Raginfridus
Member

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Anti Globalist again.

They're not sending their best.

Ha! Text messages with donation links are not far away.

It's still best to call them the Army Air Corps to remind them of their place.

Hard to meet him now that he's dead. Just seems to me like it's a random coincidence that some conspiracy theorists found and are using as support for the "truth" of the website's reports, even though there's absolutely no evidence of any connection between the two whatsoever aside from similar names. Someone probably searched looking for any DOD official ever who had a name like that. They don't even understand his resume. He was never the under secretary of the air force.

You contradicted yourself in the very next sentence. deagel.com is not a defense industry business. There is absolutely nothing connecting it to Edwin Deagle.

A person named Deagle existed and was those things. There is also a website named Deagel.com which exists. What do those two have to do with each other?

1365548280176730112

According to....

It's a bunch of laughable nonsense. The authors take whatever the scare-of-the-day is and say how America is going to collapse because of it. In 2014 it was ebola and immigrants. In 2021 it's covid and the great reset. And yet somehow, magically, their predictions are the same. Completely different reasons, same result. The more reasonable explanation is that they're simply one or more doomers writing erotic fan fiction. Here, compare the 2021 and 2014 versions of their reports: 2014:

What does your collection of random, unrelated facts have to do with anything? The domain name is spelled wrong there, deagle instead of deagel. That whois is wrong and the website you link is an entirely different web site.

I'm not saying that huge businesses run themselves. I'm saying that Trump's businesses run themselves. They have to. Someone who spends 16 hours a day watching Fox and guzzling Diet Coke is not managing day-to-day decisions.

Like saying that the Trump nuked the deep state to save the mole children?

It's not a firm, it's just some random schmoes who think the world is going to end.

Probably more profitable for him to be vague. If he tells his supporters that he's considering whether to run or not and trying to evaluate their level of support for him, he will be able to live off the wave of donations for the rest of his life.

Timely bump

This you?

Whole wheat, too--maybe even pumpernickel. And gluten free. I can't wait to see Mx. Clean.

The best and most serious people. Top of the line professionals.

None of the lawsuits were about fraud.

Can't discriminate based upon "actual or perceived attraction." By my reading that has a couple of effects. One would be that a business couldn't decide on its own whether or not a person is "actually gay." That's what I mean by accept. Not socially or morally or whatever, but legally. You couldn't say "oh well I'm not discriminating against them because they are gay, because they're not actually gay, which I determined based on the fact that they are not currently married to another man." There's also the opposite effect, which would be if a person were perceived to be gay when they aren't actually, and are discriminated against for the perceived attraction regardless of their actual attraction. In both cases the purpose seems to be that they are eliminating possible defenses against discrimination lawsuits which would either "oh, he isn't actually gay" and/or "well, I only thought he was gay." In both cases it prevents courts from having to determine whether a person is or is not actually gay.

No, it's stating that you can't discriminate against them because of their romantic or other relationships, or the lack thereof. Basically it's saying, from my understanding, that you have to accept their sexual identity to be the thing that they say it is whether or not they actually do that thing. So if they say that they're gay but they aren't in a relationship with another man, you couldn't discount their gayness. I can't imagine how this would come up in reality. It seems like the only thing this does is prevent people from evaluating the accuracy or correctness of a person's claimed sexuality or asexuality.

Everyone can tell when you're full of shit because you just make flippant absolute statements with absolutely nothing to back them up

This. And the Republicans too.

If the dollar is worth less every day, then salaries go down every day. How many people can get a raise every day? That's powerful incentive for corporations to support the Fed and inflationary policies by itself.

What was the mantra in 2016 again? He knows how to make deals. We have to have him to pack the Supreme Court. He has balls. Gee, that worked out well.

Trump's businesses are not the type that require Trump's presence and action to make money. It's not like he missed out on hotel revenue because he wasn't there to change the sheets and scrub the toilets.