger by enacting the Constitution and the anti-federalists shrunk the government again by enacting the Bill I’d Rights and the Preamble made it clear that it would do this but now politicians, professors, lawyers, media personnel, etc IGNORE this part of the Bill of Rights. The purpose being to prevent misconstruction or abuse of powers that the bill of rights are restrictive clauses.
    24 replies | 680 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-01-2019, 06:48 PM
    it Donald Trump did anything it is that he upstarted term limits by getting elected as a nonpoliticians. In the short run it doesn’t do much but in the long run it does. But if we want to restore this country to its limited function then we need to explain to the public about the Preamble to the Bill of Rights. We need to explain to the American people that the anti-federalists enacted the bill of rights to severely limit the three branches of government. The Federalists made the government stronger by enacting the Constitution and the anti-federalists shrunk the government again by enacting the Bill I’d Rights and the Preamble made it clear that it would do this but now politicians, professors, lawyers, media personnel, etc IGNORE this part of the Bill of Rights. The purpose being to prevent misconstruction or abuse of powers that the bill of rights are restrictive clauses.
    33 replies | 552 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    6 replies | 264 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-01-2019, 10:36 AM
    The Bill of Rights was meant to prevent all three branches from abusing power. “In order to prevent the the misconstruction or abuse of power further restrictive clauses shall be added”. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights-transcript#toc-the-preamble-to-the-bill-of-rights-2 The judicial branch rubber stamping laws against any of the Bill of Rights is a judicial abuse of power.
    6 replies | 264 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    10-01-2019, 10:27 AM
    For real. To read the Constitution all you have to do is read the Preamble to the Bill of Rights and you will have full understanding of what everything means. You will even see that the Bill of Rights prevents the judicial branch from abusing power. The legal profession deliberately ignores the Bill of Rights Preamble so they can justify making the law as confusing as possible so they can sell litigation services.
    66 replies | 1161 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    09-28-2019, 05:50 PM
    1 and 4. The establishment is both shocked over the loss because they were that smug and because of the far reaching implications of a non-politician winning the White House.
    43 replies | 1070 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    09-26-2019, 01:21 PM
    The original intention was to be used for serious abuses of power such as George W Bush going to war over false pretenses. Now when a serious offense comes up in the future the impeachment process would be laughed off with future Presidents.
    5 replies | 200 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    09-26-2019, 09:55 AM
    Donald Trump is a first step to term limits by getting elected as a non-politician.
    77 replies | 5737 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    09-25-2019, 07:34 PM
    It’s easy to be antiestablishment when you know your votes won’t change anything in Congress. So the real question should be is what would happen if Justin Amash were President? He would still have the Deep State blocking his agenda. He would leave office and another career politician would take his place and things would return to the way they were before he took office. Now Donald Trump winning in 2016 opens the possibility of a non-politician libertarian coming along and reducing government and career politicians quitting or being voted out as career politics is unmarketable. So in the long run Donald Trump changed America for the better even if he makes things slightly worse in the short run.
    399 replies | 4689 view(s)
  • dude58677's Avatar
    09-20-2019, 06:59 PM
    Preamble to the Bill of Rights The Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution expressed a desire in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.
    0 replies | 131 view(s)
No More Results

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please help! I'm counting on RPF! http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=251175
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About dude58677

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
4,755
Posts Per Day
1.05
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
07-01-2010 11:54 PM
General Information
Last Activity
10-13-2019 12:20 PM
Join Date
05-29-2007
Referrals
0

01-09-2018


No results to display...
Page 1 of 23 12311 ... LastLast

10-13-2019


10-12-2019


10-11-2019


10-09-2019


10-01-2019


09-26-2019


07-10-2019

  • 12:32 PM - Hidden
  • 08:35 AM - Hidden
  • 07:07 AM - Hidden
  • 03:15 AM - Hidden

07-09-2019

  • 04:38 PM - Hidden

06-30-2019


06-03-2019


05-25-2019



Page 1 of 23 12311 ... LastLast