• kahless's Avatar
    Today, 02:46 PM
    Mind completely blown reading the last few pages. What really is the point of lying about the forum history? It is not like this thread is going to make some difference in the Senate race for Rand. We all have been here for awhile and know what happened, why do this? RPF history: 1. There were many here that were outraged about Rand endorsing Romney before Ron had dropped out of the race. There really is no denying that since there were so many threads and so much outrage at the time. Some said they would not support him the future because of it. It took a couple of years before people stopped reminding other forum members about it. 2. I clearly remember reading a number of threads where some members were outraged over Rand's Middle East foreign policy and Israel. I thought they were out of line and counter productive. 3. Rand did change on several issues since 2010 including immigration and border security which I pointed out in July of last year. This put me at odds with several forum members including GunnyFreedom when I said Trump will be my second choice if Rand drops out because of it. It served as the entire basis of Gunny's forum war against me. LOL.
    80 replies | 2221 view(s)
  • Todd's Avatar
    Today, 01:40 PM
    He's Peace and Freedom....don't ya know...
    94 replies | 931 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 12:56 PM
    Splitting hairs - I didn't say she was a troll. I said she was trolling with her refusal to acknowledge and/or refute criticisms of the information she posts. I have no doubt she "only wants to help people." But so does pretty much every single person who calls the cops.
    165 replies | 1567 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 12:27 PM
    Answered above, but again - the survey posted above was taken from a sample of parents who frequent an anti-vaccine site, not a random sample of parents in general. The answers they gave were subjective - the maladies the parents observed and reported were never confirmed by any official medical diagnosis. In a real clinical study, measures are taken to eliminate as much of the biases as possible. There is nothing at all unbiased about this survey. ANd it's just ridiculous that she's still allowed to troll the forums with it without being able to defend the methods and/or the conclusions.
    165 replies | 1567 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 12:19 PM
    Of course I have, but I'm not sure which they you're talking about. The reason that the anti-vax cult has not done any studies is because every time they do, they can't get the results they want. Hence, there's no evidence to support their hypotheses, which in turn leads to the conspiracy theories. If they are the government, the answer is two-fold. First and foremost, it would be a huge ethical violation to do a double blind study on children that involved intentionally exposing children to various diseases much less intentionally unprotecting half of them. Second - they do. In this day and age, there are huge populations where the vaccine rates dramatically rises in than a decade, giving researchers the opportunity to watch for things like, say, an increase in autism that coincides with the increase in the percentage of the population vaccinated. No such link has ever been found. At some point a sane person would realize there's a reason for that, while an ideologue simply inserts a conspiracy theory into the conversation.
    165 replies | 1567 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 12:05 PM
    This is an example of the types of discussion that should be banned in these forums. All Zippy did was post the study that someone else referenced, and highlighted what it actually said. Can't refute that? Insist there are paid trolls, because when the facts don't fit a narrative, an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory will always work fill in the dead spaces.
    165 replies | 1567 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 11:57 AM
    I have stopped caring about infractions and the other petty nonsense precisely because DonnaY is allowed to troll the health forums without actually engaging in actual discussion. The cycle is always the same: She posts something, usually something she's posted before. I question the data - point out the flaws in the conclusion, the data or the methods She posts something unrelated, ignoring the initial response. 2-7 other people will join the thread, yammering about "government science" and "Paid shills" Someone will eventually post a wall of text that includes something about autism. Someone else will point out that the data is flawed, and why. Mre yammering about "government science" and "paid shills"
    165 replies | 1567 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 11:36 AM
    A questionnaire is not a study. Nor is a petition. Nor is a survey. Still waiting for you to show me the studies that your original article says we should examine if we aren't convinced, because I am not convinced.
    165 replies | 1567 view(s)
  • Todd's Avatar
    Today, 10:54 AM
    So Hillary will just outright take my guns but Trump will just stop and frisk me first and then take it. Clear choice.
    94 replies | 931 view(s)
  • CaseyJones's Avatar
    Today, 10:37 AM
    oh and this page will have a stream
    21 replies | 406 view(s)
  • CaseyJones's Avatar
    Today, 10:21 AM
    http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/26/13057162/presidential-debate-live-stream-schedule-online-streaming-time-2016 all links are at the article nm just links to other articles
    21 replies | 406 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:23 AM
    You call Ron writing a scathing mocking press release and then making the rounds in the press only a Trump fued? Come on. I agreed with the substance of what Ron was saying but believed if you are trying to win hearts and minds you do not go around trashing people. Ron should have let the CPAC thing go. This was the one instance Ron sided with the Republican establishment that was as equally hard on Trump. Like Rand, where did it get them. All it did was create an unnecessary feud rather than build alliances to achieve greater political capital.
    40 replies | 691 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 08:43 AM
    Trump never throws the first punch. It was Paul supporters that interrupted and booed him at CPAC in 2011 that triggered Trump. Trumps response: In hindsight his statement in the context of him running as opposed to Ron's chances of winning were factual and complimentary to Ron. Ron however could not let it go even after Trump decided not to run. When Trump invited all the Presidential candidates to his debate forum some months later, Ron went on attack mode writing a scathing press release and took to the media to mock Trump. So there you have the basis for the Paul-Trump feud.
    40 replies | 691 view(s)
  • LibertyEagle's Avatar
    Today, 08:38 AM
    Regarding Johnson: Does this mean you are voting for Hillary?
    118 replies | 1304 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    Today, 07:30 AM
    Typically those will be a "straw that broke the back" situation. We have a protocol we strive to follow with these things with the use of notes, warnings, infractions and bans.
    165 replies | 1567 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    Today, 07:27 AM
    I completely understand the concern in general, but I do not see anywhere where medical advice is being given. This is basic information, which could be correct or not, and can be useful for someone to look into more, and consult a medial professional for specific advise on your personal situation. It's not much different (but 180* opposite) of a drug commercial the only difference is, our disclaimers are in our T&C, which state: As with other topics (such as news or religious matters), we rarely take issue with posting if third party material of done in a correct manner. The information is already out there, posting it here just allows for additional discussion and information to be produced which could provide value for other people at some point. Thanks for your concern on this, please let me know of any suggested updated we should make to our protocols on handling this or updates to our Terms and Conditions. Thanks!
    165 replies | 1567 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    Today, 06:50 AM
    That is not the case, if we are made aware of the situation we will deal with it.
    165 replies | 1567 view(s)
More Activity

47 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    He's not a new member. He's been here for years.
  2. I am sure you are happy to see me back so I thought I would take a little initiative and say hello.
  3. View Conversation
    I'll return the rep just give me time.
  4. View Conversation
    Proof Of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey Into The Afterlife with Dr. Eben Alexander III

  5. View Conversation
    You're welcome.
  6. View Conversation
    google Anna Mae Aquash
  7. View Conversation
    neg rep me, all you want. i still love you. :P
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 47
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About LibertyEagle

Basic Information


Gary Johnson supports the Trans Pacific Partnership. That makes him a traitor.

The Property Basis of Rights


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
06-04-2015 03:15 AM
General Information
Join Date

64 Friends

  1. AdamT AdamT is offline


  2. adissa adissa is offline


  3. american.swan american.swan is offline


  4. angelatc angelatc is offline


  5. BeFranklin BeFranklin is offline


  6. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline


  7. Bryan Bryan is offline


  8. CaptainAmerica CaptainAmerica is offline


  9. CaseyJones CaseyJones is offline


  10. Conservative Christian
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 64
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast






  • 10:13 PM - Deleted Posts













  • 12:30 PM - Hidden


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 122 1231151101 ... LastLast




Page 1 of 122 1231151101 ... LastLast