• goldenequity's Avatar
    Today, 06:27 PM
    Rufina Amaya, 64, Dies; Salvador Survivor https://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/world/americas/09amaya.html?mtrref=www.google.com El Salvador: 30 Years after El Mozote https://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/el-salvador-30-years-el-mozote-massacre/ Survivors of Massacre Ask: ‘Why Did They Have to Kill Those Children?’ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/26/world/americas/el-salvador-el-mazote-massacre.html
    95 replies | 2810 view(s)
  • TheCount's Avatar
    Today, 06:26 PM
    Sounds like good business. Most stores do the same thing.
    7 replies | 125 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Today, 06:26 PM
    And devising a snazzy acronym: Perhaps the, "Promoting All Losers Entering Farming And Cheating Everyone," Act (P.A.L.E.F.A.C.E.)
    29 replies | 278 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 06:25 PM
    No. Maybe they'll use it to impeach him and remove him. But one thing never changes among the political brats. The consequences they face for their actions don't include prison. Prison is for mundanes.
    4 replies | 3 view(s)
  • TheCount's Avatar
    Today, 06:13 PM
    Depends on 2020.
    4 replies | 3 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 06:00 PM
    Nope. You can't use campaign funds to buy clothing unless we're talking about t-shirts for the staff and such. You can't buy food unless it's a dinner for a fundraiser or staff. You can't buy jewelry unless it's a gift to a non-family member. They have all been definitively addressed, both by statute and by precedent.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Today, 05:53 PM
    BEFORE VOTING, be sure to read this. Indictment of a sitting President is a political issue, regardless of what the law might say. So, despite whatever evidence various prosecutors might have of Trump doing God knows what, I would say that it's unlikely that anything significant will happen while he's in office. However, once he's out of office, whether that's after one or two terms, those considerations no longer matter. So, the POLL QUESTION is asking you whether you think Trump will eventually be indicted, whether during or (as is much more likely) after his term in D.C.
    4 replies | 3 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Today, 05:34 PM
    May faced and won a no confidence vote yesterday, but not by a comfortable margin; ~120 fellow Tories voted no-confidence. IIRC, 159 would have sufficed to oust her, whereas she and her allies were hoping for more like 80. So the result was not catastrophic, but also not good (for her). What does this mean for Brexit? Perhaps I'm missing something about the British political system, but, since about a third of the Tories oppose May (presumably because of the deal that she's negotiated ), and because the Tories don't even have a simple majority in parliament, I can't imagine how she's going to get the votes for the Brexit deal. Are there that many Labor et al MPs willing to cross the aisle? I suspect not (but, then again, maybe I'm missing something about their system - it's all Cockney to me).
    3 replies | 70 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 05:12 PM
    I'd abolish all the spending restrictions. But you should stop using Adams' Botox and clothing examples, because the law (which exists whether or not we agree with it) clearly addresses those issues. This isn't that. This also is WHY analogies suck.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 05:03 PM
    We have not heard the recordings, so we don't know what he did or said.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Today, 02:01 PM
    Not just a rumor. Already filed. https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/12/13/oakland-raiders-nfl-lawsuit-move-las-vegas But speaking of Raider's Rumors, their lease on the stadium they are currently using is up at the end of the year and their new stadium in Las Vegas won't be ready for them to move into for at least another year. One rumor is that they play in San Diego which lost their team to LA and has a vacant stadium. San Diego also has a huge Raiders fan base- probably more Raiders fans than Chargers fans. When the Raiders came to town to play there was often more silver and black than blue and gold. https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/12/13/nfl-draft-las-vegas-2020-oakland-raiders-san-diego-2019-gambling-sponsorship-owners-meeting
    510 replies | 9994 view(s)
  • Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Today, 01:56 PM
    2 replies | 57 view(s)
  • Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Today, 01:26 PM
    http://fortune.com/2018/12/12/trump-border-wall-poll/ Of course if Mexico is going to pay for it, Congress should not need to allocate any US tax dollars for the project.
    58 replies | 626 view(s)
  • Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Today, 01:01 PM
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/elon-musk-spacex-trump-wall-mexico-border-south-texas-construction-migrant-caravan-a8681966.html To build the full wall Trump wants to the government will have to seize lands from private landowners. One of them is Elon Musk. More at link.
    0 replies | 35 view(s)
  • CCTelander's Avatar
    Today, 12:55 PM
    The whole Mueller investigation has always struck me as a Richard Nixon redux, the difference being that when Nixon was Watergated by TPTB for going too far off the reservation nobody in the "liberty movement" was foolish enough to claim that it happened because old Tricky Dick was secretly working to advance the cause of liberty or stick up for the "little guy."
    13 replies | 165 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 12:41 PM
    Ah. I see where I lost you. The money was donated but not to the campaign. It never went through the campaign coffers, so it was never campaign money, so he was never charged with embezzling campaign funds for personal gain. He was charged with failing to report the money as campaign donations, and also failing to report the expenditures. He was acquitted on one charge and the jury hung on the other counts. So at this phase, the money was never campaign money.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 12:25 PM
    i just saw this tribute to Shemdog a 2016 rally.
    107 replies | 10463 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 12:21 PM
    I do not have questions about the Edwards case. (Sadly, neither do you.) Both parties had relationships with Edwards that predated the campaign. I am just patiently trying to explain why the Edwards scenario bears some similarities to the Trump scenario. In the Edwards case, the alleged violations were multi-pronged. If Trump used his own money, then there's no excessive contribution violation, which was alleged to have been triggered in the Edwards case when he accepted the money (via a third party.) But the questions about the expenditures is the same: Were the donations for the purpose of hiding the affair from his family or was the sole purpose to influence the campaign. Neither of us know what is on the Cohen recordings, so neither of us know the answer to that question.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Today, 12:21 PM
    NAFTA will pay for the wall. 1073195450033950720
    58 replies | 626 view(s)
  • Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Today, 12:15 PM
    It would take more than an executive order. Two thirds of the voters in the state would have to approve it as well as two thirds of Congress.
    22 replies | 296 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 12:04 PM
    Edwards was aquitted on one count, the jury hung on the other 5 counts. And I'm not clear as to why you think that Edwards was using campaign money. He was taking money from 2 wealthy donors and funneling it to Ms Hunter.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 11:56 AM
    I think the biggest point to be made here is that this has absolutely nothing to do with Russia, which is what Mueller is supposed to be investigating.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 11:45 AM
    Having dealt with the FEC, they're pretty easy to get along with. They do require compliance to the laws but they never seem hostile when I've dealt with them. I would guess they would call this a personal expense and move on. But again, we do not have all the evidence. And I seem to recall that Cohen recorded his meetings with Trump. And I am not a lawyer but i think that attorney-client privilege does not apply when they are colluding to commit a crime. That's quite a conundrum.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 11:40 AM
    I do not want to trigger Dannno, but I think we can also make a case that Melania knew he was a philanderer before they married, though. It would be helpful to find a history of hush-money payments that pre-dated the campaign.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 11:32 AM
    You seem to be emotionally invested in this outcome. The reason i brought up John Edwards is because that's a very similar case. As a matter of logic, it does not matter where the money came from because a candidate can make unlimited donations to the campaign. I don't disagree that the whole thing is ridiculous, but I am not going to assume any outcome at this point. I don't have all the evidence. Neither do you.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • NorthCarolinaLiberty's Avatar
    Today, 11:10 AM
    You voted Obama 2x. You voted Hilary. You voted the liberal congressional candidate in SC. Right so far? You are rabidly anti-liberty on this forum. So what is the purpose of your thread?
    19 replies | 276 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 10:58 AM
    Apparently I also know a little more about Adams' methods and the tells he looks for than you do as well, then. Like I said, you might want to look into those things rather than shooting from the hip like that. I did not answer the question about Botox because nobody is alleging that Trump did not report his Botox. As for clothing, if they are donated then the candidate has to report them. By statute, candidates are prohibited from using campaign funds to purchase clothing. Therefore, clothing purchases should not be reported as a campaign contribution. Quoting from the manual here, since they state it pretty succinctly. This paragraph is at the end of the section that talks about food, rent, tuition payments, travel expense. There's a long list of questions that are already answered, and for items that are ambiguous; I am fairly confident that the commission would find that Botox would qualify as a personal use expense. Thanks for asking. I am happy to explain what the laws are.
    39 replies | 325 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 10:51 AM
    If you read the article, that's sort of the point they made. They cited searching NRA as an example. If you are doing that search from California you get much different result than you do in the Midwest. This inadvertently creates a bubble, where people are not exposed to anything new or different views.
    7 replies | 125 view(s)
More Activity

16 Visitor Messages

  1. You know these random, shooting ******s are murdering for the State. They never target State buildings. They never hit banks, news stations, or broadcasters. They never shoot youtube, twitter, or facebook, unless people aren't watching their vegan, virtue signalling videos. They never walk into military posts and start firing, despite their sometime suicidal disposition. Its all fucked.
  2. View Conversation
    I've answered your question in The Hot Gates thread here:
  3. View Conversation
  4. View Conversation
    AF's (Ass Face) getting all pissy again in the vent and blaming me for some shit. Doesn't he have a life to live? I really honestly cannot sympathize with people that consistently complain about the state of the world and grumble over the fact that everyone else isn't doing the same. If he hates the universe so much for not conforming to his standards that's not my problem.
  5. View Conversation
    Its a good show I'm almost finished the 9th episode
  6. View Conversation
    You seen Devilman: Crybaby yet? Its on Netflix
  7. View Conversation
  8. View Conversation
    Close its Kenshiro from Fist of the North Star. I didn't know you were a Berserk fan. That reminds me.....Casca just got her memories back in Chapter 354.
  9. View Conversation
    I'll post but you won't see me as much.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 16
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
About Raginfridus

Basic Information

Date of Birth
March 31, 1989 (29)
About Raginfridus
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Displayed country:
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
05-26-2018 01:04 AM
General Information
Last Activity
06-04-2018 05:54 PM
Join Date

17 Friends

  1. acptulsa acptulsa is online now


  2. angelatc angelatc is offline


  3. AZJoe AZJoe is offline


  4. CCTelander CCTelander is online now


  5. goldenequity goldenequity is online now


    • Send a message via Skype™ to goldenequity
  6. helmuth_hubener helmuth_hubener is offline


  7. Lamp Lamp is offline


  8. NorthCarolinaLiberty
  9. otherone otherone is online now


  10. r3volution 3.0 r3volution 3.0 is online now


    r3volution 3.0
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 17
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast












Page 1 of 79 1231151 ... LastLast




  • 10:27 AM - Hidden









Page 1 of 79 1231151 ... LastLast